BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Medical building expert witness Blaine Ohio high-rise construction expert witness Blaine Ohio hospital construction expert witness Blaine Ohio parking structure expert witness Blaine Ohio structural steel construction expert witness Blaine Ohio multi family housing expert witness Blaine Ohio landscaping construction expert witness Blaine Ohio condominiums expert witness Blaine Ohio condominium expert witness Blaine Ohio office building expert witness Blaine Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness Blaine Ohio custom homes expert witness Blaine Ohio low-income housing expert witness Blaine Ohio institutional building expert witness Blaine Ohio townhome construction expert witness Blaine Ohio mid-rise construction expert witness Blaine Ohio production housing expert witness Blaine Ohio industrial building expert witness Blaine Ohio retail construction expert witness Blaine Ohio custom home expert witness Blaine Ohio casino resort expert witness Blaine Ohio housing expert witness Blaine Ohio
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Blaine, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Blaine Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Miami County
    Local # 3682
    1200 Archer Dr
    Troy, OH 45373
    http://HBAMiamiCounty.com

    Buckeye Valley Building Industry Association
    Local # 3654
    12 W Main St
    Newark, OH 43055
    http://www.buckeyevalleybia.com

    Building Industry Association of Central Ohio
    Local # 3627
    495 Executive Campus Drive
    Westerville, OH 43082
    http://www.biahomebuilders.com

    Ohio Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 3600
    17 S High Street Ste 700
    Columbus, OH 43215
    http://www.ohiohba.com

    Clark County Chapter
    Local # 3673
    PO Box 1047
    Springfield, OH 45501
    http://www.biacc.org/

    Union County Chapter
    Local # 3684
    PO Box 525
    Marysville, OH 43040
    http://www.ucbia.com

    Shelby County Builders Association
    Local # 3670
    PO Box 534
    Sidney, OH 45365
    http://www.shelbybuild.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Blaine Ohio

    DEP Plan to Deal with Noxious Landfill Fumes Met with Criticism

    Do Not File a Miller Act Payment Bond Lawsuit After the One-Year Statute of Limitations

    Construction Materials Company CEO Sees Upturn in Building, Leading to Jobs

    How Does Your Construction Contract Treat Float

    Flint Water Crisis Prompts Call for More Federal Oversight

    Hawaii Construction Defect Law Increased Confusion

    New York Establishes a Registration Requirement for Contractors and Subcontractors Performing Public Works and Covered Private Projects

    Renters Who Bought Cannot Sue for Construction Defects

    “I Didn’t Sign That!” – Applicability of Waivers of Subrogation to Non-Signatory Third Parties

    Arizona Supreme Court Leaves Limits on Construction Defects Unclear

    A Sample Itinerary to get the Most out of West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar

    Court Grants Summary Judgment to Insurer in HVAC Defect Case

    Ex-Turner Exec Gets 46 Months for Bloomberg Construction Bribes

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Highlighted | 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers

    Connecticut Supreme Court Further Refines Meaning of "Collapse"

    ETF Bulls Bet Spring Will Thaw the U.S. Housing Market

    Seventh Circuit Finds “Additional Insured” Requirements Met Where Non-Party Subcontractor Was Proximate Cause of Underlying Injuries

    Arizona Court of Appeals Rules Issues Were Not Covered in Construction Defect Suit

    Environmental and Regulatory Law Update: New Federal and State Rulings

    Navigating the DOT’s Interim Final Rule on DBE Certification Standards - and Preparing for the (Bumpy) Road Ahead

    1 De Haro: A Case Study on Successful Cross-Laminated Timber Design and Construction in San Francisco

    Enerpac Plays Critical Role in Industry-changing Discovery for Long Span Bridges at The University of Nebraska-Lincoln

    Fix for Settling Millennium Tower May Start This Fall

    Travelers Injury Impact Report Highlights Longer Recovery Times Amid Declining Injury Rates

    Insurer Must Indemnify Additional Insured After Settlement

    New Mexico Holds One-Sided Dispute Resolution Provisions Are Unenforceable

    Additional Insured Not Entitled to Reimbursement of Defense Costs Paid by Other Insurers

    Subprime Bonds Are Back With Different Name Seven Years After U.S. Crisis

    Building on New Risks: Construction in the Age of Greening

    Harmon Towers Duty to Defend Question Must Wait, Says Court

    US Supreme Court Backs Panama Canal Owner in Dispute with Builders

    Home-Rentals Wall Street Made Say Grow or Go: Real Estate

    Court Invalidates Project Labor Agreement Mandate on Federal Construction Projects

    10-story Mass Timber 'Rocking' Frame Sails Through Seismic Shake Tests

    Accessibility Considerations – What Your Company Should Be Aware of in 2021

    No Subrogation, Contribution Rights for Carrier Defending Construction Defect Claim

    Illinois Appellate Court Addresses Professional Services Exclusion in Homeowners Policy

    Courts Generally Favor the Enforcement of Arbitration Provisions

    California’s Right To Repair Act Is The Sole Remedy For Damages For Construction Defects In New Residential Construction

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Too Soon?”

    School District Client Advisory: Civility is not an Option, It is a Duty

    Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plans for Contractors: Lessons From the Past

    Primer Debuts on Life-Cycle Assessments of Embodied Carbon in Buildings

    ICYMI: Highlights From ABC Convention 2024

    Insurer's Attempt to Limit Additional Insured Status Fails

    Insurer Must Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Insurance Company Must Show that Lead Came from Building Materials

    A Survey of Trends and Perspectives in Construction Defect Decisions

    Water Damage: Construction’s Often Unnoticed Threat

    BE PROACTIVE: Steps to Preserve and Enhance Your Insurance Rights In Light of the Recent Natural Disasters
    Corporate Profile

    BLAINE OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Blaine, Ohio Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house resources which comprise construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Blaine region.

    Blaine Ohio eifs expert witnessBlaine Ohio building consultant expertBlaine Ohio expert witness structural engineerBlaine Ohio stucco expert witnessBlaine Ohio defective construction expertBlaine Ohio consulting architect expert witnessBlaine Ohio reconstruction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Blaine, Ohio

    Substantial Evidence of Flood Loss is Not a Substitute for Required Proof of Loss

    April 20, 2026 —
    The court found that the insurer properly denied the insured’s claim for loss due to flood because a proof of loss was never submitted. Bay Haven at Coco Bay Condominium Association, Inc. v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6847 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 14, 2026). Bay Haven managed several condo buildings. When Hurricane Ian hit, it caused significant flood damage to these properties. Bay Haven held federal flood insurance policies through Hartford under “Write-Your-Own” policies. This meant Hartford was essentially a fiscal agent that managed policies and handled claims but paid them using federal funds. Following the storm, FEMA extended the usual 60-day deadline for filing a proof of loss to one year, or until September 28, 2023. Bay Haven did not submit its proofs of loss until November 2023. FEMA granted an extension but only for the specific amounts in the November requests. Hartford did not waive the 60-day proof of loss requirement for any other proof of loss. Hartford paid the amounts reflected in the November submissions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Four Kahana Feld Attorneys Selected to 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers List

    March 03, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Feb. 20, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce that partners Jason Feld, Amir Kahana, Sharon Oh-Kubisch, and Manuel Ugarte were selected to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers® list. Jason Feld is a founding partner of Kahana Feld. He focuses his practice on the defense of homebuilders, contractors, developers, and real estate professionals primarily in construction defect, general liability, insurance defense, construction accident, and real estate matters. He also represents government entities handling construction, premises liability, general liability, and environmental claims. He serves as panel counsel for many prominent insurance carriers, as well as personal counsel to several national and regional homebuilders, developers, and general contractors. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    UPDATED: No Easy Fix for Potomac River Sewage Spill, Now Estimated at $20M

    April 08, 2026 —
    One month after a collapsed pipeline north of Washington, D.C., spilled about 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River and possibly between 300 and 400 million—which could be the largest wastewater spill in U.S. history—efforts are progressing to clear the damaged section and begin repairs despite weather and other impacts. Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record and Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com Read the full story...

    HHMR Attorneys Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain Named to 2026 Super Lawyers List

    April 08, 2026 —
    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC is pleased to announce that Steve Heisdorffer and Dave McLain have been selected to the 2026 Colorado Super Lawyers list for construction litigation. Mr. Heisdorffer has been consistently recognized in recent years for his work in construction litigation and related business disputes. Mr. McLain has been recognized by Super Lawyers each year from 2020 through 2026, following his earlier inclusion on the Rising Stars list from 2009 through 2012. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    Sheppard has been recognized by Chambers Global 2026 in the following practice areas:
    • Privacy & Data Security in the United States
    • Projects: Power & Renewables: Transactional in the United States
    • Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy in the United States
    Additionally, the following Sheppard partners have been recognized by Chambers Global 2026:
    • Justin Boose (Projects: Renewables & Alternative Energy – USA)
    • Will Chen (Intellectual Property: International Firms – South Korea)
    • David Chun (Intellectual Property – South Korea)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sheppard

    Colorado Supreme Court Reverses Course on Public Project Liens: Key Takeaways From Wadsworth v. Regional Rail Partners

    July 27, 2026 —
    On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Company, LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, reversing the Colorado Court of Appeals and providing much-needed clarity regarding verified statements of claim (VSOCs) under the Colorado Public Works Act, C.R.S. §§ 38-26-101 et seq. The decision resolves two issues that have generated significant concern among construction industry professionals since the Court of Appeals issued its opinion on August 1, 2024. Under C.R.S. § 38-26-107(1), a subcontractor on a public works project may file a VSOC with the contracting public entity for amounts due and unpaid for “…furnished labor, materials, sustenance, or other supplies used or consumed by a contractor or his or her subcontractor in or about the performance of the work contracted to be done or that supplies laborers, rental machinery, tools, or equipment to the extent used in the prosecution of the work….” If a claimant files a VSOC for “an amount greater than the amount due” without a reasonable possibility that the amount is due and with knowledge that the claim is excessive, the claimant “shall forfeit all rights to the amount claimed” and becomes liable for the opposing party’s costs and attorneys’ fees. C.R.S. § 38-26-110. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Amanda E. McKinlay, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. McKinlay may be contacted at amckinlay@swlaw.com