BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort expert witness Glendale Oregon condominiums expert witness Glendale Oregon hospital construction expert witness Glendale Oregon tract home expert witness Glendale Oregon production housing expert witness Glendale Oregon multi family housing expert witness Glendale Oregon Medical building expert witness Glendale Oregon institutional building expert witness Glendale Oregon custom home expert witness Glendale Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Glendale Oregon office building expert witness Glendale Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Glendale Oregon condominium expert witness Glendale Oregon housing expert witness Glendale Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Glendale Oregon low-income housing expert witness Glendale Oregon custom homes expert witness Glendale Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Glendale Oregon parking structure expert witness Glendale Oregon townhome construction expert witness Glendale Oregon industrial building expert witness Glendale Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Glendale Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Glendale, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Glendale Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Josephine Cty Oregon
    Local # 3848
    223 NE B St Ste B
    Grants Pass, OR 97526
    http://www.homebuildersofjoco.com

    Umpqua Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3816
    3000 Stewart Parkway Suite 206
    Roseburg, OR 97471
    http://www.umpquavalleyhba.org

    Klamath Basin Home Builders Association
    Local # 3855
    205 Riverside Drive Ste G
    Klamath Falls, OR 97601
    http://www.kbhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Jackson County
    Local # 3836
    1006 E Jackson St
    Medford, OR 97504
    http://www.hbajc.com

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern Oregon
    Local # 3888
    PO Box 696
    Coos Bay, OR 97420
    http://www.hbaswo.org

    Curry County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3851
    PO Box 1689
    Brookings, OR 97415


    Central Oregon Builders Association
    Local # 3810
    61396 S Hwy 97 Ste 203
    Bend, OR 97702
    http://www.coba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Glendale Oregon
    Corporate Profile

    GLENDALE OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Glendale, Oregon Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive resources which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Glendale construction industry.

    Glendale Oregon expert witnesses fenestrationGlendale Oregon building expertGlendale Oregon expert witness commercial buildingsGlendale Oregon ada design expert witnessGlendale Oregon roofing construction expertGlendale Oregon slope failure expert witnessGlendale Oregon consulting general contractor
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Glendale, Oregon

    What Construction Attorneys Do and When Contractors Need Them

    August 11, 2026 —
    Direct Answer A construction attorney advises contractors on contracts, payment rights, mechanic's liens, payment bond claims, change orders, delay claims, OSHA matters, defect claims, terminations and dispute resolution. The work covers far more than lawsuits—much of its value comes before a dispute ever becomes formal. Construction attorneys help contractors protect payment rights, manage project risk, resolve disputes and avoid contract terms that can turn a profitable job into a financial loss. Their work covers more than lawsuits. A construction attorney may review a contract before bid day, help preserve lien rights, respond to a defective work claim, prepare for mediation or defend a contractor after a safety citation. For contractors, legal counsel is often most valuable before a dispute becomes formal. A missed notice deadline, vague scope clause, unsigned change order or broad indemnity provision can create problems long before a claim is filed. Construction attorneys help identify those risks while there is still time to negotiate, document the issue or preserve leverage. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    At the Intersection of Indemnity and Prevailing Wages

    March 17, 2026 —
    In a case that I’m frankly surprised I don’t see more of, the 2nd District Court of Appeal of California examined an indemnity claim by a subcontractor against a general contractor and public entity who mistakenly believed that a construction project did not require the payment of prevailing wages. The Nabors Case In Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. v. City of Long Beach, 108 Cal.App 540 (2025), subcontractor Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. sued general contractor Tidelands Oil Production Company and the City of Long Beach after it was found liable in a class action lawsuit for failing to pay prevailing wages to its employees. Nabors’ contract with Tidelands did not require the payment of prevailing wages and neither Tidelands nor the City believed that the project, which involved “oil well plug and abandonment” work, required the payment of prevailing wages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Did You Get the Message? (And does it count?) The Legal Consequences of Text Messages, Group Chats, and Informal Digital Communication on Construction Projects

    March 17, 2026 —
    Introduction: The New Reality of Construction Communication Construction projects have always depended on a constant stream of communication. Today’s project managers, superintendents, and foremen have broadened the method of communication to include convenient forms of digital communication. Superintendents text photos of field conditions, owners send quick approvals through WhatsApp, architects clarify design intent in a Teams chat, and subcontractors coordinate sequencing through group texts. These channels are fast, convenient, and deeply embedded in modern project culture. Yet the legal framework governing construction contracts has not evolved at the same pace. Many contracts still assume – or require – that notice, directives, and approvals occur through formal written channels—letters, emails to designated recipients, or structured project‑management platforms. This disconnect creates significant legal risk, particularly for contractors who rely on informal messages as authorization for extra work or schedule changes. Courts are increasingly asked to interpret text messages, chat threads, and screenshots as evidence of notice, direction, or waiver. The outcomes vary, but the trend is unmistakable: informal digital communication is now part of the project record, and it can bind parties in ways they did not expect. Reprinted courtesy of Kellie Ros, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Curtis Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Ros may be contacted at kros@pecklaw.com Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Course of Construction Exclusions and the CGL Policy

    July 20, 2026 —
    I. Course of Construction Exclusions Course of Construction (“COC”) exclusions are found on General Liability and excess liability policies, typically a wrap-up or project specific policy, and generally exclude “all property damage occurring during the course of construction.” Insurers claim COC exclusions are not problematic because they are intended to prevent an overlap in coverage between the general liability policy and first-party property Builder’s Risk policy. However, because General Liability policies and Builder’s Risk policies provide coverage for different risks, COC exclusions can create a gap in coverage for owners and contractors. Therefore, any exclusion on a wrap-up or project specific policy that limits coverage for property damage liability should be scrutinized, and amendments sought when warranted and commercially achievable, for owners, developers and contractors because General Liability policies do not cover the same risk as that of a Builder’s Risk policy. General liability policies provide defense and indemnity to the insured(s) for claims made by a third-party against the insured. Broad COC exclusions serve to preclude coverage for all property damage, not just property damage to the insured project. This includes property damage to property other than the insured project, e.g. an adjacent property. On the other hand, Builder’s Risk policies provide first-party property coverage for direct physical loss to the project during the course of construction. The Builder’s Risk policy will not provide coverage for property other than the project itself (e.g., adjacent property) and it will not provide a defense or indemnity in the event the owner of the damaged property brings a claim against a potentially at-fault party. Reprinted courtesy of Anna M. Perry, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C., Rachel S. Kindseth, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Nina Catanzaro, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Ms. Perry may be contacted at APerry@sdvlaw.com Ms. Kindseth may be contacted at rkindseth@sdvlaw.com Ms. Catanzaro may be contacted at NCatanzaro@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Turnover Traps for Community Associations: Investigate First, Release Claims Later

    April 14, 2026 —
    Turnover of a community association from developer control to owner control is a uniquely vulnerable moment. Developers are increasingly presenting Florida condominium and homeowners’ associations with “standard” settlement or release agreements at turnover, often being framed as routine steps to finalize the transition of control. In reality, these agreements can have sweeping consequences, including the release of construction-defect claims before the association has conducted any meaningful independent evaluation. The developer has years of project knowledge and access to plans, subcontractors, and internal records. The newly elected board is just beginning to organize, obtain documents, and understand the property’s condition. Many defects, especially those involving roofing, waterproofing, windows, or structural components, are latent and not yet visible. Signing a release at this stage means the association is making a binding d
    Dealing with Hazardous Substances on the Construction Site

    Happenings in and around the West Coast Casualty Seminar

    Wilke Fleury and Attorneys Recognized as ‘Best Law Firm’ and ‘Best Lawyers’ by U.S. News!

    Federal Regulatory Recap: A Summary of Recent Rulemaking Actions Taken or Proposed Affecting the Energy Industry

    Former Hoboken, New Jersey Mayor Disbarred for Taking Bribes

    Henderson Land to Spend $839 Million on Hong Kong Retail Complex

    Scope of Alaska’s Dump Lien Statute Substantially Reduced For Natural Gas Contractors

    Top Developments March 2024

    Pillsbury Insights – Navigating the Real Estate Market During COVID-19

    Wearable Ways to Work in Extreme Heat

    Resolving Condominium Construction Defect Warranty Claims in Maryland

    Veolia Agrees to $25M Settlement in Flint Water Crisis Case

    How One Squirrel Taught us a Surprising Amount about Insurance Investigation Lessons Learned from the Iowa Supreme Court

    Montreal Bridge Builders Sue Canada Over New Restrictions

    Tenants Underwater: Indiana Court of Appeals Upholds Privity Requirement for Property Damage Claims Against Contractors

    Four Months From Helene, Emergency Repairs Continue in North Carolina

    EO or Uh-Oh: Biden’s Executive Order Requiring Project Labor Agreements on Federal Construction Projects

    White House Proposal Returns to 1978 NEPA Review Procedures

    Barratt Said to Suspend Staff as Contract Probe Continues

    New York Restrictions on Flow Through Provision in Subcontracts

    After Pittsburgh Bridge Collapse, Fast-Rising Replacement Emerges

    Hiring Subcontractors with Workers Compensation Insurance

    Purely “Compensatory” Debts Owed by Attorneys to Clients (Which Are Not Disciplinary or Punitive Fees Imposed by the State Bar) Are Dischargeable In Bankruptcy

    California Trial Court Clarifies Application of SB800 Roofing Standards and Expert’s Opinions

    Federal Court Sets High Bar for Pleading Products Liability Cases in New Jersey

    Client Alert: Disclosure of Plaintiff’s Status as Undocumented Alien to Prospective Jury Panel Grounds for Mistrial

    Recognize: A Construction Safety Week Technical Bulletin

    A Funny Thing Happened to My Ground Lease in Bankruptcy Court

    Liquidated Damages: Too High and It’s a Penalty. Too Low and You’re Out of Luck.

    Slavin Doctrine and Defense from Patent Defects

    Bar Against Forum Selection Clauses in Construction Contracts Extended to Design Professionals

    Another Municipality Takes Action to Address the Lack of Condominiums Being Built in its Jurisdiction

    WATCH: 2023 Construction Economic Update and Forecast

    Construction May Begin with Documents, but It Shouldn’t End That Way

    Whose Lease Is It Anyway: Physical Occupancy Not Require
    Analysis of the “owned property exclusion” under Panico v. State Farm

    Drastic Rebuild Resurrects Graves' Landmark Portland Building

    Reference to "Man Made" Movement of Earth Corrects Ambiguity

    In Hong Kong, You Can Find a Home Where the Buffalo Roam

    Ahead of the Storm: Preparing for Irma

    Contractors Must Register with the L&I Prior to Offering or Performing Work, or Risk Having their Breach of Contract Case Dismissed

    No Cherry Picking: Direct Benefits Estoppel and Binding Non-Parties to Arbitration

    Colorado Legislature Kills SB 20-138 – A Bill to Extend Colorado’s Statute of Repose

    California Precludes Surety from Asserting Pay-When-Paid Provision as Defense to Payment Bond Claim

    Fracking Fears Grow as Oklahoma Hit by More Earthquakes Than California

    With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it)

    Courthouse Reporter Series: Two Recent Cases Address Copyright Protection for Architectural Works

    Owner’s Obligation Giving Notice to Cure to Contractor and Analyzing Repair Protocol

    Tetra Tech-U.S. Cleanup Dispute in San Francisco Grows

    Understanding the Limits of Privilege When Applied to Witness Prep Sessions

    MBIA Seeks Data in $1 Billion Credit Suisse Mortgage Suit

    New York Appellate Court Holds Insurer’s Failure to Defend Does Not Constitute a “Reasonable Excuse” Required to Overturn Judgment

    Congratulations to BWB&O for Ranking in The U.S. News – Best Lawyers ® as “Best Law Firms”!

    Designer of World’s Tallest Building Wants to Turn Skyscrapers Into Batteries

    Federal Court Asks South Dakota Supreme Court to Decide Whether Injunction Costs Are “Damages,” Adopts Restatement’s Position on Providing “Inadequate” Defense

    No Coverage For Wind And Flood Damage Suffered From Superstorm Sandy

    Supreme Court Holds Arbitrator can Fully Decide Threshold Arbitrability Issue

    Vacant Building Negates Coverage for Broken Pipe

    The Proposed House Green New Deal Resolution

    Australia Warns of Multi-Billion Dollar Climate Disaster Costs

    Condo Owners Allege Construction Defects

    AI Adoption in Construction: A UK Practitioner’s View

    Insurer Must Defend Construction Defect Claims

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Give a Little Extra …”

    Third Circuit Follows Pennsylvania Law - Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship Does Not Arise from an Occurrence

    Amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 – Expert Testimony

    'Regluing' Oregon State's Showcase for Mass Timber

    Courthouse Reporter Series: Nebraska Court of Appeals Vacates Arbitration Award for Misconduct

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    Georgia Passes Solar CUVA Bill

    Be Careful How You Terminate: Terminating for Convenience May Limit Your Future Rights

    Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Earns Prestigious Band One Ranking in the Chambers USA 2026 Guide

    Buy America/Buy American, a Primer For Contractors

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    A Word to the Wise: The AIA Revised Contract Documents Could Lead to New and Unanticipated Risks - Part II

    Insurance and Reconstruction: A Guide for Property Owners Facing Wildfire Aftermath and Other Disasters

    Court Rules That ERISA Preemption Bars Recovery of Union Benefit Fund Payments Pursuant to New York’s Wage Theft Statute from a General Contractor Where a Subcontractor Failed to Fund Payments

    Proposition 65: OEHHA to Consider Adding and Delisting Certain Chemicals of Concern

    Two Things to Consider Before Making Warranty Repairs

    Carroll Brock of Larchmont Homes Dies at Age 88

    NYPD Investigating Two White Flags on Brooklyn Bridge

    Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Denied

    Lien Attaches To Landlord’s Interest When Landlord Is Party To Tenant Improvement Construction Contract

    Courts Generally Favor the Enforcement of Arbitration Provisions

    Wilke Fleury Celebrates the Addition of Two New Partners