BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing expert witness Lexington Oregon parking structure expert witness Lexington Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Lexington Oregon production housing expert witness Lexington Oregon industrial building expert witness Lexington Oregon office building expert witness Lexington Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Lexington Oregon tract home expert witness Lexington Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Lexington Oregon condominiums expert witness Lexington Oregon casino resort expert witness Lexington Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Lexington Oregon condominium expert witness Lexington Oregon Medical building expert witness Lexington Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Lexington Oregon housing expert witness Lexington Oregon institutional building expert witness Lexington Oregon retail construction expert witness Lexington Oregon multi family housing expert witness Lexington Oregon custom homes expert witness Lexington Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Lexington Oregon townhome construction expert witness Lexington Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lexington, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lexington Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lexington Oregon

    Depreciation of Labor in Calculating Actual Cash Value Against Public Policy

    Reducing Rework on Construction Projects Benefits Budget, Schedule and Financial Loss

    Recycled Water and New Construction. New Standards Being Considered

    Supreme Court Holds That Prevailing Wage Statute is Constitutional

    Unwrapped Pipes Lead to Flooding and Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Owner Can’t Pursue Statutory Show Cause Complaint to Cancel Lien… Fair Outcome?

    Incorporate Sustainability in Building Design to Meet Green Construction Goals

    Delays and Suspension of the Work Under Fixed Price Government Contract

    Contractual Indemnification Limitation on Florida Public Projects

    Georgia Court Clarifies Landlord Liability for Construction Defects

    Repairs Could Destroy Evidence in Construction Defect Suit

    What I Love and Hate About Updating My Contracts From an Owners’ Perspective

    Canada Cooler Housing Market Boosts Poloz’s Soft Landing

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    Excess Policy Triggered Once Retention Paid, Even if Loss Not Covered By Excess

    Home Sales and Stock Price Up for D. R. Horton

    Window Installer's Alleged Faulty Workmanship On Many Projects Constitutes Multiple Occurrences

    Third Circuit Court of Appeals Concludes “Soup to Nuts” Policy Does Not Include Faulty Workmanship Coverage

    Property Damage to Insured's Own Work is Not Covered

    DA’s Office Checking Workers Comp Compliance

    One-Upmanship by Contractors In Prevailing Wage Decision Leads to a Bad Result for All . . . Perhaps

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    Candis Jones Named “On the Rise” by Daily Report's Georgia Law Awards

    Enforceability of Contract Provisions Extending Liquidated Damages Beyond Substantial Completion

    General Indemnity Agreement Can Come Back to Bite You

    Recent Opinions Clarify Enforceability of Pay-if-Paid Provisions in Construction Contracts

    Float-In of MassDOT Span Sails, But Delay Dispute Lingers

    Navigating the DOT’s Interim Final Rule on DBE Certification Standards - and Preparing for the (Bumpy) Road Ahead

    Zoning Hearing Notice Addressed by Georgia Appeals Court

    Helsinki Stream City: A Re-imagining Outside the System

    Surplus Lines Carriers Cannot Compel Arbitration in Louisiana

    How Robotics Can Improve Construction and Demolition Waste Sorting

    California Case Is a Reminder That Not All Insurance Policies Are Alike Regarding COVID-19 Losses

    Edgewater Plans to Sue Over Pollution During Veterans Field Rehab

    Unpredictable Opinion Regarding Construction Lien (Reinstatement??)

    Aurora Joins other Colorado Cities by Adding a Construction Defect Ordinance

    Liquidated Damages: Too High and It’s a Penalty. Too Low and You’re Out of Luck.

    Damages in First Trial Establishing Liability of Tortfeasor Binding in Bad Faith Trial Against Insurer

    DC Circuit Issues Two Important Clean Air Act and Administrative Law Decisions

    French Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-Fixing

    You Are Not A “Liar” Simply Because You Amend Your Complaint

    For US Cities in Infrastructure Need, Grant Writers Wanted

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (5/22/24) – Federal Infrastructure Money, Hotel Development Pipelines, and Lab Space Construction

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “I Never Had a Chance”

    Florida High-Rise for Sale, Construction Defects Possibly Included

    Colorado Supreme Court Finds Economic Loss Rule Applies to Allegations of Willful and Wanton Conduct

    Court of Appeal Puts the “Equity” in Equitable Subrogation

    Colorado Supreme Court Decision Could Tarnish Appraisal Process for Policyholders

    Home Improvement in U.S. Slowing or Still Intact -- Which Is It?

    Finding Plaintiff Intentionally Spoliated Evidence, the Northern District of Indiana Imposes Sanction
    Corporate Profile

    LEXINGTON OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction claims related expert witness designations, the Lexington, Oregon Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Lexington region.

    Lexington Oregon building expertLexington Oregon architectural expert witnessLexington Oregon construction claims expert witnessLexington Oregon construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessLexington Oregon construction scheduling expert witnessLexington Oregon contractor expert witnessLexington Oregon engineering expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lexington, Oregon

    GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple Venues

    June 22, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani’s Hartford, Connecticut, and Dallas offices recently secured a complete defense judgment and recovery of attorney’s fees and costs in an arbitration on behalf of a longtime client, concluding a dispute that lasted several years and traversed multiple jurisdictions. The dispute initially arose in Texas state court, and almost immediately, the claimant began pursuing the matter aggressively, a pattern that continued until the day judgment was entered in GRSM’s client’s favor. GRSM’s team mounted a strong defense, achieving an early success in compelling mandatory arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    August 16, 2026 —
    On July 31, 2026, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia entered a $356,085,513.00 judgment against developers JBG Smith for defective construction and renovation of the Wardman Tower Residential Condominium in Washington, D.C. The case is Wardman Tower Residential Condominium Unit Owners Association v. JBG Smith Properties, et al., No. 2020 CA 004807 B (D.C. Super. Ct.). In a 148-page Trial Order, the D.C. Superior Court awarded $118,695,171.00 in damages in favor of the condominium association and against the condominium developers, including JBG Smith. The Court trebled those damages pursuant to the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“CPPA”) to reach an ultimate judgment of $356,085,513.00. See Cowie Law Group: DC Condominium Construction Defects: Recovering Attorney’s Fees, Litigation Expenses & Treble Damages Under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Cowie Law Group, P.C. filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Association in 2020. The firm represented the Association throughout years of pretrial discovery and ultimately served as trial counsel with Williams & Connolly LLP during a lengthy bench trial before the Honorable Yvonne Williams. The Cowie Law Group team included attorneys, George A. Bealefeld, III, Albert G. McCarraher, Stanford L. Kimmel, III and Nicholas D. Cowie. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie Law Group
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowielawgroup.com

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Structural Engineer Claims Reinforcement Was Never Installed on Troubled NYC Tower

    September 01, 2026 —
    New York City has expanded its investigation into the structural failure at the former Pfizer headquarters tower in Midtown Manhattan as the Dept. of Investigation confirmed a parallel inquiry and the Dept. of Buildings directed the property owner to retain third-party engineering oversight. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    Global Insights Center: Monthly Newsletter

    June 15, 2026 —
    May in Review Last month, inflation moved higher, with Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rising to 3.8% year over year, up from 3.3% the prior month. The increase was driven primarily by energy prices, particularly gasoline, reflecting ongoing disruptions tied to the Middle East conflict. Labor market data were broadly stable. The unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.3%, wage growth increased modestly to 3.6%, while job growth continued to be geographically concentrated in the Southern states, particularly cities in Texas. On an occupational basis, healthcare once again led job gains, especially in home health services, a trend we have consistently highlighted. Business formations increased during the month, with notable strength in e commerce and digital services firms. Manufacturing activity also improved, particularly in semiconductors, IT equipment, and natural gas–related energy infrastructure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Global Insights Center Staff, The Hartford

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    August 11, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Court Rules Insurer AIG Can't Claw Back $50M Storm Payout From Turner

    October 20, 2026 —
    A Delaware court judge ruled earlier this month that insurer AIG cannot claw back $50 million from Turner Construction for two insurance claim payouts it has made to New York University's Langone Medical Center. The dispute relates to the 2012 flooding of the university's Manhattan hospital center during Superstorm Sandy in October 2012. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com