BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    tract home expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania office building expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania housing expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Leisenring Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Leisenring, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Leisenring Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380
    http://www.builderpa.com

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404
    http://www.yorkbuilders.com

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103
    http://www.biaofphiladelphia.com

    Franklin County Builders Association
    Local # 3912
    1102 Sheller Ave Ste C
    Chambersburg, PA 17201
    http://www.franklincountybuilders.com

    Somerset Co Builders Association
    Local # 3958
    PO Box 221
    Berlin, PA 15530
    http://www.SomersetCountyBuilders.org

    Building Industry Association of Lancaster
    Local # 3936
    204 Butler Ave Ste 200
    Lancaster, PA 17601
    http://www.LancasterBuilders.org

    Builders Association of Fayette County
    Local # 3961
    PO Box 1323
    Uniontown, PA 15401



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Leisenring Pennsylvania

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    U.S. Department of Justice Settles against Days Inn

    A Trio of Environmental Decisions from the Fourth Circuit

    Fee Simple!

    Be Careful When Walking Off of a Construction Project

    ABC Safety Report: Construction Companies Can Be Nearly 6 Times Safer Than the Industry Average Through Best Practices

    Deadlines. . . They’re Important. Project Owner Risks Losing Claim By Failing to Timely Identify “Doe” Defendant

    Lender Seeks Millions From Lendlease for LA 'Graffiti Building' Suit Costs

    California Enacts New Claims Resolution Process for Public Works Projects

    Four Dead After Crane Collapses at Google’s Seattle Campus

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/08/23) – Buy and Sell With AI, Urban Real Estate Demand and Increasing Energy Costs

    Construction of World's Tallest Building to Resume With New $1.9B Contract for Jeddah Tower

    Broker Not Negligent When Insured Rejects Additional Coverage

    Is Modular Construction Destined to Fail?

    Developer Transition - Maryland Condominiums

    Zoning Hearing Notice Addressed by Georgia Appeals Court

    Rent Increases During the Coronavirus Emergency Part II: Avoiding Violations Under California’s Anti-Price Gouging Statute

    Contractor’s Poor Workmanship: How You Can Deal With It – Bad Contractor Series Part 3

    No Duty to Defend Additional Insured for Construction Defects

    Implied Warranties for Infrastructure in Florida Construction Defect Claims

    Legal Fallout Begins Over Delayed Edmonton Bridges

    Spotting Problem Projects

    Design-Assist, an Ambiguous Term Causing Conflict in the Construction Industry[1]

    Home Sales Topping $100 Million Smash U.S. Price Records

    Storm Eunice Damage in U.K. Could Top £300 Million

    New York Building Boom Spurs Corruption Probe After Death

    Diggerland, UK’s Construction Equipment Theme Park, is coming to the U.S.

    Daily Journal Publishes Article by Brenda Radmacher on Proposed Overhaul of California Construction Defect Law

    OC Streetcar Project Mediation Sets $50M Payment to Walsh

    Is Privity of Contract with the Owner a Requirement of a Valid Mechanic’s Lien? Not for GC’s

    The Looming Housing Crisis and Limited Government Relief—An Examination of the CDC Eviction Moratorium Two Months In

    TOP TAKE-AWAY SERIES: The 2023 Fall Meeting in Washington, D.C.

    Arizona Purchaser Dwelling Actions Are Subject to a New Construction

    WSHB Expands into the Southeast

    Housing Gains Not Leading to Hiring

    Low Interest Rates Encourages Homeowners to become Landlords

    Surviving the Construction Law Backlog: Nontraditional Approaches to Resolution

    Professional Liability Insurance Considerations When Design Professionals are Involved

    Court Slams the Privette Door on Independent Contractor’s Bodily Injury Claim

    Condo Owners Suing Bank for Failing to Disclose Defects

    Update Relating to SB891 and Bond Claim Waivers

    Eighth Circuit Affirms Judgment for Bad Faith after Insured's Home Destroyed by Fire

    Construction Defects Are Not An Occurrence Under New York, New Jersey Law

    FirstEnergy Fined $3.9M in Scandal Involving Nuke Plants

    Owner Bankruptcy: What’s a Contractor to Do?

    San Francisco Office Secures Defense Verdict in Legal Malpractice Action

    Carbon Monoxide Injuries Caused by One Occurrence

    Claims Litigated Under Government Claims Act Must “Fairly Reflect” Factual Claims Made in Underlying Government Claim

    Harrisburg Sought Support Before Ruinous Incinerator Retrofit

    Contractor Underpaid Workers, Pocketed the Difference
    Corporate Profile

    LEISENRING PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction and design related expert witness designations, the Leisenring, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the industry's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which include licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Leisenring and the surrounding areas.

    Leisenring Pennsylvania delay claim expert witnessLeisenring Pennsylvania roofing and waterproofing expert witnessLeisenring Pennsylvania construction code expert witnessLeisenring Pennsylvania soil failure expert witnessLeisenring Pennsylvania expert witness structural engineerLeisenring Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessLeisenring Pennsylvania building code compliance expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Leisenring, Pennsylvania

    You Filed a Mechanic’s Lien. Then You Discovered a Mistake. Now What?

    November 09, 2026 —
    Recording a mechanic’s lien is an important tool for Colorado contractors seeking payment for labor, materials, and services furnished on construction projects. But what happens when a contractor records a lien and subsequently discovers that the amount claimed is incorrect? Can the contractor amend the lien to reduce the amount owed, even after the statutory deadline for recording or amending the lien has passed? Or does the original mistake render the lien unenforceable? The Colorado Court of Appeals addressed these questions in Galiant Homes, LLC v. Herlik, 2025 COA 3, providing important guidance for contractors recording mechanic’s and materialman’s liens in connection with construction projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Adam Hall, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Hall may be contacted at ahall@hhmrlaw.com

    GRSM Team Obtains Defense Verdict for Homeowners’ Association in Orange County Superior Court

    July 20, 2026 —
    A Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani multi-state team, including Partners Christine Barker, Sean Ferron, and Keith Cramer, obtained a defense verdict on behalf of a homeowners’ association (HOA) in an Orange County Superior Court bench trial spanning two months. The case began in 2022 when a homeowner sued after the Architectural Review Committee and HOA Board of Directors declined his teardown-and-rebuild plans due to view and aesthetic concerns. After a motion for summary judgment ruling in which the court found that the existing covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) did not protect views, the HOA held a special election to add explicit view protections to the CC&Rs. At the February 2025 trial call, the plaintiff sought leave to file a third amended complaint challenging the validity of that vote, drastically reframing the case from CC&R enforcement to one of election validity. A second plaintiff then filed a parallel action toward the end of the limitations period, and the two cases were consolidated. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    GRSM Defeats Class Certification in Precedent-Setting HOA Management Case

    September 15, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners Fletcher Alford and Kevin Liu and Associate Jigar Desai secured a favorable outcome on behalf of an HOA management company in a precedent-setting class action before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, obtaining denial of the plaintiff’s motion for class certification and dismissal without prejudice of the three claims at issue. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant received earnings credit payments from a bank in exchange for maintaining HOA deposit accounts and failed to disclose the arrangement to its HOA clients. The plaintiff sought more than $40 million in damages, asserting five claims: (1) breach of contract for failing to act in class members’ best interests by not disclosing the alleged earnings credit arrangement; (2) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) based on alleged violations of California Civil Code §§ 5375, 5375.5, and 5380; (3) breach of fiduciary duty based on the alleged undisclosed arrangement; (4) violation of the UCL for unfair business practices arising from the alleged nondisclosure; and (5) unjust enrichment. The plaintiff sought class certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) and 23(b)(3) only as to its second, third, and fourth causes of action. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Beyond the Storm: How Non-Hurricane Catastrophes Expose Florida’s Construction Defect Blind Spot

    August 11, 2026 —
    On June 8, 2026, a magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck the Gulf near the coast of Cuba, the largest instrumentally recorded earthquake in the Gulf since seismic monitoring began in 1950. Buildings swayed, offices were evacuated, and many residents along the east coast of Florida, from Miami-Dade to Jacksonville, felt the ground shake. Although no tsunami followed and reported structural damage was limited, this event exposed a blind spot that Florida property owners, developers, and their counsel cannot afford to ignore: catastrophic stress on Florida buildings does not always come in the form of a named storm. Florida property owners have grown accustomed to preparing for wind, storm surge, floods, and torrential rain. Far less attention is paid to earthquakes, sinkholes, tornadoes, hail, and non-tropical flooding, each of which can place unexpected stress on buildings not designed with those forces top of mind and can trigger deficiencies in buildings that were not otherwise known, expose design failures, and create an urgency for both insurance claims and subsequent litigation. Non-Hurricane Triggers of Latent Defects Seismic activity is the clearest example. Florida’s building code accounts for wind loads, not seismic forces, meaning even a moderate earthquake can reveal weaknesses in curtain wall systems, structural connections, or foundations that were already marginal. Sinkholes, driven by Florida’s karst limestone geology, remain a persistent threat, particularly in Central Florida, where subsurface voids can undermine foundations without warning. Non-tropical flooding, like the record rainfall that flooded South Florida in June 2024, can intrude through building envelopes and waterproofing systems that were never stress-tested for such volumes of water. Tornadoes and hail, while more localized, can cause roofing and envelope failures that mimic, mask, or trigger latent construction defects. The Litigation and Coverage Disputes That Follow When one of these events strikes a building already carrying undisclosed or unresolved construction defects, the resulting disputes become considerably more complex. Property owners and associations must move quickly to document existing conditions and distinguish damage caused by the event from pre-existing defective construction, the same causation issue that arises in the hurricane context under Chapter 558, but often without the benefit of established precedent or adjuster experience with these less common events. Insurance coverage disputes frequently follow close behind. Carriers may dispute whether an earthquake, flood, or other peril is covered at all, particularly where policies contain earthquake or flood exclusions requiring separate endorsements, or anti-concurrent causation language that can bar coverage entirely when a covered peril combines with an uncovered one, such as pre-existing defective construction, to cause a loss. Sinkhole claims carry their own statutory framework under Florida law, requiring specific testing protocols and reporting before a claim is compensable. Developers and contractors, in turn, may find themselves defending Chapter 558 claims while simultaneously litigating with their own carriers over defense and indemnity obligations. Practical Risk Mitigation Strategies Property owners, associations, and developers can take several concrete steps to reduce their exposure. First, maintain thorough documentation, including engineering reports, maintenance logs, and photographs, well before any event occurs. This documentation is often the deciding factor in causation disputes. Second, engage structural engineers and consultants immediately following any seismic event, unusual flooding, or storm damage, regardless of whether a hurricane is involved. Prompt inspection preserves evidence and can help prevent inadvertent waiver of construction defect claims. Third, review insurance policies regularly with counsel or a broker to confirm earthquake, flood, and sinkhole coverage matches the property’s actual risk profile, rather than assuming a standard property policy responds to every peril. Fourth, avoid rushing to remediate before conditions are documented and/or before consulting counsel. Well-intentioned repairs can inadvertently compromise evidence needed to prove a defect claim. The June earthquake was a reminder that Florida’s catastrophic risk profile extends beyond hurricane season. Property owners, associations, and developers who build readiness plans around all forms of catastrophic stress, not just named storms, will be far better positioned when the next unexpected event occurs. Franchesco “Frank” Soto is a partner in Ball Janik’s Construction Defect Practice Group in Miami. He may be reached at fsoto@balljanik.com. Amanda L. Gonzalez is a litigation attorney in Ball Janik’s Construction Defect Practice Group in Miami. She may be reached at agonzalez@balljanik.com.

    Flatiron Said Disputed Concrete Mix Cost Millions on Large Caltrans Project

    June 22, 2026 —
    For awhile in 2023, part of the California Dept. of Transportation's (Caltrans) Fix 50 HOV lane and resurfacing project in Sacramento itself needed to be fixed. Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record and Richard Korman, Engineering News-Record Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com Read the full story...

    Bad Faith Claim Survives Summary Judgment

    June 08, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment on the insured’s bad faith claim, but granted the motion on the insured’s claim for punitive damages. Serbian Orthodox Church v. Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58234 (S.D. Cal. March 19, 2026). On February 1, 2023, the Church filed a claim for water damage with Brotherhood Mutual Insurance Company (BMIC). The claim was based on rain and wind that caused extensive water intrusion into the Sanctuary, damaging its plaster walls and ceilings and fresco paintings. The claim was assigned to Patrick Hurley. Hurley sent a letter discussing potential bars to coverage and requesting further information and documents from the Church. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Nordics Are Europe’s Next Data Center Hub

    October 05, 2026 —
    On September 9, 2026, Google announced its largest single investment in Europe. The company commits at least €13 billion to Finnish data centers and energy infrastructure in 2027 and 2028, expanding the existing Hamina campus and adding three new sites in Kajaani, Muhos, and Vaala. For the construction sector, this is great news: thousands of hectares, dozens of buildings, and a construction program that will extend well beyond the two-year investment window. Four Sites, One Regional Cluster Google is not a newcomer in Finland. Back in 2009, it converted a former paper mill in Hamina into a seawater-cooled data center. It has invested around €4.5 billion there over 15 years, and the site’s waste heat already feeds Hamina’s district heating network. The new program shifts the center of gravity north, to the border of North Ostrobothnia and Kainuu. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Arbitration in Construction Disputes: Process and Best Practices

    July 27, 2026 —
    Arbitration in construction disputes is a private process where owners, contractors, subcontractors, designers or suppliers present claims to one or more neutral arbitrators instead of taking the dispute through court. The arbitrator reviews evidence, hears testimony and issues a decision that is usually binding. Construction arbitration is common because project disputes are technical, document-heavy and time-sensitive. Claims may involve schedule delays, disputed change orders, defective work, differing site conditions, payment, termination, indemnity, surety issues or professional liability. Arbitration can be faster and more specialized than litigation, but speed is not guaranteed. Poor contract language, broad discovery, weak records and unclear damages can make arbitration expensive. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...