BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    high-rise construction expert witness Nehalem Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Nehalem Oregon custom homes expert witness Nehalem Oregon office building expert witness Nehalem Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Nehalem Oregon tract home expert witness Nehalem Oregon hospital construction expert witness Nehalem Oregon parking structure expert witness Nehalem Oregon production housing expert witness Nehalem Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Nehalem Oregon institutional building expert witness Nehalem Oregon industrial building expert witness Nehalem Oregon condominiums expert witness Nehalem Oregon townhome construction expert witness Nehalem Oregon retail construction expert witness Nehalem Oregon custom home expert witness Nehalem Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Nehalem Oregon condominium expert witness Nehalem Oregon housing expert witness Nehalem Oregon Medical building expert witness Nehalem Oregon casino resort expert witness Nehalem Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Nehalem Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Nehalem, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Nehalem Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Nehalem Oregon

    Know Your Obligations Under Both the Prime Contract and Subcontract

    No Additional Insured Coverage Under Umbrella Policy

    Older Homes for Sale in California Now Come With Wildfire Warnings

    Engineer at Flint Negligence Trial Details Government Water Errors

    Businesspeople to Nevada: Revoke the Construction Defect Laws

    Are Mechanic’s Liens the Be All End All of Construction Collections?

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds Insurer Estopped From Denying Coverage Where Declaratory Judgment Suit Filed Too Late

    How Tech Is Transforming the Construction Industry in 2019

    Navigating Threshold Arbitration Issues in Construction Contracts

    California’s Skilled and Trained Workforce Requirements: Public Works and AB 3018, What You Need to Know

    Retroactive Application of a Construction Subcontract Containing a Merger Clause? Florida’s Fifth District Court of Appeal Answers in the Affirmative

    Why the Renovation of Federal Reserve Headquarters Costs $2.5 Billion

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Too Soon?”

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    The Louvre Abu Dhabi’s Mega-Structure Domed Roof Completed

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up (03/08/23) – Updates on U.S. Mortgage Applications, the Inflation Reduction Act, and Multifamily Sector

    A Lien Might Just Save Your Small Construction Business

    2011 West Coast Casualty Construction Defect Seminar – Recap

    A Court-Side Seat: Environmental Developments on the Ninth Circuit

    Summary Judgment for Insurer Reversed Based on Expert Opinion

    New York Public Library’s “Most Comprehensive Renovation” In Its History

    After 60 Years, I-95 Is Complete

    Mortgage Whistleblower Stands Alone as U.S. Won’t Join Lawsuit

    Vegas Hi-Rise Not Earthquake Safe

    Statutes of Limitations May be the Colorado Contractors’ Friend

    Supreme Court Declines to Address CDC Eviction Moratorium

    Leaky Wells Spur Call for Stricter Rules on Gas Drilling

    Chambers Global 2026 Recognizes Sheppard Practices and Attorneys

    California Supreme Court Finds Vertical Exhaustion Applies to First-Level Excess Policies

    Hawaii Supreme Court Construes Designated Premises Endorsement In Insured's Favor

    Court Resolves Carriers' Dispute Over Which Must Defend

    Rather Than Limit Decision to "That Particular Part" of Developer's Policy Necessary to Bar Coverage, 10th Circuit Renders Questionable Decision on Exclusion j(6)

    Alaska Supreme Court Finds Insurer Owes No Independent Duty to Injured Party

    HOA Foreclosure Excess Sale Proceeds Go to Owner

    Grenfell Fire Probe Faults Construction Industry Practices

    Motion to Dismiss Insureds' Counterclaim on the Basis of Prior Knowledge Denied

    Remembering Joseph H. Foster

    When a Neighborhood Floods, Foreclosures Often Follow

    Two Texas Cities Top San Francisco for Property Investors

    Court Orders City to Pay for Sewer Backups

    2018 Update to EPA’s “Superfund Task Force Report”

    Shoring of Problem Girders at Salesforce Transit Center Taking Longer than Expected

    Texas contractual liability exclusion

    Action Needed: HB24-1230 Spells Trouble for Colorado Construction Industry and its Insurers

    Illinois Joins the Pack on Defective Construction as an Occurrence

    Ceiling Collapse Attributed to Construction Defect

    Fixed Price, Fluid Quantities: The Hidden Risks in Lump Sum Agreements with Variable Units

    Ohio: Are Construction Defects Covered in Insurance Policies?

    At Long Last, the Colorado Legislature Gets Serious About Construction Defect Reform – In a Constructive Way
    Corporate Profile

    NEHALEM OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction related expert witness designations, the Nehalem, Oregon Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction claims evaluation and expert support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Nehalem and the surrounding areas.

    Nehalem Oregon contractor expert witnessNehalem Oregon defective construction expertNehalem Oregon construction safety expertNehalem Oregon engineering consultantNehalem Oregon roofing construction expertNehalem Oregon building consultant expertNehalem Oregon construction expert witnesses
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Nehalem, Oregon

    Navigating Wind and Solar Development Opportunities on State and Private Lands During Uncertain Times for Renewable Energy

    February 02, 2026 —
    Recent executive actions and federal guidance have targeted wind and solar development, creating substantial uncertainty for the U.S. offshore wind industry and also reshaping the regulatory landscape governing onshore wind and solar development. Wind and solar projects on federal lands are now subject to heightened review processes and enhanced regulatory scrutiny. As a result, many developers are considering opportunities on state-owned and privately held lands rather than federal lands. 2025 Federal Executive Actions Impacting Wind and Solar At the federal level, renewable energy development on public lands is governed primarily by the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and administered by the Bureau of Land Management. The agency provides rights of way and leases (in designated leasing areas) for energy project development. Despite significant incentives for renewable energy development under the Biden administration, the Trump administration has deprioritized renewable energy in support of traditional energy sources like oil, gas and coal, as well as nuclear and geothermal energy. Reprinted courtesy of Cara M. MacDonald, Pillsbury, Robert G. Howard, Pillsbury and Andrew Jacobs, Pillsbury Ms. MacDonald may be contacted at cara.macdonald@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Howard may be contacted at robert.howard@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Jacobs may be contacted at andrew.jacobs@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    The Modern Nuclear Renaissance Reaches New England

    April 14, 2026 —
    On March 31, 2026, the governors of all six New England states issued a joint, bipartisan statement committing the region to explore deployment of advanced nuclear energy technologies while supporting the continued safe, affordable and reliable operation of New England’s existing nuclear generation facilities. This coordinated regional initiative follows a major policy announcement in June 2025 by New York Governor Kathy Hochul directing the New York Power Authority to pursue development of at least 1,000 MW of advanced nuclear generation to support statewide reliability needs and New York’s zero‑carbon mission. Less than one year after New York formally embraced a modern nuclear renaissance, that renaissance has now expanded across the New England states—signaling a broader Northeast regional pivot toward nuclear as a core element of long‑term reliability, affordability and decarbonization strategies. For utilities and power generators, this shift creates both opportunities and planning imperatives that warrant immediate attention. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury
    Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com

    Traub Lieberman Partners Lauren S. Curtis and Sarah A. Wilkins and Associate Veronica Guerra Win Motion for Summary Judgment

    January 21, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Lauren S. Curtis and Sarah A. Wilkins and Associate Veronica Guerra recently won a motion for summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a matter brought before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. In the underlying lawsuit, the insured, a property management company, was being sued in a wrongful death action arising from a shooting that occurred in the common area of a multi-family residential property managed by the insured. The insurer agreed to provide a defense to its insured in the wrongful death action, subject to a reservation of rights based on the policy’s Conditional Coverage Endorsement, which contains various conditions the insured must meet in order for coverage to be triggered under the policy. One of those conditions requires the insured to ensure that a property owner’s insurance policy must not contain any restrictions for assault and battery (“A&B”) exposures, including a sublimit for A&B claims. In this case, the property owner’s insurance policy did indeed contain a sublimit for A&B claims. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    Thank You All for 10 Years Straight of VA Super Lawyers

    May 05, 2026 —
    It is with humility and a sense of accomplishment that I announce that I have been selected for the tenth straight year to the Virginia Super Lawyers in the Construction Litigation category for 2026. Add this to my recent election to the Virginia Legal Elite in Construction and I’ve had a pretty good year. As always, I am thrilled to be included on these peer-elected lists. Your confidence in my work is very gratifying. So without further ado, thank you to my peers and those on the panel at Virginia Super Lawyers for the great honor. I feel quite proud to be part of the 5% of Virginia attorneys that made this list for 2026. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted). The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id. In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    NYC Billionaires’ Row Tower Could Need $160M Fix Amid Cracking

    December 02, 2025 —
    A cracking and crumbling New York City tower could leave the building “uninhabitable,” according to engineers who estimate that a $160 million renovation might be needed to fix 432 Park Avenue's striking white concrete facade. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Emell D. Adolphus, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Adolphus may be contacted at adolphuse@enr.com

    Insurer’s Late Notice Argument Fails Due to Lack of Prejudice

    December 30, 2025 —
    The court refused to dismiss the insured’s claim for hail damage based on late notice because the insurer failed to demonstrate it had suffered prejudice. Borene UMC v. Church Mut. Ins. Co., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 210767 (W.D. Texas Oct. 27, 2025). Boerne UMC owned multiple buildings that were allegedly damaged during a hailstorm that occurred in May 2021. In August 2022, Boerne hired a contractor to inspect the roofs. The contractor found damage to several roofs and HVAC units and prepared an estimate for repair of over $700,000. Boerne submitted a claim to its insurer, Church Mutual on November 17, 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2025

    January 26, 2026 —
    The insurance landscape continues to evolve, shaped by litigation that tests the limits of policy language, coverage obligations, and public policy considerations. In 2025, courts across the country issued several significant rulings that will influence how insurers and policyholders navigate claims and risks. Notable trends in 2025 include disputes over property coverage for wildfire and smoke damage, the treatment of interrelated claims under successive D&O policies, enforcement of arbitration clauses in international insurance contracts, and general liability coverage issues—such as construction exclusions for phased projects and limits on coverage for losses tied to the opioid crisis. This publication spotlights the top insurance cases of 2025, highlighting their legal reasoning, practical implications, and impact for policyholders—plus a look ahead at key cases to watch in 2026. Reprinted courtesy of Jeffrey J. Vita, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C., Michelle A. Grieco, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. and Kiley Stackpole, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. Mr. Vita may be contacted at JVita@sdvlaw.com Ms. Grieco may be contacted at MGrieco@sdvlaw.com Ms. Stackpole may be contacted at KStackpole@sdvlaw.com Read the full story...