BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon condominium expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon parking structure expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon multi family housing expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon custom homes expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon hospital construction expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon Medical building expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon low-income housing expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon custom home expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon townhome construction expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon condominiums expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon casino resort expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon office building expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon retail construction expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon production housing expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon industrial building expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon housing expert witness Lake Oswego Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lake Oswego, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lake Oswego Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lake Oswego Oregon

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Team on Their Successful Motion for Summary Judgment!

    Angela Cooner Appointed Vice-Chair of Arizona’s Inaugural Board of Legal Specialization Construction Defect Law Advisory Commission

    Search in Florida Collapse to Take Weeks; Deaths Reach 90

    ‘The Ground Just Gave Out’: How a Storm’s Fury Ravaged Asheville

    Cultivating a Company Culture Committed to Safety, Mentorship and Education

    Cuba: Construction Boom Potential for U.S. Construction Companies and Equipment Manufacturers?

    Seattle Council May Take a New Look at Micro-Housing

    How Retro-Commissioning Can Extend the Life of a Building—and the Planet

    Insureds Survive Motion to Dismiss Civil Authority Claim

    Dynamics of Managing Professional Liability Claims for Design Builders

    Kentucky Court Upholds Arbitration Award, Denies Appeal

    Insurer Must Cover Construction Defects Claims under Actual Injury Rule

    Top 10 Take-Aways from the 2025 Mid-Winter Meeting in Tampa

    Revised Federal Rule Regarding Class-Wide Settlements

    What is the Effect of an Untimely Challenge to the Timeliness of a Trustee’s Sale?

    OSHA Set to Tag More Firms as Severe Violators Under New Criteria

    SAFETY Act Part II: Levels of Protection

    Alabama Court Upholds Late Notice Disclaimer

    Issue and Claim Preclusion When Forced to Litigate Similar Issues in Different Forums: White River Village, LLP v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland

    Colorado statutory “property damage” caused by an “occurrence”

    Prime Contractor & Surety’s Recovery of Attorney’s Fees in Miller Act Lawsuit

    U.S. Stocks Fall as Small Shares Tumble Amid Home Sales

    See the Stories That Drew the Most Readers to ENR.com in 2023

    ConsensusDOCS Updates its Forms

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2022 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Alabama “occurrence” and subcontractor work exception to the “your completed work” exclusion

    Construction News Roundup

    Blackstone Said in $1.7 Billion Deal to Buy Apartments

    Terms of Your Teaming Agreement Matter

    Construction Demand Unsteady, Gains in Some Regions

    Wary to the Unlicensed Contractor – You Are Sh*T Out of Luck

    KB to Spend $43.2 Million on Florida Construction Defects

    Bribe Charges Take Toll on NY Contractor

    Hawaii Supreme Court Reaffirms an "Accident" Includes Reckless Conduct, Finds Green House Gases are Pollutants

    WSHB Ranks No.10 in Law360’s Best of Law Firms for Women

    “Details Matter” is the Foundation in a Texas Construction Defect Suit

    Multiple Occurrences Found For Claims Against Supplier of Asbestos Products

    New Rule Prohibits Use of Funds For Certain DoD Construction and Infrastructure Programs and Projects

    New York Public Library’s “Most Comprehensive Renovation” In Its History

    Virginia General Assembly Tweaks Pay-if-Paid Ban

    24th Annual West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar A Success

    New York Court Holds Insurer Can Rely on Exclusions After Incorrectly Denying Defense

    Homeowners Must Comply with Arbitration over Construction Defects

    Court Addresses HOA Attempt to Restrict Short Term Rentals

    Balestreri Potocki & Holmes Attorneys Named 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising Star

    Denver’s Proposed Solution to the Affordable Housing Crisis

    Tick Tock: Don’t Let the Statute of Repose or Limitations Time Periods Run on Your Construction Claims

    There’s an Unusual Thing Happening in the Housing Market

    Common Law Indemnification - A Primer

    Competition to Design Washington D.C.’s 11th Street Bridge Park
    Corporate Profile

    LAKE OSWEGO OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction, architectural, and engineering related expert designations, the Lake Oswego, Oregon Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to builders and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the building industry's most recognized companies, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Lake Oswego and the surrounding areas.

    Lake Oswego Oregon expert witness commercial buildingsLake Oswego Oregon consulting engineersLake Oswego Oregon construction project management expert witnessLake Oswego Oregon construction expert testimonyLake Oswego Oregon expert witnesses fenestrationLake Oswego Oregon slope failure expert witnessLake Oswego Oregon architect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lake Oswego, Oregon

    Top Developments 2025 - Issue 4

    December 22, 2025 —
    “ARISING OUT OF” Rowe v. State Mut. Ins. Co., 2025 Me. LEXIS 89 (Me., Sept. 23, 2025) Maine Supreme Court, in the premises liability context, holds that an exclusion in a mobile homeowners policy for injury or damage "arising out of a premises . . . that is not an insured location'” precluded coverage for underlying negligent failure-to-warn claims. The court looked to authority from a workers compensation case, where it stated that “the term ‘arising out of' employment means that there must be some causal connection between the conditions under which the employee worked and the injury, or that the injury, in some proximate way, had its origin, its source, or its cause in the employment. . . . [T]he employment need not be the sole or predominant causal factor for the injury and . . . the causative circumstance need not have been foreseen or expected.” In this case, it found there to be “an immediate relationship between the injury and a condition of the uninsured premises” (specifically, a gap created by the owner-insured at the entrance to a mobile home), and rejected the claimant’s argument that the injury instead arose from the insureds’ negligent conduct in failing to warn. Separately, the court held that the property did not qualify as an “insured location,” reasoning it was not listed in the declarations and there was no evidence the insureds had resided there or acquired it for use as a residence. Reprinted courtesy of John S. Anooshian, White and Williams LLP, Paul A. Briganti, White and Williams LLP, Elizabeth L. Ferguson, White and Williams LLP, Alexandra M. George, White and Williams LLP and Haley S. Newman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Anooshian may be contacted at anooshianj@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Briganti may be contacted at brigantip@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ferguson may be contacted at fergusone@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Newman may be contacted at newmanh@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Contract Interpretation – Determining What the Contract Requires

    March 24, 2026 —
    A good ole dispute on contract interpretation in government contracting. Contract interpretation disputes happen all the time in every jurisdiction under the sun. Think about that. Now, what’s the best way to avoid a contract interpretation dispute? Naturally, invest in the contract language and fully understand the scope of work. Make all of this clear. But, of course, this isn’t foolproof meaning you could still be doing this and you could still find yourself in a contract interpretation dispute. Although, if you are doing this, and being proactive, the contract interpretation disputes should be minimal and more streamlined. In Liberty Technical Services, LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 8385, 2026 WL 407656 (CBCA 2026), the dispute centered on whether the government owed the contractor for certain, necessary equipment (largely controllers, but also tanks and pumps) not specified in the contract. The government countered that this should be a non-issue because the contractor always acknowledged it was responsible for furnishing the unspecified, necessary equipment, and the contractor did actually provide the equipment without direction from the government. Each party claimed the contract was unambiguous when construed in context. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Snell & Wilmer Recognized Among the Top 10 Largest Law Firms in Orange County by the Orange County Business Journal for the Ninth Consecutive Year

    April 27, 2026 —
    ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that its Orange County office has been named the eighth largest law firm in Orange County on the Orange County Business Journal’s 2026 List of Law Firms. The office has been ranked among the top 10 largest law firms in the region by the Orange County Business Journal for nine consecutive years. “We are proud to once again be recognized among the top law firms in Orange County,” said Jonathan E. Frank, managing partner of the firm’s Orange County office. “This recognition is a testament to the outstanding attorneys and professionals in our Orange County office and the clients who trust us with their most important matters. Being ranked among the top 10 largest firms in the region for nine consecutive years reflects both the strength of our team and our deep commitment to serving the Orange County business community.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter on Winning Another Motion for Summary Judgment!

    March 17, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter’s client owned a condo, which he rented out. The tenant allegedly assaulted Plaintiff across the street from the condo, resulting in personal injury, including nerve damage. Shanna did the research and writing, and Jeff argued the Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court ruled, in pertinent part, that the subject assault off property was not foreseeable, resulting in a complete dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Shane Singh Named One of Los Angeles Business Journal's 'Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles' for 2026

    April 27, 2026 —
    Sacramento Partner Shane Singh has been named one of the Los Angeles Business Journal's "Top 100 Lawyers of Los Angeles" for 2026. The LABJ’s annual list honors Los Angeles' top lawyers for their achievements within the city's business community. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    March 24, 2026 —
    Property owners, contractors, and others dealing with mechanics and materialmen’s liens in Georgia should keep an eye on HB 676, which is currently making its way through the Georgia General Assembly. The bill aims to curb misuse of the lien process and provide additional remedies to those challenging a frivolous lien filing. What HB 676 Would Do HB 676 would add a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 44-14-366.6) to the mechanics and materialmen’s lien statutes. If a lien is filed “without substantial justification or that is not made in good faith or that is made with malice or a wrongful purpose,” this new Code section would impose a fine of $1,500 per lien on the lien claimant, in addition to any attorney’s fees or court costs incurred by the party challenging the lien. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robert Lafayette, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Lafayette may be contacted at rlafayette@seyfarth.com

    White House Explores Opening Antitrust Probe on Homebuilders

    February 10, 2026 —
    Trump administration officials are exploring opening an antitrust investigation into US homebuilders as the White House sharpens its focus on tackling the country’s housing affordability crisis. The Department of Justice could open the probe in the coming weeks, according to people familiar with the discussions. No decision has been made and the administration may abandon the effort without launching an investigation, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing non-public information. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick Clark, Bloomberg and Leah Nylen, Bloomberg Read the full story...

    UPDATED: Dominion Sues Feds Over Offshore Wind Project Halt, With Action Possible on Others Shut

    February 02, 2026 —
    UPDATED: Dominion Energy filed a federal lawsuit Dec. 23 in Norfolk, Va. against the U.S. Interior Dept. immediate construction pause order for its 2.6-GW Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind energy project (CVOW) off Virginia Beach, Va., which it developing to begin operation next year. The project is one of five large East Coast offshore wind projects under construction that the federal agency paused, claiming new "national security" risks. Dominion and OSW Project LLC, the entity that includes project co-owner Stonepeak Partners, a private investor, said they seek a temporary restraining order. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com