BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania parking structure expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania multi family housing expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania institutional building expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania office building expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Snydertown Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Snydertown, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Snydertown Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Central PA
    Local # 3952
    2038 Sandy Drive Ste 100
    State College, PA 16803
    http://centralpabuilders.com

    Carbon Bldrs Association
    Local # 3922
    PO Box 218 490 Ore Street
    Bowmanstown, PA 18030
    http://www.carbonbuilders.com

    Pocono Builders Association (PA)
    Local # 3939
    745 Main St Ste 203
    Stroudsburg, PA 18360
    http://www.poconobuilders.org

    Central Susquehanna Builders Association
    Local # 3956
    300 Walnut St
    Mifflinburg, PA 17844
    http://www.csbapa.org

    Lawrence County Builders Association
    Local # 3937
    1435 Devils Elbow Rd
    New Castle, PA 16101
    http://lawrencecountybuilders.com/

    Clearfield County Chapter
    Local # 3903
    PO Box 512
    Clearfield, PA 16830
    http://www.welcome.to/clearfieldbuilders

    Indiana-Armstrong Builders Association
    Local # 3914
    1380 Route 286 Highway East Suite 502
    Indiana, PA 15701
    http://www.iabuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Snydertown Pennsylvania

    LAX Construction Defect Suit May Run into Statute of Limitations

    PSA: Performing Construction Work in Virginia Requires a Contractor’s License

    Value in Recording Lien within Effective Notice of Commencement

    Massive Redesign Turns Newark Airport Terminal Into a Foodie Theme Park

    Illinois Legislature Passes Bill Allowing Punitive Damages In Most Wrongful Death Actions

    Hawaii Bill Preserves Insurance Coverage in Lava Zones

    Insurer's Attempt to Strike Experts in Collapse Case Fails

    COVID-19 Likely No Longer Covered Under Force Majeure

    Court Extends Insurer Rights to Equitable Contribution

    How Tech Is Transforming the Construction Industry in 2019

    Two Things to Consider Before Making Warranty Repairs

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “How Bad Is It?”

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment on Claim for Roof Damage Caused by Windstorm

    Construction Firms Complain of Missed Payments on Redevelopment Project

    California’s Wildfire Dilemma: Put Houses or Forests First?

    Failure to Strictly Adhere to Limitations for Flood Claim Leads to Denial

    OSHA Announces Expansion of “Severe Violator Enforcement Program”

    Broken Buildings: Legal Rights and Remedies in the Wake of a Collapse

    Environmental Due Diligence - What's The Hold Up?

    Arizona Contractor Designs Water-Repellant Cabinets

    Court Rejects Efforts to Limit Scope of Judgment Creditor’s Direct Action Under Insurance Code Section 11580

    Utah Becomes First State to Enact the Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act

    The Anatomy of a Construction Dispute Stage 3- The Last Straw

    A Lien Might Just Save Your Small Construction Business

    Freight Train Carrying Hot Asphalt, Molten Sulfur Plunges Into Yellowstone River as Bridge Fails

    The Importance of Providing Notice to a Surety

    New ConsensusDocs 242 Design Professional Change Order Form Helps Facilitate Compensation for Changes in Design Services

    Owner’s Obligation Giving Notice to Cure to Contractor and Analyzing Repair Protocol

    Understanding Entitlement to Delays and Proper Support

    Register and Watch Partner John Toohey Present on the CLM Webinar Series!

    Ambitious Building Plans in Boston

    Manhattan Developer Wants Claims Dismissed in Breach of Contract Suit

    Georgia Passes Solar CUVA Bill

    Parties Can Agree to Anything In A Settlement Agreement………Or Can They?

    Congratulations to San Diego Partner Johnpaul Salem and Senior Associate Scott Hoy for Obtaining a Complete Defense Verdict!

    Construction and AI: What Contractors Need to Know from ABC’s New Report

    Subsequent Purchaser Can Assert Claims for Construction Defects

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Burks Smith and Katie Keller Win Daubert Motion Excluding Plaintiff’s Expert’s Testimony in the Middle District of Florida

    NYC’s Developers Plow Ahead With Ambitious Plans to Reshape City

    Liability Coverage For Construction Claims May Turn On Narrow Factual Distinctions

    Broker's Motion for Summary Judgment on Negligence Claim Denied

    Nevada Senate Minority Leader Confident about Construction Defect Bill

    Millennials Skip the Ring and Mortgage

    Failing to Release A Mechanics Lien Can Destroy Your Construction Business

    New Jersey/New York “Occurrence”

    Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court’s Finding of No Coverage for Interior Leak

    Virginia Decision Emphasizes Importance of Naming All Necessary Parties

    Insurance Policy’s “No Voluntary Payment” Clauses Lose Some Bite in Colorado

    Court Strikes Expert Opinion That Surety Acted as a “De Facto Contractor”

    Summarizing Changes to NEPA in the Fiscal Responsibility Act (P.L. 118-5)
    Corporate Profile

    SNYDERTOWN PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Snydertown, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory delivers a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups concerned with construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction claims investigation and expert services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, general liability carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Utilizing captive assets which comprise credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Snydertown and the surrounding areas.

    Snydertown Pennsylvania construction forensic expert witnessSnydertown Pennsylvania testifying construction expert witnessSnydertown Pennsylvania concrete expert witnessSnydertown Pennsylvania window expert witnessSnydertown Pennsylvania engineering consultantSnydertown Pennsylvania construction project management expert witnessesSnydertown Pennsylvania stucco expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Snydertown, Pennsylvania

    “The Superintendent Told Us to Do It:” Why Verbal Approval May Not Be Enough

    June 02, 2026 —
    In construction defect litigation, one scenario appears repeatedly: a subcontractor installs work in a manner that differs from the plans, specifications, manufacturer instructions, or industry standards after being verbally directed to do so by the general contractor, superintendent, architect, or owner’s representative. At the time, the decision may seem minor. The project is moving quickly, the field team wants to maintain progress, and nobody wants to stop working over what appears to be a small issue. The subcontractor may trust the superintendent or project manager and assume the conversation will be remembered later if questions arise. Years later, however, when the project experiences problems, the people involved may deny the conversation occurred, remember it differently, or simply no longer remember the project. Without written documentation, the subcontractor can find itself defending claims for defective work, even though it performed the installation exactly as directed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Andrew Lintner, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Lintner may be contacted at alintner@hhmrlaw.com

    Lewis Brisbois Welcomes Clients and Community Leaders to New Garden City Office Opening

    July 27, 2026 —
    On July 15, Lewis Brisbois hosted a ribbon-cutting event for its new Garden City office, which opened in April to serve the Long Island community and beyond. The event was attended by more than 100 people, including Lewis Brisbois attorneys and staff as well as clients, local business and government leaders, Nassau County Supreme Court judges, and members of the press. Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman delivered remarks and cut the ribbon for the office. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Alert: Fraudulent Notice of Nonpayment Defense Applies to Payment Bond Claims

    April 27, 2026 —
    Under Florida’s Lien Law, there’s an affirmative defense or affirmative claim known as a “fraudulent lien.” The fraudulent lien defense or claim is set out in Florida Statute s. 713.31. This defense also extends to payment bond claims, whether under a private statutory payment bond (Florida Statute s. 713.23) or a public payment bond (Florida Statute s. 255.05), as it pertains to the notice of nonpayment. A notice of nonpayment needs to be served within 90 days from final furnishing to preserve a claimant’s rights against the bond. However, there really has not been a case, until now, that discusses a “fraudulent notice of nonpayment.” In K&M Electric Supply, Inc. v. Brown Electrical Solutions, LLC, 51 Fla.L.Weekly D672a (Fla. 4th DCA 2026), a prime contractor and surety prevailed at the trial level on their fraudulent notice of nonpayment defense based on a supplier’s notice of nonpayment and action against a public payment bond (under Florida Statute s. 255.05). Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Federal Bid Protest Standard of Review and Disparate Treatment with Ratings

    August 16, 2026 —
    A recent decision out of the Federal Claims Court explains the post-award bid protest standard of review. In Massman Construction Co. v. U.S., 2026 WL 1971985 (Fed.Cl. 2026), a protestor brought a post-award bid protest after the Army Corps of Engineers awarded the contract to another contractor. The protestor argued that the Army Corps (government) acted irrational in its evaluation through disparate treatment. The Court of Federal Claims agreed and remanded for the Army Corps to “either justify this disparity or explain why [awardee’s] lower-priced, but technically inferior proposal provides the best value to the government.” Massman Construction, supra at *1. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Traub Lieberman Wins Affirmation of Judgment on Pleadings Before the Seventh Circuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman Partners Dana Rice and Adam Joffe obtained affirmation of judgment from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of an Insurance Company. The Insurance Company filed suit seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its Insured, a Roofing Contractor, in an underlying lawsuit. The Insurance Company issued a commercial general liability policy with a one-year policy term. The policy included an exclusion that barred coverage for any losses arising out of work the insured completed before the date the policy incepted. Reprinted courtesy of Dana A. Rice, Traub Lieberman and Adam P. Joffe, Traub Lieberman Mr. Rice may be contacted at drice@tlsslaw.com Mr. Joffe may be contacted at ajoffe@tlsslaw.com Read the full story...

    DOI Finalizes Long-Awaited Modernization of Type A Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations

    August 03, 2026 —
    For nearly three decades, the U.S. Department of the Interior’s (DOI) simplified “Type A” Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations were available more in theory than in practice, constrained by dated models, narrow geographic applicability and a $100,000 cap that rarely matched the economics of modern environmental claims. DOI has now finalized revisions to the Type A natural resource damages assessment procedures under 43 C.F.R. Part 11 for hazardous substance releases under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act (CWA), with the final rule published in the Federal Register on July 13, 2026 and scheduled to become effective August 12, 2026. As discussed previously, DOI has sought to modernize what it views as an “inefficient and inflexible” process and restore the Type A procedure to its intended role as a more streamlined pathway for smaller, less contentious NRD claims. The final rule adopts a $5 million default damages threshold, allows use above that amount if all parties agree, clarifies that Type A may be used in all environments and for all natural resource types, and removes legacy model appendices that had tethered the process to outdated formulas. Reprinted courtesy of Amanda G. Halter, Pillsbury, Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury and Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury Ms. Halter may be contacted at amanda.halter@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    Ball Janik LLP Welcomes Construction Defect Attorney and U.S. Air Force Veteran Jake Scott to its Fort Lauderdale Office

    June 02, 2026 —
    Ball Janik LLP, a leading construction defect and insurance recovery law firm, has welcomed Jake Scott as an associate in its Fort Lauderdale office. Scott joins the Construction Defect Practice Group, bringing experience across construction litigation that includes construction defect, contract dispute, and negligence matters, along with a track record of representing construction professionals through depositions, court appearances, and trial preparation to support the firm's steady growth and client service statewide. "We're excited to welcome Jake Scott to our Fort Lauderdale office and Construction Defect Practice Group," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner at Ball Janik LLP. "We look forward to the fresh perspectives and legal solutions he will provide for community associations across South Florida." Scott is a results-driven attorney dedicated to providing strategic counsel for complex legal challenges. He has experience managing all phases of a case, from early investigation and discovery through trial preparation and settlement negotiations. Prior to joining Ball Janik, Scott served as an associate attorney in Fort Lauderdale, where he represented clients in construction litigation matters, handled depositions and court appearances, conducted legal research, and drafted pleadings, motions, and briefs. He also worked as an attorney in Tampa, where he represented contractors, subcontractors, and construction firms in defending claims involving construction defects, contractual disputes, and negligence, and worked closely with expert witnesses, engineers, and consultants to develop and present technical evidence. Scott's experience representing the development and building sides of construction disputes provides a valuable, contrast-driven perspective that supports the strategic evaluation of claims and practical approaches to resolution for Ball Janik's clients. A proud veteran, Scott served in the United States Air Force for eight years, including roles as an Airspace Control Officer and in Space Systems Operations, supporting safe space flight operations and satellite communications. Carrying the discipline of airborne operations, Scott worked in the aerospace sector as a Satellite Engineer and Orbital Analyst. He also held a role in the housing sector, supporting marketing and business development initiatives. Scott received his law degree from Stetson University College of Law. He attended American Military University, where he earned degrees in marketing, business management, and related support services. About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 50-plus attorneys and paralegals in 5 offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, and Corporate International. Read more here: https://www.balljanik.com.

    Celebrating 29 Years – Thank You for Your Continued Trust!

    April 20, 2026 —
    For 29 years, Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP has grown alongside the clients and communities we proudly serve. What began as a single office in Orange County has evolved into a multi-state firm with 11 locations across five states. Today, we are proud to be supported by a dedicated team of more than 200 attorneys and over 400 employees who work every day to deliver exceptional service and results. This milestone is not just about where we started; it’s about the people who have helped shape who we are today. Our continued growth reflects the strength of our relationships, the trust of our clients and partners, and the commitment of our team. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Dolores Montoya, Bremer Whyte Brown & O'Meara LLP