BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Crown Point New York parking structure expert witness Crown Point New York high-rise construction expert witness Crown Point New York condominium expert witness Crown Point New York Medical building expert witness Crown Point New York institutional building expert witness Crown Point New York mid-rise construction expert witness Crown Point New York retail construction expert witness Crown Point New York structural steel construction expert witness Crown Point New York office building expert witness Crown Point New York condominiums expert witness Crown Point New York custom home expert witness Crown Point New York townhome construction expert witness Crown Point New York tract home expert witness Crown Point New York landscaping construction expert witness Crown Point New York Subterranean parking expert witness Crown Point New York low-income housing expert witness Crown Point New York industrial building expert witness Crown Point New York custom homes expert witness Crown Point New York production housing expert witness Crown Point New York casino resort expert witness Crown Point New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Crown Point New York
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Crown Point, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Crown Point New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders & Remodelers Association of Northern NY
    Local # 3318
    PO Box 498
    Glens Falls, NY 12801
    http://www.branny.org

    Home Builders Association of Mohawk Valley
    Local # 3373
    728 Court Street
    Utica, NY 13502
    http://www.hbmv.net

    Niagara County Builders Association
    Local # 3361
    2728 Niagara Falls Blvd Ste 9
    Niagara Falls, NY 14304
    http://www.niagaracountybuilders.com

    Rochester Home Builders Association
    Local # 3367
    20 Wildbriar Rd Suite D
    Rochester, NY 14623
    http://rochesterhomebuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Central New York Inc
    Local # 3386
    3675 James St
    Syracuse, NY 13206
    http://www.hbaofcny.com

    Buffalo Niagara Builders Association
    Local # 3306
    90 Sylvan Pkwy
    West Amherst, NY 14228
    http://www.bnba.org

    Capital Region B & R Assoc
    Local # 3305
    1202 Troy-Schenectady Road Ste 7
    Latham, NY 12110
    http://www.crbra.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Crown Point New York

    Why Financial Advisers Still Hate Reverse Mortgages

    Navigate the New Health and Safety Norm With Construction Technology

    Wildfire Smoke Threatens to Wipe Out Decades of Air Pollution Progress

    Texas Court Revives Construction Defect Claims: Key Lessons for Managing Latent Defect Risk

    Homeowners May Not Need to Pay Lien on Defective Log Cabin

    Residential Mortgage Lenders and Servicers Beware of Changes to Rule 3002.1

    AEM Pursuing ISO Standard for Earthmoving Grade-Control Data

    New York Climate Mobilization Act Update: Reducing Carbon Emissions and Funding Solutions

    Flood Coverage Denied Based on Failure to Submit Proof of Loss

    The Federal Freeze Playbook: Key Steps for Government Contractors Amid a Potential Federal Funding Freeze

    New Evidence Code Requires Attorney to Obtain Written Acknowledgement that the Confidential Nature of Mediation has been Disclosed to the Client

    Water Bond Would Authorize $7.5 Billion for California Water Supply Infrastructure Projects

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (1/30/24) – Life Science Construction to Increase, Overall Homeownership Is Majority Female, and Senators Urge Fed Chair to Lower Interest Rates

    Don MacGregor To Speak at 2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar

    Agree to Use your “Professional Best"? You may Lose Insurance Coverage! (Law Note)

    Third Circuit Holds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Despite Insured’s Expectations

    Eleventh Circuit Set to Hear Challenge to Florida Law Barring Foreign Citizens From Buying Real Property

    Atlantic City Faces Downward Spiral With Revel’s Demise

    New York Restrictions on Flow Through Provision in Subcontracts

    Arbitration Provision Must Be Incorporated into a Bond for Surety to Elect Arbitration

    Request for Stay Denied in Dispute Over Coverage for Volcano Damage

    Zero-Energy Commercial Buildings Increase as Contractors Focus on Sustainability

    Do Engineers Owe a Duty to Third Parties?

    Don’t Do this When it Comes to Construction Liens

    Ensuring Efficient Arbitration of Construction Disputes Involving Mechanic’s Liens

    Eighth Circuit Remands to Determine Applicability of Collapse Exclusion

    No Duty to Defend Under Renter's Policy

    Cities' Answer to Sprawl? Go Wild.

    Remodels Replace Construction in Redding

    Seyfarth Shaw’s Construction Group Receives Top Tier Recognition from Legal 500

    Manhattan Trophy Home Sellers Test Buyer Limits on Price

    Proving and Defending Against Construction Defect Damages

    A Trio of Environmental Decisions from the Fourth Circuit

    Call Me Maybe: California’s Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations

    Death, Taxes and Attorneys’ Fees in Construction Disputes

    Tokyo Building Flaws May Open Pandora's Box for Asahi Kasei

    Millennium’s Englander Buys $71.3 Million Manhattan Co-Op

    Pool Contractor’s Assets Frozen over Construction Claims

    Seventh Circuit Finds “Additional Insured” Requirements Met Where Non-Party Subcontractor Was Proximate Cause of Underlying Injuries

    Hurdles with Triggering a Subcontractor Performance Bond

    "Decay" Found Ambiguous in Collapse Case

    When Subcontractors Sue Only the Surety on Payment Bond and Tips for General Contractors

    Pending Sales of U.S. Existing Homes Increase 0.8% in November

    North Carolina Appeals Court Threatens Long-Term Express Warranties

    Applying Mighty Midgets, NY Court Awards Legal Expenses to Insureds Which Defeated Insurer’s Coverage Claims

    Can I Record a Lis Pendens in Arizona if the Lawsuit is filed Another Jurisdiction?

    Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

    Newport Beach Attorneys John Toohey and Nick Rodriguez Receive Full Defense Verdict

    AI-Powered Construction Optioneering Today

    Extreme Heat, Smoke Should Get US Disaster Label, Groups Say
    Corporate Profile

    CROWN POINT NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction related expert witness designations, the Crown Point, New York Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to builders, risk managers, and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Crown Point region.

    Crown Point New York expert witness structural engineerCrown Point New York stucco expert witnessCrown Point New York architecture expert witnessCrown Point New York consulting architect expert witnessCrown Point New York soil failure expert witnessCrown Point New York expert witness windowsCrown Point New York construction claims expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Crown Point, New York

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    May 14, 2026 —
    Nevada currently operates an expedited litigation program designed to resolve civil disputes with a value up to $50,000 without incurring the “usual” expense of litigating these disputes. Over time, however, the number of civil cases that have been “exempted” from this program based on the claimed damages exceeding $50,000 has grown dramatically. In response, the Nevada Legislature recently enacted a number of rule changes designed to streamline Nevada’s arbitration process and include more cases. Among these changes are increasing the arbitration “cap” from $50,000 to $100,000. By way of background, the Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration program is a mandatory, non-binding program for civil cases in judicial districts that have county populations of 100,000 or more [1]. Nevada’s Court Annexed Arbitration was born out of NRS 38.250, which was enacted in 1991 and went into effect in the summer of 1992. The newly enacted NRS 38.250 was regarded as a way to address the problem of increased court caseloads while promoting judicial economy and efficiency in civil cases having a probable jury award of less than $25,000 [2]. Initially, cases that were automatically exempt from the program included class actions, medical malpractice disputes, divorce proceedings, and other domestic relations matters [3]. Reprinted courtesy of Brandon Wright, Lewis Brisbois and Manuel Gurule, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Wright may be contacted at Brandon.Wright@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Gurule may be contacted at Manuel.Gurule@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Celebrating Freedom: The Overlooked Freedom to Contract in Commercial Insurance

    July 20, 2026 —
    Happy 4th and 250 years of freedom . . . to contract! Many policyholders assume insurance policies are “standard” and must be accepted as-is. That assumption is often wrong—and dangerously limiting. Unlike many consumer insurance markets, the commercial insurance realm preserves a robust “freedom to contract,” allowing sophisticated policyholders to negotiate terms, exclusions, definitions, and limits before a policy is even issued. Particularly in recent years, high-profile disputes over cyber coverage, business interruption, and war/cyber exclusions have shown not just what happens when coverage is denied, but what could have been done up front to avoid those fights. This post highlights the power policyholders still hold in the negotiation process and illustrates, with concrete examples from recent media-covered disputes, how that freedom can be strategically used. Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Andrea DeField, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com Ms. DeField may be contacted at adefield@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Soot Constitutes Property Damage

    March 17, 2026 —
    Applying Missouri law, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the jury verdict awarding damages for the presence of soot after a fire. Maxus Metropolitan, LLC v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of Am., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 29921 (8th Cir. Nov, 17, 2025). A fire destroyed Phase 6 of a multi-building apartment complex known as the Metropolitan. At the time of the fire, all six phases of the Metropolitan were at various stages of completion, including some of which were occupied by tenants. Phase 6 was still under construction. The fire caused severe damage to Phase 5. The interiors of Phases 1-4 were unaffected by the fire. Maxus Metropolitan, the owner of the complex, had a policy with Travelers which covered up to $35 million in “direct physical loss, . . or damage.” The policy also provided coverage for up to $5 million in lost business income. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    June 02, 2026 —
    Orange County Partner and Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Co-Chair Kamran Salour was named to the Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries list, which honors the most innovative attorneys in Southern California. In announcing this year's Legal Visionaries, the Times said that Mr. Salour and his co-honorees "distinguish themselves not only through skilleand results but through an unwavering commitment to their clients, their craft and the communities they serve." "Their paths – shaped by rigorous education, defining cases and purposeful leadership – offer a deeper perspective on what sets true standouts apart," the Times' announcement stated. "Together, these visionaries exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    The Firm Turns 16!

    July 20, 2026 —
    I have always found it appropriate that my jump to solo practice and Independence Day are so close in time. Today marks the 16th anniversary of my first day as a solo practitioner of construction law at The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC. Time sure has flown by thanks to the great clients and friends who followed me to solo practice and whom I have met since the firm’s founding on July 1, 2010. I also could not have made the transition and had the fun and success I have enjoyed over the past 16 years without the support of the best wife and family that any construction lawyer could want. Since the firm’s last anniversary, my youngest child (who was 7 when this journey began!) has graduated from N. C. State University with a fisheries and wildlife biology degree and is currently in Casper, Wyoming working for Wyoming Game & Fish, my second oldest is an assistant director of admissions at Appalachian State University in Boone, NC, and has celebrated his second wedding anniversary, and my oldest has celebrated her fifth marriage anniversary. Our home in Captiva, Florida continues its recovery from from Hurricane Ian and subsequent hurricanes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    February 23, 2026 —
    Just 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Wind Damage

    June 29, 2026 —
    The court found that a six-month delay in reporting damage from wind did not comply with the policy’s notice requirements. Touchmark Hotel Group, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61910 (S.D. N. Y. March 24, 2026). A storm caused damage to Touchstone’s hotel on January 4, 2023. Touchstone’s corporate representative, Rohit Patel, testified that he was not at the property on the day of the storm. In a telephone call the next day, the manager of the property reported to Patel that he observed detached shingles from the roof the hotel in the parking lot. Patel testified that he did not file a claim at that time because Touchmark’s employees did not detect any water leakage in the building and because he did not believe that the cost of the damage from the storm would exceed the policy’s deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com