BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Mount Hope Ohio retail construction expert witness Mount Hope Ohio townhome construction expert witness Mount Hope Ohio housing expert witness Mount Hope Ohio custom home expert witness Mount Hope Ohio Subterranean parking expert witness Mount Hope Ohio casino resort expert witness Mount Hope Ohio structural steel construction expert witness Mount Hope Ohio hospital construction expert witness Mount Hope Ohio multi family housing expert witness Mount Hope Ohio custom homes expert witness Mount Hope Ohio mid-rise construction expert witness Mount Hope Ohio production housing expert witness Mount Hope Ohio Medical building expert witness Mount Hope Ohio parking structure expert witness Mount Hope Ohio high-rise construction expert witness Mount Hope Ohio office building expert witness Mount Hope Ohio tract home expert witness Mount Hope Ohio low-income housing expert witness Mount Hope Ohio industrial building expert witness Mount Hope Ohio condominiums expert witness Mount Hope Ohio condominium expert witness Mount Hope Ohio
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mount Hope, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mount Hope Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3656
    PO Box 363
    Rockford, OH 45882


    East Central OH Building Industry Association
    Local # 3664
    706 E. Shafer Ave
    Dover, OH 44622
    http://www.eco-bia.com

    Building Industry Association of North Central OH
    Local # 3651
    1183 Lexington Avenue
    Mansfield, OH 44907
    http://www.biancohio.com

    West Central Buckeye Builders Association
    Local # 3648
    1520 Allentown Rd
    Lima, OH 45805
    http://WWW.WESTCENTRALOHIOBUILDERS.COM

    Home Builders Association of Wayne and Holmes Cos
    Local # 3690
    4973 Cleveland Rd Suite A
    Wooster, OH 44691
    http://whhba.com

    Building Industry Association of Stark County
    Local # 3615
    4344 Metro Cir NW
    North Canton, OH 44720
    http://www.biastark.com

    Shelby County Builders Association
    Local # 3670
    PO Box 534
    Sidney, OH 45365
    http://www.shelbybuild.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mount Hope Ohio

    ARUP, Rethinking Green Infrastructure

    Meet BWBO’s 2024 San Diego Super Lawyers Rising Stars!

    NYC’s First Five-Star Hotel in Decade Seen at One57 Tower

    Hunton Insurance Practice Receives Top (Tier 1) National Ranking by US News & World Report

    Insured's Testimony On Expectation of Coverage Deemed Harmless

    Maryland Court Affirms Condo Association’s Right to Sue for Construction Defects

    Contractor Sues License Board

    Washington School District Sues Construction Company Over Water Pipe Damage

    Five Years of Great Legal Blogging at Insurance Law Hawaii

    Florida Insurance Legislation Alert - Part I

    Hunton Insurance Recovery Partner Michael Levine Quoted on Why Courts Must Consider the Science of COVID-19

    Construction in Indian Country – What You Need To Know About Sovereign Immunity

    Construction Defect Lawsuit Came too Late in Minnesota

    No Additional Insured Coverage Under Umbrella Policy

    Emotional Distress Damages Not Distinct from “Annoyance and Discomfort” Damages in Case Arising from 2007 California Wildfires

    Contractors and Force Majeure: Contractual Protection from Hurricanes and Severe Weather

    Condo Developers Buy in Washington despite Construction Defect Litigation

    Shutdowns? What A Covid-19-Safe Construction Site Looks Like

    Co-Founding Partner Jason Feld Named Finalist for CLM’s Outside Defense Counsel Professional of the Year

    Environmental Update: Regulatory Notes – April 2025

    Florida Passes Tort Reform Bill

    Denver Officials Clamor for State Construction Defect Law

    Policy Sublimit Does Not Apply to Business Interruption Loss

    Breath of Fresh Air

    California Judicial Council Votes to Rescind Prohibitions on Eviction and Foreclosure Proceedings

    California Court of Appeal Holds a Tenant Owes No Duty to Protect a Social Guest From a Defective Sidewalk Leading to a Condominium Unit

    Construction May Begin with Documents, but It Shouldn’t End That Way

    Jury Awards Aluminum Company 35 Million in Time Element Losses

    Is Your Home Improvement Contract Putting You At Risk?

    Couple Gets $79,000 on $10 Million Construction Defect Claim

    Big News for “Smaller” Construction Cases

    Sweat the Small Stuff – Don’t Overlook These Three (3) Clauses When Negotiating Your Construction Contract

    Unjust Enrichment Damages Must Be Measurable and Quantifiable

    No Damage for Delay? No Problem: Exceptions to the Enforceability of No Damage for Delay Clauses

    Construction Defect Litigation at San Diego’s Alicante Condominiums?

    Do You Have the Receipt? Pennsylvania Court Finds Insufficient Evidence That Defendant Sold the Product

    Force Majeure and COVID-19 in Construction Contracts – What You Need to Know

    Possible Real Estate and Use and Occupancy Tax Relief for Philadelphia Commercial and Industrial Property Owners

    Contractual Waiver of Consequential Damages

    New California Employment Laws Affect the Construction Industry for 2019

    A Survey of New Texas Environmental Laws

    Lien Waivers Should Be Fair — And Efficient

    Governor Murphy Approves Legislation Implementing Public-Private Partnerships in New Jersey

    Miorelli Doctrine’s Sovereign Immunity in Public Construction Contracts — Not the Be-All and End-All

    Florida’s Citizens Property Insurance May Be Immune From Bad Faith, But Is Not Immune From Consequential Damages

    Speak Now or Forever Sign That Release – Part 1

    Hurricane Claim Cannot Survive Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Design-build Trends, Challenges and Risk Mitigation

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment on Water Damage Claims
    Corporate Profile

    MOUNT HOPE OHIO CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand general contracting and design related expert designations, the Mount Hope, Ohio Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. Utilizing captive assets which comprise construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Mount Hope and the surrounding areas.

    Mount Hope Ohio construction expert witness public projectsMount Hope Ohio construction claims expert witnessMount Hope Ohio architect expert witnessMount Hope Ohio structural engineering expert witnessesMount Hope Ohio construction expertsMount Hope Ohio fenestration expert witnessMount Hope Ohio building expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mount Hope, Ohio

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    February 23, 2026 —
    Just 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    May 26, 2026 —
    PHOENIX, May 19, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- A Maricopa County court has entered a $323 million compensatory damages judgment in favor of Gray Development Group against ZOM Holding Inc., doing business as ZOM Living, following a 12-day trial, a unanimous jury verdict and post-trial proceedings related to a proposed business transaction. The jury found ZOM liable on claims of breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing stemming from a proposed joint venture tied to a planned pipeline of luxury multifamily and commercial projects in Phoenix and Scottsdale. The lawsuit centered on a 13-project, $1.4 billion development pipeline originated and planned by Gray Development Group over more than a decade. In 2019, Gray invited Florida-based ZOM to participate in a joint venture involving the completion of five projects, which would have marked ZOM's entry into the Arizona market. According to court findings presented at trial, the companies entered into a mutual confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement before Gray shared extensive sensitive and proprietary information related to the projects, including planning, market analysis, costs, financial data, local business relationships and operational strategies developed by Gray over decades in Arizona. Evidence presented during trial showed that over a 10-month period while under contract, ZOM made hundreds of requests for confidential project and market information before circumventing Gray and pursuing the projects independently, ultimately displacing Gray from projects it spent years planning and developing. ZOM Living, headquartered in Orlando, develops multifamily and senior housing communities across the United States and operates regional offices in Boston, Dallas, Fort Lauderdale, Nashville, Phoenix, and Raleigh. ZOM is owned by Timeless Investments, the Amsterdam-based family office of Dutch businessman Hans van Veggel, which acquired the company in 1997. About Gray Development Group Gray Development Group was founded by architect Bruce Gray in 1991. The Phoenix-based company was the top-ranked multifamily developer in Arizona for more than a decade. The company designed and developed more than 15,000 apartment and condominium units throughout metropolitan Phoenix. Two Gray-designed developments — a Tempe midrise and a San Diego high-rise — received National Apartment Community of the Year awards.

    Massachusetts Construction Industry Continues to Wait While Prompt Payment Law Is Put to the Test

    March 31, 2026 —
    Earlier this month, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) heard argument in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co. et al., a dispute concerning the state’s Prompt Payment Act (PPA). Although a decision has yet to be issued, it could potentially pose widespread implications for high-value private construction projects moving forward – and perhaps backwards. The PPA, G. L. c. 149, § 29E, enacted by the Massachusetts Legislature in 2010, has become a keystone in the construction industry. It was enacted to address, in part, downstream cash flow issues that tend to pervade construction projects by mandating a series of strict guidelines for submitting, and responding to, payment applications for private projects valued over $3,000,000. Amongst these requirements are set timeframes to respond to an application, as well as what must be contained in an application rejection. Critically, if an owner or upper-tier contractor fails to fully comply with all the statutory requirements in response to a proper payment application, the application is automatically “deemed to be approved” and payable. Significantly, however, this is not always the end of the line. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Catherine Maronski, Robinson Cole
    Ms. Maronski may be contacted at cmaronski@rc.com

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Chambers USA Recognizes Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Practice in 2026 Guide

    June 29, 2026 —
    Hunton is pleased to announce that its insurance coverage practice was recognized nationally for Insurance: Dispute Resolution – Policyholder in the recently released 2026 Chambers USA guide. The team also received state rankings in Florida (Insurance: Dispute Resolution), Georgia (Insurance), the District of Columbia (Insurance: Policyholder), and Massachusetts (Insurance). In addition to the insurance team’s group recognition across multiple states, the 2026 guide included individual rankings for Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters (USA Nationwide and District of Columbia), Latosha M. Ellis (District of Columbia), Michael S. Levine (District of Columbia), Koorosh “KT” Talieh (District of Columbia), Walter J. Andrews (Florida), Andrea DeField (Florida), Cary D. Steklof (Florida), Lawrence J. Bracken II (Georgia), and Geoffrey B. Fehling (Massachusetts). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Florida's Third DCA Reasserts the Teeth of Chapter 558 and the Future of Construction Defect Litigation

    February 23, 2026 —
    The case of Moss & Associates, LLC v. Daystar Peterson and Brickell Heights East Condominium Association, Inc. represents a quiet but significant correction in Florida construction law litigation. The Florida Third District Court of Appeal granted a petition for writ of certiorari and quashed a trial court order that denied a contractor's motion to stay litigation under Chapter 558, Florida Statutes. Though procedurally narrow, the ruling reflects an increasingly assertive appellate stance. Chapter 558's pre-suit notice and right-to-repair process is mandatory, jurisdictional in effect, and not subject to dilution by trial-level discretion. At its core, the opinion reinforces a foundational principle. Florida intends for construction defect disputes to be managed, investigated, and often resolved before they reach a courtroom. The Third DCA's insistence on strict statutory compliance signals to trial courts, and to the plaintiffs' bar, that procedural shortcuts will not be tolerated. Reprinted courtesy of Ryan C. Brooks, Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP and Keith G. Salhab, Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Mr. Brooks may be contacted at rbrooks@wshblaw.com Mr. Salhab may be contacted at ksalhab@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com