BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    structural steel construction expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania office building expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania housing expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Indiana County Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Indiana County, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Indiana County Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Huntingdon Co Builders Association
    Local # 3917
    PO Box 399
    Huntingdon, PA 16652
    http://www.huntingdoncountybuilders.com

    Builders Association of Metro Pittsburgh
    Local # 3944
    2041 Blvd Of The Allies
    Pittsburgh, PA 15219
    http://www.PGHhomebuilders.com

    Blair-Bedford Builders Association
    Local # 3908
    1410 Allegheny Street
    Hollidaysburg, PA 16648
    http://www.blairbuilders.com

    Mifflin-Juniata Chapter
    Local # 3926
    5 Oak Drive
    Thompsontown, PA 17094
    http://www.mifflinjuniatabuilders.org

    Schuylkill Builders Assn
    Local # 3954
    1036 Schylkill Mountain Rd
    Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972
    http://www.schuylkillba.com

    Lehigh Valley Builders Association
    Local # 3904
    1524 W Linden St
    Allentown, PA 18102
    http://www.lvba.org

    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701
    http://www.iabuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Indiana County Pennsylvania
    Corporate Profile

    INDIANA COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Indiana County, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction claims investigation, testimony, and support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which include licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Indiana County and the surrounding areas.

    Indiana County Pennsylvania building code expert witnessIndiana County Pennsylvania window expert witnessIndiana County Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessIndiana County Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witnessIndiana County Pennsylvania OSHA expert witness constructionIndiana County Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessIndiana County Pennsylvania expert witness concrete failure
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Indiana County, Pennsylvania

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    GRSM Ranked Among Texas’ 50 Largest Law Firms by Texas Lawyer

    August 03, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has been recognized byTexas Lawyer in its 2026 Texas 100 ranking, earning the No. 49 spot among the state’s largest law firms by attorney headcount. The annual report spotlights the continued strength of Texas’ legal market, with firms across the state collectively increasing lawyer headcount by 2% in 2025. “Texas continues to be one of the country’s most thriving legal and business markets, and we are proud to be recognized among the state’s largest law firms,” said Laura De Santos, Regional Oversight Partner for Texas. “Our continued growth shows the confidence our clients place in us, the exceptional talent of our attorneys, and our commitment to delivering seamless, high-quality legal services throughout Texas and across our 50-state platform.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    New Executive Order on AI Innovation and Security: Key Takeaways for the Construction Industry

    June 15, 2026 —
    On June 2, 2026, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security.” At its core, the Order is a cybersecurity and national-security measure rather than a broad regulation of how private companies develop or use AI. It directs federal agencies to harden government systems against AI-enabled cyber threats, establishes voluntary frameworks for collaboration between the federal government and the AI and critical-infrastructure sectors, and strengthens criminal enforcement against the malicious use of AI. Notably, the Order expressly disclaims any intent to create a “mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting” regime for the “development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models.” Instead, the Executive Order seeks to “promote AI innovation and security” by working with the private sector to modernize government and private-sector information systems and harden them against external threats, protect intellectual property from exploitation or theft, and cultivate American AI capabilities. Reprinted courtesy of Richard R. Volack, Peckar & Abramson, PC and Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, PC Mr. Volack may be contacted at rvolack@pecklaw.com Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Generic Complaint Alleging Bad Faith is Insufficient

    August 24, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for judgment on the pleadings after determining that the insured’s claims for bad faith and unfair claims settlement practices were insufficiently pled. Navia v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111261 (W.D. N. C. May 20, 2026). The insured submitted a claim for damages to real property owned by the insured allegedly caused by Hurricane Helene. State Farm advised the insured that only some of the claimed damages were covered by the policy and payment for such damages were denied because the estimate for the covered damages did not exceed the policy’s deductible. The insured sued asserting claims for breach of contract, bad faith, and unfair claim settlement practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    USDOT’s DBE Interim Final Rule: How It Affects Current and Out-to-Bid DOT and Airport Projects

    June 15, 2026 —
    In our April 16, 2026 post, we discussed the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Interim Final Rule (IFR) concerning Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concession Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) certification, specifically as it concerns transportation and airport projects in California. This post addresses a broader question: What does the IFR mean for current and out-to-bid DOT projects operating under pre-existing DBE goals? The answer is that the IFR did more than change who qualifies as a DBE. It also changed how federally funded transportation and airport projects must be handled during the re-evaluation period. This affects active contracts, pending procurements, airport projects, design-build teams, and anyone relying on old assumptions about DBE goals and counting of DBE and ACDBE credit. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Zachary F. Jacobson, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Mr. Jacobson may be contacted at zjacobson@seyfarth.com

    Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and Businesses

    May 12, 2026 —
    The recent Kona Low storms that hit all islands were devastating, causing significant property damage. Homeowners and businesses will be seeking coverage under their insurance policies to recover for their losses. Here is a brief look at what may be covered and which exclusions may be troublesome in homeowners’ and commercial property policies. Typically, both a homeowners’ policy and a commercial property policy include a grant of coverage for “direct physical loss of or damage to Covered Property.” Covered perils are listed, including such events as fire, lightning, or windstorm. Covered Property includes dwellings, other structures on the property and personal property. Additional coverages are usually provided. This includes debris removal after a peril insured against or collapse of a structure. In a homeowners’ policy, additional living expenses are likely covered when the damaged home is not fit to live in. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Communication Gaps Can Cost Construction Firms in the Data Center Boom

    June 02, 2026 —
    The data center construction boom is transforming the construction industry at a historic pace. Fueled by cloud computing, artificial intelligence and relentless demand for digital infrastructure, data centers have become one of the fastest-growing project types in the built environment. Billions of dollars are flowing into new facilities and expansions, creating unprecedented opportunities for construction firms positioned to deliver reliably. But opportunity alone does not guarantee success. As competition intensifies
    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    Communications between Counsel and PR Firm Hired by Counsel Held Discoverable

    Dave McLain included in the 2023 edition of The Best Lawyers in America

    Avoid Drowning in Data: Keep Afloat with ESI in Construction Litigation

    Construction Safety Technologies – Videos

    Lumber Li
    Part I: Key Provisions of School Facility Construction & Design Contracts

    Candis Jones Named to Atlanta Magazine’s 2021 “Atlanta 500” List

    Lump Sum Subcontract? Perhaps Not.

    Dispute Waged Over Design of San Francisco Subway Job

    Applying Jury Verdict Method in Quantifying Damages Due to Defective Specifications

    New Jersey Courts Speed Up Sandy Litigation

    Public Contract Code Section 1104 Does Not Apply to Claims of Implied Breach of Warranty of Correctness of Plans and Specifications

    No Coverage for Negligent Misrepresentation without Allegations of “Bodily Injury” or “Property Damage”

    They Say Nothing Lasts Forever, but What If Decommissioning Does?

    Power Point Presentation on Nautilus v. Lexington Case

    FIFA May Reduce World Cup Stadiums in Russia on Economic Concern

    Workers Compensation Immunity and the Intentional Tort Exception

    California’s Skilled and Trained Workforce Requirements: Public Works and AB 3018, What You Need to Know

    The Best Lawyers in America® - Ball Janik Attorneys Earn Multiple Recognitions

    Benchmark Litigation Recognizes Multiple Snell & Wilmer Offices and Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    Negligent Failure to Respond to Settlement Offer Is Not Bad Faith

    Missouri Asbestos Litigation Reform: New Bill Seeks to Establish Robust Disclosure Obligations

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: Museums

    No Additional Insured Coverage for Subcontractor's Work Outside Policy Period

    As Trump Visits Border, Texas Landowners Prepare to Fight the Wall

    New California Law Requires Real Estate Agents and Brokers to Disclose AI Alterations in Listings

    “Rip and Tear” Damage Remains Covered Under CGL Policy as “Accident”—for Now.

    Judge's Order Halts Google Data Center Project in Minnesota

    Insurer Cannot Dispose of Water Leak or Bad Faith Claims on Motion for Summary Judgment

    PFAS: From Happy Mistake to Ubiquity to Toxic Liability (But is there coverage?)

    Traub Lieberman Partner Greg Pennington Wins Summary Judgment in Favor of Property Owner

    $24 Million Verdict Against Material Supplier Overturned Where Plaintiff Failed To Prove Supplier’s Negligence Or Breach Of Contract Caused A SB800 Violation

    Farewell Capsule Tower, Tokyo’s Oddest Building

    Bert Hummel Appointed Vice Chair of State Bar of Georgia Bench & Bar Committee

    Insurers Subrogating in Arkansas Must Expend Energy to Prove That Their Insureds Have Been Made Whole

    Buyers Are Flocking to NYC’s Suburbs. Too Bad There Aren’t Many Homes to Sell.

    The G2G Year-End Roundup (2022)

    U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Powers of the Nation’s Bankruptcy Courts

    Court Confirms No Duty to Reimburse for Prophylactic Repairs Prior to Actual Collapse

    Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom

    Safeguarding History: Fire Risks in Renovating Historic Buildings

    Consequential Damages Flowing from Construction Defect Not Covered Under Florida Law

    New York Appellate Court Addresses “Trigger of Coverage” for Asbestos Claims and Other Coverage Issues

    Surety’s Several Liability Under Bonds

    Terminating Contracts for Convenience — “Just Because”

    Why Hurricane Preparedness Isn’t About the Property

    US Appeals Court Slams FERC on Long-Muddled State Environmental Permits

    Dorian Lashes East Canada, Then Weakens Heading Out to Sea

    California Contractors – You Should Know That Section 7141.5 May Be Your Golden Ticket

    Contractor Underpaid Workers, Pocketed the Difference

    There is No Presumptive Resumption!

    FERC’s New Order on Data Center Co-Location: What Utilities Need to Know

    Quick Note: Independent Third-Party Spoliation Of Evidence Claim

    Second Circuit Affirms Win for General Contractor on No Damages for Delay Provision

    California’s Prompt Payment Laws: Just Because an Owner Has Changed Course Doesn’t Mean It’s Changed Course on Previous Payments