BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Mapleton Oregon housing expert witness Mapleton Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Mapleton Oregon retail construction expert witness Mapleton Oregon condominiums expert witness Mapleton Oregon condominium expert witness Mapleton Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Mapleton Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Mapleton Oregon Medical building expert witness Mapleton Oregon office building expert witness Mapleton Oregon industrial building expert witness Mapleton Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Mapleton Oregon parking structure expert witness Mapleton Oregon custom homes expert witness Mapleton Oregon casino resort expert witness Mapleton Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Mapleton Oregon hospital construction expert witness Mapleton Oregon institutional building expert witness Mapleton Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Mapleton Oregon multi family housing expert witness Mapleton Oregon custom home expert witness Mapleton Oregon tract home expert witness Mapleton Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Mapleton, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Mapleton Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Central Oregon Builders Association
    Local # 3810
    61396 S Hwy 97 Ste 203
    Bend, OR 97702
    http://www.coba.org

    Home Builders Association of Lane County
    Local # 3824
    1065 River Rd
    Eugene, OR 97404
    http://www.hbalanecounty.org

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org

    Willamette Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3805
    PO Box 440 32054 Old Hwy 34
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.wvhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern Oregon
    Local # 3888
    PO Box 696
    Coos Bay, OR 97420
    http://www.hbaswo.org

    Umpqua Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3816
    3000 Stewart Parkway Suite 206
    Roseburg, OR 97471
    http://www.umpquavalleyhba.org

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Mapleton Oregon

    Hawaii Supreme Court Tackles "Other Insurance" Issues

    Corps Issues Draft EIS for Controversial Alaskan Copper Mine

    Designing, Constructing and Converting Data Centers and Crypto Mines

    “Source of Duty,” Tort, and Contract, Oh My!

    Ensuing Loss Provision Found Ambiguous

    Hurricane Ian: Discussing Wind-Water Disputes

    HOA Fines Capped at $100: Immediate Impact of California’s AB 130

    Dust Obscures Eleventh Circuit’s Ruling on “Direct Physical Loss”

    Wood Wizardry in Oregon: Innovation Raises the Roof for PDX Terminal

    Building on New Risks: Construction in the Age of Greening

    Mediation is (Almost) Always Worth a Shot

    Potential Gap in Workers Compensation Immunity Statutory Framework

    Seyfarth’s Brenda Radmacher Presents at Construction Defect and Insurance Conference

    Personal Thoughts on Construction Mediation

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    Architects Group Lowers U.S. Construction Forecast

    Jury Trials: A COVID Update

    Retired Judge Claims Asbestos in Courthouse gave him Cancer

    Trump Abandons Plan for Council on Infrastructure

    Why Builders Should Reconsider Arbitration Clauses in Construction Contracts

    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    CSLB’s Military Application Assistance Program

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    David McLain Recognized Among the 2021 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America© for Construction Law

    Milhouse Engineering and Construction, Inc. Named 2022 A/E/C Building a Better World Award Winner

    Quick Note: Include Key Time Related Facts in Contract to Avoid an Ambiguity

    California’s Right To Repair Act Is The Sole Remedy For Damages For Construction Defects In New Residential Construction

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    Future Environmental Rulemaking Proceedings Listed in the Spring 2019 Unified Federal Agenda

    California Supreme Court Shifts Gears on “Reverse CEQA”

    Update Coverage for Construction Defect Claims in Colorado

    BWB&O Attorneys are Selected to 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    No Coverage Under Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause

    Additional Insured Prevails on Summary Judgment For Duty to Defend, Indemnify

    Window Installer's Alleged Faulty Workmanship On Many Projects Constitutes Multiple Occurrences

    Litigation Counsel of America Honors Partner Victor Anderson with Peter Perlman Award

    Fifth Circuit Finds Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case

    White and Williams Celebrates Chambers 2024 Rankings

    Colorado Court Holds No Coverage for Breach of Contract Claim

    San Diego: Compromise Reached in Fee Increases for Affordable Housing

    Balcony Collapses Killing Six People

    Yes, Indeedy. Competitive Bidding Not Required for School District Lease-Leasebacks

    CDJ’s #9 Topic of the Year: Nevada Supreme Court Denies Class Action Status in Construction Defect Case

    City Sues over Leaking Sewer System

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2026 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Meet the Forum's ADR Neutrals: LESLIE KING O'NEAL

    Congratulations 2020 DE, MA, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    BIOHM Seeks to Turn Plastic Waste into Insulation Material with Mushrooms

    Licensing Reciprocity Comes to Virginia

    These Roads Aren’t Built for Wilder Weather Driven by Climate Change
    Corporate Profile

    MAPLETON OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction and design related expert witness designations, the Mapleton, Oregon Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building claims and trial support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Mapleton region.

    Mapleton Oregon expert witness windowsMapleton Oregon concrete expert witnessMapleton Oregon engineering consultantMapleton Oregon building expertMapleton Oregon construction forensic expert witnessMapleton Oregon building code expert witnessMapleton Oregon construction project management expert witnesses
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Mapleton, Oregon

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    September 15, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners Fletcher Alford and Kevin Liu and Associate Jigar Desai secured a favorable outcome on behalf of an HOA management company in a precedent-setting class action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, obtaining denial of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and dismissal without prejudice of the three claims at issue. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant received earnings credit payments from a bank in exchange for maintaining HOA deposit accounts and failed to disclose the arrangement to its HOA clients. The plaintiff sought more than $40 million in damages, asserting five claims: (1) breach of contract for failing to act in class members’ best interests by not disclosing the alleged earnings credit arrangement; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) based on alleged violations of California Civil Code §§ 5375, 5375.5, and 5380; (3) breach of fiduciary duty based on the alleged undisclosed arrangement; (4) violation of the UCL for unfair business practices arising from the alleged nondisclosure; and (5) unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3) only as to its second, third, and fourth causes of action. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    World's Longest Immersed Tunnel Passes Milestone, But Faces Delays

    August 03, 2026 —
    Work on the $8-billion Fehmarnbelt Tunnel, which is planned to link Germany and Denmark as the world’s longest immersed tunnel, is progressing as crews achieved a milestone last month with the successful immersion of its first precast concrete element. But Danish state-owned project owner Femern A/S says the plan is now running at least two years behind schedule and the tunnel’s road and rail portions will open in two separate stages. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James Leggate, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Leggate may be contacted at leggatej@enr.com

    What Massachusetts Contractors and Developers Can Learn from Cannistraro v. Columbia Construction

    July 13, 2026 —
    Introduction On June 26, 2026 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its decision in J.C. Cannistraro, LLC v. Columbia Construction Co.—a holding that sits at the intersection of Prompt Pay Act compliance and the Massachusetts Arbitration Act.[1] Most already know that the Massachusetts Prompt Pay Act (PPA) imposes strict timing and certification requirements for rejecting payment applications and proposed change orders on projects valued at $3 million or more. Most notably, the PPA requires the paying party to give the payee written notice of its approval or rejection of progress applications and proposed changes within 15 days of receipt, which notice must include a “factual and contractual basis for the rejection” and must be “certified as made in good faith.”[2] In the absence of a timely certified notice, payment is “deemed to be approved” unless the payor properly rejects payment before it comes due.[3] Reprinted courtesy of Anthony LaPlaca, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Luke Marston, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Mr. LaPlaca may be contacted at alaplaca@seyfarth.com Mr. Marston may be contacted at lmarston@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    August 24, 2026 —
    After filing a lawsuit, the first step is always serving process on the opposing party. While that preliminary step sounds basic enough, in McMahan v. Grasshopper, the Arizona Supreme Court recently provided a helpful refresher on the nuances of the service requirement and its importance in litigation for plaintiffs and defendants alike.1 Background McMahan arose from a hit-and-run where a tractor-trailer collided with safety barricades and injured a construction worker. The construction worker sued the tractor-trailer company, and he attempted to serve the company by leaving a copy of the complaint with the assistant to the company’s statutory agent who forwarded the complaint to the company. The assistant, however, was not authorized to accept service on the company’s behalf. Before the company appeared in the action, the construction worker successfully obtained an entry of default. Reprinted courtesy of Joseph Kanefield, Snell & Wilmer, Ryan P. Hogan, Snell & Wilmer and Lilly M. Geiler, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Kanefield may be contacted at jkanefield@swlaw.com Mr. Hogan may be contacted at rhogan@swlaw.com Ms. Geiler may be contacted at lgeiler@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Amanda Mathieu Named to Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly 2026 “Top Women of Law” List

    September 21, 2026 —
    Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly recently named Boston Deputy Managing Partner Amanda Mathieu to its 2026 “Top Women of Law” list, which honors leaders who have shown excellence, innovation, and meaningful contributions to the industry and their communities. According to the publication, “Top Women of Law honorees represent the very best of Massachusetts’ legal community—from accomplished advocates and firm leaders to pioneers, educators, trailblazers, and role models driving positive change throughout the profession. Their influence extends beyond the courtroom and boardroom, creating a lasting impact on their clients, colleagues, organizations, and communities.” “We are lucky to have Amanda as a leader in our Boston office, and a mentor to so many Lewis Brisbois Associates who are getting their careers started in the legal profession” said Managing Partner Ken Walton on this recognition. “This is a well-deserved honor for her, and I look forward to continuing to continuing to work with her as we deliver excellent results for our clients across the country." Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Insured’s Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    July 13, 2026 —
    The insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment to dispose of the insured’s bad faith claim was unsuccessful. Page v. State Farm Lloyds, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102293 (E.D. Texas March 18, 2026). Plaintiff insured alleged that hail and a windstorm caused damage to his property. The damage was reported to the defendant insurer. A claims adjuster inspected the property. Defendant then paid plaintiff $24,493.06, which was the total of the estimated damage minus depreciation and the deductible. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Snell & Wilmer’s Los Angeles Office Recognized as One of the “Best Places to Work” by the Los Angeles Business Journal

    September 15, 2026 —
    LOS ANGELES – Snell & Wilmer is proud to announce that its Los Angeles office has been named one of the 2026 Best Places to Work by the Los Angeles Business Journal as part of its annual Best Places to Work awards. The recognition honors outstanding employers across the Los Angeles region that are fostering strong workplace cultures and creating positive employee experiences. Selections are based on confidential employee surveys conducted by Workforce Research Group, which evaluate organizations on leadership, corporate culture, communication, employee engagement, and other key workplace factors. “We are honored to be recognized as one of the Best Places to Work in Los Angeles,” said Joshua Schneiderman, managing partner of the firm’s Los Angeles office. “This recognition reflects the collaborative culture we have built and the dedication of our attorneys and professional staff who contribute to making our office a great place to work. We remain committed to providing opportunities for growth, fostering meaningful connections, and supporting our team members’ continued success.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer