BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Stanfield Oregon condominiums expert witness Stanfield Oregon retail construction expert witness Stanfield Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Stanfield Oregon office building expert witness Stanfield Oregon low-income housing expert witness Stanfield Oregon industrial building expert witness Stanfield Oregon townhome construction expert witness Stanfield Oregon institutional building expert witness Stanfield Oregon condominium expert witness Stanfield Oregon housing expert witness Stanfield Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Stanfield Oregon custom home expert witness Stanfield Oregon tract home expert witness Stanfield Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Stanfield Oregon Medical building expert witness Stanfield Oregon hospital construction expert witness Stanfield Oregon casino resort expert witness Stanfield Oregon parking structure expert witness Stanfield Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Stanfield Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Stanfield Oregon multi family housing expert witness Stanfield Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Stanfield, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Stanfield Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Stanfield Oregon

    John Aho: Engineer Pushed for Seismic Safety in Alaska Ahead of 2018 Earthquake

    Colorado “occurrence”

    KF-103 v. American Family Mutual Insurance: Tenth Circuit Upholds the “Complaint Rule”

    Settlement Reached in Bridge Failure Lawsuit

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “The Jury Is Still Out”

    War-Torn Ukraine Looks to Europe’s Green Plans for Reconstruction Ideas

    Back to Basics – Differing Site Conditions

    Impossibility of Performance as Excuse to Failure to Achieve Performance Specification

    A New Way to Design in 3D – Interview with Pouria Kay of Grib

    GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple Venues

    Vaccine Mandate Confusion Continues – CMS Vaccine Mandate Restored in Some (But Not All) US States

    Human Eye Resolution Virtual Reality for AEC

    Finding of No Coverage Overturned Due to Lack of Actual Policy

    Alleged Damage to Personal Property Does Not Revive Coverage for Construction Defects

    Insurer's Motion to Dismiss Business Interruption, COVID-19 Claims Under Pollution Policy Fails

    Construction Defect or Just Punch List?

    Insurer's Late Notice Defense Fails on Summary Judgment

    With VA Mechanic’s Liens Sometimes “Substantial Compliance” is Enough (but don’t count on it)

    Rio de Janeiro's Bursting Real-Estate Bubble

    To Ask or Not to Ask (Arbitrator Inquiries and the Obligation to Remain Neutral)

    Team Temporarily Stabilizes Delaware River Bridge Crack

    Congress Relaxes Several PPP Loan Requirements

    Eighth Circuit Remands to Determine Applicability of Collapse Exclusion

    GIS and BIM Integration Will Transform Infrastructure Design and Construction

    Stormy Seas Ahead: 5th Circuit to Review Whether Maritime Law Applies to Offshore Service Contract

    One Shot to Get It Right: Navigating the COVID-19 Vaccine in the Workplace

    I-35W Bridge Collapse may be Due to “Inadequate Load Capacity”

    Washington Court Tunnels Deeper Into the Discovery Rule

    Will The New U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Deal Calm Industry Jitters?

    Jury's Verdict for Loss Caused by Collapse Overturned

    Meet the Hipster Real Estate Developers Building for Millennials

    Unfinished Building Projects Litter Miami

    Brown Orders Mandatory Water Curbs for California Drought

    Don’t Ignore the Dispute Resolution Provisions in Your Construction Contract

    Application of Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Supports Coverage

    PSA: Pay If Paid Ban Goes into Effect on January 1, 2023

    Breach of an Oral Contract and Unjust Enrichment and Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

    Grenfell Fire Probe Faults Construction Industry Practices

    Summary Judgment Granted to Insurer for Hurricane Damage

    DoD Testing New Roofing System that Saves Energy and Water

    My Construction Law Wish List

    Construction Defect Risks Shifted to Insurers in 2013

    Bert Hummel Appointed Vice Chair of State Bar of Georgia Bench & Bar Committee

    ABA’s Fundamentals of Construction Law, 3rd Edition

    FEMA Fire Management Assistance Granted for the French Fire

    No Coverage Under Property Policy With Other Insurance and Loss Payment Provisions

    Cross-Motions for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings for COVID-19 Claim Denied

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment to Reject Collapse Coverage Denied

    Hiring Subcontractors with Workers Compensation Insurance

    Flexible Seattle Off-Ramp Would Retain Shape in Quake
    Corporate Profile

    STANFIELD OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 building and construction related expert designations, the Stanfield, Oregon Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to construction claims professionals seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Employing in house assets which comprise construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Stanfield construction industry.

    Stanfield Oregon reconstruction expert witnessStanfield Oregon civil engineering expert witnessStanfield Oregon building expertStanfield Oregon expert witnesses fenestrationStanfield Oregon construction claims expert witnessStanfield Oregon OSHA expert witness constructionStanfield Oregon contractor expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Stanfield, Oregon

    Over 50 Lewis Brisbois Attorneys Recognized in 7th Edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America

    September 01, 2026 —
    56 Lewis Brisbois attorneys across 26 offices have been named to the 7th edition of “Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.” Congratulations to the following attorneys on this recognition! You can see the full list of Lewis Brisbois attorneys named to Best Lawyers' 33rd edition of The Best Lawyers in America here. Akron, OH
    • Partner Meleah M. Skillern - Commercial Litigation
    Atlanta, GA
    • Partner Catherine Crawley - Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants; and Transportation Law
    • Associate Davis Lackey - Insurance Law; and Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Newark Team Obtains Appellate Ruling Affirming Summary Judgment for Lawyer and Firm in Professional Negligence Lawsuit

    April 14, 2026 —
    Newark Partner Meredith Kaplan Stoma and Associate Anthony Doss recently secured a decision from the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, affirming summary judgment for their clients, a lawyer and her firm, in a lawsuit alleging professional negligence in connection with the administration of a commercial loan. The circumstances giving rise to the lawsuit date back to September 2020, when the plaintiff was approached by members of a real estate investment company regarding a short-term loan opportunity whereby he would loan the company $200,000. The company provided the plaintiff with a “bridge loan package,” which stated that the requested funds would be held in the escrow account of their counsel and her firm (Lewis Brisbois’ clients), and returned to him with interest within six months once the company was “capitalized” by a senior lender. The company subsequently prepared two notes, each for $100,000, in connection with the agreement. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Prevents Coverage for Collapse

    April 27, 2026 —
    The appellate court affirmed the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment to the insurer after agreeing that the policy’s anti-concurrent causation clause barred coverage. Lido Hospitality, Inc. v. AIX Specialty Ins. Co., 2026 Iii. App. Unpub. LEXIS 133 (Ill. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026). One of the brick veneer walls of the Lido Motel collapsed during a windstorm. Lido reported the loss it its insurer, AIX. AIX investigated and determined that the brick veneer collapsed due to pervasive wear and tear and corrosion of the underlying infrastructure that secured the veneer- specifically the components that anchored or tied the masonry veneer to the underlying wooden substrate. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    How Engineers Will Determine Why NYC's Pfizer HQ Conversion Buckled

    July 13, 2026 —
    Construction crews have stabilized the former Pfizer headquarters redevelopment in Midtown Manhattan after two load-bearing structural columns buckled on the 21st floor July 7. The focus has now shifted from emergency response to determining what caused the office-to-residential conversion to suffer a major structural failure. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    IEEPA Tariff Refunds: CBP Launches CAPE Process

    April 27, 2026 —
    On April 20, 2026, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched the first phase of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) tool in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) portal to administer refunds of duties imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) through a streamlined electronic filing process. Background In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain tariffs imposed under IEEPA were unlawful. Subsequent proceedings before the U.S. Court of International Trade required CBP to develop a scalable refund process applicable not only to litigants but also to non-plaintiffs. According to CBP and court filings, approximately 330,000 importers paid or deposited an estimated $166 billion in IEEPA duties across more than 53 million entries. In response, CBP developed CAPE as an electronic, consolidated refund mechanism within ACE. Reprinted courtesy of David J. Creagan, White and Williams LLP, Guido Antolini, White and Williams LLP, Bruce W. MacLennan, White and Williams LLP and Gary P. Biehn, White and Williams LLP Mr. Creagan may be contacted at creagand@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Antolini may be contacted at antolinig@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. MacLennan may be contacted at maclennanb@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Biehn may be contacted at biehng@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Construction Contract Negotiation & Drafting: A Practical Checklist (and Where State-Specific Issues Can Surprise You)

    April 20, 2026 —
    Construction contract negotiation is often treated as a “forms exercise,” especially when the parties start from familiar templates (e.g., AIA forms). In practice, though, the biggest problems tend to arise not from the existence of a form, but from (i) misalignment among the project’s governing documents and participants, (ii) ambiguity in pricing and payment mechanics, and (iii) state-specific statutory requirements that override negotiated terms. This article includes a practical checklist intended to help owners, developers, and contractors streamline contract negotiations, reduce downstream disputes, and avoid unpleasant surprises during payment administration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michelle Cooper, Sheppard
    Ms. Cooper may be contacted at mcooper@sheppard.com

    Colorado Court Affirms Attorneys’ Fee Award Against Plaintiff’s Counsel for Pursuing Unsupported CCPA Claims

    August 03, 2026 —
    The Colorado Court of Appeals recently affirmed a trial court’s award of more than $241,000 in attorney fees against a plaintiffs’ attorney who continued to pursue unsupported claims arising out of a residential construction dispute. Although the opinion was not selected for official publication under C.A.R. 35(e) and therefore has no precedential value, it nevertheless provides an instructive reminder that Colorado courts are willing to impose significant financial consequences when claims lack substantial justification. For builders, developers, contractors, insurers, and defense counsel, the case is worth reading, not because it announces new law, but because it demonstrates that Colorado’s fee-shifting statute remains a meaningful tool when unsupported claims continue long after they should have been abandoned. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    Building More Than a Ramp: HHMR and the Home Builders Foundation

    September 15, 2026 —
    Last Friday, four members of the Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell team traded briefs, depositions, and construction litigation files for lumber, drills, and a day on a jobsite. HHMR attorneys Ricky Nolen, Amanda Tynan, Kyle Thompson, and Tanner Davis participated in the Home Builders Foundation’s 2026 Blitz Build, helping construct an accessibility ramp for Andrea, a Denver-area resident whose mobility challenges had made something most of us take for granted extraordinarily difficult: leaving her own home independently. The day after the build, the volunteers received an e-mail from HBF’s Terrina Reiber with an unusual request: set an alarm for 10:00 the next morning. At 10:00 on a Saturday, she explained, they might be running errands, meeting a friend, or simply deciding what to do with the day. When the alarm went off, she asked them to think about Andrea. Because Andrea could now make that same choice. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell