BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness Sheridan Oregon Medical building expert witness Sheridan Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Sheridan Oregon industrial building expert witness Sheridan Oregon production housing expert witness Sheridan Oregon retail construction expert witness Sheridan Oregon casino resort expert witness Sheridan Oregon tract home expert witness Sheridan Oregon condominium expert witness Sheridan Oregon office building expert witness Sheridan Oregon custom homes expert witness Sheridan Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Sheridan Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Sheridan Oregon hospital construction expert witness Sheridan Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Sheridan Oregon housing expert witness Sheridan Oregon low-income housing expert witness Sheridan Oregon multi family housing expert witness Sheridan Oregon institutional building expert witness Sheridan Oregon condominiums expert witness Sheridan Oregon parking structure expert witness Sheridan Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Sheridan Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Sheridan, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Sheridan Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org

    Willamette Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3805
    PO Box 440 32054 Old Hwy 34
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.wvhba.com

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Sheridan Oregon

    EPA Coal Ash Cleanup Rule Changes Send Utilities, Agencies Back to Drawing Board

    PSA: Latest Updates from AGC-VA on COVID Rules (UPDATED)

    New Addition to the ASCE/SEI 7-22 Standard Protects Buildings from a 500-year Flood Event

    Single-Family Home Gain Brightens U.S. Housing Outlook: Economy

    Insurance Law Client Alert: California Appeals Court Refuses to Apply Professional Services Exclusion to Products-Completed Operations Loss

    The Future of Construction Tech Is Decision Tech

    One World Trade Center Due to Be America’s Tallest and World’s Priciest

    Connecting IoT Data to BIM

    Mega-Consulate Ties U.S. to Convicted Billionaire in Nigeria

    Contractor Jailed for Home Repair Fraud

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (5/29/24) – Megaprojects on the Rise, Agency Guidance for CRE, and an Upbeat Forecast for Commercial Real Estate Investment

    North Carolina Court Rules In Favor Of All Sums

    Federal Court Rejects Insurer's Argument that Wisconsin Has Adopted the Manifestation Trigger for Property Policy

    Orange County Home Builder Dead at 93

    Required Contract Provisions for Construction Contracts in California

    Updates to Residential Landlord Tenant Law

    Structural Problems May Cause Year-Long Delay Opening New Orleans School

    Be Careful with “Green” Construction

    Housing to Top Capital Spending in Next U.S. Growth Leg: Economy

    New Law Raises Standard for Defense Experts as to Medical Causation

    PSA: Virginia Repeals Its Permanent COVID-19 Safety Standard

    Winners Announced in Seattle’s Office-to-Residential Call for Ideas Contest

    Back to Basics – Differing Site Conditions

    How is Negotiating a Construction Contract Like Buying a Car?

    NYC’s Developers Plow Ahead With Ambitious Plans to Reshape City

    Occurrence Found, Business Risk Exclusions Do Not Bar Coverage for Construction Defects

    Manhattan Home Sales Rise at Slower Pace as Prices Jump

    KB to Spend $43.2 Million on Florida Construction Defects

    Dispute Waged Over Design of San Francisco Subway Job

    Understanding the EPA’s Latest Proposed Drinking Water Contaminant Monitoring Rule, Published in Law360

    ConsensusDOCS Hits the Cloud

    Consolidated Case With Covered and Uncovered Allegations Triggers Duty to Defend

    Insurance Policy Provides No Coverage For Slab Collapse in Vision One

    Texas Case Exposes Cracks in the Government Contractor Immunity Shield

    Important Insurance Alert for Out-of-State Contractors Assisting in Florida Recovery Efforts!

    The Argument for Solar Power

    World’s Biggest Crane Lifts Huge Steel Ring at U.K. Nuclear Site

    Ben L. Aderholt Joins Coats Rose Construction Litigation Group

    Spearin Doctrine as an Affirmative Defense

    Boston Developer Sues Contractor Alleging Delays That Cost Millions

    AI in Construction: What Does It Mean for Our Contractors?

    A Place to Study Eternity: Building the Giant Magellan Telescope

    Can We Compel Insurers To Cover Construction Defect in General Liability Policies?

    Keeping Up With Fast-moving FAA Drone Regulations

    Ensuring Arbitration in Construction Defect Claims

    Blog Completes Seventeenth Year

    Unesco Denies Claim It Cleared Construction of Zambezi Dam

    School District Gets Expensive Lesson on Prompt Payment Law. But Did the Court Get it Right?

    Hirer Liable for Injury to Subcontractor’s Employee Due to Failure to Act, Not Just Affirmative Acts, Holds Court of Appeal

    Are Defense Costs In Addition to Policy Limits?
    Corporate Profile

    SHERIDAN OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Sheridan, Oregon Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Sheridan construction industry.

    Sheridan Oregon consulting engineersSheridan Oregon construction cost estimating expert witnessSheridan Oregon architecture expert witnessSheridan Oregon consulting general contractorSheridan Oregon expert witness commercial buildingsSheridan Oregon architectural engineering expert witnessSheridan Oregon construction expert witness consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Sheridan, Oregon

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Sixth Circuit Revives Builder’s Risk Coverage, Refusing to Let Insurer Escape on a Technicality

    July 27, 2026 —
    In 3371 Reading, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Group, the Sixth Circuit did something courts do not always do in coverage disputes: it refused to let an insurer avoid liability based on a technical policy condition that could never actually be satisfied. The decision is a straightforward reminder of two core principles. First, policies must be interpreted from the standpoint of a reasonably prudent insured. Second, hyper-technical conditions cannot be used to deny coverage where compliance is never possible. Reprinted courtesy of Kevin V. Small, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Adriana A. Perez, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Mr. Small may be contacted at ksmall@hunton.com Ms. Perez may be contacted at pereza@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Project Labor Agreements: A New Bid Protest Forum Split

    May 14, 2026 —
    Advertisements often include a disclaimer: “individual results may vary.” Similarly, lawyers are notorious for saying “it depends.” The mandatory Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) regulations have recently placed into context this adage as it applies to federal contract bid protests, with very different results depending on which forum – the Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) versus the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) – different contractors have selected to bring PLA bid protests. Over the last two years, over 30 protesters have successfully achieved removal of mandatory PLAs from large-scale federal construction contracts based on two landmark bid protest decisions issued by the COFC. Similar challenges to PLAs at the GAO, however, have not been successful in removing PLAs, highlighting an emerging trend that the COFC is often a more effective relief forum than GAO for government construction contractors. Reprinted courtesy of Dirk D. Haire, Burr & Forman LLP, David P.J. Timm, Burr & Forman LLP and Michael J. Brewer, Burr & Forman LLP Mr. Haire may be contacted at dhaire@burr.com Mr. Timm may be contacted at dtimm@burr.com Mr. Brewer may be contacted at mbrewer@burr.com Read the full story...

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    April 14, 2026 —
    Written change orders are a big deal. Almost all construction contracts (at least the well drafted ones) require written contracts. Written change orders are even important enough that Virginia law requires these provisions in residential construction contracts. Why are they so important? Because they are a “mini-contract” of sorts. They set the expectations, price, time, and work to be performed; work that was not included in the original price or scope for the project. Without this in writing, there will be no record of what the parties agreed to do. Does this sound familiar? Sound like its own contract? It should. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    'Drywall Isn't Light': Peter Lupo on Safety Management at Standard Drywall

    May 26, 2026 —
    Peter Lupo has been safety director since 2019 at San Diego-based Standard Drywall Inc., a major wall and ceiling contractor. He draws on over two decades of safety experience across a wide range of commercial construction work, having previously served as safety director for general contractor T.B. Penick & Sons. He has also previously operated Peter Lupo Consulting, where he reviewed legal cases and provided expert testimony, and blogged on safety for ENR.com. Lupo recently spoke to ENR Correspondent Elaine Silver about the weight of drywall, heat hazard control, bilingual crews and how he supports safety creativity and learning on the Standard Drywall staff. The conversation has been edited. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Supreme Court Rules Tariffs Unconstitutional: Why the Construction Industry Shouldn’t Expect Calm Just Yet

    March 31, 2026 —
    The U.S. Supreme Court’s 6–3 decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump did what many expected: It held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President to impose tariffs. What few anticipated was the speed of what followed: Within hours of the ruling, the administration announced replacement tariffs under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, imposed a 10% global surcharge effective February 24, and signaled forthcoming Section 301 investigations against most major trading partners. For those in the construction industry hoping the Learning Resources ruling would restore market stability, the message was unambiguous. The constitutional question may be settled, but the market disruption is not. Reprinted courtesy of Christopher Barnett, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Bona Fide Dispute Defeats Violation of Prompt Payment Act

    June 15, 2026 —
    Most, if not all, jurisdictions, including the federal government, have what is known as a “Prompt Payment Act.” The objective is to ensure prompt payment. If prompt payment is not made, the Prompt Payment Act provides for interest penalties, as well as potentially other costs such as attorney’s fees. But the thing is, it’s not as simple as untimely payment to support the recourse and interest penalties the applicable Prompt Payment Act affords. And the teeth associated with the applicable Prompt Payment Act are not as sharp as perhaps the party claiming untimely payment prefers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Why Construction Tendering Needs Specialized Intelligence

    March 31, 2026 —
    The construction industry has never lacked data; it lacks usable intelligence at the moments that matter most. In the high-stakes phases of tendering and pre-construction, the industry still relies on manual “Control-F” searches through thousands of pages of unstructured documents. I recently spoke with Herman Smith, a civil engineer and former Chief Digital Officer at Multiconsult, who left the corporate world to solve this specific bottleneck. His startup, Volve, isn’t just another AI wrapper; it is a specialized “drill” designed to penetrate the complexity of construction documentation. The Paradox of Digitalization without a Productivity Boost For years, the AEC industry has faced a frustrating paradox: we have more digital tools than ever, yet productivity has not improved. Herman observed this from the inside, managing hundreds of unique software licenses while seeing companies struggle to adapt to new workflows. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi