BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing expert witness Oconee County South Carolina custom home expert witness Oconee County South Carolina housing expert witness Oconee County South Carolina Medical building expert witness Oconee County South Carolina townhome construction expert witness Oconee County South Carolina institutional building expert witness Oconee County South Carolina parking structure expert witness Oconee County South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Oconee County South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Oconee County South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Oconee County South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Oconee County South Carolina tract home expert witness Oconee County South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Oconee County South Carolina casino resort expert witness Oconee County South Carolina industrial building expert witness Oconee County South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Oconee County South Carolina condominium expert witness Oconee County South Carolina retail construction expert witness Oconee County South Carolina condominiums expert witness Oconee County South Carolina office building expert witness Oconee County South Carolina custom homes expert witness Oconee County South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Oconee County South Carolina
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Oconee County, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Oconee County South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association Anderson SC
    Local # 4210
    1924 McConnell Springs Rd
    Anderson, SC 29621
    http://hbaofanderson.com

    Union Co Chapter - SC
    Local # 4290
    1501 Whitmire Hwy
    Union, SC 29379


    Home Builders Association of Oconee
    Local # 4280
    PO Box 337 106 East North First Street
    Seneca, SC 29679
    http://www.hbaofoconee.com

    Laurens-Newberry COS Home Builders Association
    Local # 4250
    PO Box 257
    Pomaria, SC 29126


    Home Builders Association Lancaster Cty SC
    Local # 4230
    305 W Dunlap St C
    Lancaster, SC 29720


    Home Builders Association of Gr Pee Dee SC
    Local # 4232
    PO Box 13494
    Florence, SC 29504
    http://www.hbapeedee.com

    Lakelands Home Builders Association
    Local # 4242
    PO Box 3194
    Greenwood, SC 29648
    http://www.lakelandshba.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Oconee County South Carolina

    New California Law Requires Real Estate Agents and Brokers to Disclose AI Alterations in Listings

    Arbitration Provisions Are Challenging To Circumvent

    Construction Defects Checklist

    Of Pavement and Pandemic: Liability and Regulatory Hurdles for Taking It Outside

    Promptly Notifying Your Insurer of a Claim Matters

    Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

    Alabama Appeals Court Rules Unexpected and Unintended Property Damage is an Occurrence

    Facts about Chinese Drywall in Construction

    Reminder: Just Being Incorporated Isn’t Enough

    GRSM Ranks Among World’s 70 Largest Law Firms in 2025 Global 200 Rankings

    ESFI Spreads Awareness of Overhead Power Line Safety With "Always Look Up" Campaign

    Red Wings Owner, Needing Hockey-Arena Neighborhood, Builds One

    Massachusetts Couple Seek to Recuse Judge in Construction Defect Case

    No Coverage Where Cracks in Basement Walls Do Not Amount to Sudden Collapse

    Project Completion Determines Mechanics Lien Recording Deadline

    Another Reminder to ALWAYS Show up for Court

    Climate Superfund Litigation: Courts Split on Venue and Intervention in New York and Vermont Cases

    TV Kitchen Remodelers Sued for Shoddy Work

    Traub Lieberman Partner Bradley T. Guldalian Wins Summary Judgment in Pinellas County Circuit Court

    Congratulations to Partner Nicole Whyte on Being Chosen to Receive The 2024 ADL’s Marcus Kaufman Jurisprudence Award

    The Project “Completion” Paradox in California

    Important Insurance Alert for Out-of-State Contractors Assisting in Florida Recovery Efforts!

    Top 10 Insurance Cases of 2025

    San Francisco International Airport Reaches New Heights in Sustainable Project Delivery

    Affordable Global Housing Will Cost $11 Trillion

    Serial ADA Lawsuits Targeting Small Business Owners

    Suing the Lowest Bidder on Public Construction Projects

    Kushner Company Files Suit Against Jersey City Over Delays to Planned Towers

    Construction Law- Where Pragmatism and Law Collide

    California Supreme Court Declines Request to Expand Exceptions to Privette Doctrine for Known Hazards

    Berger: FIGG Is Slow To Hand Over All Bridge Collapse Data

    Perspectives from Pioneers: Kenneth C. Gibbs

    Texas Restricts Foreign Ownership of Real Property

    NTSB Outlines Pittsburgh Bridge Structure Specifics, Finding Collapse Cause Will Take Months

    Accident/Occurrence Requirement Does not Preclude Coverage for Vicarious Liability or Negligent Supervision

    Richest NJ Neighborhood Fights Plan for Low-Cost Homes on Toxic Dump

    Be Proactive Now: Commercial Construction Quickly Joining List of Industries Vulnerable to Cyber Attacks

    Cross-Office Team Secures Summary Judgment Win in Negligence Action with $2M Demand

    Consider the Risks Associated with an Exculpatory Clause

    …More on Delay Claims and the Burden of Proof Substantiating Delay

    Port Authority Approves Subsidies for 2 World Trade Project

    Reminder: Your MLA Notice Must Have Your License Number

    "Over? Did You Say 'Over'?" Determining the Preclusive Effect of an Earlier Arbitration Award

    Certificate of Merit to Sue Architects or Engineers Bill Proposed

    In Appellate Division First, New York Appellate Team Successfully Invokes “Party Finality” Doctrine to Obtain Dismissal of Appeal for Commercial Guarantors

    Vermont Supreme Court Finds COVID-19 May Damage Property

    Cross-Office Team Secures Defense Verdict in Favor of Client in Asbestos Case

    Architectural Firm, Fired by School District, Launches Lawsuit

    Construction Companies Must Prepare for a Surge of Third-Party Contractors

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Who Needs Them”
    Corporate Profile

    OCONEE COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Through over four thousand construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Oconee County, South Carolina Construction Expert Directory provides a single point of reference for construction defect and claims related support to builders and construction practice groups seeking effective resolution of construction defect, scheduling, and delay matters. BHA provides construction claims and trial support services to the nation's leading construction practice groups, Fortune 500 builders, real estate investment trusts, risk managers, owners, as well as a variety of municipalities and government offices. Employing in house assets which comprise testifying architects, design engineers, construction cost and standard of care experts, licensed general and specialty contractors, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Oconee County and the surrounding areas.

    Oconee County South Carolina slope failure expert witnessOconee County South Carolina expert witness commercial buildingsOconee County South Carolina expert witness roofingOconee County South Carolina expert witness windowsOconee County South Carolina construction expert witnessesOconee County South Carolina hospital construction expert witnessOconee County South Carolina construction forensic expert witness
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Oconee County, South Carolina

    Insured’s Failure to Determine Depreciation When Presenting Claim for Replacement Cost Value

    August 16, 2026 —
    The Third Circuit affirmed the district court’s granting of summary judgment to the insurer when the insured submitted replacement cost value of the loss but did not include a determination of depreciation. Kimmel v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 16569 (3d Cir. June 9, 2026). A lightning strike downed a tree on the insured’s property, causing extensive damage to the home. The insured had a homeowner’s policy with Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (MBIC). MBIC denied the claim, determining that much of the claimed damage already existed and that several policy exclusions otherwise barred coverage. The insured filed suit for breach of contract and bad faith. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Agent Not Liable for Loss Given Insured’s Vague Instructions for Coverage

    April 08, 2026 —
    The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insured’s agent because there was no breach of duty. Jon Van Order v. Hauk, et al., 2025 Ill. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2378 (Ill. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2025). The insured began renovating a vacant home in October 2018. He met with agent Joseph Hauk and explained the property was vacant and would be going through renovations for the next several months. Hauk then procured a policy through Shelter Insurance Company insuring the vacant property against several specified perils. The policy provided coverage for water damage if “[t]he exterior of the building sustained a covered loss” and “that loss created an opening through which the water entered.” Damage caused by escaping water from within a plumbing system was excluded if: (1) the damage was caused by a “continuous or repeated leakage over a period of fourteen days or more” or (2) the insured premises had been vacant for 30 consecutive days immediately preceding the loss. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Lawmakers Vote to Reauthorize Programs to Support Water Quality, Coastal Protection

    April 20, 2026 —
    The U.S. House of Representatives has passed a package of 14 bills that includes measures to reauthorize several U.S. Environmental Protection Agency programs to protect and restore critical water ecosystems, expand access to broadband, reduce regulatory requirements on airport projects and programs and lower costs of federal buildings. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record
    Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com

    Lost in Translation: AEC Tech’s Missing Role

    May 12, 2026 —
    I once visited a construction site where the contractor’s headquarters had commissioned a tech company to build an on-site quality-inspection application. The developer had admitted to the site engineer that they had never set foot on a construction site before. The engineer showed me what he was actually using: his own phone camera and an Excel sheet. The new app did not map to how work actually happened on site. This is not an isolated story. The vendor builds something technically coherent but operationally disconnected. The client, somewhere up the chain, had fallen in love with the idea of the solution before anyone had built an honest business case for it. The result is a tool that gets demonstrated at a board meeting but isn’t used in the field. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    Building the Research and Healthcare Facilities of Tomorrow Without Impacting the Progress of Today

    August 16, 2026 —
    Research labs run experiments that can’t be paused. Hospitals treat patients around the clock. Yet these same facilities constantly need upgrades—new infrastructure, modernized systems, renovated spaces—to meet the demands of twenty-first century science and medicine. The challenge for construction teams isn’t just building. It’s building without ever turning the lights off. This unique dynamic creates an environment where construction activities are happening adjacent to sensitive testing and treatment, a complex setting where disruptions can have serious consequences. Skanska continues to successfully navigate these challenges across multiple sectors, including from occupied lab space at the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality’s (NCDEQ) Reedy Creek Laboratory in Raleigh to hospital corridors alongside staff and patients in various hospital locations across the country. Reprinted courtesy of Jason Tobias, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Hidden Risks Behind Today’s Stadium Construction Boom

    July 20, 2026 —
    After a decade-plus lull, professional sports leagues, universities and municipalities are once again spending heavily on new stadiums and major renovations. In the NFL alone, multiple marquee projects are underway or planned, representing more than $10 billion in facilities and mixed-use entertainment districts, rivaling or exceeding the scale of development during the last stadium-build cycle of the early 2000s. Beneath the excitement of architectural ambition and civic pride lies a risk landscape that has fundamentally changed since the last wave of stadium construction. Teams, cities and contractors that rely on outdated assumptions may find themselves exposed to cost overruns, schedule delays and liabilities that are far more difficult to unwind once construction is underway. Reprinted courtesy of Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the full story...

    Insured Does Not Prevail on Summary Judgment Motion Invoking Ensuing Loss Provision

    May 05, 2026 —
    The court denied the insured’s motion for summary judgment finding genuine issues of fact regarding implication of the policy’s ensuing loss provision. Stella Prop. Dev.. & Event Productions, LLC v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15854 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 28, 2026). Stella owned a cultural center that was insured under a commercial property all-risk policy issued by Auto-Owners. A windstorm with gusts of 65 miles per hour struck the Center causing damage. The Center’s inspector found extensive wind damage on nearly all facets of the roof. Further, the inspector found the existing organic shingles were in “very poor condition” and were “defective, discontinued, and no longer available.” The estimated cost of repairs to the roof was $108,010.52. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com