BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Carbondale Ohio institutional building expert witness Carbondale Ohio housing expert witness Carbondale Ohio casino resort expert witness Carbondale Ohio concrete tilt-up expert witness Carbondale Ohio Medical building expert witness Carbondale Ohio condominium expert witness Carbondale Ohio landscaping construction expert witness Carbondale Ohio multi family housing expert witness Carbondale Ohio parking structure expert witness Carbondale Ohio structural steel construction expert witness Carbondale Ohio custom homes expert witness Carbondale Ohio custom home expert witness Carbondale Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness Carbondale Ohio high-rise construction expert witness Carbondale Ohio tract home expert witness Carbondale Ohio hospital construction expert witness Carbondale Ohio industrial building expert witness Carbondale Ohio mid-rise construction expert witness Carbondale Ohio condominiums expert witness Carbondale Ohio low-income housing expert witness Carbondale Ohio retail construction expert witness Carbondale Ohio
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Carbondale, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Carbondale Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Washington County
    Local # 3657
    PO Box 1048
    Marietta, OH 45750


    Building Industry Association of South Central OH
    Local # 3618
    545 Vine Street
    Chillicothe, OH 45601


    Athens Building Industries Association
    Local # 3646
    9344 Bassett Rd
    Athens, OH 45701


    Home Builders Association of Greater Cincinnati
    Local # 3621
    415 Glensprings Dr Ste 100
    Cincinnati, OH 45246
    http://www.cincybuilders.com

    Tri-County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3645
    PO Box 643
    Lancaster, OH 43130
    http://www.tricountyhomebuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Dayton
    Local # 3630
    One Chamber Plaza Ste 100 B
    Dayton, OH 45402
    http://www.hbadayton.com

    Clark County Chapter
    Local # 3673
    PO Box 1047
    Springfield, OH 45501
    http://www.biacc.org/


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Carbondale Ohio

    Newmeyer & Dillion Announces Three New Partners

    Contract Should Have Clear and Definite Terms to Avoid a Patent Ambiguity

    Traub Lieberman Partner Kathryn Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Secure Final Summary Judgment in Favor of Homeowner’s Insurance Company

    Almost Half of Homes in New York and D.C. Are Now Losing Value

    Three Key Takeaways from Recent Hotel Website ADA Litigation

    Gene Witkin Joins Ross Hart’s Mediation Team at AMCC

    Formal Opinion No. 2020-203: How A Lawyer Is to Handle Access to Client Confidential Information and Anticipation of Potential Security Issues

    New York Court Grants Insured's Motion to Dismiss Construction Defect Case and Awards Fees to Insured

    District Court Allows DBE False Claims Act Case to Proceed

    Consultant Says It's Time to Overhaul Construction Defect Laws in Nevada

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Newport Beach Team on Obtaining a Defense Verdict in Favor of their Subcontractor Client!

    Immigrants, Accidents and Lawsuit Loans: Does NY Need New Rules?

    Contractor Haunted by “Demonized” Flooring

    The Metaphysics of When an Accident is an “Accident” (or Not) Under Your Insurance Policy

    Your “Independent Contractor” Clause Just Got a Little Less Relevant

    Part of the Whole: Idaho District Court Holds Economic Loss Rule Bars Tort Claims Related to Water Supply Line that was Part of Home Purchase

    California Imposes New Disabled Access Obligations on Commercial Property Owners

    Drafting the Bond Form, Particularly Performance Bond Form

    Pennsylvania Federal Court Addresses Recurring Asbestos Coverage Issues

    Norfolk Southern Agrees to $310M Settlement With Feds Over 2023 Ohio Derailment

    Are You Ready For 2015?

    Manhattan Home Prices Jump to a Record as Buyers Compete

    Construction Employers Beware: New, Easier Union Representation Process

    Measure Twice, Cut (the Check) Once: Liability for Cybercrime and How to Avoid It

    Surfside Condo Collapse Investigators Uncover More Pool Deck Deviations

    Illinois Appellate Court Addresses Professional Services Exclusion in Homeowners Policy

    Party Cannot Skirt Out of the Very Fraud It Perpetrates

    Pennsylvania Reconstruction Project Beset by Problems

    Louisiana Couple Sues over Defects in Foreclosed Home

    Christopher Leise Recognized by US News – Best Lawyers 2022 "Lawyer of the Year"

    Inability to Confirm Coverage Supports Setting Aside Insured’s Default Judgment on Grounds of Extrinsic Mistake

    NY Construction Safety Firm Falsely Certified Workers, Says Manhattan DA

    U.S. Tornadoes, Hail Cost Insurers $1 Billion in June

    New York Supreme Court Building Opening Delayed Again

    Risk-Shifting Tactics for Construction Contracts

    Texas Shortens Its Statute of Repose To 6 Years, With Limitations

    Alaska Supreme Court Finds Insurer Owes No Independent Duty to Injured Party

    Claims for Negligence? Duty to Defend Triggered

    Construction Defect Claim Must Be Defended Under Florida Law

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Bars Coverage for Pool Damage

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Lisa Rolle and Christopher Acosta Win Motion to Dismiss in Bronx County Trip and Fall

    Read Her Lips: “No New Buildings”

    What to Do Before OSHA Comes Knocking

    NYC Landlord Accused of Skirting Law With Rent-Free Months Offer

    White and Williams Announces the Election of Five Lawyers to the Partnership and the Promotion of Five Associates to Counsel

    Residential Mortgage Lenders and Servicers Beware of Changes to Rule 3002.1

    General Contractor’s Ability to Supplement Subcontractor Per Subcontract

    The Greenest U.S. Cities & States

    Is Construction in Arizona Back to Normal?

    Construction Defects #10 On DBJ’s Top News Stories of 2015
    Corporate Profile

    CARBONDALE OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Carbondale, Ohio Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims evaluation and expert support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise licensed general and specialty contractors, consulting civil engineers, NCARB certified architects, roofing, and building envelope experts, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Carbondale region.

    Carbondale Ohio structural engineering expert witnessesCarbondale Ohio stucco expert witnessCarbondale Ohio building code expert witnessCarbondale Ohio construction forensic expert witnessCarbondale Ohio architectural engineering expert witnessCarbondale Ohio architectural expert witnessCarbondale Ohio civil engineer expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Carbondale, Ohio

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    June 22, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group is pleased to share that it has received a Band One ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide for Insurance, Pennsylvania. Additionally, Patricia B. Santelle, Chair Emeritus, Randy Maniloff, Partner, and Robert Walsh, Partner have all been individually ranked on the Chambers USA 2026 Guide in Insurance in Pennsylvania. The Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice's consistent focus on their clients and handling of complex claims were just two of the attributes contributing to their elite Band One ranking, after 11 years on the Chambers USA list. When asked about their experience working with White and Williams’ Pennsylvania Insurance Practice, one client stated, “What distinguishes White and Williams is the high level of service and accountability. The team is responsive, organized and reliable, which allows our internal teams to move quickly and make informed decisions with confidence.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Building in Arizona’s Data Center Boom: How Federal Executive Orders, State Regulation, and National-Security Policy Are Reshaping the Rules for Developers

    June 02, 2026 —
    Developers and practitioners evaluating data center projects in Arizona face a regulatory environment shifting on three fronts simultaneously. Federal executive orders are opening new land, streamlining permitting, and channeling financial incentives toward qualifying projects — but they are not preempting the state and local rules that most directly affect project economics. A carve-out in the December 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Framework Executive Order preserves Arizona’s authority over data center infrastructure, meaning the Arizona Corporation Commission’s (ACC) rate-classification docket, municipal zoning restrictions, water-use ordinances, and pending grid cost-allocation legislation remain the binding constraints on project feasibility. Understanding where federal tailwinds end and state and local headwinds begin is essential for any developer sizing risk or selecting sites in the state. The Federal Landscape: An Interlocking Framework of Executive Orders Five interlocking executive orders are accelerating data center development nationally, but none overrides Arizona’s authority over siting energy, or infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    CA Civil Code § 8850: What Private Multi-state Owners and Developers Building in California in 2026 Need to Know

    January 26, 2026 —
    Owners and developers building in California must be aware of a new statute, CA Civil Code § 8850, which takes effect for contracts entered into, on, and after January 1, 2026. The statute will likely apply to most private construction projects; however, a carve-out exists for residential projects that are not mixed use and are four stories or less. When a contractor—or, with proper authorization, a subcontractor—submits a claim related to payment, time extensions, damages, or change orders (encompassing the majority of construction disputes), the owner must provide a written response within 30 days. This response must clearly state which portions of the claim are disputed and which are not. The owner has 60 days from the date of its response to issue payment for those undisputed amounts. Late payments will accrue interest at a rate of two percent per month. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anand Gupta, Robinson & Cole
    Mr. Gupta may be contacted at agupta@rc.com

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    June 29, 2026 —
    Daily Journal (California) featured an article by Construction Law partner Brenda Radmacher, “A new path for construction defects in California.” The piece, published on June 15, 2026, examines Assembly Bill 1903 and its potential to significantly reshape California’s construction defect framework, particularly for common interest properties. The article highlights how AB 1903 would overhaul the state’s current right-to-repair system by mandating completion of prelitigation procedures, raising requirements for defect claims, strengthening developers’/builders’ rights to repair, and introducing a voluntary “certified building” program. The legislation aims to rebalance competing interests by reducing litigation-driven costs while preserving protections for homeowners. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brenda Radmacher, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Radmacher may be contacted at bradmacher@seyfarth.com

    Cross-Office Team Secures Litigation Stay and Order of Arbitration on Behalf of Hotel Developer

    February 17, 2026 —
    New York Partner Minyao Wang, Chicago Partner Bryan Sugar, and Denver/Washington, D.C. Partner Christopher Wood secured a victory on behalf of Lewis Brisbois’ client, a hotel developer, when the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois granted the client’s motion to dismiss and ordered the parties to proceed to arbitration. In this matter, the 39 plaintiffs, represented by a New York based law firm that focuses on EB-5 litigation against high-end real estate developers, were foreign nationals living in China or Taiwan who were seeking EB-5 visas and invested in a lending company. The lending company loaned money to entities that were managing a project that involved renovating a hotel and constructing a mixed-use tower in downtown Chicago. Disputes developed among the parties. The foreign investors organized informally and ultimately filed suit against Lewis Brisbois’ client, alleging claims of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, conversion, and conspiracy, as well as aiding and abetting conversion. The defendants faced exposure of at least $20 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois