BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania office building expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania housing expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Quakake Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Quakake, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Quakake Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803
    http://centralpabuilders.com

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030
    http://www.carbonbuilders.com

    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360
    http://www.poconobuilders.org

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844
    http://www.csbapa.org

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101
    http://lawrencecountybuilders.com/

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830
    http://www.welcome.to/clearfieldbuilders

    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701
    http://www.iabuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Quakake Pennsylvania

    Colorado “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”

    Insurance Tips for Contractors

    Contractor Jailed for Home Repair Fraud

    Drone Use On Construction Projects

    Proposed Law Protecting Tenants Amended: AB 828 Updated

    The Privacy Shield Is Gone: How Do I Now Move Data from the EU to the US

    Florida High-Rise for Sale, Construction Defects Possibly Included

    Waiving Consequential Damages—What Could Go Wrong?

    Whose Lease Is It Anyway: Physical Occupancy Not Required in Landlord-Tenant Dispute

    OSHA Extends Temporary Fall Protection Rules

    Ambiguity in Pennsylvania’s Statute of Repose Finally Cleared up by Superior Court

    Choice of Laws Test Mandates Application of California’s Continuous and Progressive Trigger of Coverage to Asbestos Claims

    Homebuilding Design Goes 3D

    Co-Housing Startups Fly in the Face of Old-School NYC Housing Law

    Partner Jason Taylor and Senior Associate Danielle Kegley Successful in Appeal of Summary Disposition on Priority of Coverage Dispute in the Michigan Court of Appeals

    Partner Lisa M. Rolle and Associate Vito John Marzano Obtain Dismissal of Third-Party Indemnification Claims

    New Jersey Legislation Would Bar Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause in Homeowners' Policies

    Appetite for Deconstruction

    Water Leak Covered for First Thirteen Days

    Michigan Finds Coverage for Subcontractor's Faulty Work

    Water Drainage Case Lacks Standing

    A Top U.S. Seller of Carbon Offsets Starts Investigating Its Own Projects

    Toolbox Talk Series: International Arbitration for the "Domestic" Construction Lawyer

    Yet ANOTHER Reminder to Always Respond

    Nobody Knows What Lies Beneath New York City

    Hospital Settles Lawsuit over Construction Problems

    Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara LLP Attorneys to Speak at the 2016 National Construction Claims Conference

    New Addition to the ASCE/SEI 7-22 Standard Protects Buildings from a 500-year Flood Event

    Building Group Has Successful 2012, Looks to 2013

    Nashville Stadium Bond Deal Tests Future of Spectator Sports

    A Sample Itinerary to get the Most out of West Coast Casualty’s Construction Defect Seminar

    Big Bertha Lawsuits—Hitachi Zosen Weighs In

    Construction of World's Tallest Building to Resume With New $1.9B Contract for Jeddah Tower

    Hawaii Federal District Court Denies Brokers' MSJ on Duties Owed In Construction Defect Case

    Successful KF Defense Results in Dismissal with Prejudice

    Insurer Must Pay for Matching Siding of Insured's Buildings

    Force Majeure Under the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

    No Subrogation, Contribution Rights for Carrier Defending Construction Defect Claim

    Wisconsin Supreme Court Upholds Asbestos Exclusion in Alleged Failure to Disclose Case

    Withdrawal Liability? Read your CBA

    DC District Court Follows Ninth Circuit’s Lead Dismissing NABA’s Border Wall Case

    Can Your Small Business Afford to Risk the Imminent Threat of a Cyber Incident?

    Amos Rex – A Museum for the Digital Age

    What You Need to Know to Protect the Project Against Defect Claims

    Protecting Your Business From Liability Claims Stemming From COVID-19 Exposure

    Nationwide Immigrant Strike May Trigger Excusable Delay and Other Contract Provisions

    Randy Maniloff Recognized by U.S. News – Best Lawyers® as a "Lawyer of the Year"

    Brian Slome Named to the Daily Journal’s List of Top Professional Responsibility Lawyers for 2025

    Best Lawyers Recognizes Hundreds of Lewis Brisbois Attorneys, Honors Four Partners as ‘Lawyers of the Year’

    Congratulations to Reno Partner Karen Baytosh for Securing a Complete Dismissal via a Motion for Summary Judgment
    Corporate Profile

    QUAKAKE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over 4500 building and claims related expert witness designations, the Quakake, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to builders and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise building envelope experts, forensic architects, professional engineers, credentialed construction standard of care consultants, the firm brings a wealth of experience and local capabilities to Quakake and the surrounding areas.

    Quakake Pennsylvania building code expert witnessQuakake Pennsylvania building consultant expertQuakake Pennsylvania construction expert witness consultantQuakake Pennsylvania construction scheduling expert witnessQuakake Pennsylvania slope failure expert witnessQuakake Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessesQuakake Pennsylvania construction defect expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Quakake, Pennsylvania

    New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits

    July 27, 2026 —
    Levi W. Barrett, Co-Managing Partner of Peckar & Abramson’s New Jersey office, Co-Chair of the firm’s Construction Contracts & Risk Management team, and Executive Committee Member, was recently quoted in “New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits,” an article written by Engineering News-Record (ENR). The article examines New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s executive order temporarily halting state environmental permit reviews for certain large-scale data center projects while regulators develop a comprehensive framework to address the sector’s energy demands, water consumption, environmental impacts, and effects on local communities. It also explores the broader implications of the moratorium for developers, contractors, investors, and other stakeholders, as well as the ongoing debate between economic development, AI-driven infrastructure growth, and environmental and utility ratepayer concerns. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Levi W. Barrett, Peckar & Abramson, P.C.
    Mr. Barrett may be contacted at lbarrett@pecklaw.com

    AI & Digital Tools on Construction Projects: Contract Risks to Address Before Peak Season

    April 08, 2026 —
    Artificial intelligence and advanced digital tools are no longer experimental on construction projects. In Q1 of 2026, we can already see how they are already influencing schedules, estimates, submittals, safety reporting, and day‑to‑day project documentation. As peak construction season approaches, many teams are accelerating adoption of AI to gain efficiency. What often lags behind, however, is the contract framework governing how those tools are used—and how their outputs are treated when something goes wrong. On sophisticated construction projects, that gap can quickly become a dispute driver. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    Ms. Douris may be contacted at mdouris@seyfarth.com

    Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros Secure a $0.00 Settlement on a Multimillion-Dollar Construction Defect Case!

    April 14, 2026 —
    Partner Jeffrey Saab and Team Leader D. Ryan Efros’ client was a construction supervisor on a palatial mansion. The homeowners claimed millions of dollars in damages and asserted the client was a general contractor (GC) and so responsible for the alleged defects. Jeff and Ryan took more than 15 depositions, reinforcing their trial strategy theme: that the client was not a GC, but Plaintiffs were. They secured significant concessions from Plaintiffs, pressed Plaintiffs’ own negligent construction choices, and made the risk of trying the case intolerable. On the eve of trial, Plaintiffs backed down, settling out Jeff and Ryan’s client for $0.00. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP

    Cross-Office Team Secures Litigation Stay and Order of Arbitration on Behalf of Hotel Developer

    February 17, 2026 —
    New York Partner Minyao Wang, Chicago Partner Bryan Sugar, and Denver/Washington, D.C. Partner Christopher Wood secured a victory on behalf of Lewis Brisbois’ client, a hotel developer, when the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois granted the client’s motion to dismiss and ordered the parties to proceed to arbitration. In this matter, the 39 plaintiffs, represented by a New York based law firm that focuses on EB-5 litigation against high-end real estate developers, were foreign nationals living in China or Taiwan who were seeking EB-5 visas and invested in a lending company. The lending company loaned money to entities that were managing a project that involved renovating a hotel and constructing a mixed-use tower in downtown Chicago. Disputes developed among the parties. The foreign investors organized informally and ultimately filed suit against Lewis Brisbois’ client, alleging claims of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, conversion, and conspiracy, as well as aiding and abetting conversion. The defendants faced exposure of at least $20 million. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Labor Shortages in Construction: Managing Legal and Operational Risks

    April 14, 2026 —
    Labor shortages in the construction industry have become more than a scheduling headache—they are a legal and financial risk multiplier. As contractors scramble to meet deadlines with limited manpower, shortcuts in compliance, safety and subcontractor oversight become more likely. These gaps can expose companies to regulatory penalties, contractual disputes and reputational damage. Understanding how workforce constraints intersect with labor laws and contractual obligations is critical to mitigating the risks and navigating these challenges without compromising compliance or project integrity. The construction industry has faced persistent workforce challenges for years, but recent trends have intensified the problem. Factors such as an aging workforce, reduced immigration and post-pandemic recovery pressures have left contractors struggling to find skilled labor. According to Associated Builders and Contractors, the construction workforce shortage surpassed half a million workers in 2024; in the same year, Associated General Contractors reported 88% of construction companies had difficulty finding qualified workers. Reprinted courtesy of Meghan Douris, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    GRSM Secures Illinois Appellate Victory for Architectural Firm in Implied Warranty Dispute

    May 14, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partner Jonathan Federman, Partner Thomas Cronin, and Senior Counsel Garrett Lee recently secured a victory in the Illinois Appellate Court, Fifth District, on behalf of the firm’s client, an architectural firm, in a liability dispute. The case arose following an entity’s purchase of a 111-unit building for use as an investment or rental property. The plaintiff made claims against the architect of the building, alleging that there were design defects that breached an implied warranty, as well as a negligence claim. GRSM argued that an architect could not be liable for implied warranties, particularly for an implied warranty which no Illinois court has ever recognized. GRSM further argued that Illinois law bars an architect from liability for negligence arising from a duty pursuant to contract under the economic loss doctrine. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    May 26, 2026 —
    Mobility is the lifeblood of any city. How people are able to travel in, out and within a metropolitan area is vital to its citizens, businesses, supply chains and social services. And as U.S. cities have expanded in size and population density, the strategies for addressing mobility have evolved. Many have taken different approaches to public transit, and each city boasts a dense tapestry of roadways, walking paths and various parking options. But as cities continue to reexamine infrastructure strategies through smart city technology, a new field of transportation has emerged—micromobility. Designed for short-distance travel using lightweight vehicles (bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc.), the industry’s global net worth has grown exponentially in recent years to the tune of hundreds of billions, with one forecast predicting it could reach $340 billion by 2030. Micromobility also finds itself at the forefront of various smart city technological improvements. Geofencing has been implemented in U.S. cities to determine where micromobility vehicles can operate, control speed limits, and park utilizing the vehicles’ GPS location. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (satellite-based location receivers, cloud communication, internet links, etc.) have improved vehicle lifespans by keeping track of when vehicles require service and prevent vandalism and theft. Data collected from vehicles’ location tracking is routinely used for urban planning and smart city development. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury
    Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com

    Differing Site Conditions Claim Requires a Misrepresentation

    May 14, 2026 —
    If you are entertaining a differing site conditions claim, consider this Third District Court of Appeals case from the mid-90s. In Hendry Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 648 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a contractor was hired by Dade County to demolish the old Rickenbacker Causeway in Miami. The original 1941 plans of the causeway were made available to contractors. The lowest bidding contractor that was awarded the project based its bid “on its conclusion that the pilings supporting the old bridge were made of concrete.” Hendry, supra at 141. The contractor based this conclusion on the original plans, its visual observation, and experience. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com