BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    housing expert witness Ripley Oklahoma retail construction expert witness Ripley Oklahoma townhome construction expert witness Ripley Oklahoma mid-rise construction expert witness Ripley Oklahoma multi family housing expert witness Ripley Oklahoma Subterranean parking expert witness Ripley Oklahoma production housing expert witness Ripley Oklahoma structural steel construction expert witness Ripley Oklahoma high-rise construction expert witness Ripley Oklahoma condominiums expert witness Ripley Oklahoma Medical building expert witness Ripley Oklahoma tract home expert witness Ripley Oklahoma concrete tilt-up expert witness Ripley Oklahoma landscaping construction expert witness Ripley Oklahoma custom homes expert witness Ripley Oklahoma casino resort expert witness Ripley Oklahoma hospital construction expert witness Ripley Oklahoma parking structure expert witness Ripley Oklahoma institutional building expert witness Ripley Oklahoma industrial building expert witness Ripley Oklahoma low-income housing expert witness Ripley Oklahoma custom home expert witness Ripley Oklahoma
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ripley, Oklahoma

    Oklahoma Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ripley Oklahoma

    Resident electrical, mechanical, and plumbing contractors must be licensed. There are special requirements for non-resident contractors. See website for details.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Greater Tulsa
    Local # 3784
    11545 E 43rd St
    Tulsa, OK 74146
    http://www.tulsahba.com

    Home Builders Association of Stillwater
    Local # 3770
    PO Box 1715
    Stillwater, OK 74076
    http://www.stillwaterhba.com

    Rogers County Builders Association - Oklahoma
    Local # 3766
    PO Box 892
    Claremore, OK 74018
    http://www.rcbaclaremore.com

    Central Oklahoma Home Builders Association
    Local # 3749
    PO Box 14005
    Oklahoma City, OK 73114
    http://www.okchomebuilders.com

    Enid Home Builders Association
    Local # 3721
    PO Box 10446
    Enid, OK 73706


    Greater Sequoyah County Chapter
    Local # 3787
    2031 Breckenridge
    Sallisaw, OK 74955


    Oklahoma State Home Builders Association
    Local # 3700
    917 NE 63rd St
    Oklahoma City, OK 73105
    http://www.oshba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ripley Oklahoma

    Perspectives from Pioneers: Kenneth C. Gibbs

    U.S. Judge Says Wal-Mart Must Face Mexican-Bribe Claims

    Navigating Tariffs in Construction Contracts: Creative Strategies for Owners and Contractors

    The Administrative Procedure Act and the Evolution of Environmental Law

    Construction Resumes after Defects

    Legal Fallout Begins Over Delayed Edmonton Bridges

    Anatomy of a Data Center

    New York Court Finds No Coverage Owed for Asbestos Losses Because Insured Failed to Prove Material Terms

    Employee Exclusion Bars Coverage for Wrongful Death of Subcontractor's Employee

    Haight Brown & Bonesteel Ranked on the 2017 "Best Law Firms" List by U.S. News - Best Lawyers

    Weslaco, Texas Investigating Possible Fraudulent Contractor Invoices

    When is a Residential Subcontractor not Subject to the VCPA? Read to Find Out

    Mitigating the Consequences of Labor Unrest on Construction Projects

    Where Did That Punch List Term Come From Anyway?

    Working Safely With Silica: Health Hazards and OSHA Compliance

    Second Circuit Court Differentiates the Standard for Determining Evident Partiality for a Neutral Arbitrator and a Party-Appointed Arbitrator

    Orchestrating Bias: Arbitrator’s Undisclosed Membership in Philharmonic Group with Pauly Shore’s Attorney Not Grounds to Reverse Award in Real Estate Dispute

    Asserting Non-Disclosure Claim Involving Residential Real Property and Whether Facts Are “Readily Observable”

    Another Colorado Construction Defect Reform Bill Dies

    BWB&O Partner Jack Briscoe and Associate Anoushe Marandjian Win Summary Judgment Motion on Behalf of Homeowner Client!

    Arbitration and Mediation: What’s the Difference? What to Expect.

    Anti-Assignment Provision Unenforceable in Kentucky

    Understanding Insurance Disputes in Construction Defect Litigation: A Review of Acuity v. Kinsale

    Colorado House Bill 25-1261 Will Skyrocket Housing Costs — Here’s Why You Should Oppose It

    Is It Time to Revisit Construction Defects in Kentucky?

    Construction Managers, Are You Exposing Yourselves to Labor Law Liability?

    Chattanooga Bridge Collapse Likely Resulted From Impact

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (04/26/23) – The Energy Transition and a Bit of Brick-and-Mortar Blues

    A New Vision for Safety: Construction Safety Week’s Five-Year Plan

    COVID-19 Response: Key Legal Considerations for Event Cancellations

    New LA Home Designs, Reimagined By Fire

    America’s Bridges and the Need for Bridge Infrastructure Investment

    Report: 2023 NYC Crane Fire and Collapse Caused by Failed Hydraulic Hose

    District Court Awards Summary Judgment to Insurance Firm in Framing Case

    Savannah Homeowners Win Sizable Judgment in Mold Case against HVAC Contractor

    Duty to Defend Sorted Between Two Insurers Based Upon Lease and Policies

    UCF Sues Architects and Contractors Over Stadium Construction Defects

    Meet the Forum's In-House Counsel: KATE GOLDEN

    Considering Stormwater Management

    What is the True Value of Rooftop Solar Panels?

    HOA Has No Claim to Extend Statute of Limitations in Construction Defect Case

    Contingent Business Interruption Claim Denied

    Buyer's Demolishing of Insured's Home Not Barred by Faulty Construction Exclusion

    Preservationists Want to Save Penn Station. Yes, That Penn Station.

    Mega-Consulate Ties U.S. to Convicted Billionaire in Nigeria

    While Construction Permits Slowly Rise, Construction Starts and Completions in California Are Stagnant

    Vinny Testaverde Alleges $5 Million Mansion Riddled with Defects

    Colorado Senate Bill 15-177: This Year’s Attempt at Reasonable Construction Defect Reform

    Hurricane Ian: Florida Expedites Road Work as Damage Comes Into Focus

    Contractor Turns Former Sears Into Interim High School Following Palisades Wildfires
    Corporate Profile

    RIPLEY OKLAHOMA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Ripley, Oklahoma Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which include construction cost and scheduling experts, registered design professionals, forensic engineers, certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Ripley and the surrounding areas.

    Ripley Oklahoma structural engineering expert witnessesRipley Oklahoma construction safety expertRipley Oklahoma ada design expert witnessRipley Oklahoma construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessRipley Oklahoma expert witness roofingRipley Oklahoma contractor expert witnessRipley Oklahoma construction forensic expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ripley, Oklahoma

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Prevents Coverage for Collapse

    April 27, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment to the insurer after agreeing that the policy’s anti-concurrent causation clause barred coverage. Lido Hospitality, Inc. v. AIX Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 Iii. App. Unpub. LEXIS 133 (Ill. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026). One of the brick veneer walls of the Lido Motel collapsed during a windstorm. Lido reported the loss it its insurer, AIX. AIX investigated and determined that the brick veneer collapsed due to pervasive wear and tear and corrosion of the underlying infrastructure that secured the veneer- specifically the components that anchored or tied the masonry veneer to the underlying wooden substrate. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    373 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    October 06, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 373 of the firm’s attorneys were recently selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® including the prestigious “Lawyer of the Year” honors, and “Ones to Watch” list. Attorneys listed as Ones to Watch typically have been in practice for five to nine years. “Lawyer of the Year” recognition is awarded to individual lawyers with the highest overall peer-feedback for a specific practice area and geographic region. Only one lawyer is recognized for each practice area and location. The following Snell & Wilmer attorneys were named 2027 “Lawyer of the Year” award recipients: Cortland P. Andrews, Troy J. Aramburu, Brian L. Blaylock, M. Lawrence Brown, Brian D. Cunningham, Michael M. Donahey, Jason Ebe, Matthew P. Fischer, Brett W. Johnson, Nathan G. Kanute, William A. Kastin, Timothy J. Kay, James D. Kilroy, Joseph A. Kroeger, Matthew L. Lalli, John F. Lomax, Anne M. Meyer, Robin L. Miskell, Patrick J. Paul, Amit D. Ranade, and M. Roxanne Veliz. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies, communication failures and poor information management are emerging as some of the most common (and costly) reasons firms lose margins, miss deadlines or fail to secure repeat work. In data center construction, where schedules are compressed and tolerance for error is minimal, even small breakdowns in communication can have outsized consequences. Reprinted courtesy of Mike Lewis, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Louisiana Enacts Important Tort Reform Legislation

    May 12, 2026 —
    The Louisiana legislature enacted tort reform legislation in 2025 to address the increasing cost of insurance in Louisiana and to provide some predictability to the Louisiana legal system. While our colleagues, Jenny Michel and Jennifer Kretschmann, have provided an excellent and comprehensive analysis of the legislation in their article entitled “Louisiana State Legislature 2025 Regular Session: Tort Reform - Acts & Vetoed Insurance Bill,” which can be found here, this article examines the anticipated impact of the tort reform legislation on personal injury trials in federal and state courts in Louisiana. The most significant reform involves the institution of a modified defense of contributory negligence, which went into effect on January 1, 2026. Since 1996, Louisiana had operated as a pure comparative fault state; the liability of each party whose fault caused damages was to be allocated among the respective parties based upon their appropriate percentage of fault, regardless of the legal theory of liability asserted against each party. Thus, a plaintiff 55 percent at fault could recover 45 percent of their damages from the liable defendants. The 2025 Tort Reform Amendments now prohibit a plaintiff in a personal injury action from recovering any damages if they are found to be 51 percent or more at fault for their damages. The 55 percent at-fault party in the example above is now prohibited from recovering any damages from any party. Importantly, this new legislation now requires the trial court to instruct the jury that if they find a plaintiff to be more than 50 percent at fault, then the plaintiff will not recover any damages. Reprinted courtesy of Lee M. Peacocke, Lewis Brisbois and Benjamin Perkins, Lewis Brisbois Mr. Peacocke may be contacted at Lee.Peacocke@lewisbrisbois.com Mr. Perkins may be contacted at Benjamin.Perkins@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Construction Liens and the “Substantial Performance” Doctrine

    April 08, 2026 —
    In a recent case dealing with a construction lien, the driving issue was whether the air conditioning contractor “substantially performed” before recording its construction lien against residential property. The importance here pertains to the substantial performance doctrine with respect to construction liens. The Third District Court of Appeal explained, with relevant citations, this doctrine as follows: Under Florida law, a contractor is entitled to a mechanic’s lien if he complies with all provisions of Chapter 713, governing construction liens, and “has substantially performed the contract.” Grant v. Wester, 679 So. 2d 1301, 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quotation omitted); Langley v. Knowles, 958 So. 2d 1149, 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“The substantial performance doctrine recognizes that a contactor who complies with all of the provisions of the contactor’s lien statute is entitled to enforce a lien if he has substantially, but not completely, performed his contractual obligations.”). Substantial performance is performance “so nearly equivalent to what was bargained for that it would be unreasonable to deny the promisee the full contract price subject to the promisor’s right to recover whatever damages may have been occasioned him by the promisee’s failure to render full performance.” Ocean Ridge Dev. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc., 247 So. 2d 72, 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com