BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    hospital construction expert witness Greene County Ohio custom homes expert witness Greene County Ohio custom home expert witness Greene County Ohio retail construction expert witness Greene County Ohio tract home expert witness Greene County Ohio institutional building expert witness Greene County Ohio multi family housing expert witness Greene County Ohio landscaping construction expert witness Greene County Ohio high-rise construction expert witness Greene County Ohio housing expert witness Greene County Ohio condominiums expert witness Greene County Ohio office building expert witness Greene County Ohio concrete tilt-up expert witness Greene County Ohio condominium expert witness Greene County Ohio Medical building expert witness Greene County Ohio industrial building expert witness Greene County Ohio production housing expert witness Greene County Ohio casino resort expert witness Greene County Ohio mid-rise construction expert witness Greene County Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness Greene County Ohio structural steel construction expert witness Greene County Ohio townhome construction expert witness Greene County Ohio
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Greene County, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Greene County Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tri-County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3645
    PO Box 643
    Lancaster, OH 43130
    http://www.tricountyhomebuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Dayton
    Local # 3630
    One Chamber Plaza Ste 100 B
    Dayton, OH 45402
    http://www.hbadayton.com

    Clark County Chapter
    Local # 3673
    PO Box 1047
    Springfield, OH 45501
    http://www.biacc.org/

    Ohio Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 3600
    17 S High Street Ste 700
    Columbus, OH 43215
    http://www.ohiohba.com

    Home Builders Association of Washington County
    Local # 3657
    PO Box 1048
    Marietta, OH 45750


    Home Builders Association of Miami County
    Local # 3682
    1200 Archer Dr
    Troy, OH 45373
    http://HBAMiamiCounty.com

    Building Industry Association of South Central OH
    Local # 3618
    545 Vine Street
    Chillicothe, OH 45601



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Greene County Ohio

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    Thanks for Four Years of Recognition from JD Supra’s Readers’ Choice Awards

    Manhattan Condo Resale Prices Reach Record High

    These Roads Aren’t Built for Wilder Weather Driven by Climate Change

    Department of Transportation Revises Its Rules Affecting Environmental Review of Transportation Projects

    RCW 60.30 – Contract Considerations

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    New York State Trial Court: Non-Cumulation Provision in Excess Policies Mandates “All Sums” Allocation

    Contractors Sued for Slip

    Kiewit Selected for Rebuild of Collapsed Baltimore Bridge

    Los Angeles Tower Halted Over Earthquake and other Concerns

    Ensuing Loss Provision Does Not Salvage Coverage

    Apartment Construction Ominously Nears 25-Year High

    London’s Best Districts Draw Buyers on Italian Triple Dip

    The Hunton Policyholder’s Guide to Artificial Intelligence: SEC’s Recent AI-Washing Claims Present D&O Risks, Potential Coverage Challenges

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    Rebuilding the West: Construction Considerations After the Smoke Clears

    Nine Haight Attorneys Selected for Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch 2021

    California Supreme Court Rules Developers can be Required to Include Affordable Housing

    Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Bars Coverage for Collapse of Building

    No Coverage for Alleged Misrepresentation Claim

    False Implied Certifications in Making Payment Requests: What We Can Learn from Lance Armstrong

    Force Majeure Recommendations

    New Survey Reveals Overwhelmingly Optimistic Results on the Use of AI in Construction

    Hawaiian Electric Finalizes $2 Billion Maui Fire Settlement

    AI – A Designer’s Assistant or a Replacement?

    World’s Biggest Crane Gets to Work at British Nuclear Plant

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/8/26) – Data Centers Negotiate Flexibility for Speed, Hotel Deal Activities Focus on Luxury, and DC Sues Apartment Owners

    Court Dismisses Coverage Action In Lieu of Pending State Case

    The Activist Group Suing the Suburbs for Bigger Buildings

    Insured's Experts Excluded, But Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment Denied

    Colorado Rejects Bill to Shorten Statute of Repose

    New York State Legislature Reintroduces Bills to Extend Mortgage Recording Tax to Mezzanine Debt and Preferred Equity

    What California’s COVID-19 Reopening Means for the Construction Industry

    Update Regarding McMillin Albany LLC v. Super Ct.

    Illinois Supreme Court Rules Labor Costs Not Depreciated to Determine Actual Cash Value

    Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2025 Edition of Chambers USA

    Appraisal May Include Cause of Loss Issues

    Insurer Wrongfully Denies Coverage When Household Member Fails to Submit to EUO

    Rhode Island Finds Pollution Exclusion Ambiguous, Orders Coverage for Home Heating Oil Leak

    Facts about Chinese Drywall in Construction

    Is A Miller Act Payment Bond Surety Bound by A Default or Default Judgment Against Its Principal?

    The Biggest Change to the Mechanics Lien Law Since 1963

    Las Vegas Team Obtains Complete Dismissal of a Traumatic Brain Injury Claim

    Are Proprietary Specifications Illegal?

    Defining Catastrophic Injury Claims

    Trump Budget Would Slash Some Construction Spending, Boost Transportation Projects

    Construction Lien Needs to Be Recorded Within 90 Days from Lienor’s Final Furnishing

    Time to Repair Nevada’s Construction Defect Laws?

    Louisiana Couple Sues over Defects in Foreclosed Home
    Corporate Profile

    GREENE COUNTY OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 general contracting and design related expert designations, the Greene County, Ohio Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Greene County region.

    Greene County Ohio architect expert witnessGreene County Ohio building envelope expert witnessGreene County Ohio expert witness roofingGreene County Ohio slope failure expert witnessGreene County Ohio fenestration expert witnessGreene County Ohio architectural expert witnessGreene County Ohio expert witness windows
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Greene County, Ohio

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    September 01, 2026 —
    The Michigan Court of Appeals found the insured was not covered for water damage because the commercial space was left vacant. Cherry Hill Recreation Center, Inc. v. Conifer Ins Co., 2026 Mich, App. LEXIS 5099 (Mich Ct. App. June 18, 2026). Alan Abbas purchased a bowling alley. Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and executive orders issued by the governor, Abbas was unable to operate the bowling center for several months. During the winter, Abbas allowed the thermostat to drop significantly, with the building expected to be around 43 degrees Fahrenheit. He later admitted the sprinkler system’s pipes were not protected against freezing. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    The Grenfell & Champlain Towers: Risk Management Considerations in the Wake of Catastrophic Loss — A UK/US Comparison

    June 02, 2026 —
    1. Introduction As part of the multinational collaborative relationship between Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Fenchurch Law, we continually find ourselves in conversations about the sometimes subtle but sometimes drastic differences between risk management and coverage considerations from one country to the next. These differences are often highlighted by the fallout from large catastrophic losses that are widely publicized and illuminate sometimes widespread risks and perils that many others may be facing in the coming years. The response of governments and their subdivisions to the needs of victims and/or commercial parties, and insurance markets’ evaluation of and reactions to catastrophic losses vary widely from country to country and jurisdiction. In this article, we discuss these responses and reactions in the cases of the Grenfell Tower Fire in London, England, and the Champlain Tower collapse in Surfside, Florida, within the United States. These two widely publicized losses involved different risk management and insurance considerations based on where they occurred. They also saw substantially different government responses and raised varied questions about what the next steps are for their respective commercial and insurance markets. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at EClarkson@sdvlaw.com

    Kamran Salour Named to Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries List

    June 02, 2026 —
    Orange County Partner and Data Privacy & Cybersecurity Practice Co-Chair Kamran Salour was named to the Los Angeles Times' 2026 Legal Visionaries list, which honors the most innovative attorneys in Southern California. In announcing this year's Legal Visionaries, the Times said that Mr. Salour and his co-honorees "distinguish themselves not only through skilleand results but through an unwavering commitment to their clients, their craft and the communities they serve." "Their paths – shaped by rigorous education, defining cases and purposeful leadership – offer a deeper perspective on what sets true standouts apart," the Times' announcement stated. "Together, these visionaries exemplify a forward-thinking approach to the law, elevating both their profession and the people who depend on it." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (8/5/26) – Data Centers Reshape Hotel Demand, AI Changes Construction Workflows and Global Tariffs Raise CRE Construction Costs

    August 16, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, AI creates new real estate play for VCs, Wall Street sells more rental homes, builders capitalize on flood of water projects and more!
    • Data center construction has the potential to be a significant opportunity for extended stay hotels in the near and long term, provided sustainable demand patterns exist within a given market. (Jenna Graber, Hotel Dive)
    • Artificial intelligence doesn’t represent an “extinction event” for AEC firms, but it will fundamentally change the way construction pros streamline certain tasks. (Matthew Thibault, Construction Dive)
    • With the 21st Century ROAD to Housing now law, there are a number of outstanding questions about implementation and compliance for multifamily pros. (Julie Strupp, Multifamily Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    April 14, 2026 —
    The ownership and licensing of design documents in professional services agreements play a significant role in protecting the interests of the design professional and the project owner during and after project completion. The ownership or licensing of the drawings provision typically outlines who owns the drawings and specifications, who can use the documents, and how the documents can be used during and after the project. Project owners and developers should understand that payment for design services does not automatically transfer ownership or an exclusive right to use the professional design. Under U.S. copyright law, the default rule is that the design professional retains ownership of the instruments of service absent a contractual provision transferring ownership or a license. See 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. The Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act provides that copyright protection applies to “pictorial, graphic and sculptural works” and includes “architectural works.” 17 U.S.C. § 102. A design professional may only transfer copyright ownership in writing. 17 U.S.C. § 204(a). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Abby Dvorkin, Snell & Wilmer
    Ms. Dvorkin may be contacted at advorkin@swlaw.com

    Insurer Cannot Dispose of Water Leak or Bad Faith Claims on Motion for Summary Judgment

    July 20, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for summary judgment seeking to eliminate the insured’s claims for damage from a water leak, bad faith and punitive damages failed. Nargizyan v, State Farm General Ins. Co., 2026 Cal App. LEXIS 302 (Cal. Ct. App. April 15, 2026). The insured noticed tiles on his kitchen floor were warmer than usual. He found water dripping from the top of the crawl space under the house. He noticed water was “dripping in different places” but not pouring like a faucet. “There were too many places to count where water was dripping and there was water all over the place.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    May 26, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – May 14, 2026 - Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer Dillion has been ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 guide and recognized as a leading firm in Litigation: General Commercial for Orange County. Newmeyer Dillion was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of the firm’s experience, expertise and caliber of talent where the firm stood out for its exceptional work and is recognized in Litigation: General Commercial. Managing Partner Paul Tetzloff expressed the firm's gratitude: “It is an honor for our firm to be recognized by Chambers and Partners in their Spotlight California 2026 guide. This acknowledgment reflects our commitment to providing high quality legal services tailored to the unique needs of our clients.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois