BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Union County Oregon condominium expert witness Union County Oregon Medical building expert witness Union County Oregon Subterranean parking expert witness Union County Oregon high-rise construction expert witness Union County Oregon structural steel construction expert witness Union County Oregon mid-rise construction expert witness Union County Oregon production housing expert witness Union County Oregon tract home expert witness Union County Oregon retail construction expert witness Union County Oregon hospital construction expert witness Union County Oregon custom homes expert witness Union County Oregon office building expert witness Union County Oregon industrial building expert witness Union County Oregon landscaping construction expert witness Union County Oregon institutional building expert witness Union County Oregon multi family housing expert witness Union County Oregon casino resort expert witness Union County Oregon concrete tilt-up expert witness Union County Oregon low-income housing expert witness Union County Oregon condominiums expert witness Union County Oregon custom home expert witness Union County Oregon
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Union County, Oregon

    Oregon Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (HB 2525 Chap. 701; HB2389) If an owner sends a builder a notice of defect within the time allowed for the owner to commence a court action against that contractor, the time for the owner to commence the action shall be extended, notwithstanding any statute of limitation or statute of ultimate repose, until the later of 120 days after written receipt of builders intention to repair, replace the defect, make monetary compensation or reject the claim. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 14 days to inspect the alleged defect. They then have no more than 90 days to communicate their intention The homebuyer must respond to the builder response within 30 days of receipt. The law requires builder notifies homebuyer of NOR before purchase.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Union County Oregon

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Metro Portland
    Local # 3862
    15555 SW Bangy Rd Ste 301
    Lake Oswego, OR 97035
    http://www.homebuildersportland.org

    Home Builders Association of Marion and Polk Counties
    Local # 3878
    385 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.homebuildersassociation.org

    Oregon Home Builders Association
    Local # 3800
    375 Taylor St NE
    Salem, OR 97301
    http://www.oregonhba.com

    Northeast Oregon Chapter
    Local # 3860
    PO Box 436
    Hermiston, OR 97838


    Baker County Chapter
    Local # 3802
    3470 10th St
    Baker City, OR 97814


    North Coast Home Builders Association
    Local # 3811
    PO Box 2547
    Seaside, OR 97138
    http://www.ncbia-or.com

    Lincoln County Home Builders Association
    Local # 3858
    PO Box 440
    Tangent, OR 97389
    http://www.lincolncountyhba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Union County Oregon

    Nebraska Joins the Ranks—No CGL Coverage for Faulty Work

    Insured Cannot Sue to Challenge Binding Appraisal Decision

    Supreme Court’s New York Harbor Case Isn’t a ‘Sopranos’ Episode

    Denial of Coverage for Bulge in Wall Upheld

    Federal Court Sets High Bar for Pleading Products Liability Cases in New Jersey

    Staying Single?

    Recording “Un-Neighborly” Documents

    Keep an Eye Out on What Your Insurance Policy and Contract Says

    Roadway Contractor Owed Duty of Care to Driver Injured Outside of Construction Zone

    Zillow Seen Dominating U.S. Home Searches with Trulia

    Housing Starts Plunge by the Most in Four Years

    Connecticut District Court to Review Proposed Class Action in Defective Concrete Suit

    In New Orleans, Katrina Taught a Lesson in Local Resilience

    Connecticut Federal District Court Again Finds "Collapse" Provisions Ambiguous

    Interior Designer Licensure

    Design Immunity Does Not Shield Public Entity From Claim That it Failed to Warn of a Dangerous Condition

    Ruling Dealing with Constructive Changes, Constructive Suspension, and the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

    Arizona Court Enters $323 Million Judgment Against ZOM Living Following Unanimous Jury Verdict

    Reminder: Quantum Meruit and Breach of Construction Contract Don’t Mix

    Construction Executives Expect Improvements in the Year Ahead

    Subsequent Owners of Homes Again Have Right to Sue Builders for Construction Defects

    Ownership and Licensing in Design Agreements

    Can Foreclosure Sale Be Overturned Because Sale Price Is Grossly Inadequate?

    Defects in Texas High School Stadium Angers Residents

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Denial of Coverage Unsuccessful

    Washington State Safety Officials Cite Contractor After Worker's Fatal Fall

    Reconciling Prompt Payments and Withholding of Retention Payments

    Arbitration Denied: Third Appellate District Holds Arbitration Clause Procedurally and Substantively Unconscionable

    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    Small Airport to Grow with Tower

    A Year After Fatal Genoa Viaduct Collapse, Replacement Takes Shape

    You Don’t Have To Be a Consumer to Assert a FDUTPA Claim

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    Arizona Contractor Designs Water-Repellant Cabinets

    Segal McCambridge Expands West Coast Presence with the Addition of 36 Attorneys from Chapman Glucksman to Los Angeles Office

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2023 New York – Metro Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

    Resulting Loss Claims Denied

    Co-Founding Partner Jason Feld Named Finalist for CLM’s Outside Defense Counsel Professional of the Year

    Security on Large Construction Projects. The Payment Remedy You Probably Never Heard of

    Mississippi Supreme Court Addresses Earth Movement Exclusion

    Perez Broke Records … But Should He Have Settled Earlier?

    Haight Welcomes Elizabeth Lawley

    Land Planners Not Held to Professional Standard of Care

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Property Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Chinese Billionaire Sues Local Governments Over Project Payment

    What Makes Building Ventilation Good Enough to Withstand a Pandemic?

    Reminder: Your MLA Notice Must Have Your License Number

    California Booms With FivePoint New Schools: Real Estate

    General Liability Alert: ADA Requirements Pertaining to Wall Space Adjacent to Interior Doors Clarified

    Default, Fraud, and VCPA (Oh My!)
    Corporate Profile

    UNION COUNTY OREGON CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 construction claims related expert witness designations, the Union County, Oregon Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. In connection with in house assets comprising building envelope and design experts, forensic engineers, forensic architects, and construction cost and scheduling consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Union County region.

    Union County Oregon window expert witnessUnion County Oregon fenestration expert witnessUnion County Oregon eifs expert witnessUnion County Oregon expert witness commercial buildingsUnion County Oregon construction code expert witnessUnion County Oregon construction cost estimating expert witnessUnion County Oregon building consultant expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Union County, Oregon

    Seattle’s Residential Zoning Transformation: What Property Owners, Buyers, and Investors Should Understand

    May 14, 2026 —
    Seattle is in the midst of a significant transformation in residential land use policy. Longstanding neighborhood zoning patterns that historically favored detached single-family development are being reexamined in response to housing supply pressures, affordability concerns, and evolving state mandates. For homeowners, purchasers, investors, and builders, these changes may create substantial new opportunities. They also create a heightened need for careful legal and practical due diligence. While zoning reform can expand potential uses of property, it does not eliminate the many other constraints that may still govern what can actually be built. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lawrence S. Glosser, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Mr. Glosser may be contacted at larry.glosser@acslawyers.com

    A Couple of Mechanic’s Lien Bills in VA [UPDATED]

    February 23, 2026 —
    Well, its that time of year again, the Virginia General Assembly is in session and looking to make changes to all kinds of things here in the Commonwealth. While most of those changes are well outside of the subject of Construction Law Musings, changes to the mechanic’s lien statutes certainly are not. This year, the Virginia General Assembly is poised to make some big changes if certain legislation gets out of committee and passes the legislature, a description and some comments on these follow: HB752 – Mechanics’ liens; liens attaching to property; memorandum of lien. [Original Description] Removes the exclusion of the attachment of a mechanic’s lien to property improved or repaired when the lien is based on a claim for repairs or existing structures. The bill further removes (i) the ability of a lien claimant to file any number of memoranda of lien including the details relating to the lien and (ii) the provisions of the Code specifying that no memorandum filed shall include sums due for (a) labor or materials furnished more than 150 days prior to the last day labor was performed or (b) material furnished to the job preceding the filing of such memorandum. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Georgia HB 676: A Bill Property Owners and Contractors Should Watch

    March 24, 2026 —
    Property owners, contractors, and others dealing with mechanics and materialmen’s liens in Georgia should keep an eye on HB 676, which is currently making its way through the Georgia General Assembly. The bill aims to curb misuse of the lien process and provide additional remedies to those challenging a frivolous lien filing. What HB 676 Would Do HB 676 would add a new Code section (O.C.G.A. § 44-14-366.6) to the mechanics and materialmen’s lien statutes. If a lien is filed “without substantial justification or that is not made in good faith or that is made with malice or a wrongful purpose,” this new Code section would impose a fine of $1,500 per lien on the lien claimant, in addition to any attorney’s fees or court costs incurred by the party challenging the lien. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Robert Lafayette, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Lafayette may be contacted at rlafayette@seyfarth.com

    Samuel Alhadeff Represents LGI Homes in Acquisition and Re-Entitlement of Maravilla Estates

    July 06, 2026 —
    Temecula Partner Samuel Alhadeff recently represented LGI Homes in its acquisition and re-entitlement of Maravilla Estates, a 169-lot active adult community located in San Jacinto, California. The acquisition and re-entitlement of the project provide LGI Homes with the opportunity to deliver much-needed age-qualified housing in one of Riverside County's growing residential markets. The community includes a recorded final map and finished lots, as well as future development inventory and planned amenities, positioning the project for continued development and completion. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Quick Note: Include Key Time Related Facts in Contract to Avoid an Ambiguity

    February 17, 2026 —
    When drafting or negotiating a contract, it is important to consider key time-related facts. In other words, if there are important provisions dealing with time, you don’t want to leave them undefined as that can create an ambiguity in the contract. In a recent case dealing with an investment contract, discussed here, that’s exactly what happened. The contract allowed investors to exercise an option to return their equity in exchange for a refund of their investment but the contract didn’t contain an expiration date on when the option must be exercised. The investors tried to exercise the option two years later leading to a dispute as to whether that was a “reasonable time.” This is because the lack of clarity regarding this temporal fact led to a latent ambiguity meaning it was a question of fact as to whether the investors exercising the option two years later was reasonable under the circumstances. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Federal Court Highlights the Strategic Value of Additional Insured Coverage

    June 22, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the District of Maryland underscores a recurring—but often underutilized—opportunity for policyholders: securing and enforcing additional insured coverage under another party’s liability policy. In Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. v. Builders Premier Insurance Co., the court held that an equipment lessor qualified as an additional insured under the lessee’s policy and was entitled to a primary defense. The decision is a useful reminder that additional insured coverage can fundamentally shift defense obligations and materially reduce a policyholder’s exposure. We build on the decision to highlight the practical steps policyholders should take to ensure that all potentially available insurance is identified and pursued. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Michael S. Levine, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Mr. Levine may be contacted at mlevine@hunton.com

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    EPA Steps Back, Arizona Moves Forward

    May 12, 2026 —
    In a significant development for Arizona’s business community and environmental policymakers, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has paused its planned reclassification of Maricopa County from “Moderate” to “Serious” ozone nonattainment status pursuant to the Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). This decision marks a shift in federal air policy — one that recognizes the unique challenges faced by regions like metro Phoenix, where environmental conditions beyond local control are often key contributors to air quality readings. The EPA’s move follows a series of meetings between EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, Arizona elected officials, and business and civic leaders, including a recent roundtable in Phoenix convened by U.S. Senator Mark Kelly. In announcing the pause, Zeldin acknowledged the need for flexibility and fairness in the application of Clean Air Act standards, especially when emissions from other states, nations, and natural events significantly influence local air quality. Reprinted courtesy of Patrick J. Paul, Snell & Wilmer, John Habib, Snell & Wilmer and Sukhmani K. Singh, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Paul may be contacted at ppaul@swlaw.com Mr. Habib may be contacted at jhabib@swlaw.com Ms. Singh may be contacted at ssingh@swlaw.com Read the full story...