BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania housing expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Prospect Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Prospect, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Prospect Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360
    http://www.poconobuilders.org

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844
    http://www.csbapa.org

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101
    http://lawrencecountybuilders.com/

    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803
    http://centralpabuilders.com

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030
    http://www.carbonbuilders.com

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830
    http://www.welcome.to/clearfieldbuilders

    Builders Association of Gr Dubois Area
    Local # 3959
    PO Box 664
    Du Bois, PA 15801



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Prospect Pennsylvania

    Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Senior Associate Shanna Carter on Winning Another Motion for Summary Judgment!

    ASCE Statement on EPA Lead Pipe and Paint Action Plan

    Contract Disputes Act and Jurisdictional Requirements

    Rejection’s a Bear- Particularly in Construction

    GSA Releases Updated Standards to Accelerate Federal Buildings Toward Zero Emissions

    How to Deal with Contractor Delays – Bad Contractor Series Part 2

    Jury Awards Aluminum Company 35 Million in Time Element Losses

    Admissions In Answers to Construction Lawsuits Matter

    Intentional Mining Neighbor's Property is Not an Occurrence

    More Thoughts on “Green” (the Practice, not the Color) Building

    Calling Hurricanes a Category 6 Risks Creating Deadly Confusion

    New Executive Order: Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for All

    Quick Note: Don’t Sue Your Arbitrator

    New York Assembly Reconsiders ‘Bad Faith’ Bill

    ASCE Statement on National Dam Safety Awareness Day - May 31

    Illinois Appellate Court Finds Insurer Estopped From Denying Coverage Where Declaratory Judgment Suit Filed Too Late

    Insurer Liable for Bad Faith Despite Actions of Insured Contributing to Excess Judgment

    EPC Contractors Procuring from Foreign Companies need to Reconsider their Contracts

    Dusseldorf Evacuates About 4,000 as World War II Bomb Defused

    Sixth Circuit Finds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Under Kentucky Law

    Suffolk and MassDOT Texts Played Role in State Contract Rebid Controversy

    Reckless Disregard is. . . Well. . .Reckless

    Location, Location, Location—Even in Construction Liens

    Arizona Court Determines Statute of Limitations Applicable to a Claim for Reformation of a Deed of Trust (and a Related Claim for Declaratory Judgment)

    A New Way to Design in 3D – Interview with Pouria Kay of Grib

    BWB&O Expands to North San Diego

    But Wait There’s More: Preserving Claims on Commonwealth Projects

    Top 10 OSHA Violations For The Construction Industry In 2023

    Court Rules in Favor of Treasure Island Developers in Environmental Case

    OSHA Releases COVID-19 Guidance

    Where There’s Smoke, Is There Coverage? A Closer Look at Bottega, LLC v. National Surety and Gharibian v. Wawanesa

    Four Things Construction Professionals Need to Know About Asbestos

    How to Protect the High-Tech Home

    Snell & Wilmer Phoenix Partner Jody Pokorski Named Winner of Connect CRE’s 2025 Lawyers in Real Estate Awards

    Billion-Dollar Power Lines Finally Inching Ahead to Help US Grids

    Compliance with Building Code Included in Property Damage

    Burden Supporting Termination for Default

    Statute of Limitations Upheld in Construction Defect Case

    What if the Supreme Court Overrules the Reciprocal Tariffs? Plan Now for Refunds, Protests, and Contract Reconciliation

    A Landlord’s Guide to the Center for Disease Control’s Eviction Moratorium

    Court Grants Partial Summary Judgment on Conversion Claim Against Insurer

    Quick Note: Independent Third-Party Spoliation Of Evidence Claim

    Attorney Writing Series on Misconceptions over Construction Defects

    Stacking of Service Interruption and Contingent Business Interruption Coverages Permitted

    Parking Garage Partially Collapses in Dearborn, Mich., Trapping One

    Signed, Sealed and (Almost) Delivered: EU Council Authorizes Signing of U.S. – EU Bilateral Insurance Agreement

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    6,500 Bridges in Ohio Allegedly Functionally Obsolete or Structurally Deficient

    Ex-Ironworkers Local President Sentenced to Prison Term for Extortion

    Tort Claims Against an Alter Ego May Be Considered an Action “On a Contract” for the Purposes of an Attorneys’ Fees Award under California Civil Code section 1717
    Corporate Profile

    PROSPECT PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 building and construction related expert designations, the Prospect, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's most recognized construction practice groups, public builders, risk managers, owners, state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets which include testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the firm brings regional experience and flexible capabilities to the Prospect construction industry.

    Prospect Pennsylvania delay claim expert witnessProspect Pennsylvania ada design expert witnessProspect Pennsylvania construction forensic expert witnessProspect Pennsylvania construction expertsProspect Pennsylvania roofing and waterproofing expert witnessProspect Pennsylvania building code compliance expert witnessProspect Pennsylvania construction expert witnesses
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Prospect, Pennsylvania

    Jurisdiction Over Foreign Manufacturers in Construction Litigation

    May 14, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Washington Court of Appeals provides important guidance on personal jurisdiction over foreign product manufacturers in construction and infrastructure litigation. In King County v. Aquatherm GmbH, No. 85572-7-I (Wash.Ct. App.Div.I)(unpublished), the court addressed whether a German manufacturer could be sued in Washington for alleged defects in piping used in major public infrastructure projects. The ruling offers a detailed, fact-driven roadmap for how Washington courts evaluate jurisdiction over foreign manufacturers operating through layered distribution networks. It also reflects a broader trend toward focusing on real-world commercial conduct rather than formal corporate structure. Background of the Case King County sued after widespread failures in polypropylene piping installed at the King County Correctional Facility. The pipe, manufactured by Aquatherm GmbH in Germany, was marketed, distributed, and installed through a network of U.S.-based entities. Following a six-week trial, the jury returned a verdict exceeding $18 million on claims under the Washington Product Liability Act and Consumer Protection Act. Aquatherm challenged, among other things, the trial court's exercise of personal jurisdiction. Reprinted courtesy of Timothy J. Repass, Wood Smith Henning Berman and Miki J. Saito, Wood Smith Henning Berman Mr. Repass may be contacted at trepass@wshblaw.com Ms. Saito may be contacted at msaito@wshblaw.com Read the full story...

    Texas Adopts New Procedural Rules for Summary Judgment Motions: What You Need To Know

    July 13, 2026 —
    On March 1, 2026, sweeping amendments to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166a took effect, fundamentally changing how Texas courts handle summary judgment motions — from filing and briefing through disposition. Whether representing a plaintiff or defendant, Texas litigants and attorneys must understand these new rules and their impact on case strategy and timelines. These procedural changes carry particular significance for construction litigants. Background: The Prior Rule Texas summary judgment practice has long diverged from the federal model. The Texas Rules of Civil Procedure recognize two types of summary judgment motions: (1) the traditional motion for summary judgment, and (2) the “no-evidence” motion for summary judgment. The no-evidence motion — unique to Texas — may be filed only after adequate time for discovery has passed. No bright-line rule governs that determination; it depends on the unique circumstances of each case. Reprinted courtesy of Conor G. Bateman, Snell & Wilmer and Marsha Cotton, Snell & Wilmer Mr. Bateman may be contacted at cbateman@swlaw.com Ms. Cotton may be contacted at mcotton@swlaw.com Read the full story...

    Only A Contractor Can Appeal a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

    April 20, 2026 —
    A recent decision from the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals confirms that “only a ‘contractor’ may file an appeal of a contracting officer’s final decision.” Wattiker v. General Services Administration, 2026 WL 846001 (CBCA 2026) (citation omitted). The term “contractor is not an ambiguous term. A ‘contractor’ refers to a party to a federal government contract. Wattiker (citing the Contract Disputes Act). This is why the Contract Disputes Act does not apply to parties that are NOT in contract with the federal government. Id. In Wattiker, an appellant (appealing party) challenged the dismissal of a co-appellant. The co-appellant was dismissed because he was not a contractor, i.e., a party in contract with the federal government. In other words, the co-appellant had no privity of contract with the federal government. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    April 14, 2026 —
    Written change orders are a big deal. Almost all construction contracts (at least the well drafted ones) require written contracts. Written change orders are even important enough that Virginia law requires these provisions in residential construction contracts. Why are they so important? Because they are a “mini-contract” of sorts. They set the expectations, price, time, and work to be performed; work that was not included in the original price or scope for the project. Without this in writing, there will be no record of what the parties agreed to do. Does this sound familiar? Sound like its own contract? It should. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    2026 Southern California Super Lawyers Recognizes 14 Snell & Wilmer Attorneys

    March 03, 2026 —
    LOS ANGELES AND ORANGE COUNTY – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that 14 attorneys in its Los Angeles and Orange County offices have been selected for inclusion in the 2026 Southern California Super Lawyers publication. Of those 15, six were recognized as Rising Stars. Super Lawyers is a listing of lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The selection process is multi-phased and includes independent research, peer nominations, and peer evaluations. The final published list represents no more than 5 percent of the lawyers in the state. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Snell & Wilmer

    Amended Again?! Critical Changes to RPAPL § 881: What New York Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know

    March 10, 2026 —
    Recent amendments to New York’s RPAPL § 881 will significantly change how project teams obtain and maintain access to adjoining properties for construction-related work. The 2025 amendment signed into law by Governor Hochul, and the newly enacted 2026 revisions, will directly impact general contractors (GCs) and construction managers (CMs), as well as their trade contractors who regularly confront neighbor‑access, support‑of‑excavation, and protection‑of‑adjoining‑property challenges. Although we do not advise that GCs and CMs get involved in the “weeds” of license agreements or the prosecution of an action to obtain access pursuant to an RPAPL § 881 action, which are typically owner responsibilities, GCs and CMs should understand the change in law, as there may be circumstances where they are responsible for securing access. This alert outlines the key statutory changes and explains the operational, scheduling, insurance, and risk‑management implications for the New York construction industry. Reprinted courtesy of Mark A. Snyder, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and David Polazzi, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Snyder may be contacted at msnyder@pecklaw.com Mr. Polazzi may be contacted at dpolazzi@pecklaw.com Read the full story...

    A New Vision for Safety: Construction Safety Week’s Five-Year Plan

    February 17, 2026 —
    Construction Safety Week has long been a powerful show of force—a catalyst for bringing the industry together and focusing on the critical importance of health and safety. Over the last decade, we’ve made meaningful strides: advancing best practices, transitioning from hard hats to helmets, shedding light on vital issues such as mental health, fostering a culture of care and accountability and creating partnerships and initiatives that improve jobsite safety. Building on the progress we’ve made, we’ve launched a bold five-year vision to bring everyone together with trust and respect and to drive alignment in how safety is understood, owned and engineered at every step of the project. This is an industrywide effort to further deepen the culture of care centered around respect for the skilled craft and through all aspects of a project where all team members share this responsibility, this respect, across every phase: design, planning, construction and beyond. Reprinted courtesy of Adam Jelen, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Why Travelers Fought a Fire Claim for Invisible Smoke Damage

    February 23, 2026 —
    Just 40 minutes after midnight on Sept. 27, 2018, the sky lit up over Birmingham, Ala. A fire engulfed an apartment building under construction—the last-to-be completed section of a wood-framed complex called the Metropolitan. It fueled one of the largest recorded blazes in the city’s history. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Elaine Silver, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com