BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Roseburg Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Roseburg Oregon low-income housing expert witness Roseburg Oregon office building expert witness Roseburg Oregon parking structure expert witness Roseburg Oregon Medical building expert witness Roseburg Oregon housing expert witness Roseburg Oregon multi family housing expert witness Roseburg Oregon hospital construction expert witness Roseburg Oregon custom homes expert witness Roseburg Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Roseburg Oregon custom home expert witness Roseburg Oregon retail construction expert witness Roseburg Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Roseburg Oregon casino resort expert witness Roseburg Oregon production housing expert witness Roseburg Oregon condominiums expert witness Roseburg Oregon institutional building expert witness Roseburg Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Roseburg Oregon condominium expert witness Roseburg Oregon industrial building expert witness Roseburg Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Roseburg Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Roseburg, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Roseburg Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Umpqua Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3816
    3000 Stewart Parkway Suite 206
    Roseburg, OR 97471
    http://www.umpquavalleyhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern Oregon
    Local # 3888
    PO Box 696
    Coos Bay, OR 97420
    http://www.hbaswo.org

    Home Builders Association of Josephine Cty Oregon
    Local # 3848
    223 NE B St Ste B
    Grants Pass, OR 97526
    http://www.homebuildersofjoco.com

    Central Oregon Builders Association
    Local # 3810
    61396 S Hwy 97 Ste 203
    Bend, OR 97702
    http://www.coba.org

    Home Builders Association of Lane County
    Local # 3824
    1065 River Rd
    Eugene, OR 97404
    http://www.hbalanecounty.org

    Klamath Basin Home Builders Association
    Local # 3855
    205 Riverside Drive Ste G
    Klamath Falls, OR 97601
    http://www.kbhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Jackson County
    Local # 3836
    1006 E Jackson St
    Medford, OR 97504
    http://www.hbajc.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Roseburg Oregon
    Corporate Profile

    ROSEBURG OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand general contracting and design related expert designations, the Roseburg, Oregon Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which comprise licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Roseburg and the surrounding areas.

    Roseburg Oregon construction claims expert witnessRoseburg Oregon testifying construction expert witnessRoseburg Oregon construction expertsRoseburg Oregon construction code expert witnessRoseburg Oregon roofing construction expertRoseburg Oregon civil engineering expert witnessRoseburg Oregon expert witness commercial buildings
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Roseburg, Oregon

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in Hudson Valley Magazine’s 2026 Top Lawyers List

    March 24, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman is pleased to announce that six Partners from the White Plains, NY office have been included in the 2026 edition of the Hudson Valley Magazine’s Top Lawyers in the Hudson Valley list. This annual guide recognizes more than 270 of the region's leading attorneys. Insurance:
    • Copernicus Gaza
    • Jonathan Harwood
    • Lisa Rolle
    • Lisa Shrewsberry
    Reprinted courtesy of Copernicus T. Gaza, Traub Lieberman, Jonathan R. Harwood, Traub Lieberman, Lisa M. Rolle, Traub Lieberman, Lisa L. Shrewsberry, Traub Lieberman, Christopher Russo, Traub Lieberman and Hillary J. Raimondi, Traub Lieberman Mr. Gaza may be contacted at cgaza@tlsslaw.com Mr. Harwood may be contacted at jharwood@tlsslaw.com Ms. Rolle may be contacted at lrolle@tlsslaw.com Ms. Shrewsberry may be contacted at lshrewsberry@tlsslaw.com Mr. Russo may be contacted at crusso@tlsslaw.com Ms. Raimondi may be contacted at hraimondi@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Secures Trio of Cyber Coverage Wins

    May 12, 2026 —
    Three weeks, three jurisdictions, three cyber wins. White and Williams picked up the first victory on March 9, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, where the court granted summary judgment to their client enforcing a Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. See Perry & Perry Builders, Inc. v. Cowbell Cyber and Obsidian Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49409 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 9, 2026). In Perry, the insured was deceived into transferring money intended for a vendor to an unintended third party. The insurer acknowledged that the loss was covered and paid the insured the policy’s Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Discontent with a single sublimit, the insured argued that because it wired the money to the fraudster in separate transfers, it was entitled to a second Cyber Crime Loss sublimit. Reprinted courtesy of Gabriel Darwick, White and Williams LLP and Sean Elman, White and Williams LLP Mr. Darwick may be contacted at darwickg@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Elman may be contacted at elmans@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Modular Construction’s Hidden Risk: Where Things Go Wrong Between the Factory and the Field

    June 15, 2026 —
    Introduction As modular and prefabricated construction methods are increasingly adopted, so too are the potential challenges that come with them. The appeal is straightforward: faster timelines, controlled fabrication environments, and reduced on-site labor demands. But the risks that accompany these benefits are often less clear—and, in many cases, poorly defined. For example, what happens when a prefabricated component is delayed past its installation window? Who is responsible for a defect discovered inside a sealed, installed module? What happens to warranty obligations when a prefabricated component must be modified on site? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    Scope of Products Requiring Proposition 65 Warnings in California Poised to Grow

    February 23, 2026 —
    The scope of products to be drawn into the warning requirements under California’s Proposition 65 law may soon be growing. California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) requested information from the public on the reproductive toxicity of p,p’-bisphenol chemicals. OEHHA is the lead agency for the implementation of Proposition 65, formerly known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxicity Enforcement Act of 1986. OEHHA’s request for information is a step toward regulators classifying all p,p’-bisphenol chemicals as reproductive toxicants under Proposition 65. California’s Proposition 65 Under Proposition 65, businesses are required to post clear and reasonable warnings before individuals are exposed to chemicals listed by the state of California as carcinogens or reproductive toxicants. To date, California has listed approximately 900 chemicals that fall under Proposition 65 regulation. Businesses may be held liable for up to $2,500 per violation per day. Proposition 65 can be enforced by public prosecutors (e.g., the California attorney general or district attorneys) or by private enforcers (known as “bounty hunters”). Reprinted courtesy of Brian M. Ledger, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani and Chassen B. Palmer, Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Mr. Ledger may be contacted at bledger@grsm.com Mr. Palmer may be contacted at cbpalmer@grsm.com Read the full story...

    Executive Order Addresses Wildfire Rebuilding Delays Through Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting

    February 10, 2026 —
    Quick Take On January 23, 2026, one year after the Los Angeles wildfires, the President issued Executive Order 14377 directing the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to consider regulations that would preempt state and local permitting requirements for federally funded reconstruction projects in the Pacific Palisades and Eaton Canyon areas. The Order mandates expedited federal environmental and historic preservation reviews, directs the development of legislative proposals, and orders an audit of California’s use of Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HGMP) funding. Key Provisions Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting The Order directs FEMA and the SBA to consider promulgating regulations that would preempt state or local permitting processes found to have “unduly impeded” the timely use of federal emergency-relief funds by homeowners, businesses, or houses of worship seeking to rebuild. Under the proposed framework, preempted permitting regimes would be replaced with a self-certification requirement, whereby builders would certify to a federal designee that they have complied with all applicable substantive state and local health and safety standards. FEMA would retain authority to review all repairs and construction for compliance with applicable health and safety standards. Proposed regulations must be published within 30 days, with final regulations due within 90 days. Reprinted courtesy of Olivia LaCasto, Snell & Wilmer and Josh Schneiderman, Snell & Wilmer Ms. LaCasto may be contacted at olacasto@swlaw.com Mr. Schneiderman may be contacted at jschneiderman@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Navigating the New Frontier of Federal-State Energy Regulation: What Energy Companies Need to Know

    June 08, 2026 —
    Introduction The jurisdictional boundary between the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the states is being actively contested, from challenges to landmark transmission planning rules to disputes over emergency cost-allocation orders, in ways that carry significant legal, financial, and operational implications for energy companies. For utilities, independent power producers, and transmission developers, understanding these dynamics is now a strategic imperative. The Jurisdictional Divide: A Bright Line That Isn’t The Federal Power Act divides authority between FERC and the states: FERC exercises jurisdiction over interstate transmission and wholesale electricity sales, while states retain authority over generation facilities, retail rates, and decisions about resource mix. The D.C. Circuit has regularly been called upon to “referee the Federal Power Act’s jurisdictional line separating [FERC’s] jurisdiction over the federal wholesale market and States’ jurisdiction over facilities used in local distribution.”1 Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ryan J. Regula, Snell & Wilmer
    Mr. Regula may be contacted at rregula@swlaw.com

    Fort Lauderdale Associate Secures Summary Judgment in Rare Premises Liability Win

    February 23, 2026 —
    Fort Lauderdale associate Kyle Hollander recently secured a summary judgment victory for his client, Winn-Dixie, in a contested premises liability case. This was a hotly disputed liability case of water on the floor near an ice cooler with surveillance footage of a customer constantly bringing bags of ice to and from the cooler to the register. The plaintiff unknowingly stepped into the area of dripped melted ice and fell. Kyle successfully argued based on the plaintiff’s own deposition testimony and the su
    Motion for Reconsideration Challenging Appraisal Determining Cause of Loss Denied

    Extreme Flooding Overwhelms New York Roadways, Killing 1 Person

    Denver Court Rules that Condo Owners Must Follow Arbitration Agreement

    Related’s $1 Billion Los Angeles Project Opens After 15-Year Wait

    More Reminders that the Specific Contract Terms Matter

    New Jersey Supreme Court Ruled Condo Association Can’t Reset Clock on Construction Defect Claim

    New Megablimp to Deliver to Remote Alaskan Construction Sites

    Contractor’s Claim for Interest on Subcontractor’s Defective Work Claim Gains Mixed Results

    China Allows Construction to Resume of High-Rise Stopped for Last Decade

    U.S. Supreme Court Decision May Negate State Law Requirement to File a Certificate of Merit with the Complaint in a Federal Action Against a Design Professional


    CGL Coverage Dispute Regarding the (J)(6) And (J)(7) Property Damage Exclusions

    The Ever-Growing Thicket Of California Civil Code Section 2782

    Is the Event You Are Claiming as Unforeseeable Delay Really Unforeseeable?

    SunCal Buys Oak Knoll Development for the Second Time

    Owners Bound by Arbitration Clause on Roofing Shingles Packaging

    Don’t Ignore Prejudgment Interest

    New York Condominium Association Files Construction Defect Suit

    Conditional Judgment On Replacement Costs Awarded

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    NY Appellate Court Clarifies Hearsay Standards for Admission of Accident-Related Entries in Medical Records

    These Roads Aren’t Built for Wilder Weather Driven by Climate Change

    Additional Insured Prevails on Summary Judgment For Duty to Defend, Indemnify

    Harsh New Time Limits on Construction Defect Claims

    Catch 22: “If You’re Moving Dirt, You Need to Control Your Dust” (But Don’t Use Potable Water!)

    Another (Insurer) Bites The Dust: Virginia District Court Rejects Narrow Reading of Pollution Exclusion

    A WARNing for Companies

    Colorado Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Pool Systems, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al.

    Balestreri Potocki & Holmes Attorneys Named 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising Star

    Policyholders' Coverage Checklist in Times of Coronavirus

    South Carolina School District Investigated by IRS and FBI

    Spearin Doctrine as an Affirmative Defense

    Emerging Trends in Shortened Statutes of Limitations and Statutes of Repose

    Dallas Condo Project to Expand

    COVID-19 Response: Executive Order 13999: Enhancement of COVID-19-Related Workplace Safety Requirements

    Chambers USA 2022 Ranks White and Williams as a Leading Law Firm

    Leaky Wells Spur Call for Stricter Rules on Gas Drilling

    Is Arbitration Always the Answer?

    Design and Construction Defects Not a Breach of Contract

    Don’t Get Caught Holding the Bag: Hold the State Liable When General Contractor Fails to Pay on a Public Project.

    Rejection’s a Bear- Particularly in Construction

    Sometimes it Depends on “Whose” Hand is in the Cookie Jar

    Architect Plans to 3D-Print a Two-Story House

    "My Bad, I Thought It Was in Good Faith" is Not Good Enough - Contractor Ordered to Pay Prompt Payment Penalties

    What Should Be in Every Construction Agreement

    Carin Ramirez and David McLain recognized among the Best Lawyers in America© for 2021

    Auditor: Prematurely Awarded Contracts Increased Honolulu Rail Cost by $354M

    No Coverage For Construction Defects Under Alabama Law

    Prejudice to Insurer After Late Notice of Hurricane Damage Raises Issue of Fact

    The Creation of San Fransokyo

    Estimate Tops $5.5B for Cost of Rebuilding After Maui Fires

    LA Lakers Partially Survive Motion to Dismiss COVID-19 Claims

    Super Lawyers Selects Haight Lawyers for Its 2023 California Rising Stars List

    Insurer Must Defend Claims of Alleged Willful Coal Removal

    Honoring Veterans Under Our Roof & Across the World

    Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

    Illinois Legislature Passes Bill Allowing Punitive Damages In Most Wrongful Death Actions

    Remodel Gets Pricey for Town

    New LG Headquarters Project Challenged because of Height

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 7: How to Successfully Prepare, Submit and Negotiate the Claim

    City Wonders Who’s to Blame for Defective Wall