BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Ashland Oregon tract home expert witness Ashland Oregon parking structure expert witness Ashland Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Ashland Oregon production housing expert witness Ashland Oregon custom home expert witness Ashland Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Ashland Oregon condominiums expert witness Ashland Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Ashland Oregon housing expert witness Ashland Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Ashland Oregon Medical building expert witness Ashland Oregon retail construction expert witness Ashland Oregon townhome construction expert witness Ashland Oregon casino resort expert witness Ashland Oregon custom homes expert witness Ashland Oregon low-income housing expert witness Ashland Oregon multi family housing expert witness Ashland Oregon hospital construction expert witness Ashland Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Ashland Oregon office building expert witness Ashland Oregon condominium expert witness Ashland Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ashland, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ashland Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Curry County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3851
    PO Box 1689
    Brookings, OR 97415


    Home Builders Association of Jackson County
    Local # 3836
    1006 E Jackson St
    Medford, OR 97504
    http://www.hbajc.com

    Klamath Basin Home Builders Association
    Local # 3855
    205 Riverside Drive Ste G
    Klamath Falls, OR 97601
    http://www.kbhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Josephine Cty Oregon
    Local # 3848
    223 NE B St Ste B
    Grants Pass, OR 97526
    http://www.homebuildersofjoco.com

    Umpqua Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3816
    3000 Stewart Parkway Suite 206
    Roseburg, OR 97471
    http://www.umpquavalleyhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern Oregon
    Local # 3888
    PO Box 696
    Coos Bay, OR 97420
    http://www.hbaswo.org

    Central Oregon Builders Association
    Local # 3810
    61396 S Hwy 97 Ste 203
    Bend, OR 97702
    http://www.coba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ashland Oregon

    Certified Question Asks Hawaii Supreme Court to Determine Coverage for Allegations of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

    New WA Law Caps Retainage on Private Projects at 5%

    Limitation on Coverage for Payment of Damages Creates Ambiguity

    Absence of Property Damage During Policy Period Equates to No Coverage

    Subsurface Water Exclusion Found Unambiguous

    Proving & Defending Lost Profit Damages

    Illinois Federal Court Determines if Damages Are Too Remote

    GRSM Houston Office Recognized as Outstanding Diverse Organization by Houston Business Journal

    Settlement Reached in Bridge Failure Lawsuit

    Contractor’s Assignment of Construction Contract to Newly Formed Company Before Company Was Licensed, Not Subject to B&P 7031

    Duty to Defend Triggered by Damage to Other Non-Defective Property

    Specification Challenge; Excusable Delay; Type I Differing Site Condition; Superior Knowledge

    Appeals Court Affirms Civil Engineer Owes No Duty of Care to General Contractor

    Applying Jury Verdict Method in Quantifying Damages Due to Defective Specifications

    CAPSA Changes Now in Effect

    Appeals Court Explains Punitive Damages Awards For Extreme Reprehensibility Or Unusually Small, Hard-To-Detect Or Hard-To-Measure Compensatory Damages

    Seventh Circuit Finds “Additional Insured” Requirements Met Where Non-Party Subcontractor Was Proximate Cause of Underlying Injuries

    Construction Defect Specialist Joins Kansas City Firm

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Increased 5% in Year to June

    Federal Court Sets High Bar for Pleading Products Liability Cases in New Jersey

    Is the Obsession With Recordable Injury Rates a Deadly Safety Distraction?

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2017

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    General Contractor’s Excess Insurer Denied Equitable Contribution From Subcontractor’s Excess Insurer

    Are Robotic Coworkers Soon a Reality in Construction?

    Condo Board May Be Negligent for not Filing Construction Defect Suit in a Timely Fashion

    Potential Problems with Cases Involving One Owner and Multiple Contractors

    Maintenance Issues Ignite Arguments at Indiana School

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/10/23) – Wobbling Real Estate, Booming (and Busting) Construction, and Eye-Watering Insurance Premiums

    Joint Venture Dispute Over Profits

    Reduce Suicide Risk Among Employees in Remote Work Areas

    White and Williams LLP Acquires 6 Attorney Firm

    Why Construction Tendering Needs Specialized Intelligence

    What You Need to Know About the Recently Enacted Infrastructure Bill

    Hunton Offers Amicus Support in First Circuit Review of “Surface Water” Under Massachusetts Law

    Federal Court Reiterates Broad Duty to Defend in Additional Insured Cases

    Breaking with Tradition, The Current NLRB is on a Rulemaking Tear: Election Procedures, Recognition Bar, and 9(a) Collective Bargaining Relationships

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss "Redundant Claims" Denied

    California Supreme Court Upholds Precondemnation Procedures

    Public Contract Code Section 1104 Does Not Apply to Claims of Implied Breach of Warranty of Correctness of Plans and Specifications

    Angelo Mozilo Speaks: No Regrets at Countrywide

    WSHB Expands into the Southeast

    Construction Defect Not an Occurrence in Ohio

    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    Buy Clean California Act Takes Effect on July 1, 2022

    Hunton’s Jae Lynn Huckaba Selected to Miami-Dade Bar’s 2026 Circle of Excellence for Insurance Law

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Pennsylvania Considers Changes to Construction Code Review

    Construction Suit Ends with Just an Apology
    Corporate Profile

    ASHLAND OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Ashland, Oregon Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building related trial support and expert services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Employing in house resources which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Ashland and the surrounding areas.

    Ashland Oregon construction expert witness public projectsAshland Oregon expert witness commercial buildingsAshland Oregon consulting architect expert witnessAshland Oregon construction defect expert witnessAshland Oregon civil engineering expert witnessAshland Oregon fenestration expert witnessAshland Oregon building consultant expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ashland, Oregon

    At the Frontier of Change: How—or Where—to Rebuild as Alaska's Permafrost Disappears

    September 28, 2026 —
    In some areas of the tiny subsistence coastal village of Kwigillingok along the Bering Sea in western Alaska, pockets of ground feel squishy, almost gelatinous, rather than solid. It’s an odd sensation, as if there is only a thin layer of muddy soil preventing people from falling into the water beneath their feet. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    Chambers USA 2026 Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Attorneys and Practices

    August 11, 2026 —
    PHOENIX – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its attorneys have received 57 individual recognitions in their respective fields, by Chambers USA: America’s Leading Lawyers for Business 2026. These prestigious rankings are driven by independent interviews with clients of the firm and members of the legal community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    A Million-Dollar Claim. A Decisive Defense Victory.

    November 02, 2026 —
    Partner Daniel Crespo and Associate Soyoun K. McConnell secured summary judgment for their Hotel client in a premises liability action seeking $1 million for injuries allegedly requiring surgery. Through targeted photographic evidence and expert analysis, Mr. Crespo and Ms. McConnell successfully persuaded the court that the curb at issue was ordinary, plainly visible, and presented no actionable dangerous condition. They convincingly countered the plaintiff’s expert’s contention that yellow warning paint was required. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    RONI: What You Lose by Not Investing in AI – With Sam Zolfagharian

    September 21, 2026 —
    Sam Zolfagharian returns to the AEC Business Podcast for her second appearance. She is an AI strategist, keynote speaker, and the author of two books, Disrupt It and Future by Design. She spoke at the AI in AEC conference in Helsinki in March, and we picked up the conversation where that keynote left off. The starting point was a question her clients keep raising. Executives are being asked by their boards about the return on their AI investments, and many of them do not have an answer they trust. This episode is about what to measure instead, and when the dollar figure finally becomes the right number to look at. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2026 Edition of Chambers USA

    June 29, 2026 —
    In the 2026 edition of Chambers USA, Traub Lieberman has been awarded rankings in the following categories: Illinois – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer In the Chambers research, clients noted: "The team are technically very strong, responsive, and on top of their cases." Florida – Insurance: Dispute Resolution: Insurer In the Chambers research, clients noted: "Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry distinguishes itself through a combination of deep subject-matter expertise, responsiveness, and practical risk-management orientation." Commenters went on to say: “The team has deep knowledge of Florida property insurance statutes, regulations and case law, enabling effective handling of disputes, appeals and third-party litigation." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    The Great Escape: Non-Invalidation Clauses and Property Damage Claims

    October 20, 2026 —
    At their core, non-invalidation clauses (“NICs”) recognise an important commercial reality: an insured cannot control everything that happens at its premises. In the event that an insured finds itself in breach of a condition or warranty owing to events that have increased the risk of damage to its property, but which were outside its authority, knowledge or beyond its control, a NIC may prevent the insurer from avoiding the claim. For that reason, they’re an important tool in an insured’s coverage arsenal. Although there is relatively little caselaw on NICs, their purpose was recognised in The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd v Aviva Insurance Ltd [2011] EWHC 1761 (Comm) (on which we wrote a previous article – The Good, the Bad & the Ugly: #26 The Good: The Seashell of Lisson Grove Ltd v Aviva) Reprinted courtesy of Abigail Smith, SDV Fenchurch and Kaarthiga Manimaran, SDV Fenchurch Ms. Smith may be contacted at abigail.smith@sdvfenchurch.uk Ms. Manimaran may be contacted at kaarthiga.manimaran@sdvfenchurch.uk Read the full story...

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    June 15, 2026 —
    Most, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees. But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com