BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Edison Ohio production housing expert witness Edison Ohio Medical building expert witness Edison Ohio casino resort expert witness Edison Ohio low-income housing expert witness Edison Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness Edison Ohio custom home expert witness Edison Ohio structural steel construction expert witness Edison Ohio landscaping construction expert witness Edison Ohio retail construction expert witness Edison Ohio institutional building expert witness Edison Ohio custom homes expert witness Edison Ohio condominium expert witness Edison Ohio townhome construction expert witness Edison Ohio mid-rise construction expert witness Edison Ohio concrete tilt-up expert witness Edison Ohio housing expert witness Edison Ohio tract home expert witness Edison Ohio office building expert witness Edison Ohio parking structure expert witness Edison Ohio industrial building expert witness Edison Ohio condominiums expert witness Edison Ohio
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Edison, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Edison Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    East Central OH Building Industry Association
    Local # 3664
    706 E. Shafer Ave
    Dover, OH 44622
    http://www.eco-bia.com

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3656
    PO Box 363
    Rockford, OH 45882


    Building Industry Association of North Central OH
    Local # 3651
    1183 Lexington Avenue
    Mansfield, OH 44907
    http://www.biancohio.com

    West Central Buckeye Builders Association
    Local # 3648
    1520 Allentown Rd
    Lima, OH 45805
    http://WWW.WESTCENTRALOHIOBUILDERS.COM

    Home Builders Association of Wayne and Holmes Cos
    Local # 3690
    4973 Cleveland Rd Suite A
    Wooster, OH 44691
    http://whhba.com

    Building Industry Association of Stark County
    Local # 3615
    4344 Metro Cir NW
    North Canton, OH 44720
    http://www.biastark.com

    Shelby County Builders Association
    Local # 3670
    PO Box 534
    Sidney, OH 45365
    http://www.shelbybuild.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Edison Ohio

    How Mansions Can Intensify Wildfires

    Hawaii Federal District Court Again Rejects Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    Blackstone Suffers Court Setback in Irish Real Estate Drama

    "Ordinance or Law" Provision Mandates Coverage for Roof Repair

    California Supreme Court Raises the Bar on Dangerous Conditions on Public Property Claims

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey W. Saab and Associate Shanna B. Carter on Obtaining Another Defense Award at Arbitration!

    Court Addresses HOA Attempt to Restrict Short Term Rentals

    Scotiabank Is Cautious on Canada Housing as RBC, BMO Seek Action

    Water Drainage Case Lacks Standing

    Welcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas City

    A Third of U.S. Homebuyers Are Bidding Sight Unseen

    A Recession Is Coming, But the Housing Market Won't Trigger It

    More Construction Defects for San Francisco’s Eastern Bay Bridge Expansion

    Contract, Breach of Contract, and Material Breach of Contract

    Dealing with Hazardous Substances on the Construction Site

    Texas contractual liability exclusion

    HB24-1014: A Warning Bell for Colorado Businesses Amid Potential Consumer Protection Changes

    Washington’s Court of Appeals Protects Contracting Parties’ Rights to Define the Terms of their Indemnity Agreements

    Hawaii Federal District Court Compels Appraisal

    ASCE Statement on House Failure to Pass the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2025

    Marlena Ellis Makes The Lawyers of Color Hot List of 2022

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    Cliff White Expands Insurance Litigation Team at Payne & Fears

    Lumber Liquidators’ Home-Testing Methods Get EPA Scrutiny

    Rising Construction Disputes Require Improved Legal Finance

    No Escape: California Court of Appeals Gives a Primary CGL Insurer’s “Other Insurance” Clause Two Thumbs Down

    Courthouse Reporter Series: The Travails of Statutory Construction...Defining “Labor” under the Miller Act

    Risk Associated with Design-Build Project Delivery Method

    2023 Construction Law Update

    Former NJ Army Base $2B Makeover is 'Buzzsaw' of Activity

    Is the Removal and Replacement of Nonconforming Work Economically Wasteful?

    The Activist Group Suing the Suburbs for Bigger Buildings

    Unpunished Racist Taunts: A Pennsylvania Harassment Case With No True 'Winner'

    The Murky Waters Between "Good Faith" and "Bad Faith"

    GIS and BIM Integration Will Transform Infrastructure Design and Construction

    Constructive Changes – A Primer

    Illinois Lawmakers Approve Carpenters Union's Legislation to Help Ensure Workers Are Paid What They're Owed

    No Coverage for Collapse of Building

    Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Faulty Work By Subcontractor Constitutes "Occurrence"

    Traub Lieberman Partner Adam Joffe Named to 2022 Emerging Lawyers List

    Economic Waste Doctrine and Construction Defects / Nonconforming Work

    Older Homes for Sale in California Now Come With Wildfire Warnings

    Is Privity of Contract with the Owner a Requirement of a Valid Mechanic’s Lien? Not for GC’s

    Eight Things You Need to Know About the AAA’s New Construction Arbitration Rules

    Three-Year Delay Not “Prompt Notice,” But Insurer Not “Appreciably Prejudiced” Either, New Jersey Court Holds

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 28 Years of Service!

    Florida SB 2022-736: Construction Defect Claims

    AIA Releases Decennial 2017 Updates to its Contracts Suites

    Fifth Circuit Requires Causal Distinction for Ensuing Loss Exception to Faulty Work Exclusion
    Corporate Profile

    EDISON OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction and design related expert designations, the Edison, Ohio Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. In connection with in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Edison and the surrounding areas.

    Edison Ohio construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessEdison Ohio engineering expert witnessEdison Ohio construction scheduling expert witnessEdison Ohio ada design expert witnessEdison Ohio expert witness concrete failureEdison Ohio reconstruction expert witnessEdison Ohio architectural engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Edison, Ohio

    Document Everything! Always! No Exceptions! (AKA, Help Your Lawyer Help You!)

    April 14, 2026 —
    I had a case last year in which once again I found myself thinking: if only my client had better documented the verbal agreements, we would have had a much easier time defending his work. I know this is often easier said than done— you are in the middle of building a project, and you get a call, and you need to keep the project moving. No time for written change directives or a special bulletin. And yet—it is simply amazing to me the number of people who develop “litigation amnesia” about things when a lawsuit is involved. Your documentation system does not need to be perfect. You can use a simple Field notebook and handwritten notations. A text memo to yourself or, better yet, an email confirmation to the owner/contractor/whoever. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Ragsdale Liggett PLLC
    Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

    Location, Location, Location — But Which One? The Few Words in Your Construction Contract that Pick Where You Fight

    June 29, 2026 —
    Most professionals know the old real estate line: location, location, location. It turns out to be just as true for construction contracts as it is for property. Consider a recent case involving a project owner that hired two design firms for a project. When issues arose during construction, the owner sued the design firms in state court in Brazoria County, Texas, pursuant to the forum selection clause in the parties’ contracts. The defendants then removed the case to the federal district court in Galveston, a courthouse in a different county. But the owner wanted the case back in Brazoria County state court. Whether it got its wish came down to two words in the contract: “situated in.” This article is about words like those. A construction contract’s forum selection clause names the place for the fight nobody plans to have, and where that fight happens can shape how it goes. This article explains why the wording in your forum selection clause deserves careful reading before you sign a construction contract. It is not a deep dive into the mechanics of federal removal jurisdiction, and it is not an academic comparison of the terms “forum” and “venue.” Instead, it is a practical look at how courts actually read these clauses, so the location of a future fight is the one you intended. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brad Sands, Jones Walker, LLP
    Mr. Sands may be contacted at bsands@joneswalker.com

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    IRMI Expert Commentary: NY Highest Court Confronts Downstream Risk Transfer for Subcontractor Bodily Injury Claims

    March 17, 2026 —
    Originally published on IRMI.com, copyright 2026 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. Subcontractor employee bodily injury claims (so-called action over claims) are a staple of construction risk management in the Empire State—so much so that the phrase “labor law” instinctively invites a shudder among the most experienced general contractors. The savvy among them intensely monitor case law developments and the evolution of the insurance market to ensure a cutting-edge, meticulously developed downstream risk transfer plan. And when guidance arrives from an appellate-level court, it’s a moment to take note. This is one of those moments. In late 2025, New York’s highest court—the NY Court of Appeals—had the rare opportunity to examine an all-too-routine bodily injury fact pattern and took the opportunity to closely examine the scope of contractual indemnity and its interplay with additional insured coverage in Dibrino v. Rockefeller Center N., Inc., 2025 N.Y. Slip Op. 07077, 2025 WL 3670593 (Ct. App. Dec. 18, 2025). Reprinted courtesy of Gregory D. Podolak, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Alexander G. Hopkins, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Mr. Podolak may be contacted at GPodolak@sdvlaw.com Mr. Hopkins may be contacted at AHopkins@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Five Payne & Fears Attorneys Named 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers

    March 10, 2026 —
    Five Payne & Fears attorneys have been named to the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers list in recognition of their work across a range of practice areas. This honor reflects their dedication to their clients, depth of experience, and the high standard of service they bring to every matter. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears LLP

    Pulling the Plug, Preserving the Product: Protecting Rights to a Modular Subcontractor’s Work Post-Termination

    June 08, 2026 —
    Volumetric Modular Construction (VMC) is a building method where a structure is divided into large components or modules, fabricated in an offsite factory and then transported to a construction site for assembly.[1] Proponents of VMC hail it as a cost-efficient alternative to traditional building methods that leads to more consistent quality and shorter construction duration.[2] Due to a growing labor shortage, high demand for compressed project schedules, and stagnant construction productivity rates, the construction industry is embracing VMC.[3] A recent report on the market size of prefabricated construction estimates that from 2026 to 2031, VMC will grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.16% and become a 413.11-billion-dollar industry.[4] As VMC becomes more prevalent, owners, general contractors, and subcontractors must consider how to effectively contract for modular construction. One important consideration, which this article focuses on, is navigating termination of a modular subcontractor. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Paul Williamson, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Williamson may be contacted at pwilliamson@pecklaw.com

    A Couple of Mechanic’s Lien Bills in VA [UPDATED]

    February 23, 2026 —
    Well, its that time of year again, the Virginia General Assembly is in session and looking to make changes to all kinds of things here in the Commonwealth. While most of those changes are well outside of the subject of Construction Law Musings, changes to the mechanic’s lien statutes certainly are not. This year, the Virginia General Assembly is poised to make some big changes if certain legislation gets out of committee and passes the legislature, a description and some comments on these follow: HB752 – Mechanics’ liens; liens attaching to property; memorandum of lien. [Original Description] Removes the exclusion of the attachment of a mechanic’s lien to property improved or repaired when the lien is based on a claim for repairs or existing structures. The bill further removes (i) the ability of a lien claimant to file any number of memoranda of lien including the details relating to the lien and (ii) the provisions of the Code specifying that no memorandum filed shall include sums due for (a) labor or materials furnished more than 150 days prior to the last day labor was performed or (b) material furnished to the job preceding the filing of such memorandum. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    New Year’s Resolution: Engineering the “Tee-Up Day” for Complex Construction Mediations

    February 17, 2026 —
    The construction industry is defined by its commitment to "Critical Path" scheduling. From the moment a project breaks ground, every stakeholder—from the MEP sub to the owner’s rep—is focused on sequencing. We know that you cannot hang drywall before the rough-in is inspected, and you cannot pour a slab-on-grade until the vapor barrier is verified. Yet, when these projects devolve into litigation, the legal community often abandons the logic of sequencing. We rush headlong into "The Mediation Day"—a high-stakes, expensive, one-day marathon where we expect dozens of parties, hundreds of insurance layers, and thousands of pages of expert reports to magically align into a settlement by 6:00 PM. As we open our calendars for the new year, it is time for a professional resolution. We must stop treating mediation as a single-day event and start treating it as a managed, sequenced process. The centerpiece of this resolution is the “Tee-Up Day.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Joël Bertet, ResolveBertet
    Mr. Bertet may be contacted at joel@resolvebertet.com