BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Sprague River Oregon office building expert witness Sprague River Oregon condominium expert witness Sprague River Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Sprague River Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Sprague River Oregon multi family housing expert witness Sprague River Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Sprague River Oregon industrial building expert witness Sprague River Oregon Medical building expert witness Sprague River Oregon hospital construction expert witness Sprague River Oregon low-income housing expert witness Sprague River Oregon custom home expert witness Sprague River Oregon custom homes expert witness Sprague River Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Sprague River Oregon tract home expert witness Sprague River Oregon parking structure expert witness Sprague River Oregon production housing expert witness Sprague River Oregon institutional building expert witness Sprague River Oregon retail construction expert witness Sprague River Oregon condominiums expert witness Sprague River Oregon housing expert witness Sprague River Oregon townhome construction expert witness Sprague River Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Sprague River, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Sprague River Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Klamath Basin Home Builders Association
    Local # 3855
    205 Riverside Drive Ste G
    Klamath Falls, OR 97601
    http://www.kbhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Jackson County
    Local # 3836
    1006 E Jackson St
    Medford, OR 97504
    http://www.hbajc.com

    Curry County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3851
    PO Box 1689
    Brookings, OR 97415


    Home Builders Association of Josephine Cty Oregon
    Local # 3848
    223 NE B St Ste B
    Grants Pass, OR 97526
    http://www.homebuildersofjoco.com

    Umpqua Valley Home Builders Association
    Local # 3816
    3000 Stewart Parkway Suite 206
    Roseburg, OR 97471
    http://www.umpquavalleyhba.org

    Home Builders Association of Southwestern Oregon
    Local # 3888
    PO Box 696
    Coos Bay, OR 97420
    http://www.hbaswo.org

    Central Oregon Builders Association
    Local # 3810
    61396 S Hwy 97 Ste 203
    Bend, OR 97702
    http://www.coba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Sprague River Oregon

    Privity Problems Continue for Additional Insureds in the Second Circuit

    Parties Can Agree to Anything In A Settlement Agreement………Or Can They?

    To Catch a Thief

    Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

    Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Receives First Tier Ranking by U.S. News and World Reports

    Time to Reform Construction Defect Law in Nevada

    Now Available: Seyfarth’s 50 State Lien Law Notice Requirements Guide (2023-2024 Edition)

    Hunton’s Jae Lynn Huckaba Selected to Miami-Dade Bar’s 2026 Circle of Excellence for Insurance Law

    Mixing Concrete, Like Baking a Cake, is Fraught with Problems When the Recipe is Not Followed

    Consult with Counsel when Preparing Construction Liens

    Growing Optimism Among Home Builders

    A WARNing for Companies

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 49 White and Williams Attorneys

    D.R. Horton Profit Beats Estimates as Home Sales Jumped

    California Construction Bill Dies in Committee

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    Amos Rex – A Museum for the Digital Age

    Texas Considers a Quartet of Construction Bills

    Defense Victory in Breach of Fiduciary Action

    Should a Subcontractor provide bonds to a GC who is not himself bonded? (Bonding Agent Perspective)

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    Guardrail Maker Defrauded U.S. of $175 Million and Created Hazard, Jury Says

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment in Collapse Case Denied

    Call Me Maybe: California’s Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations

    Illinois Insureds are Contesting One Carrier's Universal Denial to Covid-19 Losses

    Nevada’s Home Building Industry can Breathe Easier: No Action on SB250 Leaves Current Attorney’s Fees Provision Intact

    Home Builders and Developers Beware: SC Supreme Court Beats Up Hybrid Arbitration Clauses Mercilessly

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap - Undocumented Change Work

    Helsinki is Building a Digital Twin of the City

    Be Careful with Mechanic’s Lien Waivers

    Generally, What Constitutes A Trade Secret Is A Question of Fact

    Illinois Law Bars Coverage for Construction Defects in Insured's Work

    E I, E I, - OH! What’s in a Name?

    Additional Insured Not Covered Where Injury Does Not Arise Out Of Insured's Work

    No Coverage For Construction Defect Under Illinois Law

    Genuine Dispute Over Cause of Damage and Insureds’ Demolition Before Inspection Negate Bad Faith and Elder Abuse Claims

    Union Handbilling: When, Where, and Why it is Legal

    Hawaii Federal District Court Grants Preliminary Approval of Settlement on Volcano Damage

    Techniques for Resolving Construction Disputes

    Fracking Fears Grow as Oklahoma Hit by More Earthquakes Than California

    Jersey City, New Jersey, to Get 95-Story Condo Tower

    Home Prices Up, Inventory Down

    Federal Judge Strikes Down CDC’s COVID-19 Eviction Moratorium

    Why Hurricane Preparedness Isn’t About the Property

    Blog: Congress Strikes a Blow to President Obama’s “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces” Executive Order 13673

    Living With a Millennial. Or Grandma.

    Panthers Withdraw City, County Deal Over Abandoned Facility

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    A Court-Side Seat: Permit Shields, Hurricane Harvey and the Decriminalization of “Incidental Taking”

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers Rising Stars in San Diego!
    Corporate Profile

    SPRAGUE RIVER OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction and design related expert witness designations, the Sprague River, Oregon Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the construction industry's most recognized companies, legal professionals, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets which include construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Sprague River and the surrounding areas.

    Sprague River Oregon construction claims expert witnessSprague River Oregon architecture expert witnessSprague River Oregon construction expert testimonySprague River Oregon structural engineering expert witnessesSprague River Oregon expert witness structural engineerSprague River Oregon construction scheduling expert witnessSprague River Oregon consulting engineers
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Sprague River, Oregon

    Construction Companies Are Nearly Seven Times Safer With These Best Practices

    June 15, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON, May 4—Associated Builders and Contractors released its 2026 Health and Safety Performance Report, an annual guide to health and safety best practices on construction jobsites. The 2026 report shows the positive effects of participating in ABC’s STEP® Health and Safety Management System, which enables top-performing ABC members to achieve incident rates 686% safer than the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics construction industry average, reducing total recordable incident rates by 85%. Established in 1989, STEP is a proven system that provides contractors and suppliers with a robust, no-cost framework for measuring health and safety data and benchmarking with peers in the industry. This self-assessment tool helps participants identify real opportunities for scalable growth in their health and safety programs to lower their total recordable incident rates and become an employer of choice in a competitive labor market. Reprinted courtesy of ABC, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Federal Court Strikes Down New York’s Climate Superfund Act: What It Means for the “Polluter Pays” Movement

    September 28, 2026 —
    A federal judge in the Northern District of New York has struck down New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act, ruling that the “polluter pays” climate law is preempted by federal law and “simply beyond the limits of state law.” The court concluded that the Clean Air Act (CAA) does not authorize New York’s compensation scheme, which calculates liability based on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions attributable to worldwide fossil fuel extraction and refining. It separately held that any cost-recovery demand against a foreign producer would be preempted under the constitutional foreign affairs doctrine, which limits state intrusion into matters committed predominantly to the federal government. The court directed the parties to file a status report by September 14, leaving the form of further relief unresolved. In practical terms, the court has decided that the Act is preempted and cannot be enforced but has not yet determined the precise terms of its final order, including whether to formally enjoin its enforcement. The decision in West Virginia v. James, Case No. 1:25-cv-00168 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2026), issued by Chief U.S. District Judge Brenda K. Sannes, who was appointed by President Obama, marks the first judicial invalidation of a state climate superfund statute and carries significant implications for the climate superfund landscape and the three remaining lawsuits challenging these laws. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Turning Expert Services into Products

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Finnish engineering, architecture, and project consulting company, AINS Group, recently opened an online store to purchase fixed-price services. The store presents specialist work in a product-like format, with fixed service names, defined scopes, and visible prices, such as a building history report, a zoning plan cost analysis, and a technical preliminary survey for a property transaction. Is this productization a smart move or a sign that expert services are being commoditized? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    AI Can Now Train the Soft Skills Construction Ignored

    August 03, 2026 —
    Most AEC professionals learn to work in teams and across teams through trial and error. There are, however, opportunities to better prepare for the real world with formal training. Until now, it has required human facilitators. Now, generative AI is emerging as a scalable alternative, which I’m also exploring. A Gap in Curricula When I studied architecture, most of the teamwork happened with co-students in the same department. However, one course focused on industrial projects where future architects and engineers collaborated on a simulated project. I’m not sure if a similar course is still in the curriculum, but it was certainly worthwhile and should have been much more extensive. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com