BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    condominium expert witness Laurens County South Carolina townhome construction expert witness Laurens County South Carolina custom home expert witness Laurens County South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Laurens County South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Laurens County South Carolina housing expert witness Laurens County South Carolina parking structure expert witness Laurens County South Carolina office building expert witness Laurens County South Carolina institutional building expert witness Laurens County South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Laurens County South Carolina casino resort expert witness Laurens County South Carolina production housing expert witness Laurens County South Carolina Medical building expert witness Laurens County South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Laurens County South Carolina retail construction expert witness Laurens County South Carolina industrial building expert witness Laurens County South Carolina condominiums expert witness Laurens County South Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Laurens County South Carolina tract home expert witness Laurens County South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Laurens County South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Laurens County South Carolina custom homes expert witness Laurens County South Carolina
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Laurens County, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Laurens County South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association Anderson SC
    Local # 4210
    1924 McConnell Springs Rd
    Anderson, SC 29621
    http://hbaofanderson.com

    Laurens-Newberry COS Home Builders Association
    Local # 4250
    PO Box 257
    Pomaria, SC 29126


    Union Co Chapter - SC
    Local # 4290
    1501 Whitmire Hwy
    Union, SC 29379


    Home Builders Association of Oconee
    Local # 4280
    PO Box 337 106 East North First Street
    Seneca, SC 29679
    http://www.hbaofoconee.com

    Home Builders Association of Gr Pee Dee SC
    Local # 4232
    PO Box 13494
    Florence, SC 29504
    http://www.hbapeedee.com

    Lakelands Home Builders Association
    Local # 4242
    PO Box 3194
    Greenwood, SC 29648
    http://www.lakelandshba.com

    Home Builders Association Lancaster Cty SC
    Local # 4230
    305 W Dunlap St C
    Lancaster, SC 29720



    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Laurens County South Carolina

    Thoughts on New Pay if Paid Legislation

    Insurer Must Defend Additional Insured Though Its Insured is a Non-Party

    In Colorado, Repair Vendors Can Bring First-Party Bad Faith Actions For Amounts Owed From an Insurer

    Road Project to Improve Access to Peru's Machu Picchu Site

    Appellate Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Order Compelling Appraisal

    Suing a Local Government in Land Use Cases – Part 1 – Substantive Due Process

    Modernist Houses Galore! [visual candy for architects]

    Keeping Detailed Records: The Best Defense to Constructive Eviction

    New York Orders Moratorium on Large Data Center Permits

    Nonparty Discovery in California Arbitration: How to Get What You Want

    Backpacks, Broadway, and Building Restrictions: A Legal Reminder

    Contractual Waiver of Consequential Damages

    'Major' Mass. Gas Leak Follows Feds Call For Regulation Changes One Year After Deadly Gas Explosions

    Illusory Insurance Coverage: Real or Unreal?

    Yes, Virginia, Contract Terms Do Matter: Financing Term Offers Owner an Escape Hatch

    Exception to Watercraft Exclusion Does Not Apply

    Washington Supreme Court Sides with Lien Claimants in Williams v. Athletic Field

    Homeowner Sues Brick Manufacturer for Spalling Bricks

    The Show Must Go On: Navigating Arbitration in the Wake of the COVID-19 Outbreak

    Court Denies Insurers' Motions for Summary Judgment Under All Risk Policies

    Unesco Denies Claim It Cleared Construction of Zambezi Dam

    Contractor Side Deals Can Waive Rights

    Toward Increased Citizen Engagement in Urban Planning

    Settlement Ends Construction Defect Lawsuit for School

    California Levies $1 Billion Assessment on Insurers for LA Fires

    The Contractor’s Contingency: What Contractors and Construction Managers Need to Know and Be Wary Of

    Cincinnati Goes Green

    Colorado’s New Mechanic’s Lien Law: Bigger Claims, Stronger Protections, and New Risks for Owners and Contractors

    Toll Brothers Named #1 Home Builder on Fortune Magazine's 2023 World's Most Admired Companies® List

    Apartment Investors Turn to Suburbs After Crowding Cities

    Unpunished Racist Taunts: A Pennsylvania Harassment Case With No True 'Winner'

    Concrete Worker Wins Lawsuit and Settles with Other Defendant

    Contractual Waiver of Consequential Damages

    Superior Court Of Pennsylvania Holds That CASPA Does Not Allow For Individual Claims Against A Property Owner’s Principals Or Shareholders

    UConn’s Law-School Library Construction Case Settled for Millions

    What the FIU Bridge Collapse Says About Peer Review

    Jobsite Safety, Workforce Shortage Drive Innovation in Machine Automation

    Schools Remain Top Priority in Carolinas as Cleanup From Storms Continues

    Florida’s Proposed HB 255: A Quiet Shift That Could Reshape Condo Defect Liability

    The Colorado Supreme Court affirms Woodbridge II’s “Adverse Use” Distinction

    “A No-Lose Proposition?”

    Foreclosure Deficiency: Construction Loan vs. Home Improvement Loan

    Building the Future: Inside China’s Cutting-Edge Construction Innovations

    After Fatal House Explosion, Colorado Seeks New Pipeline Regulations

    Homebuilders Are Fighting Green Building. Homeowners Will Pay.

    Just a House That Uses 90 Percent Less Energy Than Yours, That's All

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (05/17/23) – A Flop in Flipping, Plastic Microbes and Psychological Hard Hats

    Read Before You Sign: Claim Waivers in Project Documents

    Contractors Admit Involvement in Kickbacks

    You're Doing Construction in Russia, Now What?
    Corporate Profile

    LAURENS COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    With over four thousand general contracting and design related expert designations, the Laurens County, South Carolina Construction Expert Directory provides a streamlined multi-disciplinary expert retention and support solution to attorneys and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect and claims matters. BHA provides building related trial support and expert consulting services to the building industry's most recognizable companies, insurers, risk managers, and a variety of municipalities. In connection with in house assets which include construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the firm brings specialized expertise and local capabilities to the Laurens County region.

    Laurens County South Carolina OSHA expert witness constructionLaurens County South Carolina hospital construction expert witnessLaurens County South Carolina reconstruction expert witnessLaurens County South Carolina construction safety expertLaurens County South Carolina slope failure expert witnessLaurens County South Carolina construction expert witness consultantLaurens County South Carolina expert witness windows
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Laurens County, South Carolina

    Fourth Circuit Extends Coverage to Contractor

    May 14, 2026 —
    The Fourth Circuit in APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. Owners Insurance Co., No. 24-1969, 2026 WL 458402 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 2026) recently endorsed broad coverage for additional insureds, interpreting “arising out of” broadly under North Carolina law to extend coverage to a repaving company under its subcontractor’s liability insurance policy. The court held that an additional insured’s liability “arising out of” a named insured’s work in an additional-insured endorsement means liability “relating to” or “causally connected to” the named insured’s operations, rather than liability defined more narrowly as “caused by” or “the fault of” the named insured. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

    Modular Construction’s Hidden Risk: Where Things Go Wrong Between the Factory and the Field

    June 15, 2026 —
    Introduction As modular and prefabricated construction methods are increasingly adopted, so too are the potential challenges that come with them. The appeal is straightforward: faster timelines, controlled fabrication environments, and reduced on-site labor demands. But the risks that accompany these benefits are often less clear—and, in many cases, poorly defined. For example, what happens when a prefabricated component is delayed past its installation window? Who is responsible for a defect discovered inside a sealed, installed module? What happens to warranty obligations when a prefabricated component must be modified on site? Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jack Mayo, Jones Walker LLP
    Mr. Mayo may be contacted at jmayo@joneswalker.com

    The Best Lawyers in America® - Ball Janik Attorneys Earn Multiple Recognitions

    September 01, 2026 —
    Orlando, FL, August 20, 2026 – Ball Janik LLP is pleased to announce that 24 of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America. The 33rd Best Lawyers edition recognitions are based on peer review and highlight attorneys across a range of practice areas. This recognition underscores the broad experience Ball Janik's attorneys bring to the firm's construction defect practice. "We're proud to be recognized by Best Lawyers again this year," said James C. Prichard, Managing Partner of Ball Janik LLP. "These honors reflect the expertise and depth of our team, our continued growth across Florida, and our commitment to providing strong counsel to clients in complex construction, insurance recovery, and litigation matters." Ball Janik attorneys recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® include: Keegan A. Berry — Construction Law Brian T. Crevasse — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Todd Demetriades — Litigation - Construction Joseph R. Fitos — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Megan A. Picataggio — Construction Law Jon E. Lemole — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Salvatore G. Scro — Construction Law Nicholas B. Vargo — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Kelly M. Corcoran — Construction Law Gabriel Z. Coelho — Construction Law Evan J. Small — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Franchesco Soto — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Phillip E. Joseph — Litigation - Construction; Real Estate Law James C. Prichard — Construction Law Ball Janik attorneys recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch® in America include: Nicholas Passantino — Litigation - Construction Amanda L. Gonzalez — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Morgan N. Lester — Litigation - Construction Chris S. Tribbey — Construction Law Kyle Bugden — Construction Law; Litigation - Construction Brian Tannenbaum — Construction Law Kayla Mosquera — Insurance Law Natasha L. Biela — Commercial Litigation Elijah C. Waring, Jr. — Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Greg K. Demers — Construction Law About Ball Janik LLP Ball Janik LLP is a Florida-based law firm offering construction defect, construction law, insurance recovery, and commercial litigation counsel, to its local and national clients. The firm was founded in 1982 and has expanded its capabilities, professionals, and geographic footprint. What started as a small firm focused on real property, land use, and litigation (known then as Ball Janik & Novack) has grown to a team of 70-plus attorneys and paralegals in five offices in Florida, with centuries of combined experience and capabilities. The firm has been recognized by Chambers USA, including for its construction law capabilities in Florida, U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, The Best Lawyers in America©, Super Lawyers, and Corporate International. Read more at www.balljanik.com.

    The Construction Defect Litigation Podcast: Navigating Multi-Party Construction Defect Litigation

    September 08, 2026 —
    Kahana Feld Construction Defect Practice Group Chair Ivette Kincaid and attorney Thomas McCarrick recently joined the Construction Defect Litigation podcast to discuss the challenges—and strategies—behind complex construction defect matters involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on their experience, Ivette and Thomas explore practical approaches to:
    • Identifying key parties and understanding how claims and crossclaims develop
    • Working with experts to evaluate defects, causation and damages
    • Managing procedural challenges, including scheduling, document management and depositions
    • Applying thoughtful case management strategies to position complex matters for successful resolution
    Reprinted courtesy of Ivette Kincaid, Kahana Feld and Thomas McCarrick, Kahana Feld Ms. Kincaid may be contacted at ikincaid@kahanafeld.com Mr. McCarrick may be contacted at tmccarrick@kahanafeld.com Read the full story...

    White and Williams LLP Secures a Clean Sweep Dismissal of Architect's Professional Liability Coverage Lawsuit

    August 16, 2026 —
    White and Williams LLP achieved a complete dismissal of professional liability coverage claims through a strategic defense led by Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Practice Group attorneys Daniel E. Bryer, Partner and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, Associate. In a nuanced action styled, Vincent Cusumano Architect P.C., et al. v. Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, et al., decided in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, plaintiffs asserted twelve pre-contractual and contractual-based causes of action against their liability insurer, Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, and its insurance agent (collectively, “Defendants”) for denying a professional liability claim arising from plaintiffs’ prior work. Reprinted courtesy of Daniel E. Bryer, White and Williams LLP and Brendaliz Minaya Ruiz, White and Williams LLP Mr. Bryer may be contacted at bryerd@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Ruiz may be contacted at minayaruizb@whiteandwilliams.com Read the full story...

    Appeals Court Upholds Skanska, Granite Win in ‘I-4 Ultimate’ JV Dispute

    June 15, 2026 —
    A federal appeals court has upheld a lower court’s decision requiring The Lane Construction Corp. to pay roughly $79 million in damages, plus interest, to joint venture partners Skanska USA Civil Southeast and Granite Construction for work on Florida’s I-4 Ultimate highway megaproject in Orlando, which was completed in 2022. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bryan Gottlieb, Engineering News-Record
    Mr. Gottlieb may be contacted at gottliebb@enr.com

    California Contractors Get a Much-Needed Break: SB 342 Softens the Harsh Consequences of Contractor License Lapses

    October 20, 2026 —
    Imagine completing a multimillion-dollar project, performing quality work, paying your subcontractors, and satisfying the owner, only to discover that a temporary contractor license lapse could prevent you from recovering payment for that work or pursuing claims for extra work. For decades, that was the reality under California Business and Professions Code section 7031. A contractor that allowed its license to lapse, even briefly, could face catastrophic consequences completely disconnected from the quality of its work. In some cases, a contractor that performed otherwise flawless work could be barred from recovering payment and even be ordered to disgorge compensation already received – even if the owner knew the contractor had a lapse in its licensing and allowed it to continue construction. That reality is about to change. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth
    Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com

    Federal Court Pauses New Mexico PFAS Labeling Rule, but Not Its Bans or Reporting Deadline

    October 26, 2026 —
    As we previously reported, New Mexico adopted novel product labeling requirements that would require manufacturers to display a PFAS flask symbol on covered products. Those requirements are now on hold. A coalition of industry associations led by the American Chemistry Council sued in federal court, arguing that the mandate unconstitutionally compels speech in violation of the First Amendment. On September 16, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico preliminarily enjoined enforcement of the labeling rule while the case, American Chemistry Council v. Kenney, No. 1:26-cv-02130-MIS-SCY, proceeds. The court found the challengers likely to succeed because New Mexico had not shown a reasonable fit between the label and its interests in protecting consumer health and the environment. A Broad Rule Built Around One Symbol New Mexico enacted its PFAS Protection Act in April 2025, joining Maine and Minnesota as the third state to adopt broad reporting requirements and eventual sales restrictions for products containing intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The Act also authorized the Environmental Improvement Board to require PFAS labels on products. The Board’s implementing rule, which became effective July 1, 2026, specified the exact format of the label and how it had to appear. Reprinted courtesy of Ashleigh K. Myers, Pillsbury, Jillian Marullo, Pillsbury and Claudia Vetesi, Pillsbury Ms. Myers may be contacted at ashleigh.myers@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Marullo may be contacted at jillian.marullo@pillsburylaw.com Ms. Vetesi may be contacted at claudia.vetesi@pillsburylaw.com Read the full story...