BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Hood River County Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Hood River County Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Hood River County Oregon industrial building expert witness Hood River County Oregon tract home expert witness Hood River County Oregon condominiums expert witness Hood River County Oregon production housing expert witness Hood River County Oregon custom homes expert witness Hood River County Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon office building expert witness Hood River County Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon Medical building expert witness Hood River County Oregon retail construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon housing expert witness Hood River County Oregon condominium expert witness Hood River County Oregon hospital construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon townhome construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon low-income housing expert witness Hood River County Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Hood River County Oregon parking structure expert witness Hood River County Oregon casino resort expert witness Hood River County Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Hood River County, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Hood River County Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Hood River County Oregon

    Construction Workers Unearth Bones

    Lightstone Committing $2 Billion to Hotel Projects

    #8 CDJ Topic: The Las Vegas HOA Fraud Case Concludes but Controversy Continues

    The Non-Imputation Affidavit in Real Estate Title Insurance

    Next Steps for Policyholders in the Aftermath of the California Wildfires

    The Great London Property Exodus Is in Reverse as Tenants Return

    Colorado Supreme Court Rules that Developers Retain Perpetual Control over Construction Defect Covenants

    Condo Building Increasing in Washington D.C.

    Dear Engineer: Has your insurer issued a “Reservation of Rights” letter? (law note)

    CDJ’s #8 Topic of the Year: California’s Board of Equalization Tower

    Construction Contract Basics: Venue and Choice of Law

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 5: Valuation of Loss, Sublimits, and Amount of Potential Recovery

    Long-Planned Miami Mega Mixed-Use Development Nears Initial Debut

    Suffolk Pauses $1.5B Boston Tower Project for Safety Audit After Fire

    Eleventh Circuit’s Noteworthy Discussion on Bad Faith Insurance Claims

    If You Get ‘Reported to the Board’ for Your Professional License (Law Note)

    Parking Garage Collapse May Be Due to Construction Defect

    Quick Note: Burden of Proving and Defending All Risk Property Insurance Claims

    Faulty Workmanship Causing Damage to Other Property Covered as Construction Defect

    As Evidence Grows, Regions Prepare for Sea Level Rise

    ConsensusDOCS Hits the Cloud

    Watchdog Opens Cartel Probe Into Eight British Homebuilders

    Waiver of Consequential Damages: The Most Important Provision in a Construction Contract

    Puerto Rico Grid Restoration Plagued by Historic Problems, New Challenges

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap – Arbitration Motion Practice

    You Should’ve Known: Colorado Holds Defendant May Have Pre-Litigation Duty to Preserve Evidence

    Defining Constructive Acceleration

    Construction Contract Basics: Indemnity

    William Doerler Recognized by JD Supra 2022 Readers’ Choice Awards

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    Florida’s Statute of Limitations / Repose for Actions Founded on Construction Improvement Modified

    Congratulations 2019 DE, MA, NJ, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    The Cost of Overlooking Jury Fees

    Newport Beach Partners Jeremy Johnson, Courtney Serrato, and Associate Joseph Real Prevailed on a Demurrer in a Highly Publicized Shooting Case!

    U.S. District Court of Colorado Interprets Insurance Policy’s Faulty Workmanship Exclusion and Exception for Ensuing Damage

    Appellate Court Reinforces When the Attorney-Client Relationship Ends for Purposes of “Continuous Representation” Tolling Provision of Legal Malpractice Statute of Limitations

    While You Were Getting Worked Up Over Oil Prices, This Just Happened to Solar

    Superintendent’s On-Site Supervision Compensable as Labor Under Miller Act

    Subcontractor Exception to Your Work Exclusion Paves the Way for Coverage

    The ABCs of PFAS: What You Need to Know About Liabilities for the “Forever Chemical”

    False Implied Certifications in Making Payment Requests: What We Can Learn from Lance Armstrong

    Georgia Court Rules that Separate Settlements Are Not the End of the Matter

    BWB&O’s LA Team Secures a Defense Victory for General Contractor Client in Riverside Superior Court!

    Canada Cooler Housing Market Boosts Poloz’s Soft Landing

    Washington, DC’s COVID-19 Eviction Moratorium Expires

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 04/13/22

    Does the Recording of a Mechanic’s Lien Memorandum by Itself Constitute Process? Read to Find Out

    Can an App Renovate a Neighborhood?

    Firm Announces Remediation of Defective Drywall

    Tokyo Tackles Flood Control as Typhoons Swamp Subways
    Corporate Profile

    HOOD RIVER COUNTY OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 building and construction related expert designations, the Hood River County, Oregon Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. In connection with in house assets which include credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Hood River County and the surrounding areas.

    Hood River County Oregon hospital construction expert witnessHood River County Oregon stucco expert witnessHood River County Oregon soil failure expert witnessHood River County Oregon consulting engineersHood River County Oregon expert witness roofingHood River County Oregon multi family design expert witnessHood River County Oregon construction claims expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Hood River County, Oregon

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    August 24, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 11, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce the opening of a new office in Sacramento, CA. This will be the firm’s 19th office across the United States. Partner Melvin F. Marcia has joined Kahana Feld and will lead the opening of the Sacramento office. He is joined by attorneys Matthew Brenner and Britney Lucchesi as well as paralegal Michelle Welcker. “We’re excited to welcome Melvin to the Kahana Feld team and expand our footprint in Northern California,” said Amir Kahana, Firmwide Managing Partner of Kahana Feld. “His addition strengthens Kahana Feld’s capabilities and will allow us to work more closely with our general liability, construction defect, and labor and employment clients in the Sacramento area while continuing to provide the level of service and experience they have come to expect from our firm.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Arbitration in Construction Disputes: Process and Best Practices

    July 27, 2026 —
    Arbitration in construction disputes is a private process where owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers or suppliers present claims to one or more neutral arbitrators instead of taking the dispute through court. The arbitrator reviews evidence, hears testimony and issues a decision that is usually binding. Construction arbitration is common because project disputes are technical, document-heavy and time-sensitive. Claims may involve schedule delays, disputed change orders, defective work, differing site conditions, payment, termination, indemnity, surety issues or professional liability. Arbitration can be faster and more specialized than litigation, but speed is not guaranteed. Poor contract language, broad discovery, weak records and unclear damages can make arbitration expensive. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    New Law Prompts ABC Minnesota/North Dakota to Design New Telecommunications Safety Training Program

    June 29, 2026 —
    On the first day of the year, a Minnesota law requiring installers of underground telecommunication infrastructure broadband, fiber or phone lines (when projects utilize directional drilling, and/or work is being conducted within 10 feet of existing utilities) to undergo a 40-hour certification went into effect. Originally passed in mid-2024 and proposed to go into effect in July 2025, the law’s requirements were postponed until January 2026, giving ABC Minnesota/North Dakota—in partnership with NCCER and the Minnesota Cable Communications Association—time to roll out their Safety Qualified Underground Telecommunications Installer training program, which would ensure the workforce of their contractor members were certified. Reprinted courtesy of Grace Calengor, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand

    May 14, 2026 —
    Seattle is in the midst of a significant transformation in residential land use policy. Longstanding neighborhood zoning patterns that historically favored detached single-family development are being reexamined in response to housing supply pressures, affordability concerns, and evolving state mandates. For homeowners, purchasers, investors, and builders, these changes may create substantial new opportunities. They also create a heightened need for careful legal and practical due diligence. While zoning reform can expand potential uses of property, it does not eliminate the many other constraints that may still govern what can actually be built. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lawrence S. Glosser, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Glosser may be contacted at larry.glosser@acslawyers.com

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision Alters Course of $745M Louisiana Coastal Damage Judgment

    June 15, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a unanimous decision allowing oil and gas companies to move Louisiana coastal erosion lawsuits from state court to federal court under the federal officer removal statute. While the ruling is procedural, it carries significant implications for environmental- and energy-related risks. The case, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, Slip Op. 24-813 (April 17, 2026), addressed a threshold jurisdictional question but has broader significance for environmental and climate related litigation. State courts are often viewed as more favorable forums for plaintiffs asserting environmental damage claims, particularly those brought by governmental entities. The opinion issued on April 17, 2026 is the latest development in long-running Louisiana coastal litigation that began more than a decade ago. Starting in 2013, Louisiana parishes filed 42 lawsuits against oil and gas companies alleging environmental damage related to historic oil field operations. The parishes alleged that oil and gas companies violated state coastal management laws by failing to properly restore impacted areas. Chevron sought to remove the cases from state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), known as federal officer removal, which provides federal jurisdiction over “any person acting under [an] officer” of the United States "for or relating to any act under color of such office." The Fifth Circuit rejected the argument and remanded the case, and others like it, to state court. Trial began in March 2025 in Point à la Hache, Louisiana. On April 4, 2025, the jury awarded a total of $745 million to compensate for land loss, contamination and abandoned equipment. On June 16, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the question of whether a federal contractor can remove to federal court when sued for oil-production activities undertaken to fulfill a federal oil-refinement contract. Reprinted courtesy of Jennifer Kretschmann, Lewis Brisbois and Jennifer E. Michel, Lewis Brisbois Ms. Kretschmann may be contacted at Jennifer.Kretschmann@lewisbrisbois.com Ms. Michel may be contacted at Jenny.Michel@lewisbrisbois.com Read the full story...

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    Powering Data Centers in a Moving Regulatory Landscape: Positioning Deals Before FERC’s Next Move

    April 27, 2026 —
    The explosive growth of data‑center load—driven by artificial intelligence, cloud computing and the expansion of digital infrastructure across industries—has forced U.S. energy regulators into unfamiliar territory. Nowhere is this more evident than at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which is actively considering how large, concentrated loads can be powered without compromising grid reliability or shifting costs to other customers. FERC has not yet issued a standalone rulemaking on data centers. But make no mistake, the regulatory framework is quietly and deliberately being built. For developers, hyperscalers, utilities and investors, the period before FERC finalizes its next round of decisions represents the critical window to crystallize advocacy and structure transactions in ways that anticipate regulatory change. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Andrew H. Jacobs, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Your AEC Firm Has a Memory Problem. Here Is How to Fix It

    June 01, 2026 —
    AEC companies trying to operationalize AI often find they lack the data foundation on which to build. There may be an abundance of data hidden in documents, but you can’t reliably use it for AI. The lack of data quality was a key topic discussed at the AI in AEC 2026 conference. During the event, I met many experts working to solve this problem, including Pavlina Nikolova, Egnyte‘s EMEA AEC Practice Lead. The chat and her presentation highlighted the challenges and ways to overcome them. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi