BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania office building expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania housing expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Nu Mine Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Nu Mine, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Nu Mine Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030
    http://www.carbonbuilders.com

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803
    http://centralpabuilders.com

    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360
    http://www.poconobuilders.org

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844
    http://www.csbapa.org

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101
    http://lawrencecountybuilders.com/

    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701
    http://www.iabuilders.com

    Lehigh Valley Builders Association
    Local # 3904
    1524 W Linden St
    Allentown, PA 18102
    http://www.lvba.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Nu Mine Pennsylvania
    Corporate Profile

    NU MINE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Nu Mine, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory offers a wide range of trial support and construction consulting services to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides building related consulting and expert witness support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house resources which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Nu Mine and the surrounding areas.

    Nu Mine Pennsylvania reconstruction expert witnessNu Mine Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessNu Mine Pennsylvania construction defect expert witnessNu Mine Pennsylvania expert witnesses fenestrationNu Mine Pennsylvania architectural expert witnessNu Mine Pennsylvania concrete expert witnessNu Mine Pennsylvania architect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Nu Mine, Pennsylvania

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Southwest Super Lawyers Recognizes 50 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys in 2026 Rankings

    June 15, 2026 —
    PHOENIX (April 22, 2026) – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 50 attorneys in the Phoenix and Tucson offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers publication. Of those 50, four were recognized for the first time and 24 were recognized as Southwest Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. Super Lawyers was first published in 1991 by Law & Politics and was acquired by Thomson Reuters, Legal in February 2010. Thomson Reuters is a leading source of information for businesses and professionals. The below Snell & Wilmer attorneys have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southwest Super Lawyers rankings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    White and Williams LLP Secures $42.4 Million Award for Ventana DBS LLC in Philadelphia Marriott Construction Litigation

    July 27, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP's Construction and Surety Practice attorneys secured a significant victory for client Ventana DBS LLC in a complex commercial construction dispute before the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, Commerce Division. The trial team, led by Bill Taylor, retired Partner, and Craig O'Neill, Co-Chair of the Construction and Surety Practice Group, with support from Lindsay Liebman, Counsel, Zachary Roth, Partner, Kristen Nichols Wright, Associate, and Sue Ferrante, Legal Secretary, obtained a $42.4 million award on Ventana's claims for unpaid work, delay costs, CASPA penalties and interest, attorneys’ fees and other project-related costs arising from the construction of the Marriott W/Element Hotel Project in Philadelphia. To achieve this result, the White and Williams team managed an extensive discovery period over the course of four-years of litigation, conducted over sixty depositions, participated in court-ordered mediation and arbitration proceedings, and successfully represented Ventana during a bifurcated trial that spanned over the course of a year. Reprinted courtesy of Craig O'Neill, White and Williams, Lindsay Liebman, White and Williams, Kristen Nichols Wright, White and Williams, Zachary Roth, White and Williams and William Taylor, White and Williams Mr. O'Neill may be contacted at oneillc@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Liebman may be contacted at liebmanl@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Wright may be contacted at wrightk@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Roth may be contacted at rothz@whiteandwilliams.com Mr. Taylor may be contacted at taylorw@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Insurer Dispenses with Bad Faith Claim on Summary Judgment

    June 22, 2026 —
    The court granted the insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment because the insured failed to present evidence that the insurer failed to conduct a reasonable investigation. PSY Burger, LLC v. State Farm General Insurance Company, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66991(C.D. Cal. March 20, 2026). The insured’s commercial property suffered heavy damage from tropical storm Hilary. State Farm denied coverage to repair the damage. The insured sued State Farm alleging breach of contract and bad faith due to an inadequate investigation. Apparently, the insured did not retain an expert to opine on claims handling. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (6/24/26) – HUD to Fund AI Grants, Luxury Hotel Deal Investment Activity to Surge, ESPCs to Fund Energy and Infrastructure Improvements

    July 06, 2026 —
    In our latest roundup, data centers are exposed to climate change, commercial tenant sues CoStar, cities see opportunities in emerging sports markets, and more!
    • With deferred maintenance growing and capital dollars stretched thin, local governments are using ESPCs to fund energy and infrastructure improvements through future operational savings. (Vicky Uhland, Construction Dive)
    • The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is offering up to $3 million in grants for local governments to deploy automated permitting and building code systems. (Ryan Kushner, Construction Dive)
    • Luxury hotel deals are set to see a surge in investment activity due to strong fundamentals and strengthening capital markets. (Noor Adatia, Hotel Dive)
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Defend Now, Allocate Later? An Unresolved Tension in Colorado Construction Law

    August 16, 2026 —
    For decades, Colorado law has recognized an important distinction between the duty to defend and the duty to indemnify. The former ordinarily arises at the beginning of litigation; the latter generally cannot be determined until the underlying liability is known. That distinction makes intuitive sense. A defense that becomes due only after litigation concludes is not much of a defense. But Colorado’s construction anti-indemnity statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(6), raises an interesting question about how that familiar rule operates in construction disputes. The statute expressly regulates contractual obligations not only to indemnify, but also to insure and defend, and it reflects a legislative policy that construction businesses should bear financial responsibility for their own negligence. Those principles have developed along separate tracks. At some point, a Colorado appellate court may have to decide precisely how they fit together. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    What Prevents Innovation in Construction from Taking Off

    September 15, 2026 —
    In construction, we have the knowledge, technology, and innovative people to radically improve our performance, yet we’re still stuck in old ways. Why is that? I attended an annual gathering for real estate and construction professionals at Rakennustieto Oy, Finland’s leading building information provider. The day before, a half-day seminar was held at the same venue. During both events, we discussed the need for change in the construction sector. Everyone agreed that we need to radically improve how we produ
    Leaders in Dispute Resolution Need to Make Unbiased Decisions for Mediation to Succeed

    Substitutions On a Construction Project — A Specification Writer Responds

    Multisensory Marvel: Exploring the Innovative MSG Sphere

    Difficulty in Defending Rental Supplier’s Claim Under Credit Application

    Court to General Contractor: Too Late to Reclaim $600K Sub Overpayment

    Mortgage Battle Flares as U.K. Homebuying Loses Allure

    The Harmon Hotel Construction Defect Trial to Begin

    The Hazards of Carrier-Specific Manuscript Language: Ohio Casualty's Off-Premises Property Damage and Contractors' E&O Endorsements

    “Since You Asked. . .”

    Traub Lieberman Partner Greg Pennington and Associate Kevin Sullivan Win Summary Judgment Dismissing Homeowner’s Claim that Presented an Issue of First Impression in New Jersey

    Fire Consultants Cannot Base Opinions on Speculation

    Perspectives from Pioneers: Kenneth C. Gibbs

    Housing Bill Threatened by Rift on Help for Disadvantaged

    Colorado Court of Appeals Decides the Triple Crown Case

    Keep It Simple: Summarize (Voluminous Evidence, That Is...)

    'Taylor Swift Is an Economic Phenomenon': CE's Q1 2024 Economic Update and Forecast

    Tech to Help Contractors Avoid Litigation

    Construction Defect Lawsuits Hinted for Dublin, California

    A Subcontractor’s Perspective On California’s Recent Changes to Indemnity Provisions

    New York Converting Unlikely Buildings into Condominiums

    Florida Appellate Courts Holds Underwriting Manuals are Discoverable in Breach of Contract Case

    Calling the Shots

    Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

    California Court of Appeal Clarifies Intent of Faulty Workmanship Exclusions

    North Carolina Court Rules In Favor Of All Sums

    Maine Court Allows $1B Hydropower Transmission Project to Proceed

    Celebrating Excellence: Lisa Bondy Dunn named by Law Week Colorado as the 2024 Barrister’s Best Construction Defects Lawyer for Defendants

    Can Baltimore Get a Great Bridge?

    Executive Order Addresses Wildfire Rebuilding Delays Through Federal Preemption of State and Local Permitting

    Quick Note: Choice of Law Provisions

    Negligence Per Se Claim Based Upon Failure to Pay Benefits Fails

    Presenting a “Total Time” Delay Claim Is Not Sufficient

    Overview of New Mexico Construction Law

    Boston Nonprofit Wants to Put Grown-Ups in Dorms

    BWB&O Attorneys are Selected to 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars

    Settlement Reached on Troubled Harbor Bridge in Corpus Christi, Texas

    Contractors: Beware the Subordination Clause

    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Strikes a Deathblow to Substantial Factor Causation in Most Cases; Is Asbestos Litigation Next?

    Call to Conserve Power Raises Questions About Texas Grid Reliability

    Fifth Circuit Asks Texas Supreme Court to Clarify Construction Defect Decision

    Senior Housing Surplus Seen as Boomers Spur Building Boom

    Appraisal Award Upheld Despite Insurer’s Contention that Causation was Considered

    Law Firm Fails to Survive Insurer's and Agent's Motions to Dismiss

    Microsoft Urges the Construction Industry to Deliver Lifecycle Value

    Earth Movement Exclusion Bars Coverage

    NYC’s Next Hot Neighborhoods Targeted With Property Funds

    Steel-Fiber Concrete Link Beams Perform Well in Tests

    Committeewoman Requests Refund on Attorney Fees after Failed Legal Efforts

    Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Replace Lawyers Anytime Soon

    Best Practices: Commercial Lockouts in Arizona

    Arizona Is the No. 1 Merit Shop Construction State, According to ABC’s 2020 Scorecard

    LA Scores Major Victory in a High-Exposure Premises Liability Action
    licyholders