Italian Court Convicts 32 in Morandi Bridge Collapse Case
August 25, 2026 —
Bryan Gottlieb - Engineering News-RecordFormer Autostrade per l'Italia CEO Giovanni Castellucci was sentenced to 12 years in prison July 16 after an Italian court handed down the first criminal verdicts stemming from the 2018 Morandi Bridge collapse in Genoa that killed 43 people.
Read the full story...Reprinted courtesy of
Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-RecordMr. Gottlieb may be contacted at
gottliebb@enr.com
White and Williams LLP Secures $42.4 Million Award for Ventana DBS LLC in Philadelphia Marriott Construction Litigation
July 27, 2026 —
Craig O'Neill, Lindsay Liebman, Kristen Nichols Wright, Zachary Roth & William Taylor - White and WilliamsWhite and Williams LLP's Construction and Surety Practice attorneys secured a significant victory for client Ventana DBS LLC in a complex commercial construction dispute before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Commerce Division. The trial team, led by Bill Taylor, retired Partner, and Craig O'Neill, Co-Chair of the Construction and Surety Practice Group, with support from Lindsay Liebman, Counsel, Zachary Roth, Partner, Kristen Nichols Wright, Associate, and Sue Ferrante, Legal Secretary, obtained a $42.4 million award on Ventana's claims for unpaid work, delay costs, CASPA penalties and interest, attorneys’ fees and other project-related costs arising from the construction of the Marriott W/Element Hotel Project in Philadelphia.
To achieve this result, the White and Williams team managed an extensive discovery period over the course of four-years of litigation, conducted over sixty depositions, participated in court-ordered mediation and arbitration proceedings, and successfully represented Ventana during a bifurcated trial that spanned over the course of a year.
Reprinted courtesy of
Craig O'Neill, White and Williams,
Lindsay Liebman, White and Williams,
Kristen Nichols Wright, White and Williams,
Zachary Roth, White and Williams and
William Taylor, White and Williams
Mr. O'Neill may be contacted at oneillc@whiteandwilliams.com
Ms. Liebman may be contacted at liebmanl@whiteandwilliams.com
Ms. Wright may be contacted at wrightk@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Roth may be contacted at rothz@whiteandwilliams.com
Mr. Taylor may be contacted at taylorw@whiteandwilliams.com
Read the full story...
Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy
July 20, 2026 —
Anna M. Perry, Rachel S. Kindseth & Nina Catanzaro - Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.I. Course of Construction Exclusions
Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy.
General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party.
Reprinted courtesy of
Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.,
Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and
Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com
Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com
Read the full story...
Turnover Traps for Community Associations: Investigate First, Release Claims Later
April 14, 2026 —
Nicholas B. Vargo - Ball Janik LLPTurnover of a community association from developer control to owner control is a uniquely vulnerable moment. Developers are increasingly presenting Florida condominium and homeowners’ associations with “standard” settlement or release agreements at turnover, often being framed as routine steps to finalize the transition of control. In reality, these agreements can have sweeping consequences, including the release of construction-defect claims before the association has conducted any meaningful independent evaluation.
The developer has years of project knowledge and access to plans, subcontractors, and internal records. The newly elected board is just beginning to organize, obtain documents, and understand the property’s condition. Many defects, especially those involving roofing, waterproofing, windows, or structural components, are latent and not yet visible. Signing a release at this stage means the association is making a binding decision under conditions of uncertainty, without full information, to release all future potential claims.
Over the last few years, there has been a rise in reports of developers offering a packaged deal: they agree to complete certain repairs, often minor punch-list or cosmetic items, and to “forgive” an alleged financial deficit (often around $50,000) supposedly owed by the association from the developer-control period. In exchange, the association is asked to sign a broad release covering all claims, including known and unknown construction defects. To a new HOA board that received their community with limited operating and reserve funds, they are left with a difficult decision to either accept the developer’s offer or assess their owners to pay this alleged debt.
These agreements are occasionally presented through community management companies, which may describe them as “standard” or "routine.” Whether due to misunderstanding or influence from the developer, management companies can unintentionally reinforce the idea that signing is expected. Any recommendation provided to HOAs about whether to sign these releases could open community management to liability down the road. The best practice for both associations and community managers is to refer any agreements to be reviewed by general counsel for the association.
The following two case studies illustrate the real-world consequences:
Case Study One: A newly transitioned board relies on its management company to negotiate with the developer-builder to resolve irrigation issues, pond concerns, and signage deficiencies, along with forgiving an asserted financial shortfall. In exchange, the board signs a broad release covering all claims, including latent defects.
Within a year, several punch-list items remain incomplete, and more serious issues arise. When the association demands completion, the developer delays, prompting the association to seek advice on how to enforce the settlement agreement. The association hires counsel to hold the developer responsible for both the previously agreed-upon items and newly identified construction defects. However, when the association brings claims against the developer, the developer points to the release of all potential construction defects in the community. Thus, the only remaining remedy is limited to enforcement of the specific punch-list terms. The community, still relatively new, has no viable claims against the developer-builder for the construction defects. With warranties expired and the release, the association must fund repairs through special assessments, despite defects that would otherwise have been actionable.
Case Study Two: A community is presented with a similar agreement as above. The management company encourages execution, suggesting it is standard and even telling the board to “name your price.” The developer also pressures the newly elected board to sign.
Instead of signing, the board consults with their attorney. Counsel advises the board not to sign the release and recommends further investigation. Engineers are retained and identify early indicators of broader issues, including stucco cracking, water intrusion, and irrigation deficiencies. Based on this information, the association declines to sign the release. Subsequent evaluation reveals potentially significant construction-defect claims, allowing the community to pursue recovery that would have been lost under the proposed agreement.
These scenarios underscore a fundamental point: signing a release at turnover is not an administrative formality—it is a major legal decision. Board members act in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of their community, and their decisions can bind all current and future owners. At turnover, an association’s right is to investigate and pursue claims. Preserving that right until a full and independent evaluation is completed is not adversarial—it is responsible governance.
Accordingly, associations should retain independent evaluations of the property and consult qualified legal counsel before signing any “standard” agreements, especially ones involving a release of future claims.
Nicholas B. Vargo is a partner in Ball Janik LLP’s Construction Practice Group. He may be reached at nvargo@balljanik.com.
LA Fire Victims Can Pursue City Utility Claims, Judge Rules
March 10, 2026 —
Jef Feeley & Maxwell Adler - BloombergThe water and power utility that serves the city of Los Angeles must face hundreds of lawsuits faulting its response to the massive 2025 wildfire that leveled one of the city’s premier seaside neighborhoods and caused tens of billions of dollars in damage.
In a significant victory for fire victims, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Samantha Jessner concluded in a
written ruling Thursday that a unique California law allows property and business owners to pursue claims that the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power failed to supply enough water to fight the blaze that consumed the Pacific Palisades area.
Over strong objections from lawyers for the nation’s largest public utility, Jessner finalized a tentative ruling she issued last week concluding victims have a legal basis
U.S. Housing Starts Exceed Estimates After a Stronger DecemberClean Water Act Cases: Of Irrigation and NavigabilityVaccine Mandate Confusion Continues – CMS Vaccine Mandate Restored in Some (But Not All) US StatesTrial Court’s Grant of Summary Judgment On Ground Not Asserted By Moving Party Upheld Investing in Metaverse Real Estate: Mind the Gap Between Recognized and Realized PotentialConsider Manner In Which Loan Agreement (Promissory Note) Is DraftedCourt Rules Planned Development of Banning Ranch May ProceedFederal Court Upholds Privity Requirement in Additional Insured Endorsement; Finds No Equitable EstoppelConstruction and Contract Issues Blamed for Problems at Anchorage PortOpoplan Introduces Generative AI Tools for Home-BuildingInsurer Must Defend Additional Insured Though Its Insured is a Non-PartyMaryland Enacts Climate-Cost Study Over Veto, New Jersey Advances Climate Superfund Proposal as Earlier State Laws Face Ongoing Court ChallengesDefend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret LawThird Circuit Affirms Use of Eminent Domain by Natural Gas PipelineDuty to Defend Affirmed in Connecticut Construction Defect CaseYou Can Take This Job and Shove It!Sun, Sand and Stir-Fry? Miami Woos Chinese for Property: CitiesBad Faith Claim For Independent Contractor's Reduced Loss Assessment Survives Motion to Dismiss“Genuine” Issue of “Material” Fact and Summary JudgmentsCommon Construction Contract Provisions: Indemnity ProvisionsHard to Believe It, Construction Law Musings is 16Goldman Veteran Said to Buy Mortgages After Big ShortCleveland Condo Board Says Construction Defects Caused LeaksDorian’s Wrath: How Event Cancellation Insurance Helps Businesses Recoup Losses from Severe WeatherDrill Rig Accident Kills Engineering Manager, Injures Operator in PhiladelphiaCourt Sharpens The “Sword” And Strengthens The “Shield” Of Contractors’ License LawUnderstanding the Miller ActCrane Firm Pulled Off NYC Projects Following Multiple IncidentsFederal Court Dismisses Coverage Action in Favor of Pending State ProceedingScope of Alaska’s Dump Lien Statute Substantially Reduced For Natural Gas ContractorsGeorgia Court of Appeals Holds That Insurer Must Defend Oil Company Against Entire LawsuitAsbestos Client Alert: Court’s Exclusive Gatekeeper Role May not be Ignored or Shifted to a JuryCan a Receiver Prime and Strip Liens Against Real Property?That’s What I have Insurance For, Right?10 Safety Tips for General ContractorsThe Benefits of Incorporating AI Into the Construction LifecycleDocumentation Important for Defending Construction Defect ClaimsPort Authority Revises Plans for $10B Midtown NYC Bus Terminal ReplacementUnder Construction – November 2025Multiple Occurrences Found For Claims Against Supplier of Asbestos ProductsU.K. High Court COVID-19 Victory for Policyholders May Set a Trend in the U.S.Termination of Construction ContractsGood Indoor Air Quality Keeps Workers Healthy and HappyQuick Note: Insurer’s Denial of Coverage Waives Right to Enforce Post-Loss Policy ConditionsWhat Construction Firm Employers Should Do Right Now to Minimize Legal Risk of Discrimination and Harassment LawsuitsSanctions Issued for Frivolous Hurricane Sandy Complaint Filed Against InsurerIndex Demonstrates Increase in Builders’ SentimentBrown Orders Mandatory Water Curbs for California DroughtAecmaster’s Digital Twin: A New Era for Building DesignWall Street’s Palm Beach Foray Fuels Developer Office RushNY Attorney General to Propose Bill Requiring Climate Adaptation for UtilitiesBeware of Personal-Liability Clauses – Even When Signing in Your Representative CapacityDetroit Craftsmen Sift House Rubble in Quest for Treasured WoodAdditional Dismissals of COVID Business Interruption, Civil Authority ClaimsUnfortunate Event Test Leads to Three OccurrencesRoof's "Cosmetic" Damage From Hail Storm CoveredNorth Carolina Learns More Lessons From Latest StormSenior Living Facility Makes Construction Defect Claims Washington Court of Appeals Divisions Clash Over Interpretations of the Statute of ReposeDust Infiltration Due to Construction Defect Excluded from PolicyPandemic Magnifies Financial Risk in Construction: What Executives Can Do to Speed up Customer PaymentsIt’s All a Matter of [Statutory] Construction: Supreme Court Narrowly Interprets the Good Faith Dispute Exception to Prompt Payment Requirements in United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.Study Finds Construction Cranes Vulnerable to HackingFix for Settling Millennium Tower May Start This FallWhy Construction Tendering Needs Specialized IntelligenceDispositive Motions in AAA Construction Arbitration: Why You Should Think TwiceWho, Me?Unqualified Threat to Picket a Neutral is Unfair Labor PracticeQuick Note: Include Key Time Related Facts in Contract to Avoid an AmbiguityOSHA Advisory Committee, Assemble!Fifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of InsuredSeventh Circuit, With an Assist From the Illinois Supreme Court, Finds That “Pollution Exclusion” Bars Coverage For Emissions Allowed Under Regulatory PermitTop 10 Construction Contract Provisions – Changes and ClaimsCongress Passes, President Signs Sweeping Energy Measure In Spend BillMichigan Finds Coverage for Subcontractor's Faulty WorkCalifornia Federal Court Finds a Breach of Contract Exclusion in a CGL Policy Bars All Coverage for a Construction Defect ActionFormer Superintendent Sentenced in Rhode Island Tainted Fill CaseDrill Rig Accident Kills Engineering Manager, Injures Operator in PhiladelphiaIn a Win for Property Owners California Court Expands and Clarifies Privette DoctrineReal Estate & Construction News Round-Up (01/25/23) – Artificial Intelligence, Proptech Innovation, and Drone AdoptionNew Utah & Colorado Homebuilder Announced: Jack Fisher HomesLiving Not So Large: The sprawl of television shows about very small housesDifference Between a Novation And A Modification to a ContractSnell & Wilmer’s Orange County Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Orange County Business JournalNo Coverage Under Anti-Concurrent Causation ClauseColorado’s Three-Bill Approach to Alleged Construction Defect IssuesIs There Direct Physical Loss Under A Property Policy When COVID-19 is Present?Actual Cost Value Includes Depreciation of Repair Labor Costs
