BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Prattsburgh New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Prattsburgh New York landscaping construction expert witness Prattsburgh New York office building expert witness Prattsburgh New York custom homes expert witness Prattsburgh New York institutional building expert witness Prattsburgh New York casino resort expert witness Prattsburgh New York Subterranean parking expert witness Prattsburgh New York hospital construction expert witness Prattsburgh New York production housing expert witness Prattsburgh New York tract home expert witness Prattsburgh New York custom home expert witness Prattsburgh New York condominiums expert witness Prattsburgh New York townhome construction expert witness Prattsburgh New York condominium expert witness Prattsburgh New York industrial building expert witness Prattsburgh New York housing expert witness Prattsburgh New York structural steel construction expert witness Prattsburgh New York high-rise construction expert witness Prattsburgh New York multi family housing expert witness Prattsburgh New York mid-rise construction expert witness Prattsburgh New York retail construction expert witness Prattsburgh New York
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Prattsburgh, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Prattsburgh New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tompkins/Cortland Bldrs&Remo
    Local # 3382
    PO Box 202
    Cortland, NY 13045
    http://www.tcbra.com

    New York State Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3300
    1 Commerce Plz Ste 704
    Albany, NY 12210
    http://www.nysba.com

    Capital Region B & R Assoc
    Local # 3305
    1202 Troy-Schenectady Road Ste 7
    Latham, NY 12110
    http://www.crbra.com

    Finger Lakes Home Builders & Remodelers Association
    Local # 3312
    PO Box 421
    Big Flats, NY 14814
    http://www.fingerlakesbuilders.com

    Southern Tier Home Builders & Rem Assoc
    Local # 3330
    2807 North St
    Endwell, NY 13760
    http://www.sthbra.com

    Buffalo Niagara Builders Association
    Local # 3306
    90 Sylvan Pkwy
    West Amherst, NY 14228
    http://www.bnba.org

    Home Builders Association of Central New York Inc
    Local # 3386
    3675 James St
    Syracuse, NY 13206
    http://www.hbaofcny.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Prattsburgh New York

    Aurora Joins other Colorado Cities by Adding a Construction Defect Ordinance

    No Duty to Defend under Homeowner's Policy Where No Occurrence, No Property Damage

    Bill Proposes First-Ever Federal Workforce Housing Tax Credit for Middle-Class Housing

    5 Questions about New York's Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act

    Alabama Appeals Court Rules Unexpected and Unintended Property Damage is an Occurrence

    Pennsylvania: When Should Pennsylvania’s New Strict Products Liability Law Apply?

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    LA Lakers Partially Survive Motion to Dismiss COVID-19 Claims

    California Department of Corrections Gets Hit With the Prison Bid Protest Blues

    BWB&O is Recognized in the 2024 Edition of Best Law Firms®!

    Title II under ADA Applicable to Public Rights-of-Way, Parks and Other Recreation Areas

    Industry Practices Questioned After Girder Fractures at Salesforce Transit Center

    Almost Nothing Is Impossible

    If Passed, New Bill AB 2320 Will Mandate Cyber Insurance For State Government Contractors

    Smart Home Products go Mainstream as Consumer Demand Increases

    Flushing Away Liability: What the Aqua Engineering Case Means for Contractors and Subcontractors

    Nonparty Discovery in California Arbitration: How to Get What You Want

    New Jersey Law Firm Sued for Malpractice in Construction Defect Litigation

    Emerging Trends in Shortened Statutes of Limitations and Statutes of Repose

    CA Supreme Court Set to Rule on Important Occurrence Issue Certified by Ninth Circuit

    Proactively Addressing Potential Construction Claims

    HB24-1014: A Warning Bell for Colorado Businesses Amid Potential Consumer Protection Changes

    Shifting Fees and Costs in Nevada Construction Defect Cases

    Microsoft Urges the Construction Industry to Deliver Lifecycle Value

    Kahana Feld Obtains Favorable Result in High-Exposure NY Premises Liability Case

    Colorado House Bill 25-1261 Will Skyrocket Housing Costs — Here’s Why You Should Oppose It

    Idaho Construction Executive Found Guilty of Fraud and Tax Evasion

    Key Amendments to Insurance Claims-Handling Regulations in Puerto Rico

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Reaffirms Validity of Statutory Employer Defense

    A Loud Boom, But No Serious Injuries in World Trade Center Accident

    Mortgage Bonds Stare Down End of Fed Easing as Gains Persist

    Arizona Court Cites California Courts to Determine Construction Defect Coverage is Time Barred

    NY Construction Safety Firm Falsely Certified Workers, Says Manhattan DA

    Connecticut Gets Medieval All Over Construction Defects

    Nevada’s Mandatory Nonbinding Arbitration Law for Civil Cases is Going Through Changes

    Building Supplier Sued for Late and Defective Building Materials

    At the Border of Contract and Torts in Construction Disputes

    Insured's Collapse Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    The U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Rules on Greystone

    Non-compliance With Endorsement Means No Indemnity Coverage

    Code Changes Pave Way for CLT in Tall Buildings and Spark Flammability Debate

    Do Not File a Miller Act Payment Bond Lawsuit After the One-Year Statute of Limitations

    Insurer Must Defend and Indemnify Construction Defect Claims Under Iowa Law

    Estoppel Certificate? Estop and Check Your Lease

    Tennessee Court of Appeals Holds Defendant Has the Burden of Offering Alternative Measure of Damages to Prove that Plaintiff’s Measure of Damages is Unreasonable

    Sales of New U.S. Homes Slump to Lowest Level Since November

    Be Proactive, Not Reactive, To Preserve Force Majeure Rights Regarding The Coronavirus

    Protect Against Design Errors With Owners Protective Professional Indemnity Coverage

    Subcontractors Must be Careful Providing Bonds when General Contractor Does Not

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates
    Corporate Profile

    PRATTSBURGH NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than four thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Prattsburgh, New York Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to widely recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which include registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Prattsburgh construction industry.

    Prattsburgh New York consulting engineersPrattsburgh New York construction expertsPrattsburgh New York construction expert witnessPrattsburgh New York soil failure expert witnessPrattsburgh New York expert witness roofingPrattsburgh New York ada design expert witnessPrattsburgh New York building envelope expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Prattsburgh, New York

    White and Williams LLP Attorneys Recognized as PA and DE Super Lawyers

    July 06, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP is proud to announce that eight attorneys in the firm’s Philadelphia office and one attorney in the firm's Delaware Office have been recognized on the 2026 Super Lawyers® and Rising Star lists. This recognition highlights our attorney's exceptional legal acumen and their commitment to client service excellence. Lawyers are selected for inclusion in Pennsylvania and Delaware Area Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars through a process that considers independent research, peer recognition and the professional achievements of attorneys from more than 70 practice areas. Approximately 2.5% of lawyers in each state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers® to receive this honor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Construction Robotics Works Where Variation Ends

    August 11, 2026 —
    BuiltWorlds published its 2026 Robotics Top 50 this summer, and the list is genuinely wide. Fifty solutions across nine categories, from 3D printing and prefabricated component manufacturing to earthmoving, demolition, material transport, layout, installation, inspection, and drilling. The honorees come from sixteen countries. It looks like robotics has finally spread across the whole project lifecycle. However, having vendors in nine categories does not mean that contractors are robotizing their work en masse. Zacua Ventures, in its 2026 construction robotics report, estimates that on-site robotics accounted for less than 0.03% of global construction spending in 2025. Zacua says: “That is not a failed market. It is a market at the beginning of an adoption S-curve”, while warning that its estimates rest on private vendor data and may be high if vendors overstate how widely their machines are deployed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Supreme Court Strikes Down IEEPA Tariffs: The Refund Process Will Be Messy

    March 10, 2026 —
    On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, and the consolidated case Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs unilaterally.1 The decision invalidates both the “reciprocal” tariffs and the drug-trafficking tariffs imposed under IEEPA. For importers, the immediate question is whether, how, and when refunds can actually be obtained. On that issue, the U.S. Supreme Court provided no roadmap. To the contrary, the dissent warned that the United States “may be required to refund billions of dollars,” that the process is likely to be a “mess,” and that the majority opinion “says nothing today about whether, and if so how, the Government should go about returning the billions of dollars that it has collected from importers.” Reprinted courtesy of Brett W. Johnson, Snell & Wilmer, Derek Flint, Snell & Wilmer, T. Troy Galan, Snell & Wilmer and Thomas Williams, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Johnson may be contacted at bwjohnson@swlaw.com Mr. Flint may be contacted at dflint@swlaw.com Mr. Galan may be contacted at tgalan@swlaw.com Mr. Williams may be contacted at twilliams@swlaw.com> Read the full story...

    Suit Limitation Provision Eliminates Wind Loss Claim

    July 27, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted after the insured failed to file suit against the insurer within the policy’s two-year suit limitation provision. Interstate Investments, LLC v. Mt. Hawley Ins Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98108 (S.D. N. Y. May 4, 2026). On or before June 27, 2023, a wind, hail and rainstorm damaged Interstate’s property in Oklahoma. Interstate filed a claim under its policy with Mt. Hawley. The policy provided that New York law applied and contained a two- year suit limitation provision. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    May 05, 2026 —
    Construction safety has long been a top priority across the industry. Yet fatality rates have remained stubbornly flat for more than a decade. Steven Carter, global health and safety director at Gilbane chair company for Construction Safety Week 2026—believes the industry has reached a pivotal moment. This year’s theme—”All In Together: Recognize. Respond. Respect.”—is a unified call to action for owners, designers, contractors and craft professionals around a shared, risk-based approach to preventing serious injuries and fatalities. In a recent interview with Construction Executive, Carter discusses why the industry must move beyond incremental improvements, how technology and AI can support better planning and what it will take to create a true culture of psychological safety on jobsites. Reprinted courtesy of Maggie Murphy, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    The GKN Aerospace Chemical Release and the Laws Designed to Address It

    July 06, 2026 —
    On May 21, 2026, a 34,000-gallon storage tank at the GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California began leaking methyl methacrylate (MMA), a volatile and highly flammable industrial chemical used to manufacture high-strength acrylic plastics. GKN Aerospace makes advanced military and commercial transparencies, such as aircraft canopies, windshields, cabin windows, bullet-resistant glass, and spacecraft windows. In polymer chemistry lingo, MMA is known as a monomer. Monomers are like individual links to a chain. Under the right conditions they link up (react) with each other to form long-chained polymers, or plastics. MMA is an unstable monomer that requires controlled storage conditions to avoid setting off a polymerization (chain) reaction. According to early reports, the MMA tank at GKN Aerospace overheated. The cause of the overheating is not yet clear, but the overheating may have created conditions enabling the MMA to initiate polymerization, which in turn generated heat, which in turn generated pressure, activating the tank’s pressure-relief system and releasing MMA vapor into the atmosphere. Concerns about a runaway reaction, massive release, and explosion led the Orange County Fire Authority to order evacuation of approximately 40,000 residents and closure of thirteen schools. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sean M. Sherlock, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Sherlock may be contacted at ssherlock@swlaw.com