BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania housing expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania office building expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Smithfield Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Smithfield, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Smithfield Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Adams County
    Local # 3920
    PO Box 3321
    Gettysburg, PA 17325


    Builders Association of Fayette County
    Local # 3961
    PO Box 1323
    Uniontown, PA 15401


    Somerset Co Builders Association
    Local # 3958
    PO Box 221
    Berlin, PA 15530
    http://www.SomersetCountyBuilders.org

    Franklin County Builders Association
    Local # 3912
    1102 Sheller Ave Ste C
    Chambersburg, PA 17201
    http://www.franklincountybuilders.com

    Building Industry Association of Philadelphia
    Local # 3946
    1735 Market St Ste A432
    Philadelphia, PA 19103
    http://www.biaofphiladelphia.com

    Home Builders Association of Chester & Delaware Co
    Local # 3941
    1502 McDaniel Dr
    West Chester, PA 19380
    http://www.builderpa.com

    York County Builders Assn
    Local # 3972
    540 Greebriar Road
    York, PA 17404
    http://www.yorkbuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Smithfield Pennsylvania

    New California Construction Laws for 2020

    Ohio Court Finds No Coverage for Construction Defect Claims

    Discussing Parametric Design with Shajay Bhooshan of Zaha Hadid Architects

    How To Spot a Bad Contractor Before It’s Too Late – Part 1

    Caterpillar Said to Be Focus of Senate Overseas Tax Probe

    Maryland Enacts Climate-Cost Study Over Veto, New Jersey Advances Climate Superfund Proposal as Earlier State Laws Face Ongoing Court Challenges

    Insurer’s Broad Duty to Defend in Oregon, and the Recent Ruling in State of Oregon v. Pacific Indemnity Company

    Deductibles Limited to Number of Suits Filed Against Insured, Not Number of Actual Plaintiffs

    Implementation of CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards Delayed

    Insurer Could Not Rely on Extrinsic Evidence to Circumvent Its Duty to Defend

    Court Orders City to Pay for Sewer Backups

    Structural Health Check-Ups Needed but Are Too Infrequent

    Massachusetts Appellate Court Confirms Construction Defects are Not Covered Under Commercial General Liability Policies

    2016 Updates to CEB’s Mechanics Liens and Retail Leasing Practice Books Now Available

    Stop Losing Proposal Competitions

    Takeaways From Schedule-Based Dispute Between General Contractor and Subcontractor

    Colorado Nearly Triples Damages Caps for Cases Filed in 2025, Allows Siblings to File Wrongful Death Claims

    What You Don’t Know About Construction Law Can Hurt Your Engineering Firm (Law Note)

    Building Materials Price Increase Clause for Contractors and Subcontractors – Three Options

    AEM Pursuing ISO Standard for Earthmoving Grade-Control Data

    Defect Claims Called “Witch Hunt”

    BOO! Running From Chainsaw Wielding Actor then Falling is an Inherent Risk of a Haunted Attraction

    California Supreme Court Adopts Vertical Exhaustion for Long-Tail Claims

    Court Holds That Property Insurance Does Not Cover Economic Loss From Purchasing Counterfeit Vintage Wine

    GRSM Attorneys Selected to 2024 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Florida Appellate Court Holds Four-Year Statute of Limitations Applicable Irrespective of Contractor Licensure

    Fixing the Problem – Not the Blame

    Appraisal Appropriate Despite Pending Coverage Issues

    Construction Defects Claims Can Be Limited by Contract Says Washington Court

    Ex-Detroit Demolition Official Sentenced for Taking Bribes

    Duty to Defend Negligent Misrepresentation Claim

    Construction Slow to Begin in Superstorm Sandy Cases

    Measure Of Damages for Breach of Construction Contract

    Fundamental Fairness Trumps Contract Language

    A Court-Side Seat: Environmental Developments on the Ninth Circuit

    Thank You for 18 Straight Years in the Virginia Legal Elite in Construction Law

    Forethought Is Key to Overcoming Construction Calamities

    First-Time Buyers Home Sales Stagnates

    Suzanne Pollack Elected to Lawyers Club of San Diego 2021 Board of Directors

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    Client Alert: Service Via Tag Jurisdiction Insufficient to Subject Corporation to General Personal Jurisdiction

    Happenings in and around the West Coast Casualty Seminar

    BWB&O Senior Associate Kyle Riddles and Associate Alexandria Heins Obtain a Trial Victory in a Multi-Million Dollar Case!

    More Hensel Phelps Ripples in the Statute of Limitations Pond?

    Insurance Firm Defends against $22 Million Claim

    Hunton Insurance Coverage Attorneys Top Benchmark Litigation 2026 Guide

    AI Systems and the Real Estate Industry

    Massachusetts Court Holds Statute of Repose Bars Certain Asbestos-Related Construction Claims

    Late Notice Bars Insured's Claim for Loss Caused by Hurricane

    Next Steps for Policyholders in the Aftermath of the California Wildfires
    Corporate Profile

    SMITHFIELD PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Smithfield, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to builders and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing in house assets which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, the firm brings regional experience and local capabilities to Smithfield and the surrounding areas.

    Smithfield Pennsylvania defective construction expertSmithfield Pennsylvania engineering consultantSmithfield Pennsylvania expert witness concrete failureSmithfield Pennsylvania eifs expert witnessSmithfield Pennsylvania construction expertsSmithfield Pennsylvania construction defect expert witnessSmithfield Pennsylvania expert witness structural engineer
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Smithfield, Pennsylvania

    EPA, Maryland Sue DC Water Over Massive Potomac River Sewage Spill

    May 14, 2026 —
    The state of Maryland and the federal government have filed separate lawsuits against the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water), both alleging that the agency’s failure to address longstanding deterioration in the Potomac Interceptor contributed to a weeklong release of more than 240 million gallons of raw sewage into the Potomac River this past January. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at enr@enr.com

    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke Win Final Summary Judgment on Behalf of Homeowner’s Insurance Company

    November 02, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partner Ryan Parker and Associates Robert Biferie and Matthew Groteke won final summary judgment on behalf of their client, a homeowner’s insurance company. The case related to a claim for damage caused by Hurricane Milton, which was reported more than ten months after the date of loss. The homeowner’s insurance company reviewed historical aerial photography of the roof and determined that there was no evidence of damage immediately after the Hurricane, which was inconsistent with the condition of the roof when it was inspected more than ten months later. Additionally, the homeowner’s insurance company was unable to determine when the interior water damage occurred due to the delay in reporting the claim. After a lawsuit was filed, the Traub Lieberman team took depositions of the Plaintiffs and the opposing expert and eventually filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the failure to timely report the claim and resulting prejudice to their client. The Court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment finding that notice of the claim was untimely as a matter of law and that the Plaintiffs failed to rebut the legal presumption of prejudice to the insurance company. As a result of the ruling, the insurance company has a valid claim for attorney’s fees. Reprinted courtesy of Ryan S. Parker, Traub Lieberman, Robert Biferie, Traub Lieberman and Matthew Groteke, Traub Lieberman Mr. Parker may be contacted at rparker@tlsslaw.com Mr. Biferie may be contacted at rbiferie@tlsslaw.com Mr. Groteke may be contacted at mgroteke@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    Inaccurate Representations Can Lead to Differing Site Conditions Claim

    May 26, 2026 —
    In the prior posting, I discussed a case dealing with a differing site condition. In that case, the owner did not have an affirmative duty to make a representation and there was no inaccurate representation made by the owner that misled the contractor. Well, what about when there is an inaccurate misrepresentation regarding the site? This was the circumstance in an older Florida case where a dredging contractor had a successful differing site conditions claim. See Jacksonville Port Authority v. Parkhill-Goodloe, Co., Inc., 362 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The government provided inaccurate information as to the lack of rock that would be encountered during the dredging that was relied on by the dredging contractor. But the government had “superior knowledge” that there was rock in an adjacent location based on a prior claim from a contractor, yet the government did not disclose the possibility that rock could be encountered. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Pursuing Claims for Loss Caused by Recent Kona Low Storms for Homeowners and Businesses

    May 12, 2026 —
    The recent Kona Low storms that hit all islands were devastating, causing significant property damage. Homeowners and businesses will be seeking coverage under their insurance policies to recover for their losses. Here is a brief look at what may be covered and which exclusions may be troublesome in homeowners’ and commercial property policies. Typically, both a homeowners’ policy and a commercial property policy include a grant of coverage for “direct physical loss of or damage to Covered Property.” Covered perils are listed, including such events as fire, lightning, or windstorm. Covered Property includes dwellings, other structures on the property and personal property. Additional coverages are usually provided. This includes debris removal after a peril insured against or collapse of a structure. In a homeowners’ policy, additional living expenses are likely covered when the damaged home is not fit to live in. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Kahana Feld Opens New Office in Sacramento, Adding Key Litigator and Expanding Northern California Footprint

    August 24, 2026 —
    IRVINE, CA – Aug. 11, 2026 – Kahana Feld is pleased to announce the opening of a new office in Sacramento, CA. This will be the firm’s 19th office across the United States. Partner Melvin F. Marcia has joined Kahana Feld and will lead the opening of the Sacramento office. He is joined by attorneys Matthew Brenner and Britney Lucchesi as well as paralegal Michelle Welcker. “We’re excited to welcome Melvin to the Kahana Feld team and expand our footprint in Northern California,” said Amir Kahana, Firmwide Managing Partner of Kahana Feld. “His addition strengthens Kahana Feld’s capabilities and will allow us to work more closely with our general liability, construction defect, and labor and employment clients in the Sacramento area while continuing to provide the level of service and experience they have come to expect from our firm.” Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kahana Feld

    Mandatory Arbitration Isn’t All Bad, if. . .

    July 13, 2026 —
    In the past week or so mandatory arbitration has been all the rage. From those that argue that arbitration is becoming more burdensome than litigation, to my friend and fellow construction attorney Scott Wolfe who gives great advice on how to make arbitration worth it again. You can place me in the camp of those that think that mandatory arbitration clauses of the type typically found in contracts can add a layer of expense that can be unnecessary. However, if an arbitration clause is carefully drafted, and properly used, these clauses an be helpful in assuring that the streamlining effect for which arbitration was created actually occurs. Because the contract is king in Virginia, these provisions can essentially create the rule of civil procedure used to resolve any dispute relating to the project. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    July 13, 2026 —
    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai has been recognized as a 2026 Northern California Super Lawyer honoree in the area of Construction Litigation. This is the thirteenth consecutive year he has been recognized by Super Lawyers. Super Lawyers, an annual listing of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and personal achievement, is limited to no more than five percent (5%) of lawyers in a state who are selected through a multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, independent research evaluation and peer reviews by practice area. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret D. Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    Michael C. Zisa and Phillip Boldt Co-Author D.C. Chapter of “50-State Guide to Electronic Execution of the General Agreement of Indemnity”

    October 06, 2026 —
    Michael C. Zisa, Co-Managing Partner of P&A’s Washington, D.C. office, Chair of the Surety and Construction Related Insurance Defense practice, and Co-Chair of the Crisis Management team, and Phillip Boldt, an Associate in P&A’s Washington, D.C. office, have co-authored the District of Columbia chapter of the American Bar Association (ABA) Fidelity and Surety Law Committee and The Surety & Fidelity Association of America’s (SFAA), “50-State Guide to Electronic Execution of the General Agreement of Indemnity.” Reprinted courtesy of Michael C. Zisa, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Phillip Boldt, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Mr. Zisa may be contacted at mzisa@pecklaw.com Mr. Boldt may be contacted at pboldt@pecklaw.com Read the full story...