BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Schoharie County New York condominium expert witness Schoharie County New York landscaping construction expert witness Schoharie County New York office building expert witness Schoharie County New York casino resort expert witness Schoharie County New York parking structure expert witness Schoharie County New York institutional building expert witness Schoharie County New York multi family housing expert witness Schoharie County New York tract home expert witness Schoharie County New York concrete tilt-up expert witness Schoharie County New York production housing expert witness Schoharie County New York townhome construction expert witness Schoharie County New York Medical building expert witness Schoharie County New York mid-rise construction expert witness Schoharie County New York custom home expert witness Schoharie County New York Subterranean parking expert witness Schoharie County New York condominiums expert witness Schoharie County New York high-rise construction expert witness Schoharie County New York industrial building expert witness Schoharie County New York hospital construction expert witness Schoharie County New York low-income housing expert witness Schoharie County New York structural steel construction expert witness Schoharie County New York
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Schoharie County, New York

    New York Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Schoharie County New York

    State license is required for Asbestos Abatement. All other licensing is done at the local level. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Capital Region B & R Assoc
    Local # 3305
    1202 Troy-Schenectady Road Ste 7
    Latham, NY 12110
    http://www.crbra.com

    New York State Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3300
    1 Commerce Plz Ste 704
    Albany, NY 12210
    http://www.nysba.com

    Tompkins/Cortland Bldrs&Remo
    Local # 3382
    PO Box 202
    Cortland, NY 13045
    http://www.tcbra.com

    Buffalo Niagara Builders Association
    Local # 3306
    90 Sylvan Pkwy
    West Amherst, NY 14228
    http://www.bnba.org

    Home Builders Association of Central New York Inc
    Local # 3386
    3675 James St
    Syracuse, NY 13206
    http://www.hbaofcny.com

    Rochester Home Builders Association
    Local # 3367
    20 Wildbriar Rd Suite D
    Rochester, NY 14623
    http://rochesterhomebuilders.com

    Niagara County Builders Association
    Local # 3361
    2728 Niagara Falls Blvd Ste 9
    Niagara Falls, NY 14304
    http://www.niagaracountybuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Schoharie County New York

    Crypto and NFTs Could Help People Become Real Estate Tycoons

    Herman Russell's Big Hustle

    Can an Owner Preemptively Avoid a Mechanics Lien?

    Cherokee Nation Wins Summary Judgment in COVID-19 Business Interruption Claim

    Older Homes for Sale in California Now Come With Wildfire Warnings

    As Fracture Questions Remain, Team Raced to Save Mississippi River Bridge

    New Zealand Using Plywood Banned Elsewhere

    Can Your Employee File a Personal Injury Claim if They’re Injured at Work?

    Contractor Removed from Site for Lack of Insurance

    Contractors with Ties to Trustees Reaped Benefits from LA Community College Modernization Program

    Lawsuits over Roof Dropped

    Insurer’s “Failure to Cooperate” Defense

    Claims for Negligence? Duty to Defend Triggered

    Defending Against the Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine – Liability Considerations

    Solving the Construction Workforce Puzzle

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    Residential Building Sector: Peaking or Soaring?

    How Fort Lauderdale Recovered a Phished $1.2M Police HQ Project Payment

    Righting Past Wrongs Through Equitable Development

    Georgia Court Rules that Separate Settlements Are Not the End of the Matter

    Dealing with Hazardous Substances on the Construction Site

    8 Secrets About Working with Contractors – Bad Contractor Series Part 5

    NYC Hires Engineer LERA for Parking Garage Collapse Probe

    Right to Repair Reform: Revisions and Proposals to State’s “Right to Repair Statutes”

    “Rip and Tear” Damage Remains Covered Under CGL Policy as “Accident”—for Now.

    Defense Owed to Insured Subcontractor, but not to Additional Insured

    Defective Concrete Blocks Spell Problems for Donegal Homeowners

    “It Just Didn’t Add Up!”

    Plaza Construction Negotiating Pay Settlement for Florida Ritz-Carlton Renovation

    Georgia Update: Automatic Renewals in Consumer Service Contracts

    When Does a Contractor Legally Abandon a Construction Project?

    2017 Legislative Changes Affecting the Construction Industry

    Water Alone is Not Property Damage under a CGL policy in Connecticut

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    Public-Employee Union Fees, Water Wars Are Key in High Court Rulings

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    MTA Implements Revised Contractors Debarment Regulations

    Is Construction Defect Notice under Florida Repair Statute a Suit?

    Housing-Related Spending Makes Up Significant Portion of GDP

    American Arbitration Association Revises Construction Industry Rules and Mediation Procedures

    From Singapore to Rio Green Buildings Keep Tropical Tenants Cool

    Pulte Home Corp. v. CBR Electric, Inc.

    Case Remanded for Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine

    Fire Protection You Can Trust Starts With the Right Testing

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Ursinus is Cleared!”

    Invest In America Act Offers 494 Billion In Funding to U.S. Infrastructure and Millions of New Jobs

    New York Labor Laws and Action Over Exclusions

    DOD Contractors Receive Reprieve on Implementation of Chinese Telecommunications Ban

    A Top U.S. Seller of Carbon Offsets Starts Investigating Its Own Projects

    The Miller Act Explained
    Corporate Profile

    SCHOHARIE COUNTY NEW YORK CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Schoharie County, New York Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to builders and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims evaluation and expert support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Schoharie County and the surrounding areas.

    Schoharie County New York construction expert witnessSchoharie County New York architecture expert witnessSchoharie County New York construction cost estimating expert witnessSchoharie County New York construction expert witness public projectsSchoharie County New York defective construction expertSchoharie County New York expert witness windowsSchoharie County New York testifying construction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Schoharie County, New York

    GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100

    April 20, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly celebrates the seventh anniversary of its becoming the first and only full-service law firm with offices and attorneys in all 50 states. Since launching its innovative 50-state platform in April 2019, GRSM has experienced extraordinary growth across markets, practices, and client relationships. In the past seven years, GRSM has expanded its footprint with 20 new offices in both major and secondary markets and doubled its attorney headcount, growing from 940 to more than 2000 lawyers. This growth has propelled GRSM from the 40th to the 11th largest law firm in the United States, according to Law360, while also driving a significant rise on the Am Law 100 rankings, from #103 in 2019 to #70 in 2026. GRSM has served nearly half of the Fortune 500, a testament to its deep bench of lawyers and national capabilities. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit

    April 20, 2026 —
    In Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants. Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    Turning Expert Services into Products

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Finnish engineering, architecture, and project consulting company, AINS Group, recently opened an online store to purchase fixed-price services. The store presents specialist work in a product-like format, with fixed service names, defined scopes, and visible prices, such as a building history report, a zoning plan cost analysis, and a technical preliminary survey for a property transaction. Is this productization a smart move or a sign that expert services are being commoditized? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Managing Tariff Volatility in Cross‑Border U.S. Construction Projects: Practical Contract‑Drafting and Procurement Strategies

    March 10, 2026 —
    Volatile U.S. tariff announcements continue to affect international supply chains for U.S. construction projects. Although recent litigation has centered on the scope of presidential tariff authority rather than construction‑specific disputes, these decisions carry important implications for how parties structure risk in their contracts. In May 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) struck down certain “Liberation Day” tariffs as exceeding presidential authority under IEEPA. A federal district court in Washington, D.C. likewise issued a preliminary injunction suspending related tariffs—though it later stayed its own order pending appeal. And the Supreme Court has agreed to review cases addressing the legal limits of IEEPA‑based tariffs. While none of these developments arises from construction disputes, the themes they highlight—timing, statutory authority, and documentation—mirror the issues encountered when tariff conditions disrupt international procurement. The following strategies reflect practical steps U.S. project owners, contractors, and foreign suppliers can take to mitigate risk, drawing on drafting approaches now widely used across major construction forms, including—but not limited to—modified AIA agreements. Reprinted courtesy of Sara Beiro Farabow, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Michael Wagner, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Farabow may be contacted at sfarabow@seyfarth.com Mr. Wagner may be contacted at mewagner@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen Recognized as 2026 Legal Visionary by Los Angeles Times

    June 02, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani proudly congratulates Partner Debra Ellwood Meppen on being named a 2026 Legal Visionary by the Los Angeles Times. The LA Times Studios 2026 Legal Visionaries List recognizes lawyers in Southern California who “exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it.” Meppen is recognized for helping shape the future of the legal profession through her leadership, professionalism, and integrity. Published as part of the May 2026 issue highlighting Southern California’s leading law firms and attorneys, the Legal Visionaries section honors attorneys making a significant impact on the legal industry and the broader business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today

    August 16, 2026 —
    Research labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off. This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences. Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    One Industry, One Goal: Construction Safety Week 2026

    May 05, 2026 —
    Construction safety has long been a top priority across the industry. Yet fatality rates have remained stubbornly flat for more than a decade. Steven Carter, global health and safety director at Gilbane chair company for Construction Safety Week 2026—believes the industry has reached a pivotal moment. This year’s theme—”All In Together: Recognize. Respond. Respect.”—is a unified call to action for owners, designers, contractors and craft professionals around a shared, risk-based approach to preventing serious injuries and fatalities. In a recent interview with Construction Executive, Carter discusses why the industry must move beyond incremental improvements, how technology and AI can support better planning and what it will take to create a true culture of psychological safety on jobsites. Reprinted courtesy of Maggie Murphy, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...