BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Wilson County North Carolina low-income housing expert witness Wilson County North Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Wilson County North Carolina tract home expert witness Wilson County North Carolina custom home expert witness Wilson County North Carolina Medical building expert witness Wilson County North Carolina townhome construction expert witness Wilson County North Carolina industrial building expert witness Wilson County North Carolina production housing expert witness Wilson County North Carolina condominiums expert witness Wilson County North Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Wilson County North Carolina hospital construction expert witness Wilson County North Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Wilson County North Carolina casino resort expert witness Wilson County North Carolina parking structure expert witness Wilson County North Carolina office building expert witness Wilson County North Carolina condominium expert witness Wilson County North Carolina multi family housing expert witness Wilson County North Carolina retail construction expert witness Wilson County North Carolina institutional building expert witness Wilson County North Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Wilson County North Carolina custom homes expert witness Wilson County North Carolina
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Wilson County, North Carolina

    North Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Wilson County North Carolina

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $30,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Asheville Home Builders Association
    Local # 3405
    PO Box 9722
    Asheville, NC 28815
    http://www.ashevillehba.com

    Home Builders Association of Salisbury-Rowan
    Local # 3466
    PO Box 1334
    Salisbury, NC 28145


    Home Builders Association of Hickory-Catawba Valley
    Local # 3433
    3145 Tate Blvd SE
    Hickory, NC 28602
    http://www.hickoryhba.com

    Iredell County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3468
    PO Box 539
    Troutman, NC 28166
    http://www.iredellhomebuilders.com

    Lake Norman Home Builders Association
    Local # 3495
    128 Cedar Point Dr
    Mooresville, NC 28117
    http://www.lakenormanhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Wilson
    Local # 3481
    PO Box 7011
    Wilson, NC 27895


    Home Builders Association of Asheboro-Randolph Cty
    Local # 3407
    1037 Hammer Ave
    Asheboro, NC 27203



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Wilson County North Carolina

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2023 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!!

    Former Trump Atlantic City Casino Set for February Implosion

    Landmark Montana Supreme Court Decision Series: Trigger and Allocation

    Senate’s Fannie Mae Wind-Down Plan Faces High Hurdles

    How Artificial Intelligence Can Transform Construction

    Can You Really Be Liable For a Product You Didn’t Make? In New Jersey, the Answer is Yes

    Texas Supreme Court Finds Payment of Appraisal Award Does Not Absolve Insurer of Statutory Liability

    California Supreme Court Finds that the Notice-Prejudice Rule Applicable to Insurance is a Fundamental Public Policy of the State

    Under Construction – November 2025

    Federal Court Holds that Demolition Exclusion Does Not Apply and Carrier Has Duty to Defend Additional Insureds

    NY Attorney General to Propose Bill Requiring Climate Adaptation for Utilities

    Taking Service Network Planning to the Next Level

    Lawsuit Gives Teeth to Massachusetts Pay Law

    Mississippi exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    Data Center Construction: Contractors Must Step Up

    Were Quake Standards Illegally Altered for PG&E Nuclear Power Plant?

    Canada Housing Surprises Again With July Starts Increase

    Discussion of the Discovery Rule and Tolling Statute of Limitations

    Housing Gains Not Leading to Hiring

    Power of Workers Compensation Immunity on Construction Project

    Tesla Powerwalls for Home Energy Storage Hit U.S. Market

    Loose Bolts Led to Sagging Roof in Construction Defect Claim

    New Home Sales Slip, but Still Strong

    Professional Malpractice Statute of Limitations in Construction Context

    Are Construction Defect Laws a Factor in Millennials Home Buying Decisions?

    Court Agrees to Stay Coverage Matter While Underlying State Action is Pending

    What I Learned at My First NAWIC National Conference

    Health Officials Concerned About Lead-Tainted Dust Created by Detroit Home Demolitions

    Paris ‘Locks of Love’ Overload Bridges, Threatening Structures

    This New Indicator Shows There's No Bubble Forming in U.S. Housing

    Construction Contract Basics: Venue and Choice of Law

    To Require Arbitration or Not To Require Arbitration

    When it Comes to Trials, it’s Like a Box of Chocolates. Sometimes You Get the Icky Cream Filled One

    Sinking S.F. Tower Prompts More Lawsuits

    DC Metro Extension’s Precast Supplier Banned from Federal Contracts

    Flushing Away Liability: What the Aqua Engineering Case Means for Contractors and Subcontractors

    Construction Site Blamed for Flooding

    Presidential Executive Order 14008: The Climate Crisis Order

    Partner Yvette Davis Elected to ALFA International’s Board of Directors

    San Francisco Bay Bridge Tower Rod Fails Test

    Idaho Federal Court Rules Against Sacketts After SCOTUS Decided Judicial Review of an EPA Compliance Order was Permissible

    Liability Cap Does Not Exclude Defense Costs for Loss Related to Deep Water Horizon

    Contractor Walks Off Job. What are the Owner’s Damages?

    McCarthy Workers Test Fall-Protection Harnesses Designed to Better Fit Women

    Eleven Payne & Fears Attorneys Honored by Best Lawyers

    BIM Legal Liabilities: Not That Different

    Haight Ranked in 2018 U.S. News - Best Lawyers "Best Law Firms" List

    What Types of “Damages Claims” Survive a Trustee’s Sale?

    #1 CDJ Topic: McMillin Albany LLC v Superior Court of California

    Duty To Defend Construction Defect Case Affirmed, Duty to Indemnify Reversed In Part
    Corporate Profile

    WILSON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction and design related expert designations, the Wilson County, North Carolina Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include licensed architects, registered professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, ICC Certified inspection and testing professionals, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Wilson County and the surrounding areas.

    Wilson County North Carolina window expert witnessWilson County North Carolina construction expert witness consultantWilson County North Carolina slope failure expert witnessWilson County North Carolina concrete expert witnessWilson County North Carolina construction cost estimating expert witnessWilson County North Carolina construction claims expert witnessWilson County North Carolina structural concrete expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Wilson County, North Carolina

    Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit

    May 12, 2026 —
    Congratulations to Partner Mike D’Andrea and Associates Ruth Rasiah and Kaylah Abdullah in the Los Angeles office for obtaining a complete dismissal of their clients in a significant claim involving California’s Public Utilities regulations. After lengthy litigation, BWB&O’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted against Claimant, Spectrum (Charter Communications), which resulted in a complete dismissal of the action against BWB&O’s clients. At issue was whether California’s Public Utilities Code shifted the common law duty to maintain certain utility equipment in residential areas within Southern California. After significant briefing, the Superior Court found that BWB&O correctly argued that the Public Utilities Code required utility companies, like Spectrum, to fully maintain utility equipment, and that private residents are not responsible for utility maintenance (even if the physical equipment is located on private property). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Science-Based Standards for Wildfire Recovery: What California Policyholders Need to Know About A.B. 1642

    March 03, 2026 —
    Wildfires continue to present serious risks for California property owners. Unfortunately, commercial property owners, corporate facilities, landlords, and homeowners need to overcome not only the flames themselves, but also remediating hazardous contamination against a backdrop of unpredictable and ambiguous environmental safety standards. In response to the destructive Los Angeles area fires in 2025, the California Legislature recently introduced Assembly Bill 1642 aimed at creating uniform science-based standards for evaluating, testing, and clearing wildfire-impacted properties. While A.B. 1642 is in its early stages of consideration, it could materially influence claims handling, remediation costs, risk management practices, and broader liability exposures for California policyholders. Reprinted courtesy of Geoffrey B. Fehling, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Yosef Itkin, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Fehling may be contacted at gfehling@hunton.com Mr. Itkin may be contacted at yitkin@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (6/24/26) – HUD to Fund AI Grants, Luxury Hotel Deal Investment Activity to Surge, ESPCs to Fund Energy and Infrastructure Improvements

    July 06, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, data centers are exposed to climate change, commercial tenant sues CoStar, cities see opportunities in emerging sports markets, and more!
    • With deferred maintenance growing and capital dollars stretched thin, local governments are using ESPCs to fund energy and infrastructure improvements through future operational savings. (Vicky Uhland, Construction Dive)
    • The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is offering up to $3 million in grants for local governments to deploy automated permitting and building code systems. (Ryan Kushner, Construction Dive)
    • Luxury hotel deals are set to see a surge in investment activity due to strong fundamentals and strengthening capital markets. (Noor Adatia, Hotel Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    NJ Public Works Contractors Beware – Pay Special Attention When Submitting Your Public Works Contractor Registration

    May 26, 2026 —
    While it is always important to be careful when making submissions to government agencies, recent activity by the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDOL”) reveals considerably increased scrutiny in connection with contractors renewing their New Jersey Public Works Registration. Extra care when completing the registration renewal process is warranted, because the consequences of a misstep can be significant and disruptive. The New Jersey Public Works Contractor Registration Act requires all contractors bidding on or engaging in construction-related public works projects to register with the NJDOL. This registration, which must be resubmitted every 1-2 years, requires contractors to make a number of detailed disclosures relating to, among other things, the entity’s ownership structure, prior state and federal labor law violations, details regarding interests in other businesses, unlawful acts by owners/officers, and participation in apprenticeship programs. Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Aaron C. Schlesinger, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com Mr. Schlesinger may be contacted at aschlesinger@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    July 27, 2026 —
    In 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, the Sixth Circuit did something courts do not always do in coverage disputes: it refused to let an insurer avoid liability based on a technical policy condition that could never actually be satisfied. The decision is a straightforward reminder of two core principles. First, policies must be interpreted from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent insured. Second, hyper-technical conditions cannot be used to deny coverage where compliance is never possible. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Adriana A. Perez, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Small may be contacted at ksmall@hunton.com Ms. Perez may be contacted at pereza@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Navigating the New Frontier of Federal-State Energy Regulation: What Energy Companies Need to Know

    June 08, 2026 —
    Introduction The jurisdictional boundary between the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the states is being actively contested, from challenges to landmark transmission planning rules to disputes over emergency cost-allocation orders, in ways that carry significant legal, financial, and operational implications for energy companies. For utilities, independent power producers, and transmission developers, understanding these dynamics is now a strategic imperative. The Jurisdictional Divide: A Bright Line That Isn’t The Federal Power Act divides authority between FERC and the states: FERC exercises jurisdiction over interstate transmission and wholesale electricity sales, while states retain authority over generation facilities, retail rates, and decisions about resource mix. The D.C. Circuit has regularly been called upon to “referee the Federal Power Act’s jurisdictional line separating [FERC’s] jurisdiction over the federal wholesale market and States’ jurisdiction over facilities used in local distribution.”1 Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    Connecticut Expands Construction Wage-Theft Liability and Prevailing Wage Recordkeeping Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    This post was co-authored by Labor + Employment group lawyer Christopher Costain, Hayden Eckblom (Summer Intern), and Pasqualina Fox-Mina (Summer Associate). Hayden and Pasqualina are not admitted to practice law. On May 11, 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed into law Public Act 26-12, a wide-ranging bill centered around employee rights. Our colleagues in Robinson+Cole’s Labor, Employment, Benefits + Immigration group recently published a legal update summarizing the key components of Public Act 26-12. Here, we focus on the Wage Theft and Prevailing Wage concepts in the bill that directly relate to the construction industry. Wage Theft With exceptions for public works and small residential projects, general contractors will be jointly and severally liable for any unpaid wages owed to an employee of a subcontractor of any tier on private construction projects, beginning with contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2027. As we know, there is a separate regime for public works projects involving payment bonds. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anand Gupta, Robinson & Cole LLP
    Mr. Gupta may be contacted at agupta@rc.com