BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Jackson County Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Jackson County Oregon housing expert witness Jackson County Oregon retail construction expert witness Jackson County Oregon institutional building expert witness Jackson County Oregon Medical building expert witness Jackson County Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Jackson County Oregon multi family housing expert witness Jackson County Oregon hospital construction expert witness Jackson County Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Jackson County Oregon townhome construction expert witness Jackson County Oregon condominium expert witness Jackson County Oregon office building expert witness Jackson County Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Jackson County Oregon condominiums expert witness Jackson County Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Jackson County Oregon production housing expert witness Jackson County Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Jackson County Oregon low-income housing expert witness Jackson County Oregon custom homes expert witness Jackson County Oregon casino resort expert witness Jackson County Oregon parking structure expert witness Jackson County Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Jackson County, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Jackson County Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Curry County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3851
    PO Box 1689
    Brookings, OR 97415


    Home Builders Association of Jackson County
    Local # 3836
    1006 E Jackson St
    Medford, OR 97504
    http://www.hbajc.com

    Klamath Basin Home Builders Association
    Local # 3855
    205 Riverside Drive Ste G
    Klamath Falls, OR 97601
    http://www.kbhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Josephine Cty Oregon
    Local # 3848
    223 NE B St Ste B
    Grants Pass, OR 97526
    http://www.homebuildersofjoco.com

    Umpqua Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3816
    3000 Stewart Parkway Suite 206
    Roseburg, OR 97471
    http://www.umpquavalleyhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern Oregon
    Local # 3888
    PO Box 696
    Coos Bay, OR 97420
    http://www.hbaswo.org

    Central Oregon Builders Association
    Local # 3810
    61396 S Hwy 97 Ste 203
    Bend, OR 97702
    http://www.coba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Jackson County Oregon

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy Courts

    Avoid a Derailed Settlement in Construction

    Insurers in New Jersey Secure a Victory on Water Damage Claims, But How Big a Victory Likely Remains to be Seen

    New York’s Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Imposes Increased Disclosure Requirements On Defendants at the Beginning of Lawsuits

    No Third-Quarter Gain for Construction

    Comparative Breach of Contract – The New Benefit of the Bargain in Construction?

    Alaska Supreme Court Finds Insurer Owes No Independent Duty to Injured Party

    Certified Question Asks Washington Supreme Court Whether Insurer is Bound by Contradictory Certificate of Insurance

    Federal Interpleader Dealing with Competing Claims over Undisputed Payable to Subcontractor

    Seattle’s Audacious Aquarium Throws Builders Swerves, Curves, Twists and Turns

    Home Prices on the Rise

    Consider the Risks Associated with an Exculpatory Clause

    Loaded Boom of Burning Tower Crane Collapses in Manhattan, Injuring Six

    NTSB Cites Design Errors in Fatal Bridge Collapse

    Saudi Prince’s Megacity Shows Signs of Life

    NLRB Finalizes Rule for Construction Industry Unions to Obtain Majority Support Representational Status

    Ohio Does Not Permit Retroactive Application of Statute of Repose

    Unprecedented Times: An Interview Panel With 2025 Top Construction Law Firms

    Vinny Testaverde Alleges $5 Million Mansion Riddled with Defects

    "Occurrence" May Include Intentional Acts In Montana

    Suit Limitation Provisions in New York

    Housing Advocacy Group Moved to Dissolve New Jersey's Council on Affordable Housing

    BHA has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports CDCCF Charity at 2014 WCC Seminar

    Subcontractors Eye 2022 with Guarded Optimism

    Insured Survives Motion for Summary Judgment in Collapse Case

    Hotel Owner Makes Construction Defect Claim

    2019 Legislative Session

    Luxury Villa Fraudsters Jailed for Madeira Potato Field Scam

    Client Alert: Release of Liability Agreement Extinguishes Duty of Ordinary Care

    Business Insurance Names Rachel Hudgins Among 2024 Break Out Award Winners

    Buyer Alleges Condo Full of Mold and Mice

    Texas and Georgia Are Paying the Price for Sprawl

    Chambers USA 2019 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Texas Supreme Court Holds that Invoking Appraisal Provision and Paying Appraisal Amount Does Not Insulate an Insurer from Damages Under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act

    Banks Loosening U.S. Mortgage Standards: Chart of the Day

    Subcontractor Sued for Alleged Defective Work

    No Additional Insured Coverage Under Umbrella Policy

    White and Williams recognized with Multiple Honorees in the Chambers 2023 USA Guide

    Proposed California Legislation Would Eliminate Certain Obstacles to Coverage for Covid-19 Business Income Losses

    The Importance of Retrofitting Existing Construction to Meet Sustainability Standards

    Don’t Do this When it Comes to Construction Liens

    Serial ADA Lawsuits Targeting Small Business Owners

    Court Finds Duty To Defend Environmental Claim, But Defense Limited to $100,000

    Suing the Lowest Bidder on Public Construction Projects

    Proposed Bill Provides a New Federal Tax Credit for the Conversion of Office Buildings

    What Construction Firm Employers Should Do Right Now to Minimize Legal Risk of Discrimination and Harassment Lawsuits

    Can an App Renovate a Neighborhood?

    City of Sacramento Approves Kings NBA Financing Plan

    Mutual Or Concurrent Delay Caused By Subcontractors

    Billion-Dollar Power Lines Finally Inching Ahead to Help US Grids
    Corporate Profile

    JACKSON COUNTY OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than four thousand construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Jackson County, Oregon Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house assets which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Jackson County and the surrounding areas.

    Jackson County Oregon stucco expert witnessJackson County Oregon construction expert witness consultantJackson County Oregon construction code expert witnessJackson County Oregon construction expert witness public projectsJackson County Oregon structural engineering expert witnessesJackson County Oregon building expertJackson County Oregon expert witness structural engineer
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Jackson County, Oregon

    Court to General Contractor: Too Late to Reclaim $600K Sub Overpayment

    March 03, 2026 —
    Massachusetts contractors and their attorneys are once again testing the limits of the state's 15-year-old prompt-pay law, with concerned prime contractors asking an appeals court to overturn a lower court ruling that they believe gives subcontractors a powerful upper hand in payment disputes. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    April 08, 2026 —
    The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insured’s agent because there was no breach of duty. Jon Van Order v. Hauk, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2378 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2025). The insured began renovating a vacant home in October 2018. He met with agent Joseph Hauk and explained the property was vacant and would be going through renovations for the next several months. Hauk then procured a policy through Shelter Insurance Company insuring the vacant property against several specified perils. The policy provided coverage for water damage if “[t]he exterior of the building sustained a covered loss” and “that loss created an opening through which the water entered.” Damage caused by escaping water from within a plumbing system was excluded if: (1) the damage was caused by a “continuous or repeated leakage over a period of fourteen days or more” or (2) the insured premises had been vacant for 30 consecutive days immediately preceding the loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    August 03, 2026 —
    For nearly three decades, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) simplified “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations were available more in theory than in practice, constrained by dated models, narrow geographic applicability and a $100,000 cap that rarely matched the economics of modern environmental claims. DOI has now finalized revisions to the Type A natural resource damages assessment procedures under 43 C.F.R. Part 11 for hazardous substance releases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), with the final rule published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2026 and scheduled to become effective August 12, 2026. As discussed previously, DOI has sought to modernize what it views as an “inefficient and inflexible” process and restore the Type A procedure to its intended role as a more streamlined pathway for smaller, less contentious NRD claims. The final rule adopts a $5 million default damages threshold, allows use above that amount if all parties agree, clarifies that Type A may be used in all environments and for all natural resource types, and removes legacy model appendices that had tethered the process to outdated formulas. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Legal 500 US Ranks Hunton’s Insurance Coverage Team Among Top Policyholder Practices in 2026 Guide

    July 06, 2026 —
    Hunton’s insurance coverage practice was once again recognized among the nation’s top policyholder insurance practices, receiving a Band 2 national ranking in the 2026 United States Edition of The Legal 500 for Insurance: Advice to Policyholders. The Legal 500 recognizes firms solely based on merit through numerous factors including client feedback and peer input. Bolstering the team’s national recognition, several coverage lawyers received individual accolades: special counsel Lorelie “Lorie” S. Masters was named to The Legal 500’s Hall of Fame; team head Syed S. Ahmad and partner Michael S. Levine were named Leading Lawyers; and partners Andrea DeField and Latosha M. Ellis were named Next Generation Partners. In addition, partners Walter J. Andrews, Lawrence J. Bracken II, and Koorosh “KT” Talieh were recognized as Key Lawyers on the team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Standing When It Comes to Real Property Owned by a Trust

    February 23, 2026 —
    It is not uncommon for property to be owned in the name of the trust as part of an estate planning agenda. In construction, improvements are made all the time to real property owned in the name of a trust or later transferred to a trust for estate planning purposes. In a recent case, the question became that if the property is owned by the trust does only the trust have standing to file the lawsuit. In this case, homeowners, in their individual capacities, sued a flooring contractor for defective work; however, prior to the lawsuit, the homeowners deeded the home (which would include the flooring in the home) to a revocable trust. The plaintiffs, though, were the trustees of the revocable trust and the settlors of the trust. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    New York Team Secures Dismissal of Premises Liability Action Against Client

    May 26, 2026 —
    New York Associate Nicole Koch and Partner Jennine Gerrard recently secured a complete dismissal of a plaintiff’s claims for injuries following a fall in front of a client’s business at an outdoor mall. The plaintiff alleged that she was walking on the sidewalk outside of the client's hair care supply store in the Bronx in May 2024 when she tripped and fell on a broken/defective portion of the sidewalk. As a result of the accident, the plaintiff suffered injuries to her spine, hip, wrist, and both knees. She proceeded to file suit in New York County Supreme Court against Lewis Brisbois’ client and the landlord for the property. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    HDR Agreed to $12M Settlement With Miami Bridge Design-Build Team

    May 12, 2026 —
    HDR last year agreed to pay $12 million to the design-build construction contractor Archer Western-de Moya Group to settle its claims that the engineer had incompletely designed and under-designed Miami's new Signature Bridge when the joint venture committed to a fixed price prior to construction in 2018. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com