BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania office building expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania housing expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pleasant Mount, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Bradford County Chapter
    Local # 3930
    PO Box 213
    Monroeton, PA 18832


    Tri-County Builders Association
    Local # 3962
    5183 Georgetown Rd
    Franklin, PA 16323


    Wayne County Builders Assoc
    Local # 3965
    PO Box 378
    Hawley, PA 18428
    http://www.waynecountybuilders.com

    Lackawanna Home Builders Association
    Local # 3902
    116 N. Washington Ave.
    Scranton, PA 18503
    http://www.lackawannahba.com

    Builders Association of Northwestern PA
    Local # 3916
    PO BOX 9549
    Erie, PA 16506
    http://www.banwpa.com

    Pike County Builders Association
    Local # 3953
    209 E Harford St
    Milford, PA 18337
    http://www.pikecountybuilders.com

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3942
    PO Box 488
    Fredonia, PA 16124



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania

    Mortgage Whistleblower Stands Alone as U.S. Won’t Join Lawsuit

    Tony Sonnett Secures Highly Favorable Verdict for Client in Admitted Liability Case in Which Plaintiff Sought $34.5M

    Forget the Apple Watch. Apple’s Next Biggest Thing Isn’t for Sale

    Wyoming Supreme Court Picks a Side After Reviewing the Sutton Rule

    Hunton Insurance Coverage Partner Lawrence J. Bracken II Awarded Emory Public Interest Committee’s 2024 Lifetime Commitment to Public Service Award

    Morrison Bridge Allegedly Crumbling

    Green Investigations Are Here: U.S. Department of Justice Turns Towards Environmental Enforcement Actions, Deprioritizes Compliance Assistance

    Measure Twice, Cut (the Check) Once: Liability for Cybercrime and How to Avoid It

    Gilbert’s Plan for Downtown Detroit Has No Room for Jail

    Construction Defect Scam Tied to Organized Crime?

    Indiana Appellate Court Allows Third-Party Spoliation Claim to Proceed

    Bankrupt Canada Contractor Execs Ordered to Repay $26 Million

    Hilti Partners with Canvas, a Construction Robotics Company

    Court Rejects Insurer's Argument That Two Triggers Required

    Regions Where Residential Construction Should Boom in 2014

    New York’s Second Department Holds That Carrier Must Pay Judgment Obtained by Plaintiff as Carrier Did Not Meet Burden to Prove Willful Non-Cooperation

    ACEC Research Institute Report: Real Risk of AI Isn’t Technology. It’s the Org Chart.

    #12 CDJ Topic: Am. Home Assur. Co. v. SMG Stone Co., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75910 (N. D. Cal. June 11, 2015)

    In Colorado, Repair Vendors Can Bring First-Party Bad Faith Actions For Amounts Owed From an Insurer

    Four Companies Sued in Pool Electrocution Case

    A New Lawsuit Might Change the Real Estate Industry Forever

    No Coverage For Damage Caused by Chinese Drywall

    The Colorado Court of Appeals Rules that a Statutory Notice of Claim Triggers an Insurer’s Duty to Defend.

    Managing Tariff Volatility in Cross‑Border U.S. Construction Projects: Practical Contract‑Drafting and Procurement Strategies

    A General Contractors Guide to Bond Thresholds by State

    EEOC Focuses on Eliminating Harassment, Recruitment and Hiring Barriers in the Construction Industry

    Allegations of Actual Property Damage Necessary to Invoke Duty to Defend

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    Recovering Time and Costs from Hurricane Helene: Force Majeure Solutions for Contractors

    Lumber Drops to Nine-Month Low, Extending Retreat From Record

    Hunton Insurance Partner Syed Ahmad Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2019 40 & Under Hot List

    De-escalating The Impact of Price Escalation

    Empowering Success: The Advantages of Female Attorneys in Construction Defect Law

    Foundation Arbitration Doesn’t Preclude Suing Over Cracks

    Drafting a Contractual Arbitration Provision

    Housing Prices Up through Most of Country

    No Duty to Defend Suit That Is Threatened Under Strict Liability Statute

    When is a “Notice of Completion” on a California Private Works Construction Project Valid? Why Does It Matter for My Collection Rights?

    Resolving Condominium Construction Defect Warranty Claims in Maryland

    $356 Million Judgement Against Developer for Defective Construction of DC Condominium

    Assignment of Insured's Policy Ineffective

    General Contractor’s Excess Insurer Denied Equitable Contribution From Subcontractor’s Excess Insurer

    US Appeals Court Slams FERC on Long-Muddled State Environmental Permits

    How Your Disgruntled Client Can Turn Into Your Very Own Car Crash! (and How to Avoid It) (Law Tips)

    Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies Parties’ Post-Default Conduct Cannot Validate Void Default Orders

    Application Of Two Construction Contract Provisions: No-Damages-For-Delay And Liquidated Damages

    Rebuilding in Fire-Damaged Los Angeles One Year Later

    Architect Searches for Lost Identity in a City Ravaged by War

    Final Rule Regarding Project Labor Agreement Requirements for Large-Scale Federal Construction Projects

    ACI 318-25 Structural Concrete Code Update Adds Sustainability Guide, Performance-based Wind Design
    Corporate Profile

    PLEASANT MOUNT PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 construction defect and claims related expert designations, the Pleasant Mount, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory delivers a superior construction and design expert support solution to developers, risk managers, and construction claims professionals concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay claims. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Pleasant Mount and the surrounding areas.

    Pleasant Mount Pennsylvania architectural engineering expert witnessPleasant Mount Pennsylvania architect expert witnessPleasant Mount Pennsylvania eifs expert witnessPleasant Mount Pennsylvania multi family design expert witnessPleasant Mount Pennsylvania slope failure expert witnessPleasant Mount Pennsylvania expert witness roofingPleasant Mount Pennsylvania roofing construction expert
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pleasant Mount, Pennsylvania

    White and Williams LLP Secures a Clean Sweep Dismissal of Architect's Professional Liability Coverage Lawsuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP achieved a complete dismissal of professional liability coverage claims through a strategic defense led by Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group attorneys Daniel E. Bryer, Partner and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, Associate. In a nuanced action styled, Vincent Cusumano Architect P.C., et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, et al., decided in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiffs asserted twelve pre-contractual and contractual-based causes of action against their liability insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, and its insurance agent (collectively, “Defendants”) for denying a professional liability claim arising from plaintiffs’ prior work. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel E. Bryer, White and Williams LLP and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, White and Williams LLP Mr. Bryer may be contacted at bryerd@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ruiz may be contacted at minayaruizb@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

    September 28, 2026 —
    Continuing the trend from last year, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC is excited to announce that thirteen members of our firm have received recognition from Best Lawyers® in America for 2027. The Best Lawyers in America® has been an annual publication since 1983 and focuses on the top legal talent across the United States and the globe. Through its rankings, Best Lawyers® provides a comprehensive guide to legal representation for individuals and businesses alike. Over time, Best Lawyers® has been recognized as one of the leading publications for attorney achievements and references. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC

    California Contractors Get a Much-Needed Break: SB 342 Softens the Harsh Consequences of Contractor License Lapses

    October 20, 2026 —
    Imagine completing a multimillion-dollar project, performing quality work, paying your subcontractors, and satisfying the owner, only to discover that a temporary contractor license lapse could prevent you from recovering payment for that work or pursuing claims for extra work. For decades, that was the reality under California Business and Professions Code section 7031. A contractor that allowed its license to lapse, even briefly, could face catastrophic consequences completely disconnected from the quality of its work. In some cases, a contractor that performed otherwise flawless work could be barred from recovering payment and even be ordered to disgorge compensation already received – even if the owner knew the contractor had a lapse in its licensing and allowed it to continue construction. That reality is about to change. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth
    Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com

    Bridging the Gap at Alaska’s Juneau Creek

    September 21, 2026 —
    The largest single-span steel plate girder bridge launch in the nation wasn’t about setting records. Alaska’s Juneau Creek Bridge design was a matter of necessity. The fully erected steel plate girder bridge, featuring a 440-ft main span hovering 285 ft above the Juneau Creek, was part of the larger Sterling Highway project. It offered a logistical challenge but was chosen among over a dozen bridge types due to the unique constraints brought by the mountainous site. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tim Newcomb, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Insured is Third Party Beneficiary of Forced-Place Policy

    October 26, 2026 —
    The court denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss the insured’s fire damage claims under a forced-place policy because the insured was a third-party beneficiary of the policy. Fredericks v. Assurant Specialty, et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179779 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 12, 2026). The insureds’ home burned down on the same day their homeowner’s policy expired. The expiration automatically triggered a forced-placed policy issued by American Security Insurance Company (ASIC) to the insureds’ mortgage company, Rocket Mortgage Company, LLC. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    My Current Love-Hate Relationship with AI

    June 08, 2026 —
    It’s early in the relationship, I know. But still, there are some things that bug me. Yet, I also know that it’s a relationship in which leaving is not an option, and even if I could, it’s not to the point where it’s so bad that I would do so. So, if you would, let me gripe a bit. While there’s been much discussion about AI and, at least in my neck of the woods, a fair amount of discussion about how lawyers can, should, and must use AI or risk becoming discarded into the dustbin of history, much less has been written about clients’ use of AI. Increasingly, I’ve gotten the sense that my clients are using AI. For example, I had a client ask for confirmation that if he disagreed with an administrative decision that he could file a writ of mandate, and if so, whether that deadline was 30, 60 or 90 days after the administrative decision. The answer to the first question was yes, and as to the second question, the answer was 90 days. This was from a client who, smart as he is, probably didn’t know this off the top of his head. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com