BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    retail construction expert witness Clackamas County Oregon low-income housing expert witness Clackamas County Oregon industrial building expert witness Clackamas County Oregon casino resort expert witness Clackamas County Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Clackamas County Oregon custom homes expert witness Clackamas County Oregon condominiums expert witness Clackamas County Oregon townhome construction expert witness Clackamas County Oregon parking structure expert witness Clackamas County Oregon hospital construction expert witness Clackamas County Oregon office building expert witness Clackamas County Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Clackamas County Oregon production housing expert witness Clackamas County Oregon tract home expert witness Clackamas County Oregon institutional building expert witness Clackamas County Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Clackamas County Oregon multi family housing expert witness Clackamas County Oregon custom home expert witness Clackamas County Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Clackamas County Oregon condominium expert witness Clackamas County Oregon Medical building expert witness Clackamas County Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Clackamas County Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Clackamas County, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Clackamas County Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org

    Willamette Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3805
    PO Box 440 32054 Old Hwy 34
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.wvhba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Clackamas County Oregon

    Miller Wagers Gundlach’s Bearish Housing Position Loses

    Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

    Will the YIMBY ‘Holy Grail’ Deliver an LA Building Boom?

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2024 New York – Metro Super Lawyers®

    Insurance Law Client Alert: California Appeals Court Refuses to Apply Professional Services Exclusion to Products-Completed Operations Loss

    Pennsylvania Considers Changes to Construction Code Review

    Congratulations to all of our 2023 Attorneys Named as Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    Amazon Hits Pause on $2.5B HQ2 Project in Arlington, Va.

    Oklahoma Limits Claims for Construction Cases

    Washington Court of Appeals Divisions Clash Over Interpretations of the Statute of Repose

    Traub Lieberman Recognized in the 2026 Edition of Chambers USA

    New York Preserves Subrogation Rights

    Blue Gold: Critical Water for Critical Energy Materials

    Insurer Cannot Raise Issues on Appeal that Were Not Presented to the Trial Court

    Thanks for My 6th Year Running as a Construction Litigation Super Lawyer

    Court Denies Insurers' Motions for Summary Judgment Under All Risk Policies

    Quick Note: Be Careful with Pay if Paid Clauses (Both Subcontractors and General Contractors)

    Iconic Seattle Center Arena Roof the Only Piece to Stay in $900-Million Rebuild

    New Legislation Requires Changes to your California Home Improvement Contract for 2026

    Entire Fairness or Business Judgment? It’s Anyone’s Guess

    Denver’s Mayor Addresses Housing and Modifying Construction Defect Law

    California Ballot Initiative Seeks to Repeal Infrastructure Funding Bill

    Can Your Small Business Afford to Risk the Imminent Threat of a Cyber Incident?

    Will Protecting Copyrights Get Easier for Architects?

    Mississippi Sues Over Public Health Lab Defects

    Recent Third Circuit OSHA Decision Sounds Alarm for Employers and Their Officers

    Brenda Radmacher Authors Chapter in ABA Publication on Construction Delays

    New Jersey Appellate Decision Reminds Bid Protestors to Take Caution When Determining Where to File an Action

    The California Legislature Return the Power Back to the People by Passing the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018

    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Jones Provides Testimony Before Florida Senate Committees

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    Insurers Must Defend Allegations of Faulty Workmanship

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Flint Water Crisis Prompts Call for More Federal Oversight

    A UK Bridge That Is a Lesson on How to Build Infrastructure

    Amazon Can be Liable in Louisiana

    Federal Court Ruling Bolsters the “Your Work” Exclusion in Standard CGL Policies

    Hurricane Handbook: A Policyholder's Guide to Handling Claims during Hurricane Season

    Traub Lieberman Partner Kathryn Keller and Associate Steven Hollis Secure Final Summary Judgment in Favor of Homeowner’s Insurance Company

    General Contractor Intervening to Compel Arbitration Per the Subcontract

    Design & Construction Case Expands Florida’s Slavin Doctrine

    Is it the Dawning of the Age of Strict Products Liability for Contractors in California?

    Nader Eghtesad v. State Farm General Insurance Company

    Measure Of Damages for Breach of Construction Contract

    Only Two Weeks Until BHA’s Texas MCLE Seminar in San Antonio

    Las Vegas Stadium for Athletics, Now $1.75B Project, Gains Key OK

    Five Facts About Housing That Will Make People In New York City and San Francisco Depressed

    Pending Home Sales in U.S. Increase Less Than Forecast

    Court Makes an Unsettling Inference to Find that the Statute of Limitations Bars Claims Arising from a 1997 Northridge Earthquake Settlement

    Court of Appeal Holds Only “Named Insureds” May Sue for Bad Faith Under California FAIR Plan Policy
    Corporate Profile

    CLACKAMAS COUNTY OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Clackamas County, Oregon Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Clackamas County and the surrounding areas.

    Clackamas County Oregon building envelope expert witnessClackamas County Oregon expert witness roofingClackamas County Oregon defective construction expertClackamas County Oregon window expert witnessClackamas County Oregon multi family design expert witnessClackamas County Oregon engineering expert witnessClackamas County Oregon reconstruction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Clackamas County, Oregon

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Emerging Issues in Construction CGL Insurance Part 2: The Separation of Insureds and Additional Insured Interests

    September 29, 2026 —
    Many coverage disputes hinge on first principles—the fundamentals of insurance —rather than the minutiae. Unfortunately, the basic anatomy of insurance policies can get lost sometimes when parties are laser-focused on a particular term or set of circumstances. This is true not just in disputes, but also when writing coverage. One of the fundamentals that is commonly misunderstood and overlooked—but which is absolutely critical to the intended operation of insurance coverage—is what is commonly known as the “separation of insureds.” The “separation of insureds” is the concept that each “insured” under a policy are referred to and treated differently, and most of all that the distinctions matter. The concept is usually included as a condition in the policy. It embodies the requirement that the policy applies to each insured distinctly from how it applies to other insureds. The ISO Form CGL policies specifically state that they apply “[s]eparately to each insured against whom a claim is made or ‘suit’ is brought.” The separate and distinct treatment of insureds is more critical in construction operations than anywhere else. This distinction is essential to ensure coverage works as intended, especially when contracted operations are involved, because the policy must insure the subcontractor that purchased the policy, the general contractor who hired the subcontractor, and the owner that hired the general contractor. Even small modifications can easily frustrate the intent of the parties. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eric M. Clarkson, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Clarkson may be contacted at eric.clarkson@sdvfenchurch.us

    Leading Boutiques Combine to Form SDV Fenchurch, A Global Law Firm for Insurance Policyholders

    September 15, 2026 —
    TRUMBULL, Conn., and LONDON, Sept. 1, 2026 — Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), Fenchurch Law, Wesolowski Abogados, and CLIR & Fenchurch and their partner members in Asia, Europe and North America combined today to launch SDV Fenchurch, a global law firm built exclusively to represent policyholders and the brokers who advise them. Structured as a Swiss verein, SDV Fenchurch unites dedicated insurance-recovery practices across eight jurisdictions in the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Spain, Denmark, Norway, Turkey, and Singapore. With over 90 lawyers devoted to insurance coverage matters, the firm is among the largest policyholder-side practices in the world and, by number of jurisdictions with full-time policyholder counsel capabilities, the most geographically extensive. The founders are brought together by a single shared mission: to act solely for policyholders, never the insurers, in insurance disputes. This is in stark contrast to most international firms with insurance practices, which mostly represent insurers only. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of SDV Fenchurch

    Colorado Court Affirms Attorneys’ Fee Award Against Plaintiff’s Counsel for Pursuing Unsupported CCPA Claims

    August 03, 2026 —
    The Colorado Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court’s award of more than $241,000 in attorney fees against a plaintiffs’ attorney who continued to pursue unsupported claims arising out of a residential construction dispute. Although the opinion was not selected for official publication under C.A.R. 35(e) and therefore has no precedential value, it nevertheless provides an instructive reminder that Colorado courts are willing to impose significant financial consequences when claims lack substantial justification. For builders, developers, contractors, insurers, and defense counsel, the case is worth reading, not because it announces new law, but because it demonstrates that Colorado’s fee-shifting statute remains a meaningful tool when unsupported claims continue long after they should have been abandoned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Global Insights Center: Monthly Newsletter

    June 15, 2026 —
    May in Review Last month, inflation moved higher, with Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rising to 3.8% year over year, up from 3.3% the prior month. The increase was driven primarily by energy prices, particularly gasoline, reflecting ongoing disruptions tied to the Middle East conflict. Labor market data were broadly stable. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%, wage growth increased modestly to 3.6%, while job growth continued to be geographically concentrated in the Southern states, particularly cities in Texas. On an occupational basis, healthcare once again led job gains, especially in home health services, a trend we have consistently highlighted. Business formations increased during the month, with notable strength in e commerce and digital services firms. Manufacturing activity also improved, particularly in semiconductors, IT equipment, and natural gas–related energy infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Global Insights Center Staff, The Hartford