BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania low-income housing expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania Medical building expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania industrial building expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania Subterranean parking expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania high-rise construction expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania townhome construction expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania mid-rise construction expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania condominium expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania condominiums expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania structural steel construction expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania office building expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania tract home expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania concrete tilt-up expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania casino resort expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania landscaping construction expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania housing expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania hospital construction expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania custom homes expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania production housing expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania custom home expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania retail construction expert witness Wyoming County Pennsylvania
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Wyoming County, Pennsylvania

    Pennsylvania Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB 1875 stipulates that “no later than 90 days before filing an action, serve written notice of claim on the contractor. Upon receipt of notice, builder has 15 days to forward the claim to any subcontractor/supplier and 30 days after service of notice to offer to compromise and settle the claim by monetary payment without inspection, propose to inspect the dwelling that is the subject of the claim; or reject the claim. Contractor has 14 days after inspection to provide written notice of intention.”


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Wyoming County Pennsylvania

    No state license required. For public works projects, see General Services website.


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Bradford County Chapter
    Local # 3930
    PO Box 213
    Monroeton, PA 18832


    Tri-County Builders Association
    Local # 3962
    5183 Georgetown Rd
    Franklin, PA 16323


    Wayne County Builders Assoc
    Local # 3965
    PO Box 378
    Hawley, PA 18428
    http://www.waynecountybuilders.com

    Lackawanna Home Builders Association
    Local # 3902
    116 N. Washington Ave.
    Scranton, PA 18503
    http://www.lackawannahba.com

    Pike County Builders Association
    Local # 3953
    209 E Harford St
    Milford, PA 18337
    http://www.pikecountybuilders.com

    Mercer Co Builders Association
    Local # 3942
    PO Box 488
    Fredonia, PA 16124


    Building Industry Association of Northeastern PA
    Local # 3932
    411 Main St
    Kingston, PA 18704
    http://www.bianepa.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Wyoming County Pennsylvania

    Time is Money. Unless You’re an Insurance Company

    Insurer Granted Summary Judgment, in Part, After Partial Payment of Claim

    The Future of Construction Tech Is Decision Tech

    Hunton Insurance Practice Receives Top (Tier 1) National Ranking by US News & World Report

    Navigate the New Health and Safety Norm With Construction Technology

    Yes, Indeedy. Competitive Bidding Not Required for School District Lease-Leasebacks

    Injury to Employees Endorsement Eliminates Coverage for Insured Employer

    Eyes on the Sky: Regulating DJI Drones on Federal and Private Construction Sites

    Suffolk Construction Drywall Suits Involve Claim for $3 Million in Court Costs

    The Overlooked Nevada Rule In an Arena Project Lawsuit

    Efficient Proximate Cause Applies to Policy's Collapse Provisions

    Sales of New Homes in U.S. Increased 5.4% in July to 507,000

    Water Damage Sub-Limit Includes Tear-Out Costs

    Will European Insurers’ Positive Response to COVID-19 Claims Influence US Insurers?

    A Word to the Wise: The AIA Revised Contract Documents Could Lead to New and Unanticipated Risks - Part II

    CLB Recommends Extensive Hawaii Contractor License Changes

    Fires, Hurricanes, Dangerous Heat: The US Is Reeling From a String of Disasters

    Court Holds That Self-Insured Retentions Exhaust Vertically And Awards Insured Mandatory Prejudgment Interest in Stringfellow Site Coverage Dispute

    Home Prices Expected to Increase All Over the U.S.

    The Failure to Pursue a Construction Lien Does Not Create a “Gotcha” Argument

    Construction Industry Groups Challenge DOL’s New DBRA Regulations

    Factual Issues Prevent Summary Judgment Determination on Coverage for Additional Insured

    Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail”

    Insurers Subrogating in Arkansas Must Expend Energy to Prove That Their Insureds Have Been Made Whole

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (12/4/24) – Highest Rate of Office Conversions, Lending Caps for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Affordability Challenges for Homebuyers

    Resolving Condominium Construction Defect Warranty Claims in Maryland

    Mobile Home Owners Not a Class in Drainage Lawsuit

    The Construction Lawyer as Problem Solver

    "Decay" Found Ambiguous in Collapse Case

    Subcontractors Eye 2022 with Guarded Optimism

    Congratulations to BWB&O’s 2024 Southern California Super Lawyers!

    Wall Street Journal Analyzes the Housing Market Direction

    Construction Law Job Opps and How to Create Them

    Commercial Real Estate Brokerages in an Uncertain Russian Market

    Ignoring Employee ADA Accommodation Requests Can Be Costly – A Cautionary Tale

    Updated 3/13/20: Coronavirus is Here: What Does That Mean for Your Project and Your Business?

    Empowering Success: The Advantages of Female Attorneys in Construction Defect Law

    In Search of Cement Replacements

    What You Need to Know to Protect the Project Against Defect Claims

    Expanded Virginia Court of Appeals Leads to Policyholder Relief

    Texas Construction Firm Officials Sentenced in Contract-Fraud Case

    With Historic Removal of Four Dams, Klamath River Flows Again Unhindered

    Montreal Bridge Builders Sue Canada Over New Restrictions

    Loaded Boom of Burning Tower Crane Collapses in Manhattan, Injuring Six

    Why You Make A Better Wall Than A Window: Why Policyholders Can Rest Assured That Insurers Should Pay Legal Bills for Claims with Potential Coverage

    California Construction Bill Dies in Committee

    Designing a Fair Standard of Care in Design Agreements

    Four Companies Sued in Pool Electrocution Case

    Construction Defects as Occurrences, Better Decided in Law than in Courts

    Augmented and Mixed Reality in Construction
    Corporate Profile

    WYOMING COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from approximately 5000 construction claims related expert witness designations, the Wyoming County, Pennsylvania Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to lawyers and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the construction industry's leading builders and developers, legal professionals, and owners, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies. In connection with in house assets comprising credentialed construction consultants, NCARB certified architects, forensic engineers, building envelope and design experts, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Wyoming County and the surrounding areas.

    Wyoming County Pennsylvania construction cost estimating expert witnessWyoming County Pennsylvania construction claims expert witnessWyoming County Pennsylvania architecture expert witnessWyoming County Pennsylvania consulting architect expert witnessWyoming County Pennsylvania stucco expert witnessWyoming County Pennsylvania eifs expert witnessWyoming County Pennsylvania reconstruction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Wyoming County, Pennsylvania

    No Bad Faith Despite Insurer’s Appraisal Award Exceeding Initial Payment

    August 03, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment, finding no bad faith despite the appraisal award exceeding the amount the insurer initially paid. Jazi Kat 4659 Rockridge LLC, et al. v. Travelers Cas. Ins. Co. of Am., et al., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105634 (D. Ariz. May 13, 2026). Plaintiffs sued Travelers for breach of contract and bad faith, alleging that Travelers failed to pay money plaintiffs were owed under the policy. Plaintiffs held a commercial property policy for two properties. A fire destroyed one of the properties. Travelers adjusted the claim and issued two payments. Plaintiffs disagreed with the amount of the payments and demanded an appraisal. Travelers agreed to the appraisal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    GRSM Trial Team Holds Alameda County Asbestos Verdict to $900,000 Against $50 Million Demand

    July 27, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani Partners John Katerndahl and Vincent Gunter recently obtained an outstanding trial result for a manufacturer of asbestos-containing electrical cable, holding a jury verdict to $900,000 against a $50 million demand following an eight-week trial in Alameda County Superior Court, which is among the most challenging asbestos venues in the country. The GRSM team also included Associate Brandon Sanchez, on-site trial Paralegal Laura Vitanova, and Paralegal Kerrie Lease. The plaintiffs, the surviving spouse and four children of a former painter who died of mesothelioma, alleged that the decedent was exposed to asbestos from the company’s electrical cable during construction of a California nuclear power facility. GRSM’s client was the sole remaining defendant at trial. The plaintiffs asked the jury for $50 million and called 15 witnesses across their case-in-chief and rebuttal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in the 2027 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®

    September 08, 2026 —
    Traub Lieberman is pleased to announce that four Partners have been selected by their peers for inclusion in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America®. In addition, six attorneys have been included in the 2027 Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch list. These recognitions include attorneys from the firm’s White Plains, NY; Chicago, IL; Palm Beach Gardens, FL; and St. Petersburg, FL offices. 2027 Best Lawyers® White Plains, NY
    • Lisa L. Shrewsberry – Commercial Litigation
    Chicago, IL
    • Brian C. Bassett – Insurance Law
    Palm Beach Gardens, FL
    • Rina Clemens – Personal Injury Litigation – Defendants, Product Liability Litigation – Defendants
    St. Petersburg, FL
    • Lauren S. Curtis – Insurance Law
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    Micromobility in Smart Cities: Keeping the Wheels in Motion

    May 26, 2026 —
    Mobility is the lifeblood of any city. How people are able to travel in, out and within a metropolitan area is vital to its citizens, businesses, supply chains and social services. And as U.S. cities have expanded in size and population density, the strategies for addressing mobility have evolved. Many have taken different approaches to public transit, and each city boasts a dense tapestry of roadways, walking paths and various parking options. But as cities continue to reexamine infrastructure strategies through smart city technology, a new field of transportation has emerged—micromobility. Designed for short-distance travel using lightweight vehicles (bikes, e-bikes, e-scooters, etc.), the industry’s global net worth has grown exponentially in recent years to the tune of hundreds of billions, with one forecast predicting it could reach $340 billion by 2030. Micromobility also finds itself at the forefront of various smart city technological improvements. Geofencing has been implemented in U.S. cities to determine where micromobility vehicles can operate, control speed limits, and park utilizing the vehicles’ GPS location. Internet of Things (IoT) technologies (satellite-based location receivers, cloud communication, internet links, etc.) have improved vehicle lifespans by keeping track of when vehicles require service and prevent vandalism and theft. Data collected from vehicles’ location tracking is routinely used for urban planning and smart city development. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury
    Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com

    Prefatory Contract Language Cannot Be Used to Create an Ambiguity with Operative Provisions

    May 12, 2026 —
    Contract drafting and interpretation matters. A case dealt with the potential conflict with prefatory language in an agreement compared with operative provisions in the agreement. The trial court held that the operative provisions control. I discussed this case here where the appellate court reversed based on the prefatory language. But, through a motion for rehearing, the appellate court reconsidered its position and affirmed the trial court based on the operative provisions, mainly that the prefatory language cannot be used to create an ambiguity with operative provisions. Consider this explanation in affirming the trial court:
    Because the trial court correctly found that the initial language in the contract was prefatory and could not be used to create an ambiguity in the remainder of the contract, we affirm the final judgment.
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Owner Taking Assignment of General Contractor’s Claims Against a Subcontractor(s)

    September 21, 2026 —
    Here’s a scenario that occurs in construction defect cases. An owner sues a general contractor and subs for construction defects. The owner settles with a number of parties and takes an assignment of the general contractor’s claims against some or all of the subs and pursues the remaining parties for indemnity based on the assignment of the general contractor’s claims. This was the scenario in Craftsman Plastering and Lath, Inc. v. Rath Mor, LLC, 2026 WL 2328032 (Fla. 4th DCA 2026). The owner settled with the general contractor and all subs except one. The owner took an assignment of the general contractor’s claim against the sub, and really the indemnity claim. The owner was then substituted as the real party in interest as it relates to the general contractor’s claims against the sub. The owner sought roughly $780,000 in attorney’s fees and costs in connection with the dispute claiming the sub was liable for such fees. The jury didn’t buy the argument and awarded the owner about $55,000. Basically, the jury seemingly prorated the fees by the number of parties, at least, that’s how the math worked out. The owner didn’t like that and moved for an additur to increase the jury’s verdict which the trial court granted. This was reversed on appeal despite the fact that a trial court has broad discretion to grant a motion for additur. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Special Counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters Appointed Chair of the ABA’s Commission on Women in the Profession

    October 06, 2026 —
    Special counsel Lorelie (Lorie) Masters was recently appointed as the chair of the American Bar Association’s Commission on Women in the Profession. Established in 1987, the Commission was created to assess the status of women in the legal sector and remove barriers to their professional advancement. As chair, Lorie will lead a 12-member roster of commissioners, and a panel of special advisers, dedicated to ensuring equal participation and systemic equity for women lawyers across the justice system and pursuing various studies to identify issues uniquely facing women in the profession, including disparate treatment, training and recruitment, parenting, and other issues. Most recently, the Commission in late July 2026 issued a groundbreaking study about issues affecting the mental health and well-being of women lawyers. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    RONI: What You Lose by Not Investing in AI – With Sam Zolfagharian

    September 21, 2026 —
    Sam Zolfagharian returns to the AEC Business Podcast for her second appearance. She is an AI strategist, keynote speaker, and the author of two books, Disrupt It and Future by Design. She spoke at the AI in AEC conference in Helsinki in March, and we picked up the conversation where that keynote left off. The starting point was a question her clients keep raising. Executives are being asked by their boards about the return on their AI investments, and many of them do not have an answer they trust. This episode is about what to measure instead, and when the dollar figure finally becomes the right number to look at. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi