BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Heppner Oregon industrial building expert witness Heppner Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Heppner Oregon casino resort expert witness Heppner Oregon hospital construction expert witness Heppner Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Heppner Oregon condominium expert witness Heppner Oregon Medical building expert witness Heppner Oregon townhome construction expert witness Heppner Oregon condominiums expert witness Heppner Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Heppner Oregon custom homes expert witness Heppner Oregon multi family housing expert witness Heppner Oregon retail construction expert witness Heppner Oregon parking structure expert witness Heppner Oregon office building expert witness Heppner Oregon housing expert witness Heppner Oregon low-income housing expert witness Heppner Oregon custom home expert witness Heppner Oregon production housing expert witness Heppner Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Heppner Oregon tract home expert witness Heppner Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Heppner, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Heppner Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Heppner Oregon

    Pennsylvania Court Finds that Two Possible Causes Can Prove a Product Malfunction Theory of Liability

    Bert Hummel Appointed to Chief Justice’s Commission on Professionalism

    That’s not the way we’ve always done it! (Why you should update your office practices)

    President Trump Announces New Steel Tariffs

    Coverage For Advertising Injury Barred by Prior Publication Exclusion

    HOA Coalition Statement on Construction-Defects Transparency Legislation

    Significant Ruling in PFAS Litigation Could Impact Insurance Coverage

    Unpaid Subcontractor Walks Off the Job and Wins

    Insurance Agent Sued for Lapse in Coverage after House Collapses

    Beyond the Flow-Down Clause: Subcontract Provisions That Can Expose General Contractors to Increased Liability and Inconsistent Outcomes

    Beginning of the 2020 Colorado Legislative Session: Here We Go Again

    Coronavirus and Contract Obligations

    Insurers May Not Be Required to Defend Contractors In a Florida §558 Proceeding

    Insurance Litigation Roundup: “Post No Bills!”

    Funding the Self-Insured Retention (SIR)

    One More Thing Moving From California to Texas: Wildfire Risk

    Housing Bill Threatened by Rift on Help for Disadvantaged

    Crumbling Roadways Add Costs to Economy, White House Says

    Don’t Hire Me! (Principle Is Expensive, and Lawsuits Based on Principle Are Even More Expensive)

    Quick Note: Don’t Spoil Evidence!!!!

    The Multigenerational Housing Trend

    California’s Prompt Payment Laws: Just Because an Owner Has Changed Course Doesn’t Mean It’s Changed Course on Previous Payments

    When Coronavirus Cases Spike at Construction Jobsites

    43% of U.S. Homes in High Natural Disaster Risk Areas

    A New Lawsuit Might Change the Real Estate Industry Forever

    Updated Covid-19 Standards In The Workplace

    Homebuilders Offer Hope for U.K. Economy

    New York Regulator Issues Cyber Insurance Guidelines

    Effective Zoning Reform Isn’t as Simple as It Seems

    John Boyden, Alison Kertis Named “Top Rank Attorneys” by Nevada Business Magazine

    California’s Retention Reform on Private Construction Projects

    Construction Defects Not Occurrences under Ohio Law

    California Appellate Court Holds “Minimal Causal Connection” Satisfies Causation Requirement in All Risk Policies

    Know Your Obligations Under Both the Prime Contract and Subcontract

    Australians Back U.S. Renewables While Opportunities at Home Ebb

    More Fun with Indemnity and Construction Contracts!

    Brian Newberry Accepted into ABOTA

    Loss Ensuing from Alleged Faulty Workmanship is Covered

    Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Denied

    New Rule Prohibits Use of Funds For Certain DoD Construction and Infrastructure Programs and Projects

    Is It Time to Revisit Construction Defects in Kentucky?

    Mediation Confidentiality Bars Malpractice Claim but for How Long?

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    It’s Getting Harder and Harder to be a Concrete Supplier in California

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Colorado Senate Voted to Kill One of Three Construction Defect Bills

    Eminent Domain Bomb Threats Made on $775M Alabama Highway Project

    Lake Charles Tower’s Window Damage Perplexes Engineers

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    Historical Long-Tail Claims in California Subject to a Vertical Exhaustion Rule
    Corporate Profile

    HEPPNER OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Heppner, Oregon Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking meaningful resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Heppner construction industry.

    Heppner Oregon construction expert witnessesHeppner Oregon construction expert witnessHeppner Oregon delay claim expert witnessHeppner Oregon architect expert witnessHeppner Oregon construction scheduling expert witnessHeppner Oregon testifying construction expert witnessHeppner Oregon ada design expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Heppner, Oregon

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    AI in AEC 2026: Doing AI Right and Rethinking Your Business Model

    April 08, 2026 —
    The sixth AI at the AEC 2026 conference showcased the evolution of AI discussions. There were, naturally, many talks about software and technologies. But more than before, there were conversations about realizing AI’s business value. Two themes appeared in nearly every session I attended. First, many companies struggle with AI adoption, not because they lack tools, but because their thinking isn’t right. Second, when AI works, it disrupts the business model that brought them there. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    $27B Meta Data Center Pushes Louisiana Toward Massive Power Expansion

    April 27, 2026 —
    Meta Platforms has reached an agreement with Entergy Louisiana to fund new energy infrastructure to support its planned $27-billion data center in Richland Parish, a project the company says could ultimately scale to 5 GW, becoming its largest facility to date. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has described the site as large enough to cover a significant portion of Manhattan. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Vince Kong, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Kong may be contacted at kongv@enr.com

    Elliott Backed Venture Sues Lloyds Over Avant Cladding, Times Reports

    February 17, 2026 —
    Elliott Investment Management and British housing tycoon Jeff Fairburn, joint-venture partners in UK homebuilder Avant Homes Group, are suing Lloyds Banking Group Plc over who should pay to fix properties that fail to meet post-Grenfell fire-safety standards, the Times reported. Avant, which faces remediation costs of at least £107 million ($146 million) for potentially dangerous cladding, argues that Lloyds should shoulder part of the bill because most of the developments were built before 2014, when the homebuilder was under the bank’s ownership, the Times reported. Cladding has become a contentious issue in the UK following the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017, in which dozens died after flames spread rapidly through flammable exterior cladding on the West London high-rise, laying bare deep failures in Britain’s building safety regulations. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Eamon Farhat, Bloomberg

    Data Center Construction: Contractors Must Step Up

    May 26, 2026 —
    I attended the Datacenter Forum 2026 in Helsinki last week. Over 400 people packed the room. Walking out, I had one overriding thought: Is construction operating in a different century from the technology it is being asked to house? Is Our Industry on Par? Ciarán Forde, Senior Vice President at CTS Nordics, opened the forum with a statement that set the tone for everything that followed: data centers are no longer just a technical challenge; they are a national strategy. Before AI, Ciarán had worked in telecoms, where data centers were already complex. But now, he said flatly, everything has changed, and the industry must rethink everything. The numbers behind the claim are staggering. Current AI data center racks run at 40 to 100 kW. In three years, 800 kW per rack is on the roadmap. And the development cycle for a new chip is roughly one year, which means deployments begin aging out almost as soon as they are commissioned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Meet BWB&O’s Super Lawyers Rising Stars in Colorado!

    April 08, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is thrilled to share that Partner Devin Brunson and Associate Melissa Youngpeter have been named to the Super Lawyers 2026 Colorado Rising Stars list. This recognition reflects their exceptional work in Personal Injury and Civil Litigation.
    SUPER LAWYERS RISING STARS
    Devin Brunson: 2024-2026
    Melissa Youngpeter: 2026
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...