BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Echo Oregon industrial building expert witness Echo Oregon production housing expert witness Echo Oregon parking structure expert witness Echo Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Echo Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Echo Oregon Medical building expert witness Echo Oregon custom homes expert witness Echo Oregon tract home expert witness Echo Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Echo Oregon multi family housing expert witness Echo Oregon casino resort expert witness Echo Oregon housing expert witness Echo Oregon condominium expert witness Echo Oregon institutional building expert witness Echo Oregon custom home expert witness Echo Oregon hospital construction expert witness Echo Oregon condominiums expert witness Echo Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Echo Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Echo Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Echo Oregon retail construction expert witness Echo Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Echo, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Echo Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Echo Oregon

    California Rejects Judgments By Confession Pursuant to Civil Code Section 1132

    In Review: SCOTUS Environmental and Administrative Decisions in the 2020 Term

    How BIM Helps Make Buildings Safer

    DC Circuit Rejects Challenge to EPA’s CERCLA Decision Regarding Hardrock Mining Industry

    More Musings on Why I Mediate

    Construction Group Seeks Defense Coverage for Hard Rock Stadium Claims

    Sioux City Building Owners Sue Architect over Renovation Costs

    Maritime Law: An Albatross for Contractors Navigating Marine Construction

    What If There Is a Design Error?

    Sustainability Is an Ever-Increasing Issue in Development

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    Key Legal Issues to Consider Before and After Natural Disasters

    Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Denied

    Executive Order Addresses Wildfire Rebuilding Delays Through Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting

    Architects and Engineers Added to Harmon Towers Lawsuit

    Texas Voids Out-of-State Forum and Choice of Law Clauses in Construction Contracts

    Brazil’s Former President Turns Himself In to Police

    Unlicensed Contractor Shoots for the Stars . . . Sputters on Takeoff

    #7 CDJ Topic: Truck Ins. Exchange v. O'Mailia

    Housing Isn’t Expensive for Everyone

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    Condo Owners Suing Bank for Failing to Disclose Defects

    California Supreme Court Rights the “Occurrence” Ship: Unintended Harm Resulting from Intentional Conduct Triggers Coverage Under Liability Insurance Policy

    Denial of Coverage For Bodily Injury After Policy Period Does Not Violate Public Policy

    Withholding Payment or Having Your Payment Withheld Due to Disputes on Other Projects: Know Your Rights to Offset

    HOA Fines Capped at $100: Immediate Impact of California’s AB 130

    Delaware River Interstate Bridge Shut to Assess Truss Fracture

    Meet the Forum's Neutrals: MATTHEW W. ARGUE

    Flood Sublimit Applies, Seawater Corrosion to Amtrak's Equipment Not Ensuing Loss

    Five Keys to Driving Digital Transformation in Engineering and Construction

    The Right to Repair Act (Civ.C §895 et seq.) Applies and is the Exclusive Remedy for a Homeowner Alleging Construction Defects

    Speculative Luxury Homebuilding on the Rise

    New York Restaurant and Bar Fire Caused by Electric Defect

    Local Government’s Claims on Developer Bonds Dismissed for Failure to Pursue Administrative Remedies

    FEMA Offers Recovery Tips for California Wildfire Survivors

    Jean Nouvel’s NYC ‘Vision Machine’ Sued Over Construction Defects

    Contractor Sentenced to 7 Years for “Hail Damage” Fraud

    Incorporation, Indemnity and Statutes of Limitations, Oh My!

    California’s Right to Repair Act not an Exclusive Remedy

    Florida Construction Defect Decision Part of Lengthy Evolution

    Empowering Success: The Advantages of Female Attorneys in Construction Defect Law

    Eight Ways to Protect a Construction Company Before a Claim Is Filed

    Vallagio v. Metropolitan Homes: Colorado Supreme Court Upholds Declarant Consent Provision to Amend Arbitration Out of Declarations

    Manhattan Home Prices Top Pre-Crisis Record on Luxury Deals

    Explore Legal Immigration Options for Construction Companies

    Supreme Court of New York Denies Motion in all but One Cause of Action in Kikirov v. 355 Realty Assoc., et al.

    Court Rules That ERISA Preemption Bars Recovery of Union Benefit Fund Payments Pursuant to New York’s Wage Theft Statute from a General Contractor Where a Subcontractor Failed to Fund Payments

    Staffing Company Not Entitled to Make a Claim Against a Payment Bond and Attorneys’ Fees on State Public Works Payment Bonds

    Builders Beware: A New Class Of Defendants In Asbestos Lawsuits

    Righting Past Wrongs Through Equitable Development
    Corporate Profile

    ECHO OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction and design related expert witness designations, the Echo, Oregon Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides building related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets comprising credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Echo region.

    Echo Oregon expert witnesses fenestrationEcho Oregon construction project management expert witnessEcho Oregon construction defect expert witnessEcho Oregon building consultant expertEcho Oregon expert witness windowsEcho Oregon construction expert witnessEcho Oregon construction code expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Echo, Oregon

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    June 22, 2026 —
    The court granted the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment because the insured failed to present evidence that the insurer failed to conduct a reasonable investigation. PSY Burger, LLC v. State Farm General Insurance Company, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66991(C.D. Cal. March 20, 2026). The insured’s commercial property suffered heavy damage from tropical storm Hilary. State Farm denied coverage to repair the damage. The insured sued State Farm alleging breach of contract and bad faith due to an inadequate investigation. Apparently, the insured did not retain an expert to opine on claims handling. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Oracle's $16B Michigan Data Center Secures Financing as Power Contracts Face Appeals

    June 08, 2026 —
    A $16 billion hyperscale data center under construction outside Ann Arbor, Mich., has secured financing backed by Blackstone and other institutional investors, even as the project's power supply agreements now face a legal challenge before the Michigan Court of Appeals. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Expands with New Office in Foxborough, Massachusetts

    June 08, 2026 —
    Foxborough, MA — April 1st, 2026— Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV), a national law firm focused exclusively on representing policyholders in insurance coverage disputes, is pleased to announce the opening of its new office in Foxborough, Massachusetts. The expansion marks another milestone in the firm’s continued growth and deepens SDV’s ability to serve clients across the region. The new location strengthens SDV’s presence in Massachusetts and expands the firm’s capacity to support both existing and anticipated client needs in an increasingly complex insurance landscape. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Insured is Third Party Beneficiary of Forced-Place Policy

    October 26, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s fire damage claims under a forced-place policy because the insured was a third-party beneficiary of the policy. Fredericks v. Assurant Specialty, et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179779 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2026). The insureds’ home burned down on the same day their homeowner’s policy expired. The expiration automatically triggered a forced-placed policy issued by American Security Insurance Company (ASIC) to the insureds’ mortgage company, Rocket Mortgage Company, LLC. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    In-House Insight at CSC

    October 26, 2026 —
    Elaine Y. Lee, Partner in P&A’s Los Angeles office, sat down with Third Thursday to discuss effective collaboration with in-house counsel, strategies for resolving construction disputes, and the factors that can help determine the best path forward. This discussion previews her upcoming Construction Super Conference panel, “Same But Different: How In-House Legal Teams Vary in Approach, Role, and Decision-Making,” on December 2nd. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Y. Lee, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Ms. Lee may be contacted at elee@pecklaw.com

    Key Ways Construction Companies Can Stay in Compliance with E-Verify

    October 26, 2026 —
    The federal E-Verify program has become an increasingly central feature of employment verification in the construction industry. Once a voluntary tool used primarily by federal contractors, E-Verify is now mandated, either broadly or for specific project types, by a growing number of states, and its role continues to expand under federal enforcement policy. For construction companies, which depend heavily on large, mobile workforces, and layered subcontracting relationships, E-Verify compliance presents unique operational and legal challenges. This article identifies the key practices construction companies should adopt to maintain compliance, highlights common good-faith mistakes that nonetheless expose contractors to enforcement risk, and examines the broader implications of continued E-Verify expansion for the construction labor market. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen E. Irving, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Irving may be contacted at sirving@pecklaw.com

    $27B Meta Data Center Pushes Louisiana Toward Massive Power Expansion

    April 27, 2026 —
    Meta Platforms has reached an agreement with Entergy Louisiana to fund new energy infrastructure to support its planned $27-billion data center in Richland Parish, a project the company says could ultimately scale to 5 GW, becoming its largest facility to date. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has described the site as large enough to cover a significant portion of Manhattan. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Vince Kong, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Kong may be contacted at kongv@enr.com