Introducing the Updated 2026 Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers
June 08, 2026 —
Gravel2Gavel Team - Gravel2Gavel Construction & Real Estate Law BlogSince the initial publication of the Pillsbury Guide to Data Centers in 2025, the market has continued to evolve—most notably with respect to power availability, energy strategy, tax and incentives planning, and investment activity across the sector. While many of the legal, commercial and regulatory frameworks addressed in the original Guide remain durable and relevant, recent developments warranted targeted updates and additions.
The
2026 edition expands and updates our energy-focused content to reflect the increasingly central role of power procurement, interconnection and long-term energy strategy in data center development. We have incorporated new materials addressing power purchase and interconnection agreements, solar and other renewable energy solutions, advanced reactor designs, and nuclear-powered data centers projects, including an updated project tracker. We have also added new analysis covering state and local tax considerations and incentive structures relevant to data center development and operations, as well as current M&A and private equity trends shaping investment in the sector.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Gravel2Gavel Team
Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements
June 29, 2026 —
Jill Casson Owen, Benjamin J. Hawkins & Stephen Wright - Snell & WilmerA Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026)
OVERVIEW
The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law).
KEY HOLDINGS
1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings
The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session.
Reprinted courtesy of
Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer,
Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and
Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer
Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com
Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com
Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com
Read the full story...
U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional
April 27, 2026 —
Christopher Olsen & Phillip Boldt - ConsensusDocsTo deter frivolous and unfounded claims against design professionals, states throughout the country have enacted statutes which generally require litigants to furnish a formal certification of merit (“COM”) from a qualified expert or face potential dismissal of their lawsuit. These COM statutes can impose a significant front-end burden on claimants who must pay an expert to review project records, interview the project team, and prepare a formal report before the lawsuit can be filed—often regardless of the amount in controversy. However, in light of a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a medical malpractice case, most, if not all of these statutes, may no longer be enforceable in federal court. This article examines the recent decision in Berk v. Choy, 146 S. Ct. 546 (2026), the decisions thus far which have applied Berk to invalidate COM statutes, and other categories of statutes applicable to the construction industry which may face a similar fate.
The U.S. Supreme Court Decision (Berk v. Choy)
In Berk, the plaintiff, Harold Berk, sued a doctor for medical malpractice under Delaware law in Delaware federal court. 146 S. Ct. at 551. Under Del. Code, Tit. 18, § 6853(a)(1), an affidavit of merit (like a COM) must accompany a complaint alleging medical malpractice. Id. Berk failed to include an affidavit of merit with his complaint. Id. at 552. Applying Delaware state law, the federal court dismissed Berk’s medical malpractice claim. Berk appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that the affidavit of merit required by § 6853(a)(1) is unenforceable in federal court because it is more onerous than the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court’s ruling, finding § 6853(a)(1) enforceable in federal court.
Reprinted courtesy of
Christopher Olsen, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and
Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
Mr. Olsen may be contacted at colsen@pecklaw.com
Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com
Read the full story...
Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak
March 24, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiApplying California law, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that water damage caused by a leaking pipe over time was not covered under the insured’s homeowners’ policy. Mojica v. State Farm General Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 32405 (9th Cir. Dec. 11, 2025).
A small hole, slightly larger than a pen tip in size, developed in a pressurized hot water pipe. The resulting leak lasted for nearly six days and released enough water to saturate and ruin all the subflooring and flooring in the insureds’ home.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
The Most Expensive Signature to Not Get: Why Change Orders Matter
August 16, 2026 —
Kathryne E. Baldwin - Wilke FleuryGeorge Bernard Shaw has a quote we use a lot in my family: “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.” This is pertinent to contractors and homeowners alike because the cost of failing to get proper signatures on documents like construction contracts, and particularly, change orders, is heavy. Both contractors and homeowners are in the same boat as far as wanting to complete a job as swiftly as possible: contractors go on to their next job and homeowners can return to peace in their home. This is prime territory for either party to suggest the work be completed today and the contract or change order executed tomorrow, or even later. However, without a contract, there is no memorialization of the communication between the parties, which can lead to confusion and missed expectations on both sides.
Construction plans are rarely as neat and tidy as they originally seem to be. A contractor may uncover unforeseen conditions, an owner may request additional work or changes that require additional work, or weather interferes with project schedules or the work itself. Unfortunately, the signature that never gets collected can become one of the most expensive omissions on a project – for both sides.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Kathryne E. Baldwin, Wilke FleuryMs. Baldwin may be contacted at
kbaldwin@wilkefleury.com
Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and Businesses
May 12, 2026 —
Tred R. Eyerly - Insurance Law HawaiiThe recent Kona Low storms that hit all islands were devastating, causing significant property damage. Homeowners and businesses will be seeking coverage under their insurance policies to recover for their losses. Here is a brief look at what may be covered and which exclusions may be troublesome in homeowners’ and commercial property policies.
Typically, both a homeowners’ policy and a commercial property policy include a grant of coverage for “direct physical loss of or damage to Covered Property.” Covered perils are listed, including such events as fire, lightning, or windstorm. Covered Property includes dwellings, other structures on the property and personal property. Additional coverages are usually provided. This includes debris removal after a peril insured against or collapse of a structure. In a homeowners’ policy, additional living expenses are likely covered when the damaged home is not fit to live in.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak HastertMr. Eyerly may be contacted at
te@hawaiilawyer.com
Did You Know: Unique Legal Considerations for Animal Care Facilities
August 24, 2026 —
Hannah Skidmore - Construction ExecutiveAnimal care facilities are highly specialized environments that require expertise far beyond traditional commercial or even standard medical construction. Whether designing and building animal shelters, doggy daycares, veterinary clinics or full-service animal hospitals, these facilities operate under conditions that introduce unique challenges related to sanitation, durability, animal behavior and operational workflows.
Because of these complexities, projects that fail to account for animal care requirements adequately often encounter costly issues—many of which result in litigation. Below are real-world examples drawn from expert witness work, followed by proactive best practices construction professionals should apply to future animal care projects.
Reprinted courtesy of
Hannah Skidmore, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved.
Read the full story...
Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand
May 14, 2026 —
Lawrence S. Glosser - Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLCSeattle is in the midst of a significant trans
Defects, Delays and Change OrdersHawaii Supreme Court Reaffirms an "Accident" Includes Reckless Conduct, Finds Green House Gases are Pollutants24/7 Wall Street Reported on Eight Housing Markets at All-Time HighsNorthern District of Mississippi Finds That Non-Work Property Damages Are Not Subject to AIA’s Waiver of Subrogation ClauseSafety Guidance for the Prevention of the Coronavirus on Construction SitesCalifornians Swarm Few Listings Cuts to Affordable HomesTen Firm Members Recognized as Super Lawyers or Rising StarsMetrostudy Shows New Subdivisions in MidwestAlaska Supreme Court Dismisses Claims of Uncooperative Pro Se Litigant in Defect CaseNewmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide9th Circuit Plumbs Through the Federal and State False Claims ActsAre Construction Defect Laws a Factor in Millennials Home Buying Decisions?AI in Construction: What Does It Mean for Our Contractors?The Housing Market Is Softening, But Home Depot and Lowe's Are Crushing ItContract Change #9: Owner’s Right to Carry Out the Work (law note)Las Vegas Team Obtains Complete Dismissal of a Traumatic Brain Injury ClaimFlorida Court Gives Parties Assigned a Subrogation Claim a Math LessonColorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal Adopts Horizontal Exhaustion RuleCal/OSHA’s Toolbox Has Significantly Expanded: A Look At Senate Bill 606Modified Plan Unveiled for Chicago's Sixth-Tallest TowerToll Brothers Shows how the Affluent Buyer is Driving Up Prices$109-Million Renovation Begins on LA's Willowbrook/Rosa Parks Station2019 Promotions - New Partners at HaightWindstorm Exclusion Found AmbiguousPay-If-Paid: What You Need to Know Before Signing on the Dotted LineSouth Adams County Water and Sanitation District Takes Proactive Step to Treat PFAS, Safeguard Water SuppliesLoan Snarl Punishes Spain Builder Backed by Soros, GatesJet Crash Blamed on Runway Construction DefectTraub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2023 Illinois Super Lawyers® and Rising StarsA Court-Side Seat: Appeals and Agency Developments at the Close of 2020Burlingame Construction Defect Case Heading to TrialRenovate or Demolish Milwaukee’s Historic City Hall?Know What’s Under Ground and Make Smarter Planning DecisionsMaryland Contractor Documents its Illegal Deal and Pays $2.15 Million to Settle Fraud ClaimsVirtual Reality for ConstructionUS Homes Face Costly Retrofits for Induction Stoves, EV ChargersFinding Insurer's Declaratory Relief Action Raises Unsettled Questions of State Law, Case is DismissedCalOSHA Updates its FAQ on its COVID-19 Emergency Temporary RegulationsManhattan Home Prices Top Pre-Crisis Record on Luxury DealsCourt Slams the Privette Door on Independent Contractor’s Bodily Injury ClaimApplying Jury Verdict Method in Quantifying Damages Due to Defective SpecificationsDOI Aims to Modernize its “Inefficient and Inflexible” Type A Natural Resource Damages Assessment RegulationsBOO! Running From Chainsaw Wielding Actor then Falling is an Inherent Risk of a Haunted AttractionCertificate of Merit to Sue Architects or Engineers Bill ProposedSubsequent Owners of Homes Again Have Right to Sue Builders for Construction DefectsCourt finds subcontractor responsible for defending claimEighth Circuit Considers Judicial Estoppel in Hazardous Substance Release-Related Personal Injury CaseClimate-Proofing Your Home: Upgrades to Weather a DroughtDon’t Be Lazy with Your TendersA Word to the Wise: The AIA Revised Contract Documents Could Lead to New and Unanticipated Risks - Part IIConstruction Defect Notice in the Mailbox? Respond AppropriatelyRuling Closes the Loop on Restrictive Additional Insured Endorsement – Reasonable Expectations of Insured Builder Prevails Over Intent of InsurerLouisiana Legislature Enacts Act 932 – Significant Changes to Insurer Bad-Faith Exposure for Failure to SettleGene Witkin Celebrates First Anniversary as Member of Ross Hart’s Mediation TeamHousing Starts in U.S. Drop to Lowest Level in Three MonthsSecond Circuit Denies Petitions for Review of EPA’s Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures
