Mandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .
July 13, 2026 —
Christopher G. Hill - Construction Law MusingsIn the past week or so mandatory arbitration has been all the rage. From those that argue that
arbitration is becoming more burdensome than litigation, to my friend and fellow construction attorney Scott Wolfe who gives great advice on how to make arbitration worth it again. You can place me in the camp of those that think that mandatory arbitration clauses of the type typically found in contracts can add a layer of expense that can be unnecessary.
However, if an arbitration clause is carefully drafted, and properly used, these clauses an be helpful in assuring that the streamlining effect for which arbitration was created actually occurs. Because the
contract is king in Virginia, these provisions can essentially create the rule of civil procedure used to resolve any dispute relating to the project.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
The Law Office of Christopher G. HillMr. Hill may be contacted at
chrisghill@constructionlawva.com
GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court
August 11, 2026 —
Gordon Rees Scully MansukhaniA Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months.
The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani
Snell & Wilmer’s Los Angeles Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Los Angeles Business Journal
September 15, 2026 —
Snell & WilmerLOS ANGELES – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its Los Angeles office has been named one of the
2026 Best Places to Work by the Los Angeles Business Journal as part of its annual Best Places to Work awards. The recognition honors outstanding employers across the Los Angeles region that are fostering strong workplace cultures and creating positive employee experiences. Selections are based on confidential employee surveys conducted by Workforce Research Group, which evaluate organizations on leadership, corporate culture, communication, employee engagement, and other key workplace factors.
“We are honored to be recognized as one of the Best Places to Work in Los Angeles,” said
Joshua Schneiderman, managing partner of the firm’s Los Angeles office. “This recognition reflects the collaborative culture we have built and the dedication of our attorneys and professional staff who contribute to making our office a great place to work. We remain committed to providing opportunities for growth, fostering meaningful connections, and supporting our team members’ continued success.”
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Snell & Wilmer
Arbitration in Construction Disputes: Process and Best Practices
July 27, 2026 —
Construction ExecutiveArbitration in construction disputes is a private process where owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers or suppliers present claims to one or more neutral arbitrators instead of taking the dispute through court. The arbitrator reviews evidence, hears testimony and issues a decision that is usually binding.
Construction arbitration is common because project disputes are technical, document-heavy and time-sensitive. Claims may involve schedule delays, disputed change orders, defective work, differing site conditions, payment, termination, indemnity, surety issues or professional liability.
Arbitration can be faster and more specialized than litigation, but speed is not guaranteed. Poor contract language, broad discovery, weak records and unclear damages can make arbitration expensive.
Reprinted courtesy of
Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!
April 20, 2026 —
Dolores Montoya - Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLPFor 29 years, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP has grown alongside the clients and communities we proudly serve.
What began as a single office in Orange County has evolved into a multi-state firm with 11 locations across five states. Today, we are proud to be supported by a dedicated team of more than 200 attorneys and over 400 employees who work every day to deliver exceptional service and results.
This milestone is not just about where we started; it’s about the people who have helped shape who we are today. Our continued growth reflects the strength of our relationships, the trust of our clients and partners, and the commitment of our team.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP
Seventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory Permit
April 20, 2026 —
Jason Taylor - Traub Lieberman Insurance Law BlogIn Griffith Foods Int’l Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 24-1217 & 24-1223 (7th Cir. Mar. 13, 2026), the Seventh Circuit addressed the meaning and scope of a pollution exclusion in a standard-form commercial general liability insurance policy for underlying injuries caused by ethylene oxide (EtO) emissions. The insurance dispute arose out of underlying tort litigation involving bodily injury claims, including cancer, allegedly caused by emissions of ethylene oxide over a 35-year period from 1984 through 2019 by Griffith Foods International and later Sterigenics U.S. The pollution exclusion at issue generally barred coverage for “bodily injury” arising out of the discharge, dispersal, release or escape of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, or other irritants, contaminants or pollutants.
Interpreting similar exclusions, the Illinois Supreme Court has previously held that the standard CGL pollution exclusion bars coverage for bodily injuries caused by traditional environmental pollution (essentially industrial emissions of pollutants), but not by more commonplace emissions (such as carbon monoxide from a residential furnace or excess chlorine in a backyard swimming pool). See American States Insurance Co. v. Koloms, 177 Ill. 2d 473 (Ill. 1997). In Griffith Foods, the District Court initially concluded that the pollution exclusion did not apply because the companies emitted EtO pursuant to a permit issued by the IEPA. The District Court reached this latter conclusion by applying Erie Insurance Exchange v. Imperial Marble Corp., 957 N.E.2d 1214 (Ill. App. Ct. 2011), an Illinois intermediate appellate court decision finding it ambiguous whether a CGL policy’s pollution exclusion barred coverage for emissions authorized by regulatory permit.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Jason Taylor, Traub LiebermanMr. Taylor may be contacted at
jtaylor@tlsslaw.com
NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration
May 26, 2026 —
Levi W. Barrett & Aaron C. Schlesinger - Peckar & Abramson, P.C.While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive.
The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs.
Reprinted courtesy of
Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com
Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value
August 16, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026).
A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s pol
Construction Litigation Roundup: “How Bad Is It?”Montrose III: Vertical Exhaustion Applies in Upper Layers of Excess CoverageNew York Considers Amendments to Construction Industry Wage Laws that Would Impose Significant Burden Upon ContractorsWSHB Partner Sheila Fix Selected as Los Angeles Business Journal's Woman of Influence in Construction, Engineering, and ArchitectureRefer
Reasonable Expectations – Pennsylvania’s Case by Case Approach to the Sutton Rule
Insured's Failure to Challenge Trial Court's Application of Exclusion Makes Appeal Futile
California’s Fair Payment Act: What Every Owner, Developer, and Contractor Should Know About SB 440
A Discussion on Home Affordability
Consequential Damages Flowing from Construction Defect Not Covered Under Florida Law
2021 California Construction Law Update
Neighbor Allowed to Remove Tree Roots on Her Property That Supported Adjoining Landowners’ Two Large Trees With Legal Immunity
Gene Witkin Celebrates First Anniversary as Member of Ross Hart’s Mediation Team
Colorado’s Three-Bill Approach to Alleged Construction Defect Issues
Tom Newmeyer Elected Director At Large to the 2017 Orange County Bar Association Board of Directors
Firm Claims Construction Defects in Hawaiian Homes
The “Right to Repair” Construction Defects in the Rocky Mountain and Plains Region
Turning Back the Clock: DOL Proposes Previous Davis-Bacon Prevailing Wage Definition
Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys
Rattlesnake Bite Triggers Potential Liability for Walmart
Building in the Age of Technology: Improving Profitability and Jobsite Safety
Motion to Strike Insureds' Experts Denied, Unfair Claim Settlement Claims Survive Summary Judgment
Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013
Construction Defect Lawsuits May Follow Hawaii Condo Boom
Louisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to Settle
Construction Contractors Must Understand Retainage In 2021
World’s Biggest Crane Gets to Work at British Nuclear Plant
California Court of Appeal Clarifies Intent of Faulty Workmanship Exclusions
Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees!
Future Environmental Rulemaking Proceedings Listed in the Spring 2019 Unified Federal Agenda
Court Addresses When Duty to Defend Ends
From ‘Cuckoo’s Egg’ to Today’s Cyber Threat Landscape
Meritage Acquires Legendary Communities
Builders Oppose Senate Housing Bill Over Investor Ban Provision
Citigroup Reaches $1.13 Billion Pact Over Mortgage Bonds
Reservation of Rights Letter Merely Citing Policy Provisions Inadequate
Dump Site Provider Has Valid Little Miller Act Claim
NYC Billionaires’ Row Tower Could Need $160M Fix Amid Cracking
Fifth Circuit Decision on Number of Occurrences Underscores Need to Carefully Tailor Your Insurance Program
Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (06/06/23) – Housing Woes, EV Plants and the Debate over Public Financing
Everyone’s Working From Home Due to the Coronavirus – Is There Insurance Coverage for a Data Breach?
2023’s Bank Failures: What Contractors, Material Suppliers and Equipment Lessors Can Do to Protect Themselves
Not Everything is a Pollutant: A Summary of Recent Cases Supporting a Common Sense and Narrow Interpretation of the CGL's Pollution Exclusion
U.K. to Set Out Plan for Fire-Risk Apartment Cladding Crisis
The Moment of Truth
Excess Must Defend After Primary Improperly Refuses to Do So
3M PFAS Water Settlement Could Reach $12.5B
Construction Contract Clauses That May or May Not Have Your Vote – Part 3
Protect Your Right To Payment By Following Nedd
In South Carolina, Insurer's Denial of Liability Does Not Waive Attorney-Client Privilege for Bad Faith Claim
Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks
Insurer Sued for Altering Policies after Claim
Quick Note: Attorney’s Fees and the Significant Issues Test
Sometimes, Being too Cute with Pleading Allegations is Unnecessary
Dispute Resolution in Your Construction Contract
