BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania office building expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Fairview Village Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Fairview Village, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fairview Village Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Washington Co Builders Association
    Local # 3964
    30 E Beau St Room #321
    Washington, PA 15301
    http://www.wcbabuilders.org

    Building Industry Association of Lancaster
    Local # 3936
    204 Butler Ave Ste 200
    Lancaster, PA 17601
    http://www.LancasterBuilders.org

    Home Builders Association of Bucks & Montgomery Counties
    Local # 3945
    721 Dresher Road Suite 1200
    Horsham, PA 19044
    http://www.hbahomes.com

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404
    http://www.yorkbuilders.com

    Pennsylvania Builders Association
    Local # 3900
    600 N 12th St
    Lemoyne, PA 17043
    http://www.pabuilders.org

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380
    http://www.builderpa.com

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103
    http://www.biaofphiladelphia.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Fairview Village Pennsylvania

    Travelers Insurance Sues Chicago for $26M in Damages to Willis Tower

    Home Prices in 20 U.S. Cities Rose at Faster Pace in January

    Courthouse Reporter Series: Nebraska Court of Appeals Vacates Arbitration Award for Misconduct

    Court Invalidates Project Labor Agreement Mandate on Federal Construction Projects

    Colorado Legislative Update: HB 20-1155, HB 20-1290, and HB 20-1348

    House Passes $25B Water Resources Development Bill

    Wilke Fleury Attorney Featured in 2022 Best Lawyers in America and Best Lawyers: Ones To Watch!

    Are Modern Buildings Silently Killing Us?

    Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Recognized in 2024 Best Law Firm® Rankings

    Claim for Collapse After Demolition of Building Fails

    KY Mining Accident Not a Covered Occurrence Under Commercial General Liability Policy

    The Status of OSHA’s Impending Heat Stress Standard

    OSHA’s COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard Is in Flux

    Contractors: Revisit your Force Majeure Provisions to Account for Hurricanes

    There's No Such Thing as a Free House

    Brian Slome Named to the Daily Journal’s List of Top Professional Responsibility Lawyers for 2025

    That’s What I have Insurance For, Right?

    The Problem With Building a New City From Scratch

    Hamptons Home Up for Foreclosure That May Set Record

    American Roads Are Paved With Inefficiency

    Trump Tower Is Now One of NYC’s Least-Desirable Luxury Buildings

    “It’s My Retainage and I Want It Now!” - Fundamentals to Requirements and Entitlement for Retainage

    Best Lawyers Honors Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Names Two Partners “Lawyers of the Year”

    Surfside Condo Collapse Investigators Have Nearly Finished Technical Work

    HHMR Recognized in 2026 Best Law Firms® Rankings for Construction Litigation and Construction Law

    CDJ’s #2 Topic of the Year: Ewing Constr. Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 2014 Tex. LEXIS 39 (Tex. Jan.17, 2014)

    Preservationists Want to Save Penn Station. Yes, That Penn Station.

    UPDATED: No Easy Fix for Potomac River Sewage Spill, Now Estimated at $20M

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules in Builder’s Implied Warranty of Habitability Case

    Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2022 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Insured Cannot Sue to Challenge Binding Appraisal Decision

    Plans Go High Tech

    GRSM Named Among 2025 “Best Law Firms” by Best Lawyers

    Court Finds That SIR Requirements are Not Incorporated into High Level Excess Policies and That Excess Insurers’ Payment of Defense Costs is Not Conditioned on Actual Liability

    Columbus, Ohio’s Tallest Building to be Inspected for Construction Defects

    Settlement Ends Construction Defect Lawsuit for School

    Sacramento Water Works Recognized as a Historic Civil Engineering Landmark

    FAA Plans Final Regulation on Commercial Drone Use by Mid-2016

    Late Progress Payments on Local Public Works Projects Are Not a Statutory Breach of Contract

    Fraud, the VCPA and Construction Contracts

    A Court-Side Seat: Appeals and Agency Developments at the Close of 2020

    White and Williams Elects Four Lawyers to Partnership, Promotes Six Associates to Counsel

    Ohio Does Not Permit Retroactive Application of Statute of Repose

    Part of the Whole: Idaho District Court Holds Economic Loss Rule Bars Tort Claims Related to Water Supply Line that was Part of Home Purchase

    Homeowner’s Claims Defeated Because “Gravamen” of Complaint was Fraud, not Breach of Contract

    New York Regulator Issues Cyber Insurance Guidelines

    Building Resiliency: Withstanding Wildfires and Other Natural Disasters

    Eastern District of Pennsylvania Clarifies Standard for Imposing Spoliation Sanctions

    Cultivating a Company Culture Committed to Safety, Mentorship and Education

    Connecticut Answers Critical Questions Regarding Scope of Collapse Coverage in Homeowners Policies in Insurers’ Favor
    Corporate Profile

    FAIRVIEW VILLAGE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction related expert witness designations, the Fairview Village, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to developers, risk managers, and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which include design experts, civil / structural engineers, ICC Certified Inspectors, ASPE certified professional estimators, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Fairview Village and the surrounding areas.

    Fairview Village Pennsylvania consulting general contractorFairview Village Pennsylvania stucco expert witnessFairview Village Pennsylvania ada design expert witnessFairview Village Pennsylvania building envelope expert witnessFairview Village Pennsylvania building expertFairview Village Pennsylvania construction expert witnessFairview Village Pennsylvania expert witnesses fenestration
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Fairview Village, Pennsylvania

    Research Illuminates Pollution Problem in Tijuana River Valley

    June 29, 2026 —
    The Tijuana River watershed between southern California and northern Mexico has been the epicenter of an environmental and public health crisis for more than two decades. Since October 2023 alone, more than 31 billion gallons of raw sewage and polluted water have flowed into the U.S. and, eventually, the Pacific Ocean. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Yoders, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Yoders may be contacted at yodersj@enr.com

    Arizona Court of Appeals Clarifies Homeowners Association Open Meeting Requirements

    June 29, 2026 —
    A Z N H Revocable Trust v. Sunland Springs Village Homeowners Association, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0424 (Ariz. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2026) OVERVIEW The Arizona Court of Appeals issued an opinion clarifying how homeowners associations must conduct meetings under A.R.S. § 33-1804. The decision reinforces the legislative policy favoring transparency in association governance, bringing association meeting requirements more in line with the open meeting standards applicable to public bodies under A.R.S. § 38-431 et seq. (Arizona’s Open Meeting Law). KEY HOLDINGS 1. All Voting and Formal Actions Must Occur in Open Meetings The Court affirmed that association boards cannot vote or take formal action during closed (executive) sessions. Under A.R.S. § 33-1804(A), associations may close portions of meetings only for “consideration” of certain enumerated topics, such as legal advice, pending litigation, or personal/financial information about individual members. The Court interpreted “consideration” to mean discussion and deliberation, not voting. The Court noted that dictionaries define “consider” as “spending time thinking about a possibility” and “formulating an opinion,” which are processes that precede formal action. This interpretation mirrors how Arizona’s Open Meeting Law (A.R.S. § 38-431.03(D)) prohibits public bodies from voting in executive session. Reprinted courtesy of Jill Casson Owen, Snell & Wilmer, Benjamin J. Hawkins, Snell & Wilmer and Stephen Wright, Snell & Wilmer Ms. Owen may be contacted at jowen@swlaw.com Mr. Hawkins may be contacted at bhawkins@swlaw.com Mr. Wright may be contacted at swright@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    AI Data Centers Become City-Scale Infrastructure, Prompting New Industry Playbook

    August 11, 2026 —
    AI data centers are no longer just buildings. They are increasingly reaching power-demand levels more commonly associated with municipalities, prompting industry groups to launch a new framework they say is needed to keep pace with rapidly changing power, cooling and reliability requirements. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    ACEC Research Institute Report: Real Risk of AI Isn’t Technology. It’s the Org Chart.

    September 01, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON (August 19, 2026) – The ACEC Research Institute today released Leading Through AI Risk: The Enterprise Framework for Engineering Firm Leaders, a new study finding that the most significant risks artificial intelligence poses to engineering firms are organizational rather than technological, and that firms treating AI as an IT initiative are managing the wrong issue. The report, part of the Institute’s yearslong Firm of the Future initiative, combines an extensive literature review with in-depth interviews of 21 leaders drawn from engineering firms, public infrastructure owners, technology vendors, insurance and legal professionals, licensing and regulatory agencies, and AI consultants. The report groups AI risk into eight interconnected domains:
    • technical reliability and model risk
    • professional liability and standard of care risk
    • data governance, privacy, and intellectual property risk
    • organizational and workforce risk
    • ethical, regulatory, and reputational risk
    • operational and cybersecurity risk
    • financial and business model risk
    • strategic leadership and enterprise governance risk
    The last serves as the integrating domain through which firms coordinate responsible AI adoption enterprise wide. The report stresses that firms do not experience these risks one at a time. Weak oversight may create legal liability. Workforce gaps may affect quality assurance. “Understanding these interactions,” the study notes, “is often more important than understanding individual risks independently.” About the ACEC Research Institute The ACEC Research Institute is the independent research arm of the American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC). Its mission is to fund and deliver research to equip the engineering industry with actionable intelligence on the issues critical to its success. Learn more at www.acecresearchinstitute.org.

    Conditional Payment Bond Consideration-Make Sure There Is Pay-If-Paid Provision

    June 29, 2026 —
    If a general contractor is going to have a conditional payment bond, it needs to ensure it subcontracts contain pay-if-paid or pay-when-paid provisions. This conditional payment language in subcontracts is the general contractor’s defense that it doesn’t have to pay a subcontractor UNTIL owner has paid the general contractor for the subcontractor’s work. The general contractor (and the surety) can look at the conditional payment bond with the s. 713.245 legend stamped on its face designating the conditional nature of the bond, and assume the conditional structure is locked in against the bond: no payment from the owner, no obligation to the subcontractors under the bond. But what happens when the subcontracts contain no express conditional payment language despite having a valid conditional payment bond? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Insureds’ Altering Dates for Hailstorm Damage Justifies Denial of Claim

    June 02, 2026 —
    The Firth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer due to the insureds’ failure to establish the date of loss after a hailstorm. Cutchall v. Chubb Lloyds Ins. Co. of Texas, 2026 WL 625633 (5th Cir. March 5, 2026). In September 2021, the Cutchalls made a claim on their policy for interior water damage due to a hailstorm that breached their roof. Chubb retained two engineers to inspect the home, but neither found evidence that a hailstorm caused the damage. Instead, the engineers concluded a variety of other causes, such as poor ventilation and as-built defects, caused the damage. Because Chubb concluded that some of these other causes were covered by the policy, it paid only for the covered portions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Function Over Form: Eighth Circuit Narrows Application of Cosmetic Damage Exclusion

    October 12, 2026 —
    Introduction In a significant decision for policyholders, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit adopted a narrow interpretation of an exclusion for cosmetic roof damage caused by wind or hail.[1] The court held that for a cosmetic damage exclusion to apply, an insurer must prove that the roof’s ability to function as a barrier to the elements is not impaired as compared to its functionality prior to the loss or damage. Background In April 2022, a hailstorm struck the insured school buildings causing indentations in the buildings’ metal roofs. The hail did not puncture the roofs’ metal, and no leaks were reported. The insurer denied the claim based on the policy’s cosmetic damage exclusion, which precluded coverage for “cosmetic damage to roof surfacing caused by wind and/or hail.” Cosmetic damage was defined as “superficial damage that altered the appearance of the roof surfacing, but such damage does not prevent the roof from continuing to function as a barrier to entrance of the elements to the same extent as it did before.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ali Jamwal, SDV Fenchurch
    Mr. Jamwal may be contacted at ali.jamwal@sdvfenchurch.us

    We’re Burning Tokens to Clean Up Bad PDFs

    August 24, 2026 —
    Last Thursday, researchers from Tampere and Aalto universities reported on preliminary results of two AI- and digitalization-related projects. One project demonstrated how AI can automate the Bill of Materials process; the other tried to quantify the impact of data-driven construction and AI. The conclusion was that AI-powered automation can dramatically increase productivity, but unevenly. However, the substantial benefits may come from better outcomes rather than project efficiency. Various standards, company-specific practices, project-specific schemas, and traditions are designed for humans to comprehend. 2D drawings and text documents as PDF files, Excel sheets, and design and planning software have the information, but not the data in ideal form for automation. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi