BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    industrial building expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania office building expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania housing expert witness Ottsville Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Ottsville, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Ottsville Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701
    http://www.iabuilders.com

    Lehigh Valley Builders Association
    Local # 3904
    1524 W Linden St
    Allentown, PA 18102
    http://www.lvba.org

    Schuylkill Builders Assn
    Local # 3954
    1036 Schylkill Mountain Rd
    Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972
    http://www.schuylkillba.com

    Mifflin-Juniata Chapter
    Local # 3926
    5 Oak Drive
    Thompsontown, PA 17094
    http://www.mifflinjuniatabuilders.org

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030
    http://www.carbonbuilders.com

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803
    http://centralpabuilders.com

    Huntingdon Co Builders Association
    Local # 3917
    PO Box 399
    Huntingdon, PA 16652
    http://www.huntingdoncountybuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Ottsville Pennsylvania
    Corporate Profile

    OTTSVILLE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction and design related expert witness designations, the Ottsville, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house assets which include registered architects, professional engineers, licensed general and specialty contractors, the construction experts group brings national experience and local capabilities to Ottsville and the surrounding areas.

    Ottsville Pennsylvania construction defect expert witnessOttsville Pennsylvania window expert witnessOttsville Pennsylvania testifying construction expert witnessOttsville Pennsylvania OSHA expert witness constructionOttsville Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessOttsville Pennsylvania delay claim expert witnessOttsville Pennsylvania expert witness structural engineer
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Ottsville, Pennsylvania

    Congratulations to Gianna Liddy on Her Promotion to Partner

    September 21, 2026 —
    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP is proud to announce that Gianna Liddy has been promoted to partner. Gianna’s dedication, leadership, and exceptional contributions to the firm have earned her this well-deserved recognition. Please join us in congratulating her on this exciting achievement! Meet Gianna Liddy! Gianna has been with BWB&O since 2019 and has been practicing law since 2017. Her practice focuses on complex civil defense litigation, including high-exposure personal injury, premises liability, transportation, construction defect, habitability, and general liability matters. As a Supervising Attorney in the firm’s Encinitas office, she oversees a team of attorneys, collaborates closely with clients and insurance professionals, and develops litigation strategy in complex matters. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    From Dark Data to Building Intelligence

    July 13, 2026 —
    In this episode, I talk with Mark Sorsa-Leslie, founder and CEO of Auttaa AI, whose team just won first place in Luotea’s inaugural hackathon in Helsinki for turning property maintenance from reactive firefighting into proactive forecasting with AI. Mark is a chartered surveyor with 30 years of real estate data experience, previously the founder of the UK sensor company Beringar. We discuss why so much building data stays dark and siloed, from outdated networking technology to the shortage of people who understand both engineering and property. Mark explains how Auttaa bridges real-time building data with large language models, using what he calls an “influence graph” to surface correlations and causation across previously disconnected systems, such as linking occupancy patterns to CO2 readings to diagnose ventilation problems in minutes rather than days. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Landlord Determined to Not Qualify as Additional Insured

    September 08, 2026 —
    In a dispute between two insurers, the Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s determination that the landlord was not an additional insured under the tenant’s policy. Peleus Ins. Co. v. Am. European Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 17981 June 22, 2026). Blossom Miller sued 57th Avenue and 21st Century in state court alleging that she was injured when she tripped on the sidewalk in front of the leased premises (the “Miller Action”). The premises was leased by 57th Avenue to 21st Century. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    In-House Insight at CSC

    October 26, 2026 —
    Elaine Y. Lee, Partner in P&A’s Los Angeles office, sat down with Third Thursday to discuss effective collaboration with in-house counsel, strategies for resolving construction disputes, and the factors that can help determine the best path forward. This discussion previews her upcoming Construction Super Conference panel, “Same But Different: How In-House Legal Teams Vary in Approach, Role, and Decision-Making,” on December 2nd. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Y. Lee, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Ms. Lee may be contacted at elee@pecklaw.com

    FERC Issues Show-Cause Orders: Impacts on California and Other Regional Power Markets

    July 13, 2026 —
    At an open meeting on June 18, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued show-cause orders under Section 206 of the Federal Power Act to the six FERC-jurisdictional RTOs/ISOs—PJM Interconnection, ISO New England, Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Southwest Power Pool, New York Independent System Operator and California Independent System Operator—along with their transmission owners (TOs), directing each region and the TOs to justify or revise tariff provisions governing how data centers and other large loads connect to and receive transmission service from the grid. These show-cause orders will impact several power markets across the country, including California. Reprinted courtesy of Stephen J. Humes, Pillsbury, Alicia M. McKnight, Pillsbury and Jason Drogin Atwood, Pillsbury Mr. Humes may be contacted at stephen.humes@pillsburylaw.com Ms. McKnight may be contacted at alicia.mcknight@pillsburylaw.com Mr. Atwood may be contacted at jason.atwood@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Executive Insights 2026: Leaders in Construction Law

    October 06, 2026 —
    What advice would you give contractors regarding documentation and recordkeeping to better protect themselves during disputes? Jim Archibald Partner Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP Disputes over payment, scope and delays are among the biggest risks contractors face. Thorough documentation doesn’t just help win these disputes; it may prevent them from happening at all. Start with the contract: Every project should begin with a written agreement that clearly defines scope, schedule, payment terms and change-order procedures. Verbal understandings are difficult to enforce. Track changes in real time: Change orders, change directives, RFIs and scope clarifications should always be documented in writing. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...
    6 Ways to Reduce Fire Safety Hazards in BESS

    Kumagai Drops Most in 4 Months on Building Defect: Tokyo Mover

    Construction Insurance Rates Up in the United States

    Dispute Over Exhaustion of Primary Policy

    Another Colorado City Passes Construction Defects Ordinance

    Are “Financial Hardship” Damages Recoverable?

    Louisiana Couple Sues over Defects in Foreclosed Home

    Court Finds that Subcontractor Lacks Standing to Appeal Summary Judgment Order Simply Because Subcontractor “Might” Lose at Trial Due to Order

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds Insurer Estopped From Denying Coverage Where Declaratory Judgment Suit Filed Too Late

    Navigate the New Health and Safety Norm With Construction Technology

    Contract, Breach of Contract, and Material Breach of Contract

    Five New Laws to Know Before They Take Effect On Jan. 1, 2022

    CAUTION: Terms of CCP Section 998 Offers to Compromise Must Be Fully Contained in the Offer Itself

    Why Clinton and Trump’s Infrastructure Plans Leave Us Wanting More

    Zetlin & De Chiara Ranked in the Top Tier for Construction Law by Legal 500 USA

    Mortgagors Seek Coverage Under Mortgagee's Policy

    Newmeyer Dillion Named 2023 Best Law Firm in Multiple Practice Areas By U.S. News-Best Lawyers

    Seller's Silence on Unfinished Repairs Sinks Summary Judgment in Real Estate Dispute

    Hurricane Damage Not Covered for Home Owner Not Named in Policy

    Construction Termination Issues Part 4: What to Do When They Want to Fire You, the Architect or Engineer

    It Ain’t Over Till it’s Over. Why Project Completion in California Isn’t as Straightforward as You Think

    South Carolina Supreme Court Finds that Consequential Damage Arise From "Occurrence"

    With an Eye Already in the Sky, Crane Camera Goes Big Data

    The Murky Waters Between "Good Faith" and "Bad Faith"

    Hawaii Court of Appeals Remands Bad Faith Claim Against Title Insurer

    Document Everything! Always! No Exceptions! (AKA, Help Your Lawyer Help You!)

    Party Loses Additional Insured Argument by Improper Pleading

    Non-compliance With Endorsement Means No Indemnity Coverage

    Why Biden’s Infrastructure Plan Is a Green Jobs Plan

    Know What’s Under Ground and Make Smarter Planning Decisions

    The Texas Storm – Guidance for Contractors

    Land Use Team Wins Appeal for Affordable Senior Housing Development in San Francisco

    Liability Insurer’s Duty To Defend Insured Is Broader Than Its Duty To Indemnify

    Court to General Contractor: Too Late to Reclaim $600K Sub Overpayment

    Court Holds That Parent Corporation Lacks Standing to Sue Subsidiary’s Insurers for Declaratory Relief

    Subsidence Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Landslide

    Nancy Conrad to Serve as President of the Pennsylvania Bar Association

    Going Digital in 2019: The Latest Technology for a Bright Future in Construction

    The Condo Conundrum: 10 Reasons Why There's a 'For Sale' Shortage in Seattle

    Sustainability Puts Down Roots in Real Estate

    Landmark San Diego Hotel Settles Defects Suit for $6.4 Million

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (7/15/26) – The World Cup’s Effect on Commercial Real Estate, Megadeals Lift CRE Sales and Algorithmic Pricing Lawsuits Continue

    Congratulations to Partners Nicole Whyte, Keith Bremer, Peter Brown, Karen Baytosh, and Associate Matthew Cox for Their Inclusion in 2022 Best Lawyers!

    Insurer Not Entitled to Summary Judgment Based Upon Vandalism Exclusion

    Two Architecturally Prized Buildings May be Demolished

    Beam Cracks Cause Closure of San Francisco’s New $2B Transit Center

    Standard For Evaluating Delay – Directly from An Armed Services Board Of Contract Appeal’s Opinion

    What You Need to Know About “Ipso Facto” Clauses and Their Impact on Termination of a Contractor or Subcontractor in a Bankruptcy

    Texas Allows Wide Scope for Certificate of Merit

    Review of Recent Contractors State License Board Changes

    Year and a Half Old Las Vegas VA Emergency Room Gets Rebuilt

    Lewis Brisbois Moves to Top 15 in Law360 2022 Diversity Snapshot

    The Architects Who Dream of a New Stone Age

    Colorado Rejects Bill to Shorten Statute of Repose

    Bad Faith Claim for Investigation Fails

    The EEOC Is Actively Targeting the Construction Industry

    New Standard Addresses Wind Turbine Construction Safety Requirements and Identifies Hazards

    2018 Construction Outlook: Mature Expansion, Deceleration in Some Sectors, Continued Growth in Others

    Construction Defects and Warranties in Maryland

    Hirer Not Liable Under Privette Doctrine Where Hirer Had Knowledge of Condition, but not that Condition Posed a Concealed Hazard

    Mind Those Deadlines! Party Loses Appeal of Arbitration Decision by Failing to Timely File a Petition to Vacate