BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure expert witness Chester County South Carolina office building expert witness Chester County South Carolina institutional building expert witness Chester County South Carolina production housing expert witness Chester County South Carolina custom home expert witness Chester County South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Chester County South Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Chester County South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Chester County South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Chester County South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Chester County South Carolina tract home expert witness Chester County South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Chester County South Carolina casino resort expert witness Chester County South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Chester County South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Chester County South Carolina condominium expert witness Chester County South Carolina Medical building expert witness Chester County South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Chester County South Carolina industrial building expert witness Chester County South Carolina housing expert witness Chester County South Carolina custom homes expert witness Chester County South Carolina retail construction expert witness Chester County South Carolina
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Chester County, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Chester County South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association Anderson SC
    Local # 4210
    1924 McConnell Springs Rd
    Anderson, SC 29621
    http://hbaofanderson.com

    Union Co Chapter - SC
    Local # 4290
    1501 Whitmire Hwy
    Union, SC 29379


    Home Builders Association of Oconee
    Local # 4280
    PO Box 337 106 East North First Street
    Seneca, SC 29679
    http://www.hbaofoconee.com

    Laurens-Newberry COS Home Builders Association
    Local # 4250
    PO Box 257
    Pomaria, SC 29126


    Home Builders Association Lancaster Cty SC
    Local # 4230
    305 W Dunlap St C
    Lancaster, SC 29720


    Home Builders Association of Greenville
    Local # 4240
    5 Creekside Park Ct Suite A
    Greenville, SC 29615
    http://www.greenvillehba.com

    Home Builders Association of Gr Pee Dee SC
    Local # 4232
    PO Box 13494
    Florence, SC 29504
    http://www.hbapeedee.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Chester County South Carolina

    Oregon to Add 258,000 Jobs by 2022, State Data Shows

    Recent Decision Further Jeopardizes Availability of Additional Insured Coverage in New York

    A Subcontractor’s Perspective On California’s Recent Changes to Indemnity Provisions

    The Year 2010 In Review: Design And Construction Defects Litigation

    Affordable Housing should not be Filled with Defects

    Wage Theft Investigations and Citations in the Construction Industry

    Spain’s Sagrada Familia: Contemporary Construction Methods Speed Iconic Basilica to Completion

    Negligence Claim Not Barred by Gist of the Action Doctrine

    South Carolina’s New Insurance Data Security Act: Pebbles Before a Landslide?

    How to Properly Fill Out and Use the Unconditional Waiver and Release on Final Payment Form Used in California Construction

    White and Williams Celebrates Chambers 2024 Rankings

    Updates to the CEQA Guidelines Have Been Finalized

    No Coverage Under Installation Policy When Read Together with Insurance Application

    Updated Covid-19 Standards In The Workplace

    American Arbitration Association Revises Construction Industry Rules and Mediation Procedures

    Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions Into Waterlogged Miami?

    Colorado Passes Construction Defect Reform Bill

    Run Spot...Run!

    Late Filing Contractor Barred from Involving Subcontractors in Construction Defect Claim

    University of Tennessee’s New Humanities Building Construction Set to Begin

    District Court's Ruling Affirmed in TCD v American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

    Justice Didn’t Ensure Mortgage Fraud Was Priority, IG Says

    Monitoring Building Moisture with RFID – Interview with Jarmo Tuppurainen

    Can Anyone Save Gary, Indiana?

    Super Lawyers Recognized Five Lawyers from Hunton’s Insurance Recovery Group

    Federal Court Predicts Coverage In Nevada for Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship

    Lumber Liquidators’ Home-Testing Methods Get EPA Scrutiny

    The Jersey Shore gets Beach Prisms Designed to Reduce Erosion

    Insurer’s Optional Appeals Process Does Not Toll Statute of Limitations Following Unequivocal Written Denial

    How Algorithmic Design Improves Collaboration in Building Design

    Nevada Assembly Passes Construction Defect Bill

    Los Angeles Seeks Speedier Way to Build New Affordable Homes

    Subsidence Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Landslide

    Florida Court Puts the Claim of Landlord’s Insurer In The No-Fly Zone

    Bremer Whyte Sets New Precedent in Palos Verdes Landslide Litigation

    Halliburton to Pay $1.1 Billion to Settle Spill Lawsuits

    Governmental Action Exclusion Bars Claim for Damage to Insured's Building

    The Court of Appeals Holds That Indifference to Safety Satisfies the Standard for a Willful Violation Under WISHA

    Feds Outline Workforce Rules for $39B in Chip Plant Funding

    First Railroad Bridge Between Russia and China Set to Open

    Two More Lawsuits Filed Over COVID-19 Business Interruption Losses

    Condominiums and Homeowners Associations Remain Popular Housing Choices for U-S Homeowners

    Insurance Company Prevails in “Chinese Drywall” Case

    The Godfather of Solar Predicts Its Future

    Chinese Drywall Manufacturer Claims Product Was Not for American Market

    Contractor Changes Contract After Signed, Then Sues Older Woman for Breaking It

    COVID-19 Response: California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board Implements Sweeping New Regulations to Prevent COVID-19 in the Workplace

    Progress, Property, and Privacy: Discussing Human-Led Infrastructure with Jeff Schumacher

    A Top U.S. Seller of Carbon Offsets Starts Investigating Its Own Projects

    As Florence Eyes East Coast, Are You Looking At Your Insurance?
    Corporate Profile

    CHESTER COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over 4500 construction and design related expert designations, the Chester County, South Carolina Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides construction related consulting and expert witness support services to the industry's most recognized construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, CGL carriers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. In connection with in house personnel which comprise construction delay claims experts, registered design professionals, professional engineers, and credentailed construction consultants, the firm brings national experience and local capabilities to Chester County and the surrounding areas.

    Chester County South Carolina delay claim expert witnessChester County South Carolina building code compliance expert witnessChester County South Carolina architecture expert witnessChester County South Carolina building code expert witnessChester County South Carolina expert witnesses fenestrationChester County South Carolina construction expert witness public projectsChester County South Carolina reconstruction expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Chester County, South Carolina

    A Customized Approach to Data Center Construction

    June 29, 2026 —
    Data center construction projects are, to put it mildly, distinct. They differ from traditional construction in a host of manners, and are particularly distinctive because the value of the facility depends on unique measures of performance. A center that cannot meet uptime, cooling, redundancy or connectivity standards will not achieve its mission, whether or not the structure itself meets standard industry contract-form “substantial completion” or “mechanical completion” definitions. Owners, developers, lenders, operators and hyperscalers—especially hyperscalers!—want it all. They seek favorable and stable pricing, accelerated delivery and sophisticated components, all of which are evolving in “real project time.” Standard construction contract forms deserve extensive modifications to align clauses with expectations, with a heightened focus on systems integration, commissioning, and allocation of special risks. This article details customized considerations for drafting, negotiating and administering data center design and construction agreements. Reprinted courtesy of James P. Bobotek, Pillsbury, Arielle L. Murphy, Pillsbury and Robert A. James, Pillsbury Mr. Bobotek may be contacted at james.bobotek@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Murphy may be contacted at arielle.murphy@pillsburylaw.com Mr. James may be contacted at rob.james@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Secures a Clean Sweep Dismissal of Architect's Professional Liability Coverage Lawsuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP achieved a complete dismissal of professional liability coverage claims through a strategic defense led by Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group attorneys Daniel E. Bryer, Partner and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, Associate. In a nuanced action styled, Vincent Cusumano Architect P.C., et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, et al., decided in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiffs asserted twelve pre-contractual and contractual-based causes of action against their liability insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, and its insurance agent (collectively, “Defendants”) for denying a professional liability claim arising from plaintiffs’ prior work. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel E. Bryer, White and Williams LLP and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, White and Williams LLP Mr. Bryer may be contacted at bryerd@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ruiz may be contacted at minayaruizb@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Managing Tariff Volatility in Cross‑Border U.S. Construction Projects: Practical Contract‑Drafting and Procurement Strategies

    March 10, 2026 —
    Volatile U.S. tariff announcements continue to affect international supply chains for U.S. construction projects. Although recent litigation has centered on the scope of presidential tariff authority rather than construction‑specific disputes, these decisions carry important implications for how parties structure risk in their contracts. In May 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) struck down certain “Liberation Day” tariffs as exceeding presidential authority under IEEPA. A federal district court in Washington, D.C. likewise issued a preliminary injunction suspending related tariffs—though it later stayed its own order pending appeal. And the Supreme Court has agreed to review cases addressing the legal limits of IEEPA‑based tariffs. While none of these developments arises from construction disputes, the themes they highlight—timing, statutory authority, and documentation—mirror the issues encountered when tariff conditions disrupt international procurement. The following strategies reflect practical steps U.S. project owners, contractors, and foreign suppliers can take to mitigate risk, drawing on drafting approaches now widely used across major construction forms, including—but not limited to—modified AIA agreements. Reprinted courtesy of Sara Beiro Farabow, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Michael Wagner, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Farabow may be contacted at sfarabow@seyfarth.com Mr. Wagner may be contacted at mewagner@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    New York Moves to Tighten Third-Party Practice: Key Changes to CPLR 1007

    March 31, 2026 —
    Effective April 18, 2026, the New York Legislature enacted the Avoiding Vexatious Overuse of Impleading to Delay (“AVOID”) Act, amending CPLR 1007—the statute that governs third-party practice. The amendment sharply limits when and how defendants can commence third-party actions, curbing the expansive discretion they previously enjoyed and targeting the late-stage impleaders that often upend case schedules. What Changes Before the AVOID Act was signed into law on December 19, 2025 (and subsequently modified by Chapter Amendments A9502 and S8809, signed by Governor Hochul on February 13, 2026[1]), CPLR 1007 gave defendants broad latitude to implead “any person who is or may be liable” for all or part of the plaintiff’s claim. CPLR 1007 specified no outside time limit for the initiation of a third-party claim; courts assessed only whether a defendant’s delay was undue—such as impleading months after the note of issue—and whether the plaintiff would suffer prejudice if the third-party action were not severed. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Sophia L. Cahill, Sheppard
    Ms. Cahill may be contacted at scahill@sheppard.com

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    April 14, 2026 —
    Written change orders are a big deal. Almost all construction contracts (at least the well drafted ones) require written contracts. Written change orders are even important enough that Virginia law requires these provisions in residential construction contracts. Why are they so important? Because they are a “mini-contract” of sorts. They set the expectations, price, time, and work to be performed; work that was not included in the original price or scope for the project. Without this in writing, there will be no record of what the parties agreed to do. Does this sound familiar? Sound like its own contract? It should. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Insured General Contractor Prevails on Motion for Summary Judgment to Establish Builder’s Risk Coverage

    July 06, 2026 —
    The general contractor’s motion for partial summary judgment successfully established that damage to footings in place before the policy period was covered after the collapse of a building. Big D Builders, Inc. v. Am Zurich Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72012 (D. Idaho March 31, 2026). Big D was the general contractor for building a new airplane hangar by erecting a 38,000 square foot structure. Before Big D began construction, the site of the hangar did not contain any pre-existing structures or buildings. Before completion of the hangar, it collapsed and caused extensive property damage. The builder’s risk policy issued by Zurich covered certain aspects of the construction project for the policy period December 28, 2023, to December 28, 2024. Zurich accepted coverage for most of the damage but not for damage to footings and columns installed prior to the start date of the policy. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Late Notice Bars Insured’s Claim for Water Leak Damage

    August 11, 2026 —
    The federal district court granted the insurer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the insured’s claim due to late notice. Global Approach, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120183 (S. D. Fla. June 1, 2026). Global suffered water damage on September 3, 2021, which originated in the bathroom of one of its rental properties. Global reported the claim to its insurer, Scottsdale, on October 19, 2021. Prior to reporting the claim, Global hired a handyman to inspect the property and then demolished the damaged area and repaired the bathroom. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    The “Pay When Paid” Clause in California Construction—Strategies as the Battle Continues

    August 03, 2026 —
    It is well known in California Construction circles that the “Pay If Paid” clause is illegal in this state. There is a great distinction, though, between this clause and a similar clause, known as a “Pay When Paid” clause. A pay if paid clause allows a contractor to tell a subcontractor that if the contractor is unpaid for the subcontractor’s work, then the contractor has no legal obligation to pay the subcontractor, ever. For a great variety of reasons, the California Supreme Court, in the case of Wm. R. Clarke Corp v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America (1997) 15 Cal.4th 882, declared this type of clause illegal in California Construction. Although the pay if paid clause is illegal in California, the pay when paid clause is still perfectly legal and is found in many subcontracts that contractors issue to their subcontractors. The pay when paid clause allows a contractor to delay paying its subcontractors until the dispute between the contractor and the property owner over payment has been resolved and the contractor is paid by the property owner. Although seemingly reasonable (since it merely delays payment until the contractor is paid by the owner, thereby providing a funding source to pay subcontractors), significant problems still arise. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com