BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania housing expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania custom home expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania tract home expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania production housing expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania condominium expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness New Albany Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    New Albany, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines New Albany Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Bradford County Chapter
    Local # 3930
    PO Box 213
    Monroeton, PA 18832


    Tri-County Builders Association
    Local # 3962
    5183 Georgetown Rd
    Franklin, PA 16323


    Wayne County Builders Assoc
    Local # 3965
    PO Box 378
    Hawley, PA 18428
    http://www.waynecountybuilders.com

    Lackawanna Home Builders Association
    Local # 3902
    116 N. Washington Ave.
    Scranton, PA 18503
    http://www.lackawannahba.com

    Pike County Builders Association
    Local # 3953
    209 E Harford St
    Milford, PA 18337
    http://www.pikecountybuilders.com

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3942
    PO Box 488
    Fredonia, PA 16124


    Building Industry Association of Northeastern PA
    Local # 3932
    411 Main St
    Kingston, PA 18704
    http://www.bianepa.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For New Albany Pennsylvania

    Construction Litigation—Battles on Many Fronts

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    White and Williams Announces the Election of Five Lawyers to the Partnership and the Promotion of Five Associates to Counsel

    Insurers' Motion for Summary Judgment on Collapse Claim Granted in Part, Denied in Part

    California Supreme Court Adopts Vertical Exhaustion for Long-Tail Claims

    When Subcontractors Sue Only the Surety on Payment Bond and Tips for General Contractors

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2021

    Todd Ehrenreich Joins International Academy of Trial Lawyers

    English v. RKK. . . The Rest of the Story

    Florida’s Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    Newmeyer Dillion Announces Jacqueline McCalla as Its Newest Partner

    McDermott International and BP Team Arbitrate $535M LNG Site Dispute

    Motions to Dismiss, Limitations of Liability, and More

    GRSM Marks Seventh Anniversary as First and Only Full-Service Law Firm in All 50 States, Climbs to #70 on Am Law 100

    Federal Judge Rips Shady Procurement Practices at DRPA

    Third Circuit Vacates Judgment for Insurer on Alleged Construction Defect Claim

    Toronto Contractor Bondfield Wins Court Protection as Project Woes Mount

    Time To “Construct” New Social Media Policies

    Shifting the Risk of Delay by Having Float Go Your Way

    Owner Bankruptcy: What’s a Contractor to Do?

    Insurer Need Not Pay for Rejected Defense When No Reservation of Rights Issued

    Your AI Tool Could Be Your Next Breach of Contract

    Tropical Storms Pile Up Back-to-Back-to-Back Out West

    President Trump Nullifies “Volks Rule” Regarding Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Recordkeeping Requirements

    $6 Million in Punitive Damages for Chinese Drywall

    Labor Under the Miller Act And Estoppel of Statute of Limitations

    Efficient Proximate Cause Doctrine Bars Coverage for Collapse of Building

    ASCE Statement on National Dam Safety Awareness Day - May 31

    United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in EEOC Subpoena Case

    Chicago Criticized for Not Maintaining Elevator Inspections

    Unit Owners Have No Standing to Sue under Condominium Association’s Policy

    Falling Tree Causing Three Injuries/Deaths Is One Occurrence

    Mercury News Editorial Calls for Investigation of Bay Bridge Construction

    Construction Employment Rose in 38 States from 2013 to 2014

    Federal Energy Regulator Approves Rule to Speed Clean Energy Grid Links

    Lake Texoma, Texas Condo Case may go to Trial

    Haight Ranked in 2018 U.S. News - Best Lawyers "Best Law Firms" List

    Arizona Court of Appeals Decision in $8.475 Million Construction Defect Class Action Suit

    Long-Planned Miami Mega Mixed-Use Development Nears Initial Debut

    Julie Firestone & Francois Ecclesiaste Recognized as 2023 MSBA North Star Lawyers

    Resolving Subcontractor Disputes with Pass-Through Claims and Liquidation Agreements

    Steel Cooling: Steel Costs Steadily Decline After Pandemic Price Shock

    Gatluak Ramdiet Named to The National Black Lawyers’ “Top 40 Under 40” List

    School District Settles Construction Lawsuit

    Deadline Nears for “Green Performance Bond” Implementation

    Illinois Court Determines Insurer Must Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Sick Leave, Paid Time Off, and the Families First Coronavirus Response Act

    Eleven Newmeyer Dillion Attorneys Named to 2023 U.S. News Best Lawyers in Multiple Practice Areas

    20 Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2020 Top Lawyers!

    HP Unveils Cheaper, 3-D Printing System to Spur Sales
    Corporate Profile

    NEW ALBANY PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately five thousand building and claims related expert witness designations, the New Albany, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory provides a wide spectrum of trial support and consulting services to lawyers and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise licensed architects, civil engineers, building envelope experts, general and specialty contractors focused on the evaluation of construction claims, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to New Albany and the surrounding areas.

    New Albany Pennsylvania window expert witnessNew Albany Pennsylvania construction defect expert witnessNew Albany Pennsylvania contractor expert witnessNew Albany Pennsylvania construction claims expert witnessNew Albany Pennsylvania consulting general contractorNew Albany Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessNew Albany Pennsylvania fenestration expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    New Albany, Pennsylvania

    Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman Co-Edit/Author Lexology Panoramic: Construction 2027

    August 03, 2026 —
    P&A partners Denis Serkin and Michael S. Zicherman served as co-editors and authors of Lexology’s Panoramic: Construction 2027 – US and Global guide. Formerly Getting the Deal Through, Lexology Panoramic provides members of the construction industry and construction-related legal and business providers with side-by-side comparison of key industry issues in 19 jurisdictions worldwide. Reprinted courtesy of Denis Serkin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Michael S. Zicherman, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Serkin may be contacted at dserkin@pecklaw.com Mr. Zicherman may be contacted at mzicherman@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    Urban Digital Twins: How Virtual Cities Could Help Build Smarter Cities

    August 11, 2026 —
    Traffic congestion, endless construction, flooded streets and power outages. For city leaders and residents alike, these disruptions are simply part of daily urban life. But an emerging tool, known as the urban digital twin, could help cities anticipate problems before they occur by allowing planners to simulate responses, stress-test infrastructure, and evaluate decisions before implementing them in the real world. What Is an Urban Digital Twin? An urban digital twin is a dynamic, data-driven virtual model of a real city. It uses AI analytics and combines 3D modeling with real-time data and information from sources such as IoT sensors, traffic cameras, satellite feeds, infrastructure databases, utility networks, and environmental data including weather systems and heat maps to create a continuously updated digital representation of the urban environment that mirrors infrastructure, movement and systems in real time. In other words, it is a living digital replica of a city. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s Orange County Team for Securing a Strong MSJ Result in a Residential Gas Explosion Matter!

    May 14, 2026 —
    Huge Congratulations to Partner Kevin Wheeler and Associate Lindsey Wells for securing a strong result on a Motion for Summary Judgment / Summary Adjudication filed on behalf of their client, the City of Murrieta. This was a complex, multi-party matter arising from a residential gas leak and explosion, where Plaintiffs alleged the City and MFPD failed to properly respond to the incident. After multiple complaints were consolidated and extensive defense work narrowed the case, eighteen plaintiffs remained asserting five causes of action against the City, prompting a comprehensive MSJ/MSA targeting liability, causation, and damages. The Court’s ruling reflects a significant win, particularly on the immunity framework. The Court eliminated the core negligence and assumed-duty claims arising from fire protection and emergency response activities. It further disposed of the misrepresentation and public nuisance claims. At the end of the day, three plaintiffs were dismissed entirely for failure to comply with Government Claims Act requirements, further reducing the scope of the case. While the dangerous condition claim remains, it does so in a very limited posture. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    D.C. Circuit Upholds EPA’s CERCLA Hazardous-Substance Designations for PFAS as State-Law Settlements Highlight Expanding Liability Landscape

    September 15, 2026 —
    On August 18, 2026, a unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the 2024 designation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund). (See Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. EPA, No. 24-1193 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 18, 2026).) The decision leaves EPA’s PFOA and PFOS hazardous substance designations in place and provides guidance on the scope of EPA’s authority to make future hazardous substances designations under CERCLA Section 102(a). The decision also likely resolves a challenge to the rule that has spanned two presidential administrations. After taking office, the Trump administration had obtained an abeyance of the litigation challenging the Biden-era rule while EPA reconsidered its position. In September 2025, EPA informed the court that it had decided to retain the designations, while signaling that it would work with Congress and industry to address CERCLA liability concerns for “passive receivers.” The litigation then resumed, with the current Administration defending the rule. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Navigating Timelines and Technology: Patent Strategies for Space and Earth

    June 01, 2026 —
    More than half a century after the Apollo 11 landing fulfilled President John F. Kennedy’s bold vision, the global race back to the Moon is no longer theoretical. With renewed attention on NASA’s Artemis program and a surge of commercial investment in space infrastructure, lunar exploration is again shaping technology priorities here on Earth. Reprinted courtesy of Kate Nuehring Su, Engineering News-Record and Vanessa Wang, Engineering News-Record Read the full story...
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    July 06, 2026 —
    In 2007, New York City’s sanitation department threatened Natalie Shea with a $300 fine for defacing public property with graffiti. Her crime: drawing a blue flower in front of her family’s Park Slope home with sidewalk chalk. She was six years old. The incident, which made local and national news at the time, captures the fraught role that sidewalks often play in US cities. These patches of pavement do more than carry pedestrians to their destinations: They’re also places for commerce, social interaction and childhood play, from chalking to learning how to ride a bike. Urbanist Jane Jacobs once likened the range of activities that city sidewalks attract to an “intricate ballet.” In the new book Sidewalk Nation: The Life and Law of America’s Most Overlooked Resource (Harvard University Press), author Michael Pollack explores the “tangled web of state and local regulation” that governs sidewalks, with cities often passing along responsibilities for tasks like clearing snow and keeping walkways safe. He paints a portrait of the American sidewalk a disorderly and often neglected network, filled with literal and metaphorical cracks that give rise to all sorts of conflict, from mundane clashes over maintenance to more consequential fights over accessibility and inequality. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    Doctrine of Substantial Performance When It Comes to Payment

    July 27, 2026 —
    A recent non-construction case touches upon the doctrine of substantial performance when it comes to payment. In this case, a club was to make two payments to secure a rapper’s attendance. The first payment was made. The second payment was made but was a few hundred dollars short of the agreed amount. The rapper did not show up. The club claimed it substantially performed its obligations. At first glance, the argument makes sense because the second payment fell only a few hundred dollars short. But that wasn’t the case when it comes to pre-commencement payment obligations:
    Substantial performance applies only when the variance from the contract terms “is inadvertent or unintentional and unimportant so that the work actually performed is substantially what was called for in the contract.” However, when one party agrees to pay the other on or before a specific date, time is of the essence, and the payor is required to pay the payee on or before that date. “There is almost always no such thing as ‘substantial performance’ of payment between commercial parties when the duty is simply the general one to pay. Payment is either made in the amount and on the date due, or it is not.”
    Big Gate Records, LLC v. Washington, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D1281a (Fla. 2nd DCA 2026) (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com