BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Adams County North Dakota custom homes expert witness Adams County North Dakota structural steel construction expert witness Adams County North Dakota condominium expert witness Adams County North Dakota hospital construction expert witness Adams County North Dakota institutional building expert witness Adams County North Dakota low-income housing expert witness Adams County North Dakota high-rise construction expert witness Adams County North Dakota retail construction expert witness Adams County North Dakota housing expert witness Adams County North Dakota parking structure expert witness Adams County North Dakota multi family housing expert witness Adams County North Dakota industrial building expert witness Adams County North Dakota custom home expert witness Adams County North Dakota mid-rise construction expert witness Adams County North Dakota office building expert witness Adams County North Dakota production housing expert witness Adams County North Dakota concrete tilt-up expert witness Adams County North Dakota townhome construction expert witness Adams County North Dakota Subterranean parking expert witness Adams County North Dakota Medical building expert witness Adams County North Dakota casino resort expert witness Adams County North Dakota
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Adams County, North Dakota

    North Dakota Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB1437) Notice required six months prior to undertaking any repair other than emergency repair, or instituting action for breach of warranty of one or two-family dwelling; response time 30 days.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Adams County North Dakota

    A contractor's license is required for all jobs over $2,000.00. Separate boards license plumbing and electrical trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Fargo-Moorhead
    Local # 3545
    1802 32nd Ave S
    Fargo, ND 58103
    http://www.hbafm.com

    Dickinson Area Home Builders Association
    Local # 3512
    PO Box 1697
    Dickinson, ND 58602


    North Dakota AB
    Local # 3500
    1720 Burnt Boat Dr Ste 207
    Bismarck, ND 58503
    http://www.ndbuild.com

    Bismarck-Mandan Home Builders Association
    Local # 3510
    2600 Gateway Ave Ste 1
    Bismarck, ND 58503
    http://www.bmhba.com

    Forx Builders Association
    Local # 3515
    519 DeMers Ave
    Grand Forks, ND 58201
    http://www.forxbuilders.com

    Williston Area Builders Association
    Local # 3520
    PO Box 1825
    Williston, ND 58802


    Minot Association of Bldrs
    Local # 3565
    PO Box 1851
    Minot, ND 58702
    http://www.minotab.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Adams County North Dakota

    Hunton Insurance Partner, Larry Bracken, Elected to the American College of Coverage Counsel

    Alabama Court Upholds Late Notice Disclaimer

    Courts Generally Favor the Enforcement of Arbitration Provisions

    Think Before you Execute that Release – the Language in the Release Matters!

    Reminder: Always Order a Title Search for Your Mechanic’s Lien

    David McLain Recognized Among the 2021 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America© for Construction Law

    Colorado’s Need for Condos May Spark Construction Defect Law Reform

    The Construction Project is Late—Allocation of Delay

    Uneven Code Enforcement Seen in Earthquake-Damaged Buildings in Turkey

    A Termination for Convenience Is Not a Termination for Default

    Bridging the Gap at Alaska’s Juneau Creek

    At the Frontier of Change: How—or Where—to Rebuild as Alaska's Permafrost Disappears

    Contract Terms Can Impact the Accrual Date For Florida’s Statute of Repose

    Colorado Construction Defect Action Reform: HB 17-1279 Approved by Colorado Legislature; Governor’s Approval Imminent

    Unravel the Facts Before Asserting FDUTPA and Tortious Interference Claims

    Real Protection for Real Estate Assets: Court Ruling Reinforces Importance of D&O Insurance

    Winter COVID-19 Relief Bill: Overview of Key Provisions

    Pennsylvania “occurrence”

    Policy Language Matters: New Jersey Court Bars Cleanup Coverage Under Broad Policy Terms

    Water Drainage Case Lacks Standing

    Precast Standards' Work Under Way as Brittle Fracture Warnings Aired

    Drones Give Inspectors a Closer Look at Bridges

    Ninth Circuit Issues Injunction Halting SB 261 Climate Disclosure Laws

    The Need for Situational Awareness in Construction

    Maui Wildfire Cleanup Could Cost $1B and Take One Year

    Buffett Says ‘No-Brainer’ to Get a Mortgage to Short Rates

    Meritage Acquires Legendary Communities

    Congratulations 2016 DE, MA, NJ, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Gibbs Giden is Pleased to Announce Four New Partners and Two New Associates

    Nevada Construction Defect Lawyers Dead in Possible Suicides

    Landlords Challenge U.S. Eviction Ban and Continue to Oust Renters

    Florida Project Could Help Address Runoff, Algae Blooms

    Hunton Andrews Kurth Insurance Attorney, Latosha M. Ellis, Honored by Business Insurance Magazine

    Nevada HOA Criminal Investigation Moving Slowly

    White and Williams Recognized by BTI Consulting Group for Client Service

    Ownership is Not a Conclusive Factor for Ongoing Operations Additional Insured Coverage

    Manhattan Bargain: Condos for Less Than $3 Million

    Should I Pull the Pin? Contractor and Subcontractor Termination for Cause

    No Occurrence Where Contract Provides for Delays

    Update Relating to SB891 and Bond Claim Waivers

    Gillotti v. Stewart (2017) 2017 WL 1488711 Rejects Liberty Mutual, Holding Once Again that the Right to Repair Act is the Exclusive Remedy for Construction Defect Claims

    University of Tennessee’s New Humanities Building Construction Set to Begin

    Associated Builders and Contractors Northern California Chapter Announces New President/CEO

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Indemnity Coverage For Damage Caused by Named Insured

    Kiewit Selected for Rebuild of Collapsed Baltimore Bridge

    Zombie Foreclosures Plaguing Various Cities in the U.S.

    Mitsui Fudosan Said to Consider Rebuilding Tilted Apartments

    Indemnity Provision Provides Relief to Contractor; Additional Insured Provision Does Not

    Proposed Florida Construction Defect Act

    Know When Your Claim “Accrues” or Risk Losing It
    Corporate Profile

    ADAMS COUNTY NORTH DAKOTA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Adams County, North Dakota Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Utilizing captive resources which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Adams County construction industry.

    Adams County North Dakota consulting architect expert witnessAdams County North Dakota construction project management expert witnessAdams County North Dakota construction cost estimating expert witnessAdams County North Dakota expert witness roofingAdams County North Dakota architectural expert witnessAdams County North Dakota construction claims expert witnessAdams County North Dakota construction expert witness public projects
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Adams County, North Dakota

    Perennial Question, Perennial Answer? EPA and Army Corps Propose Year-Round Standard for WOTUS that Could Reshape Clean Water Act Jurisdiction

    October 12, 2026 —
    Federal Clean Water Act jurisdiction may be about to get considerably narrower. On September 4, 2026, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) announced a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking that would limit federal authority over streams and wetlands to those containing water year-round—a “perennial” standard that would go beyond even what the Supreme Court required in Sackett v. EPA, 598 U.S. 651 (2023). The supplemental notice offers two options for revising the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA): One would define “relatively permanent” waters as perennial, and the other would require perennial surface water to establish a wetland’s continuous surface connection to a jurisdictional water. If adopted, either option would substantially reduce the number of streams, wetlands and other water features subject to federal permitting, with the sharpest effects in arid and semi-arid regions where rainfall patterns leave many waterways dry for portions of the year. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    It’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do It

    July 27, 2026 —
    When you win a bid, you might be singing that everything is going your way. Then something goes wrong. The owner hands you defective plans, sits on RFI responses or other critical information, or otherwise upends the work. The costs pile up through no fault of your own. You feel wronged, and you want to be made whole. But a feeling that you got burned is not enough. To recover, that feeling has to become something the law recognizes as damages. So, what are damages, and how do you prove them? At bottom, contract damages are the money that puts the non-breaching party (i.e., the party that doesn’t breach the contract) in the position it would have occupied had the contract been performed. Reprinted courtesy of Bradley E. Sands, Jones Walker LLP and Katie McCracken, Summer Associate, University of Georgia School of Law Read the full story...
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Mark Cronenwett Obtains Appellate Ruling Vacating Default Judgment Against Mortgage Lender Client

    October 12, 2026 —
    Dallas Partner Mark Cronenwett recently secured a decision from the Dallas Court of Appeals that vacated a default judgment against his mortgage lender client, on the grounds that the client was never properly served with the complaint. In prior litigation, a real property investor purchased a Texas residential property for pennies on the dollar at an HOA foreclosure sale. That investor then filed a frivolous lawsuit against Lewis Brisbois' mortgage-lender client to invalidate its lien, contending that mortgage lender had abandoned the debt because it failed to respond to the investor’s alleged requests for information about the amounts owed on the loan. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Alexander Hopkins Authors Law360 Article on Wisconsin Supreme Court Coverage Decision

    October 06, 2026 —
    Alexander Hopkins recently authored an Expert Analysis for Law360 examining a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court decision addressing coverage for water damage arising from alleged construction defects. In “Wis. Coverage Ruling Rejects Strict Ensuing Loss Test,” Alex explores the relationship between construction defect exclusions and ensuing loss provisions, and what the decision means for policyholders seeking coverage when an excluded condition contributes to subsequent damage. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Alexander G. Hopkins, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Hopkins may be contacted at alexander.hopkins@sdvfenchurch.us

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    May 05, 2026 —
    MEP equipment accounts for up to 40% of costs on data center or hospital projects, has lead times ranging from 20 weeks to over a year, and has historically been the most underserved area in construction software. In this episode, I speak with Victor Muchiri from BuildVision about what it actually takes to make AI useful in construction procurement, not as a pilot, but in production. We dig into why you cannot simply upload a set of construction drawings to ChatGPT and trust the output. Construction documents are complex, cross-referenced, and consequential. Without deep domain context, such as manufacturer ontologies, equipment taxonomies, and engineering expertise, AI produces plausible results, not reliable ones. BuildVision’s approach is to act as a harness around AI models, wrapping them in construction-specific knowledge so the output can be trusted for real procurement decisions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Not Every Job Is Worth Winning: Contract Risk Questions Contractors Should Ask Before They Bid

    September 29, 2026 —
    Introduction Winning the work is not the same as winning the project, at least financially. Consider a contractor that commits to procure custom or long-lead materials before receiving complete construction documents. Depending on the language of the contract, if the final design is altered after those materials have been ordered, the contractor may be left responsible for replacement costs, procurement delays, or both. Alternatively, a subcontractor that accepts a pay-if-paid provision without investigating the owner’s financing, or prematurely waives lien rights, potentially risks nonpayment for properly performed work. Such concessions can quickly transform an apparently profitable project into a significant financial burden. A successful bid can therefore become an unsuccessful project if the contractor accepts contractual “red flags” without evaluating their consequences and the long-term financial impacts that they may have. The significance of each risk will depend on the project, the parties, the proposed contract, applicable law, and the contractor’s business objectives. Although not comprehensive, this article identifies several key considerations for that process to help mitigate certain risks. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com