BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania office building expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania housing expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Lansford Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Lansford, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lansford Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803
    http://centralpabuilders.com

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030
    http://www.carbonbuilders.com

    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360
    http://www.poconobuilders.org

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844
    http://www.csbapa.org

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101
    http://lawrencecountybuilders.com/

    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701
    http://www.iabuilders.com

    Lehigh Valley Builders Association
    Local # 3904
    1524 W Linden St
    Allentown, PA 18102
    http://www.lvba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Lansford Pennsylvania

    Privity Problems Continue for Additional Insureds in the Second Circuit

    Parties Can Agree to Anything In A Settlement Agreement………Or Can They?

    To Catch a Thief

    Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

    Wendel Rosen’s Construction Practice Group Receives First Tier Ranking by U.S. News and World Reports

    Time to Reform Construction Defect Law in Nevada

    Now Available: Seyfarth’s 50 State Lien Law Notice Requirements Guide (2023-2024 Edition)

    Hunton’s Jae Lynn Huckaba Selected to Miami-Dade Bar’s 2026 Circle of Excellence for Insurance Law

    Mixing Concrete, Like Baking a Cake, is Fraught with Problems When the Recipe is Not Followed

    Consult with Counsel when Preparing Construction Liens

    Growing Optimism Among Home Builders

    A WARNing for Companies

    Best Lawyers® Recognizes 49 White and Williams Attorneys

    D.R. Horton Profit Beats Estimates as Home Sales Jumped

    California Construction Bill Dies in Committee

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    Amos Rex – A Museum for the Digital Age

    Texas Considers a Quartet of Construction Bills

    Defense Victory in Breach of Fiduciary Action

    Should a Subcontractor provide bonds to a GC who is not himself bonded? (Bonding Agent Perspective)

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    Guardrail Maker Defrauded U.S. of $175 Million and Created Hazard, Jury Says

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment in Collapse Case Denied

    Call Me Maybe: California’s Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations

    Illinois Insureds are Contesting One Carrier's Universal Denial to Covid-19 Losses

    Nevada’s Home Building Industry can Breathe Easier: No Action on SB250 Leaves Current Attorney’s Fees Provision Intact

    Home Builders and Developers Beware: SC Supreme Court Beats Up Hybrid Arbitration Clauses Mercilessly

    Toolbox Talk Series Recap - Undocumented Change Work

    Helsinki is Building a Digital Twin of the City

    Be Careful with Mechanic’s Lien Waivers

    Generally, What Constitutes A Trade Secret Is A Question of Fact

    Illinois Law Bars Coverage for Construction Defects in Insured's Work

    E I, E I, - OH! What’s in a Name?

    Additional Insured Not Covered Where Injury Does Not Arise Out Of Insured's Work

    No Coverage For Construction Defect Under Illinois Law

    Genuine Dispute Over Cause of Damage and Insureds’ Demolition Before Inspection Negate Bad Faith and Elder Abuse Claims

    Union Handbilling: When, Where, and Why it is Legal

    Hawaii Federal District Court Grants Preliminary Approval of Settlement on Volcano Damage

    Techniques for Resolving Construction Disputes

    Fracking Fears Grow as Oklahoma Hit by More Earthquakes Than California

    Jersey City, New Jersey, to Get 95-Story Condo Tower

    Home Prices Up, Inventory Down

    Federal Judge Strikes Down CDC’s COVID-19 Eviction Moratorium

    Why Hurricane Preparedness Isn’t About the Property

    Blog: Congress Strikes a Blow to President Obama’s “Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces” Executive Order 13673

    Living With a Millennial. Or Grandma.

    Panthers Withdraw City, County Deal Over Abandoned Facility

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    A Court-Side Seat: Permit Shields, Hurricane Harvey and the Decriminalization of “Incidental Taking”

    Celebrating BWB&O’s 2026 Super Lawyers Rising Stars in San Diego!
    Corporate Profile

    LANSFORD PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand building and construction related expert designations, the Lansford, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory provides a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides construction related litigation support and expert witness services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Lansford and the surrounding areas.

    Lansford Pennsylvania civil engineer expert witnessLansford Pennsylvania engineering expert witnessLansford Pennsylvania roofing and waterproofing expert witnessLansford Pennsylvania construction safety expertLansford Pennsylvania building expertLansford Pennsylvania engineering consultantLansford Pennsylvania concrete expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Lansford, Pennsylvania

    Construction Companies Are Nearly Seven Times Safer With These Best Practices

    June 15, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON, May 4—Associated Builders and Contractors released its 2026 Health and Safety Performance Report, an annual guide to health and safety best practices on construction jobsites. The 2026 report shows the positive effects of participating in ABC’s STEP® Health and Safety Management System, which enables top-performing ABC members to achieve incident rates 686% safer than the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics construction industry average, reducing total recordable incident rates by 85%. Established in 1989, STEP is a proven system that provides contractors and suppliers with a robust, no-cost framework for measuring health and safety data and benchmarking with peers in the industry. This self-assessment tool helps participants identify real opportunities for scalable growth in their health and safety programs to lower their total recordable incident rates and become an employer of choice in a competitive labor market. Reprinted courtesy of ABC, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Ninth Circuit Holds That Policies Covering Environmental Claims Do Not Have Aggregate Limits

    May 12, 2026 —
    In the case of County of San Bernardino v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, the Ninth Circuit recently addressed the issue of whether general liability policies issued in the 1960s and 1970s included aggregate limits for claims arising under the premises-operations coverage in CGL policies. The difference between the policyholder’s interpretation of the policies’ limits clauses and the insurer’s interpretation was worth hundreds of millions of dollars in exposure for the insurer. The Court closely examined the policy language and extrinsic evidence from both the insurance industry’s drafting history and the parties before concluding that the policies were ambiguous. The Court construed that ambiguity in favor of the policyholder and ruled that aggregate limits did not apply to the claims at issue. The Court’s decision underscores the importance of carefully examining a policy’s limits, especially for older policies written before 1986 when the insurance industry revised the standard-form CGL policy to state the aggregate limits apply not only to products liability claims but to premises-operations claims as well. Decades of insurance industry drafting history confirms, as the policyholder’s submissions in this case indicate, that the industry well understood that operations claims like the environmental waste-disposal claims at issue here typically were not subject to aggregate limits. Reprinted courtesy of Lorelie S. Masters, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Joseph T. Niczky, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP Ms. Masters may be contacted at lmasters@hunton.com Mr. Niczky may be contacted at jniczky@hunton.com Read the full story...

    Federal Court Strikes Down New York’s Climate Superfund Act: What It Means for the “Polluter Pays” Movement

    September 28, 2026 —
    A federal judge in the Northern District of New York has struck down New York’s Climate Change Superfund Act, ruling that the “polluter pays” climate law is preempted by federal law and “simply beyond the limits of state law.” The court concluded that the Clean Air Act (CAA) does not authorize New York’s compensation scheme, which calculates liability based on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions attributable to worldwide fossil fuel extraction and refining. It separately held that any cost-recovery demand against a foreign producer would be preempted under the constitutional foreign affairs doctrine, which limits state intrusion into matters committed predominantly to the federal government. The court directed the parties to file a status report by September 14, leaving the form of further relief unresolved. In practical terms, the court has decided that the Act is preempted and cannot be enforced but has not yet determined the precise terms of its final order, including whether to formally enjoin its enforcement. The decision in West Virginia v. James, Case No. 1:25-cv-00168 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 31, 2026), issued by Chief U.S. District Judge Brenda K. Sannes, who was appointed by President Obama, marks the first judicial invalidation of a state climate superfund statute and carries significant implications for the climate superfund landscape and the three remaining lawsuits challenging these laws. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Turning Expert Services into Products

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Finnish engineering, architecture, and project consulting company, AINS Group, recently opened an online store to purchase fixed-price services. The store presents specialist work in a product-like format, with fixed service names, defined scopes, and visible prices, such as a building history report, a zoning plan cost analysis, and a technical preliminary survey for a property transaction. Is this productization a smart move or a sign that expert services are being commoditized? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    July 20, 2026 —
    Walsh Construction told a California state court judge last month that lawsuit mediation of its claims on an Orange County light-rail project—known as OC Streetcar—had produced a settlement of some claims under which the county agreed to pay the contractor almost an additional $50 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Wilke Fleury Attorneys Recognized by 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!

    July 20, 2026 —
    Wilke Fleury is pleased to announce that 18 of the firm’s attorneys have been selected for inclusion on the 2026 Northern California Super Lawyers and Rising Stars lists. The annual Super Lawyers and Rising Stars selections recognize attorneys across a wide range of practice areas. This year’s honorees reflect the depth of Wilke Fleury’s litigation, business, healthcare, employment, bankruptcy, appellate, real estate, construction, and estate planning practices. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Wilke Fleury

    AI Can Now Train the Soft Skills Construction Ignored

    August 03, 2026 —
    Most AEC professionals learn to work in teams and across teams through trial and error. There are, however, opportunities to better prepare for the real world with formal training. Until now, it has required human facilitators. Now, generative AI is emerging as a scalable alternative, which I’m also exploring. A Gap in Curricula When I studied architecture, most of the teamwork happened with co-students in the same department. However, one course focused on industrial projects where future architects and engineers collaborated on a simulated project. I’m not sure if a similar course is still in the curriculum, but it was certainly worthwhile and should have been much more extensive. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com