BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Bay City Oregon tract home expert witness Bay City Oregon custom home expert witness Bay City Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Bay City Oregon housing expert witness Bay City Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Bay City Oregon institutional building expert witness Bay City Oregon custom homes expert witness Bay City Oregon parking structure expert witness Bay City Oregon low-income housing expert witness Bay City Oregon production housing expert witness Bay City Oregon condominiums expert witness Bay City Oregon office building expert witness Bay City Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Bay City Oregon retail construction expert witness Bay City Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Bay City Oregon hospital construction expert witness Bay City Oregon condominium expert witness Bay City Oregon casino resort expert witness Bay City Oregon multi family housing expert witness Bay City Oregon townhome construction expert witness Bay City Oregon Medical building expert witness Bay City Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Bay City, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Bay City Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Bay City Oregon

    Acord Certificates of Liability Insurance: What They Don’t Tell You Can Hurt You

    Contract And IP Implications Of Design Professionals Monetizing Non-Fungible Tokens Comprising Digital Construction Designs

    Latest Updates On The Coronavirus Pandemic

    Dispute Over Exhaustion of Primary Policy

    West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar Returns to Anaheim May 15th & 16th

    A Lot of Cheap Housing Is About to Get Very Expensive

    Labor Intensive

    California Booms With FivePoint New Schools: Real Estate

    Quick Note: Subcontractor Payment Bond = Common Law Payment Bond

    Contract’s Definition of “Substantial Completion” Does Not Apply to Third Party for Purposes of SOL, Holds Court of Appeal

    Chris Konzelmann Appointed to NASP Board of Directors

    Collapse Claim Dismissed

    Insurer Must Defend Additional Insured

    Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Broad Duty to Defend

    CSLB “Fast Facts” for Online Home Improvement Marketplaces

    Construction Contractors Must Understand Retainage In 2021

    Delaware District Court Finds CGL Insurer Owes Condo Builder a Duty to Defend Faulty Workmanship Claims — Based on the Subcontractor Exception to the Your Work Exclusion

    What Types of “Damages Claims” Survive a Trustee’s Sale?

    Erdogan Vows to Punish Shoddy Builders Ahead of Crucial Election

    There’s Still No Amazon for Housing, But Fintech’s Working on It

    Construction Law Client Alert: California Is One Step Closer to Prohibiting Type I Indemnity Agreements In Private Commercial Projects

    Second Circuit Denies Petitions for Review of EPA’s Final Regulations to Establish Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures

    Court of Federal Claims: Upstream Hurricane Harvey Case Will Proceed to Trial

    VF Law Strengthens Litigation Practice with Experienced Litigation Attorney Andre Egle in the Seattle Office

    The Project “Completion” Paradox in California

    Structural Concerns Force Emergency Closure of Maryland Office Building

    Taylor Morrison v. Terracon and the Homeowner Protection Act of 2007

    Confidence Among U.S. Homebuilders Declines to Eight-Month Low

    Nebraska’s Prompt Pay Act for 2015

    Providing Your Insurer Prompt Notice

    Buy America/Buy American, a Primer For Contractors

    Louisiana District Court Declines to Apply Total Pollution Exclusion

    Nine ACS Lawyers Recognized as Super Lawyers – Including One Top 10 and Three Top 100 Washington Attorneys

    Haight has been named a Metropolitan Tier 1 and Tier 2 “Best Law Firm” by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” in 2025

    Turner, Subcontractor Reach $23.5M Settlement in Worker Death on Chicago Project

    Colorado Appeals Court Clarifies “Control” Exception to Statute of Repose

    Additional Insured Is Covered Under On-Going Operations Endorsement Despite Subcontractor's Completion of Work

    Building the Secondary Market for Reclaimed Building Materials

    Good Ole Duty to Defend

    Ninth Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend CERCLA Section 104 (e) Letter

    Owners and Contractors Beware: Pennsylvania (Significantly) Strengthens Contractor Payment Act

    NYC Supertall Tower Condo Board Sues Over Alleged Construction, Design 'Defects'

    Ill-fated Complaint Fails to State Claims Against Broker and FEMA

    Court of Appeal Shines Light on Collusive Settlement Agreements

    Architectural Firm, Fired by School District, Launches Lawsuit

    Court Denies Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment on Breach of Contract Claim and Further Denies Motion to Exclude Insured's Expert

    Court of Appeal Holds Only “Named Insureds” May Sue for Bad Faith Under California FAIR Plan Policy

    Fire Fears After Grenfell Disaster Set Back Wood Building in UK

    LA Metro To Pay Kiewit $297.8M Settlement on Freeway Job

    Waive Not, Want Not: Waivers and Releases on California Construction Projects
    Corporate Profile

    BAY CITY OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction and design related expert designations, the Bay City, Oregon Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which include design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Bay City and the surrounding areas.

    Bay City Oregon consulting engineersBay City Oregon consulting general contractorBay City Oregon concrete expert witnessBay City Oregon eifs expert witnessBay City Oregon civil engineering expert witnessBay City Oregon building code expert witnessBay City Oregon expert witnesses fenestration
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Bay City, Oregon

    Dispute Erupts Into Public Over Castro Theater Rehab Project Costs

    September 08, 2026 —
    As it was about to start an arbitration of final payments on a complex theater renovation, the entertainment company that leases San Francisco's landmark Castro Theatre has filed a state court trademark violation lawsuit seeking to bar the contractor from publicizing as a success its work for the owner on that and other projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Are Robotic Coworkers Soon a Reality in Construction?

    March 24, 2026 —
    General-purpose humanoid robots are in the headlines, but is the hype justified? What’s the point of having a robot home assistant when it still needs a “guy behind the curtain” to control it remotely? Despite the challenges, robots, even those that look like humans, are seriously considered as future coworkers in business environments. According to the McKinsey report ‘Will embodied AI create robotic coworkers?‘ the idea that AI-powered robots will become general-purpose coworkers is grounded in real technological progress, but not an overnight reality. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Construction Contract Negotiation & Drafting: A Practical Checklist (and Where State-Specific Issues Can Surprise You)

    April 20, 2026 —
    Construction contract negotiation is often treated as a “forms exercise,” especially when the parties start from familiar templates (e.g., AIA forms). In practice, though, the biggest problems tend to arise not from the existence of a form, but from (i) misalignment among the project’s governing documents and participants, (ii) ambiguity in pricing and payment mechanics, and (iii) state-specific statutory requirements that override negotiated terms. This article includes a practical checklist intended to help owners, developers, and contractors streamline contract negotiations, reduce downstream disputes, and avoid unpleasant surprises during payment administration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michelle Cooper, Sheppard
    Ms. Cooper may be contacted at mcooper@sheppard.com

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    March 24, 2026 —
    The idea of a single source of truth has been a fundamental part of the digital vision in the AEC industry for many years. From centralized CAD storage to BIM collaboration platforms and, more recently, Common Data Environments, the goal stays the same. Project teams want a reliable place where everyone can access the latest information. The phrase “single source of truth” comes from database and information management practices in the IT world, where the goal was to maintain one authoritative record of data and eliminate data redundancy. As the AEC industry began adopting digital tools, the same idea was applied to project information and workflows. Despite decades of technological progress, the question remains whether “one ring that rules them all” can actually be implemented in real construction projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    September 01, 2026 —
    New York City has expanded its investigation into the structural failure at the former Pfizer headquarters tower in Midtown Manhattan as the Dept. of Investigation confirmed a parallel inquiry and the Dept. of Buildings directed the property owner to retain third-party engineering oversight. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    May 12, 2026 —
    Steel prices have continued trending downward after several years of volatility, according to Gordian’s latest analysis based on RSMeans Data. After dramatic spikes during the pandemic-era supply disruptions, the market has gradually stabilized as supply chains improve and demand softens in some construction segments. However, selective volatility and tariff uncertainty continue to influence pricing across the sector. Key findings from the report include:
    • Steel prices declining: The national average price of structural steel fell to about $2,343.93 per ton in January 2026, down 5.38% from the previous quarter and 7.18% year over year.
    • Longer-term price correction: Steel costs have been trending downward since 2024 after earlier volatility driven by inflation, supply shortages and global demand swings.
    Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    What Is the Independent Tort Doctrine? New Case Explains…

    August 24, 2026 —
    Florida’s Sixth District Court of Appeals in Atout v. HHM Land Trust Dated October 29, 2013, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1569a (Fla. 6th DCA 2026) recently included an extensive discussion on Florida’s independent tort doctrine. The independent tort doctrine is an important legal doctrine, particularly when parties are in contractual privity. This doctrine stands for the proposition that tort claims must be independent of any breach of contract. See Atout, supra. The Sixth District’s extensive discussion analyzed the indicators to determine this “independence,” which may arise from the source of the duty, the asserted conduct, the damages sought, or even public policy: Unlike claims that rely on contractual relationships, an “independent” tort is often characterized by a duty imposed by law rather than by agreement. As to this consideration, United States District Court Judge Steven Merryday has explained that the independent tort doctrine honors the same divide as the economic loss rule, but rather than looking at the nature of the loss, it focuses on the source of the duty allegedly breached. “If a contract imposes a duty, and the defendant breaches that duty, the plaintiff must sue for breach of contract. If society imposes the duty, the plaintiff must sue in tort.” Following this reasoning, courts should consider whether the alleged breach of a duty in tort coincides or overlaps with a duty imposed by a contract. If the duty at issue is within the scope of a contract, and the relationship of the parties that led to the creation of that duty stems from a contract, then that duty’s source is from contract and any alleged tort claims based on a breach of those duties may not be “independent.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com