BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Clinton New York low-income housing expert witness Clinton New York hospital construction expert witness Clinton New York landscaping construction expert witness Clinton New York institutional building expert witness Clinton New York multi family housing expert witness Clinton New York Subterranean parking expert witness Clinton New York mid-rise construction expert witness Clinton New York production housing expert witness Clinton New York structural steel construction expert witness Clinton New York casino resort expert witness Clinton New York Medical building expert witness Clinton New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Clinton New York retail construction expert witness Clinton New York tract home expert witness Clinton New York housing expert witness Clinton New York parking structure expert witness Clinton New York industrial building expert witness Clinton New York custom home expert witness Clinton New York condominium expert witness Clinton New York townhome construction expert witness Clinton New York high-rise construction expert witness Clinton New York
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Clinton, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Clinton New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Southern Tier Home Builders & Rem Assoc
    Local # 3330
    2807 North St
    Endwell, NY 13760
    http://www.sthbra.com

    Finger Lakes Home Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 3312
    PO Box 421
    Big Flats, NY 14814
    http://www.fingerlakesbuilders.com

    Builders Association of the Hudson Valley
    Local # 3348
    1161 Little Britain Rd
    New Windsor, NY 12553
    http://www.hvbuilder.com

    Tompkins/Cortland Bldrs&Remo
    Local # 3382
    PO Box 202
    Cortland, NY 13045
    http://www.tcbra.com

    New York State Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3300
    1 Commerce Plz Ste 704
    Albany, NY 12210
    http://www.nysba.com

    Rockland County Bldrs & Remodelers
    Local # 3342
    8 College Ave
    Nanuet, NY 10954
    http://www.rcbra.org

    Capital Region B & R Assoc
    Local # 3305
    1202 Troy-Schenectady Road Ste 7
    Latham, NY 12110
    http://www.crbra.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Clinton New York

    Dot I’s and Cross T’s When It Comes to Construction Licensure Requirements

    Port Authority Approves Subsidies for 2 World Trade Project

    Thanks to All for My 9th Straight Super Lawyers Election

    The Almost-Collapse of a Sarasota, Florida Condo Building

    Homeowner Survives Motion to Dismiss Depreciation Claims

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jessica Garland as Its Newest Partner

    CDJ’s #5 Topic of the Year: Beacon Residential Community Association v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, et al.

    Lewis Brisbois Listed on Leopard Solutions Top 10 Law Firm Index

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/04/23) – NFL Star Gets into Real Estate, DOJ Focuses on “Buyer-Broker Commissions”, and the Auto Workers’ Strike Continues

    TV Kitchen Remodelers Sued for Shoddy Work

    Contractual Impartiality Requires an Appraiser to be Unbiased, Disinterested, and Unswayed by Personal Interest

    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    Remodel Gets Pricey for Town

    The Business of Engineering: An Interview with Matthew Loos

    Circumstances In Which Design Professional Has Construction Lien Rights

    More thoughts on Virginia Mechanic’s Liens

    Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom

    New World Cup Stadiums Failed at their First Trial

    Don’t Forget to Mediate the Small Stuff

    Why Construction Firms Should Think Differently on the Issue of Sustainability

    April Rise in Construction Spending Not That Much

    Broker's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence Claim Denied

    Protecting Your Business From Liability Claims Stemming From COVID-19 Exposure

    New York Court Discusses Evidentiary Standards for Policy Rescission Based on Material Misrepresentation

    Update Your California Release Provisions to Include Amended Section 1542 Language

    OSHA Aims to Address the Long Summer Days

    Contractual Waiver of Consequential Damages

    Court of Appeals Expands Application of Construction Statute of Repose

    Ohio Condo Owners Sue Builder, Alleging Construction Defects

    Failure to Timely File Suit in Federal Court for Flood Loss is Fatal

    A Subcontractor’s Perspective On California’s Recent Changes to Indemnity Provisions

    Is Performance Bond Liable for Delay Damages?

    Federal Lawsuit Accuses MOX Contractors of Fraud

    Gordie Howe Bridge Project Team Looks for a Third Period Comeback

    You Should’ve Known: Colorado Holds Defendant May Have Pre-Litigation Duty to Preserve Evidence

    Newmeyer & Dillion Attorneys Selected to the 2016 Southern California Super Lawyers Lists

    Denver Airport Terminates P3 Contract For Main Terminal Renovation

    New Orleans Terror Attack Lawsuit Targets Engineer Mott MacDonald, Contractor and City

    There is No Presumptive Resumption!

    Used French Fry Oil Fuels London Offices as Buildings Go Green

    Construction Defects Survey Results Show that Warranty Laws Should be Strengthened for Homeowners & Condominium Associations

    The Oregon Tort Claims Act (“OTCA”) Applies When a Duty Arises from Statute or Common Law and is Independent from The Terms of a Specific Contract. (OR)

    Construction Contracts Need Amending Post COVID-19 Shutdowns

    South Carolina Legislature Defines "Occurrence" To Include Property Damage Arising From Faulty Workmanship

    A Matter of Circumstance: New York Court Finds Circumstantial Evidence Enough

    Celebrities Lose Case in Construction Defect Arbitration

    Construction’s AI Moment — Why Contractors Are Increasingly Optimistic

    Water Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in Connecticut

    Governor Signs Permit Extension Bill Extending Permit Deadlines to One Year
    Corporate Profile

    CLINTON NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand building and claims related expert witness designations, the Clinton, New York Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. In connection with regional assets which comprise building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Clinton region.

    Clinton New York construction expert witness public projectsClinton New York construction forensic expert witnessClinton New York reconstruction expert witnessClinton New York consulting architect expert witnessClinton New York construction cost estimating expert witnessClinton New York construction defect expert witnessClinton New York construction expert witness consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Clinton, New York

    Credibility Matters…Even in Delay Claims

    September 29, 2026 —
    Credibility matters. Here’s another example involving a delay claim on public private partnership delivery method. The project agreement required claims to be tried by a hearing examiner. The public private partnership developer (for lack of a better term) submitted delay claims that it contended were caused by Miami-Dade County. The hearing examiner awarded the developer delay time and compensation. On appeal, the County argued that the delays awarded by the hearing examiner were concurrent critical path delays with other delays caused by the developer’s team (the developer’s contractor). This was demonstrated by the fact that in an attempt to mitigate the County delay, the contractor’s incorporated a schedule fragnet into its schedule to mitigate delay that showed the critical path was driven by events deemed caused by the contractor. This was also reported in the contractor’s monthly updates. The developer argued that its mitigation plan did not work and, thus, the schedules showed a hypothetical delay caused by the contractor when, in actuality, it was the County-caused delay that drove the critical path. The hearing officer agreed with the contractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    The Construction Defect Litigation Podcast: Navigating Multi-Party Construction Defect Litigation

    September 08, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld Construction Defect Practice Group Chair Ivette Kincaid and attorney Thomas McCarrick recently joined the Construction Defect Litigation podcast to discuss the challenges—and strategies—behind complex construction defect matters involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on their experience, Ivette and Thomas explore practical approaches to:
    • Identifying key parties and understanding how claims and crossclaims develop
    • Working with experts to evaluate defects, causation and damages
    • Managing procedural challenges, including scheduling, document management and depositions
    • Applying thoughtful case management strategies to position complex matters for successful resolution
    Reprinted courtesy of Ivette Kincaid, Kahana Feld and Thomas McCarrick, Kahana Feld Ms. Kincaid may be contacted at ikincaid@kahanafeld.com Mr. McCarrick may be contacted at tmccarrick@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    Modular Construction’s Hidden Risk: Where Things Go Wrong Between the Factory and the Field

    June 15, 2026 —
    Introduction As modular and prefabricated construction methods are increasingly adopted, so too are the potential challenges that come with them. The appeal is straightforward: faster timelines, controlled fabrication environments, and reduced on-site labor demands. But the risks that accompany these benefits are often less clear—and, in many cases, poorly defined. For example, what happens when a prefabricated component is delayed past its installation window? Who is responsible for a defect discovered inside a sealed, installed module? What happens to warranty obligations when a prefabricated component must be modified on site? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    Conditional Payment Bond Consideration-Make Sure There Is Pay-If-Paid Provision

    June 29, 2026 —
    If a general contractor is going to have a conditional payment bond, it needs to ensure it subcontracts contain pay-if-paid or pay-when-paid provisions. This conditional payment language in subcontracts is the general contractor’s defense that it doesn’t have to pay a subcontractor UNTIL owner has paid the general contractor for the subcontractor’s work. The general contractor (and the surety) can look at the conditional payment bond with the s. 713.245 legend stamped on its face designating the conditional nature of the bond, and assume the conditional structure is locked in against the bond: no payment from the owner, no obligation to the subcontractors under the bond. But what happens when the subcontracts contain no express conditional payment language despite having a valid conditional payment bond? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers

    June 08, 2026 —
    Since the initial publication of the Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers in 2025, the market has continued to evolve—most notably with respect to power availability, energy strategy, tax and incentives planning, and investment activity across the sector. While many of the legal, commercial and regulatory frameworks addressed in the original Guide remain durable and relevant, recent developments warranted targeted updates and additions. The 2026 edition expands and updates our energy-focused content to reflect the increasingly central role of power procurement, interconnection and long-term energy strategy in data center development. We have incorporated new materials addressing power purchase and interconnection agreements, solar and other renewable energy solutions, advanced reactor designs, and nuclear-powered data centers projects, including an updated project tracker. We have also added new analysis covering state and local tax considerations and incentive structures relevant to data center development and operations, as well as current M&A and private equity trends shaping investment in the sector. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gravel2Gavel Team

    11 Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    August 24, 2026 —
    Congratulations to the 11 Payne & Fears attorneys included in the 2027 Edition of “Lawyer of the Year” and The Best Lawyers In America®. Attorneys have been recognized in the following practice areas: “Lawyer of the Year” (2027 Edition) Orange County
    • Benjamin A. Nix
      • Trade Secrets Law
    The Best Lawyers in America® (2027 Edition) Irvine, CA
    • Jeffrey K. Brown
      • Employment Law – Management
      • Labor Law – Management
      • Litigation – Labor and Employment
    • Daniel F. Fears
      • Employment Law – Management
      • Labor Law – Management
      • Litigation – Labor and Employment
    • Daniel M. Livingston
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Litigation – Real Estate
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears

    Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid

    September 29, 2026 —
    Introduction Winning the work is not the same as winning the project, at least financially. Consider a contractor that commits to procure custom or long-lead materials before receiving complete construction documents. Depending on the language of the contract, if the final design is altered after those materials have been ordered, the contractor may be left responsible for replacement costs, procurement delays, or both. Alternatively, a subcontractor that accepts a pay-if-paid provision without investigating the owner’s financing, or prematurely waives lien rights, potentially risks nonpayment for properly performed work. Such concessions can quickly transform an apparently profitable project into a significant financial burden. A successful bid can therefore become an unsuccessful project if the contractor accepts contractual “red flags” without evaluating their consequences and the long-term financial impacts that they may have. The significance of each risk will depend on the project, the parties, the proposed contract, applicable law, and the contractor’s business objectives. Although not comprehensive, this article identifies several key considerations for that process to help mitigate certain risks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi