BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania office building expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania housing expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Quentin Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Quentin, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Quentin Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Lebanon County Bldrs Assn
    Local # 3938
    39 Klein Avenue
    Lebanon, PA 17042
    http://www.lebcobuilders.com

    Pennsylvania Builders Association
    Local # 3900
    600 N 12th St
    Lemoyne, PA 17043
    http://www.pabuilders.org

    Home Builders Association of the Alleghenies
    Local # 3928
    1397 Eisenhower Blvd Suite 201
    Johnstown, PA 15904
    http://www.hbaahomes.org

    Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Harrisburg
    Local # 3924
    2416 Park Drive
    Harrisburg, PA 17110
    http://www.harrisburgbuilders.com

    Home Builders Association of Berks County
    Local # 3948
    25 Stevens Ave
    West Lawn, PA 19609
    http://www.hbaberks.org

    Home Builders Association of Bucks & Montgomery Counties
    Local # 3945
    721 Dresher Road Suite 1200
    Horsham, PA 19044
    http://www.hbahomes.com

    Washington Co Builders Association
    Local # 3964
    30 E Beau St Room #321
    Washington, PA 15301
    http://www.wcbabuilders.org


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Quentin Pennsylvania

    BHA has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports CDCCF Charity at 2014 WCC Seminar

    Resulting Loss From Faulty Workmanship Covered

    Force Majeure Recommendations

    Claims for Bad Faith and Punitive Damages Survive Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment

    Texas Considers a Quartet of Construction Bills

    New York Appellate Court Holds Insurer’s Failure to Defend Does Not Constitute a “Reasonable Excuse” Required to Overturn Judgment

    Construction Employers Beware: New, Easier Union Representation Process

    EPA Announces that January 2017 Revised RMP Rules are Now Effective

    Is There a Conflict of Interest When a CD Defense Attorney Becomes Coverage Counsel Post-Litigation?

    Understanding the Limits of Privilege When Applied to Witness Prep Sessions

    Gilbert’s Plan for Downtown Detroit Has No Room for Jail

    Moving in Before Substantial Completion? The Risks of Early Owner Occupancy

    You’ve Been Suspended – Were You Ready?

    Plaintiff’s Mere Presence in Area Where Asbestos is Present Insufficient to Establish Bystander Exposure

    Arctic Roads and Runways Face the Prospect of Rapid Decline

    Handling Construction Defect Claims – New Edition Released

    The Construction Gigaprojects Report

    Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment in Collapse Case Denied

    Construction Manager’s Win in Michigan after Michigan Supreme Court Finds a Subcontractor’s Unintended Faulty Work is an ‘Occurrence’ Under CGL

    Expanded Virginia Court of Appeals Leads to Policyholder Relief

    Ortega Outbids Pros to Build $10 Billion Property Empire

    The Living Makes Buildings Better with Computational Design

    A New Hope - You Now May Have Coverage for Punitive Damages in Connecticut

    Beyond the Flow-Down Clause: Subcontract Provisions That Can Expose General Contractors to Increased Liability and Inconsistent Outcomes

    Haight’s Sacramento Office Has Moved

    What You Should Know About Liquidated Damages and Liability Caps for Delay and Performance Liquidated Damages

    Marlena Ellis Makes The Lawyers of Color Hot List of 2022

    TxDOT, Flatiron/Dragados Mostly Resolve Bridge Design Dispute

    Civil Engineers: Montana's Infrastructure Grade Declines to a 'C-'

    Rihanna Gained an Edge in Construction Defect Case

    No Subrogation, Contribution Rights for Carrier Defending Construction Defect Claim

    Clearly Determining in Contract Who Determines Arbitrability of Dispute

    Whose Employee is it Anyway?: Federal Court Finds No Coverage for Injured Subcontractor's Claim Based on Modified Employer's Liability Exclusion

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    Outcry Over Peru’s Vast Graft Probe Prompts Top Lawyer to Quit

    U.S. Architecture Firms’ Billing Index Faster in Dec.

    Ahlers Cressman & Sleight Rated as One of the Top 50 in a Survey of Construction Law Firms in the United States

    Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Arguing the Fees Are Inextricably Intertwined

    South Carolina “Your Work” Exclusion, “Get To” Costs

    Contractor Definition Central to Coverage Dispute

    Deterioration of Bridge Infrastructure Is Increasing Insurance Needs

    Bel Air Mansion Construction Draws Community Backlash

    No Coverage for Contractor's Faulty Workmanship

    New York Court Discusses Evidentiary Standards for Policy Rescission Based on Material Misrepresentation

    Judge Halts Sale of Brazilian Plywood

    Despite Construction Gains, Cement Maker Sees Loss

    Professional Services Exclusion Bars Coverage After Carbon Monoxide Leak

    Scope of Alaska’s Dump Lien Statute Substantially Reduced For Natural Gas Contractors

    The New “White Collar” Exemption Regulations

    After Restoring Power in North Carolina, Contractor Faces Many Claims
    Corporate Profile

    QUENTIN PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand construction related expert witness designations, the Quentin, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory delivers a wide range of trial support and consulting services to attorneys and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction related trial support and expert consulting services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which include construction cost, scheduling, and delay experts, professional engineers, ASPE certified professional estimators, and construction safety professionals, the organization brings national experience and local capabilities to Quentin and the surrounding areas.

    Quentin Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessesQuentin Pennsylvania construction expert witnessQuentin Pennsylvania expert witness structural engineerQuentin Pennsylvania ada design expert witnessQuentin Pennsylvania construction safety expertQuentin Pennsylvania construction expert witness public projectsQuentin Pennsylvania construction expert witness consultant
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Quentin, Pennsylvania

    Newmeyer Dillion Ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 Guide

    May 26, 2026 —
    NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. – May 14, 2026 - Prominent business and real estate law firm Newmeyer Dillion has been ranked in Chambers Spotlight California 2026 guide and recognized as a leading firm in Litigation: General Commercial for Orange County. Newmeyer Dillion was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of the firm’s experience, expertise and caliber of talent where the firm stood out for its exceptional work and is recognized in Litigation: General Commercial. Managing Partner Paul Tetzloff expressed the firm's gratitude: “It is an honor for our firm to be recognized by Chambers and Partners in their Spotlight California 2026 guide. This acknowledgment reflects our commitment to providing high quality legal services tailored to the unique needs of our clients.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Newmeyer Dillion

    Contract Interpretation – Determining What the Contract Requires

    March 24, 2026 —
    A good ole dispute on contract interpretation in government contracting. Contract interpretation disputes happen all the time in every jurisdiction under the sun. Think about that. Now, what’s the best way to avoid a contract interpretation dispute? Naturally, invest in the contract language and fully understand the scope of work. Make all of this clear. But, of course, this isn’t foolproof meaning you could still be doing this and you could still find yourself in a contract interpretation dispute. Although, if you are doing this, and being proactive, the contract interpretation disputes should be minimal and more streamlined. In Liberty Technical Services, LLC v. Department of Veterans Affairs, CBCA 8385, 2026 WL 407656 (CBCA 2026), the dispute centered on whether the government owed the contractor for certain, necessary equipment (largely controllers, but also tanks and pumps) not specified in the contract. The government countered that this should be a non-issue because the contractor always acknowledged it was responsible for furnishing the unspecified, necessary equipment, and the contractor did actually provide the equipment without direction from the government. Each party claimed the contract was unambiguous when construed in context. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    High-Rise Design and Construction: Then, Now, and Next

    March 16, 2026 —
    The Empire State Building was built in 14 months. Since 2010, the average completion time for a 200-meter-plus building has increased from 4.3 to 5.8 years. Buildings have become more complex, and there's more regulation than in the 1930s. Still, there are ways to make high-rise construction more efficient. An Unlikely Benchmark From 1930 When construction began on the Empire State Building on March 17, 1930, the world was in the midst of the Great Depression. That turned out to be an advantage. Contractors Starrett Brothers & Eken had access to a vast, motivated workforce, peaking at 3,439 workers on a single day in August 1930. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Indiana District Court Finds Crane Inspection Services Do Not Trigger “Professional Services” Exclusion in Liability Policy

    February 17, 2026 —
    In Crane 1 Holdco, Inc. et al. v. Continental Ins. Co., 23-cv-205 (N.D. Ind. Jan 12, 2026), the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana had occasion to interpret the scope and meaning of the term “professional services” in an excess liability policy exclusion. By way of background, Robert Coppage was crushed by a crane while at work. He was seriously injured and later received a significant settlement in a state court civil action against the company that inspected the crane, Crane1. Crane1 sought coverage for the settlement under a first layer excess policy issued by Continental Insurance Company, which included an exclusion for any “liability arising out of the actual or alleged rendering of, or failure to render, any professional services by the Insured or any other person for whose acts the Insured is legally responsible.” The underlying complaint alleged that Crane1 was negligent in its modification, services, maintenance, inspection, and/or repair of the crane. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Taylor, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Taylor may be contacted at jtaylor@tlsslaw.com

    ACEC Supports BUILD America 250 Act as Important First Step on Surface Reauthorization

    May 26, 2026 —
    WASHINGTON -- The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), the business voice of America’s engineering and design services industry released the following statement on the BUILD America 250 Act: "Chairman Graves and Ranking Member Larsen have taken an important bipartisan step toward reauthorizing the federal surface transportation programs that are critical to economic growth in every state. The BUILD America 250 Act provides five years of stability in funding road and transit projects, raises new revenues to address the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund, and includes meaningful provisions to strengthen project delivery, advance digital infrastructure, and improve the contracting framework that engineering firms rely on every day. ACEC will continue to advocate for investment levels that keep pace with the country's growing infrastructure needs, and we urge the Committee to keep this process moving forward." The American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) is the business association of America’s engineering industry, representing more than 5,500 independent engineering firms and more than 650,000 professionals throughout the United States engaged in the development of America’s transportation, water, and energy infrastructure, along with environmental, industrial, and other public and private facilities. Founded in 1906 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., ACEC is a national federation of 51 state and regional organizations.

    Construction Liens and the “Substantial Performance” Doctrine

    April 08, 2026 —
    In a recent case dealing with a construction lien, the driving issue was whether the air conditioning contractor “substantially performed” before recording its construction lien against residential property. The importance here pertains to the substantial performance doctrine with respect to construction liens. The Third District Court of Appeal explained, with relevant citations, this doctrine as follows: Under Florida law, a contractor is entitled to a mechanic’s lien if he complies with all provisions of Chapter 713, governing construction liens, and “has substantially performed the contract.” Grant v. Wester, 679 So. 2d 1301, 1307 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quotation omitted); Langley v. Knowles, 958 So. 2d 1149, 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“The substantial performance doctrine recognizes that a contactor who complies with all of the provisions of the contactor’s lien statute is entitled to enforce a lien if he has substantially, but not completely, performed his contractual obligations.”). Substantial performance is performance “so nearly equivalent to what was bargained for that it would be unreasonable to deny the promisee the full contract price subject to the promisor’s right to recover whatever damages may have been occasioned him by the promisee’s failure to render full performance.” Ocean Ridge Dev. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc., 247 So. 2d 72, 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    How AI Turns Construction Documents Into Procurement Intelligence

    May 05, 2026 —
    MEP equipment accounts for up to 40% of costs on data center or hospital projects, has lead times ranging from 20 weeks to over a year, and has historically been the most underserved area in construction software. In this episode, I speak with Victor Muchiri from BuildVision about what it actually takes to make AI useful in construction procurement, not as a pilot, but in production. We dig into why you cannot simply upload a set of construction drawings to ChatGPT and trust the output. Construction documents are complex, cross-referenced, and consequential. Without deep domain context, such as manufacturer ontologies, equipment taxonomies, and engineering expertise, AI produces plausible results, not reliable ones. BuildVision’s approach is to act as a harness around AI models, wrapping them in construction-specific knowledge so the output can be trusted for real procurement decisions. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    AI Adoption in Construction: A UK Practitioner’s View

    April 20, 2026 —
    I recently talked with Chris Brady, an AI adoption consultant based in Birmingham, UK, who has spent 18 years working in construction. Two years ago, he began integrating AI into his work with contractors and SMEs, initially as an add-on service, and it has since become his main business. Chris now runs Metrix, an AI consultancy focused on UK construction companies, alongside two other ventures: Trade Upskill, an education platform for construction professionals, and ctrldash.ai, a compliance-automation SaaS for construction SMEs, both of which are soon to launch. What struck me most in our conversation was how grounded his approach is, built on years of direct industry experience rather than arriving from outside with a technology solution looking for a problem. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi