BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina Subterranean parking expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina parking structure expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina structural steel construction expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina townhome construction expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina high-rise construction expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina low-income housing expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina concrete tilt-up expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina housing expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina production housing expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina industrial building expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina Medical building expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina landscaping construction expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina casino resort expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina retail construction expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina multi family housing expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina condominium expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina condominiums expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina mid-rise construction expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina tract home expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina hospital construction expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina institutional building expert witness Pinopolis South Carolina
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Construction Expert Witness Builders Information
    Pinopolis, South Carolina

    South Carolina Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (Amend HB446/SB433; §40-59-850) Applies only to single-family and multi-family dwellings (not to exceed 16 units or three stories). Claimant to provide written notice to contractor of subcontractor no later that 90 days before filing action; Contractor must respond within 15 days if claim description not sufficient; Contractor has 30 days from service of notice to inspect and offer remedy/settlement


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Pinopolis South Carolina

    A state license is required for commercial work over $5,000.00, and residential work over $200.00


    Construction Expert Witness Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Orangebg.-Bamberg
    Local # 4260
    PO Box 870
    Orangeburg, SC 29116


    Home Builders Association of Aiken County
    Local # 4208
    P O Box 2251
    Aiken, SC 29802
    http://www.aikenbuilders.com

    Charleston Trident Home Builders Association
    Local # 4216
    2120 Noisette Blvd Ste 108A
    North Charleston, SC 29405
    http://www.hbacharleston.com

    Horry-Georgetown Home Builders Association
    Local # 4252
    728 Highway 501 East
    Conway, SC 29526
    http://www.hbahorrygeorgetown.com

    Home Builders Association of Sumter-Clarendon
    Local # 4276
    PO Box 1215
    Sumter, SC 29151


    Home Builders Association of South Carolina
    Local # 4200
    1419 Pendleton St
    Columbia, SC 29201
    http://www.hbaofsc.com

    Home Builders Association of Greater Columbia
    Local # 4224
    625 Taylor Street
    Columbia, SC 29202
    http://www.columbiabuilders.com


    Construction Expert Witness News and Information
    For Pinopolis South Carolina

    BHA Has a Nice Swing

    Form Contracts are Great, but. . .

    Insurer Must Pay Portions of Arbitration Award Related to Faulty Workmanship

    Newmeyer & Dillion Selected to 2017 OCBJ’s Best Places to Work List

    Do You Have A Florida’s Deceptive And Unfair Trade Practices Act Claim

    Christopher Leise Recognized by US News – Best Lawyers 2022 "Lawyer of the Year"

    Convictions Obtained in Las Vegas HOA Fraud Case

    New OSHA Vaccination Requirements For Employers With 100 Or More Employees (And Additional Advice for California Employers)

    Not so Fast – Florida’s Legislature Overrules Gindel’s Pre-Suit Notice/Tolling Decision Related to the Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    The Woodland Hills Office Secures a Total Defense Award on Behalf of their High-End Custom Home Builder Client!

    Whitney Stefko Named to ENR’s Top Young Professionals, formerly ENR’s Top 20 Under 40, in California

    Insurer's Late Notice Defense Fails on Summary Judgment

    West Virginia Couple Claim Defects in Manufactured Home

    Fire Protection You Can Trust Starts With the Right Testing

    EEOC Issues Anti-Harassment Guidance To Construction-Industry Employers

    The Credibility of Your Expert (Including Your Delay Expert) Matters in Construction Disputes

    Is Performance Bond Liable for Delay Damages?

    U.K. to Set Out Plan for Fire-Risk Apartment Cladding Crisis

    It’s a COVID-19 Pandemic; It’s Everywhere – New Cal. Bill to Make Insurers Prove Otherwise

    A Closer Look at an HOA Board Member’s Duty to Homeowners

    Fifth Circuit: Primary Insurer Relieved of Duty to Defend Without Release of Liability of Insured

    $17B Agreement Streamlines Disney World Development Plans

    Anti-Concurrent Causation Clause Prevents Coverage for Collapse

    Lost Rental Income not a Construction Defect

    A Reminder to Get Your Contractor’s License in Virginia

    Bank of America’s Countrywide Ordered to Pay $1.3 Billion

    Contract Should Have Clear and Definite Terms to Avoid a Patent Ambiguity

    A Court-Side Seat: Waters, Walls and Pipelines

    West Coast Casualty’s Quarter Century of Service

    7 Areas where Technology is Shifting the Construction Business

    Contractor Underpaid Workers, Pocketed the Difference

    ASCE's Architectural Engineering Institute Announces Winners of 2021 AEI Professional Project Award

    Approaches to Managing Job Site Inventory

    Quick Note: Not In Contract With The Owner? Serve A Notice To Owner.

    Ohio Court of Appeals: Absolution Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Workplace Coal-Tar Pitch Exposure Claims

    Drywall Originator Hopes to Sell in Asia

    99-Year-Old Transmission Tower Seen as Possible Cause of Devastating Calif. Wildfire

    A Classic Blunder: Practical Advice for Avoiding Two-Front Wars

    Some Insurers Dismissed, Others Are Not in Claims for Faulty Workmanship

    How to Deal with Contractor Delays – Bad Contractor Series Part 2

    The A, B and C’s of Contracting and Self-Performing Work Under California’s Contractor’s License Law

    Pennsylvania Court Extends Construction Defect Protections to Subsequent Buyers

    Navigating Turbulent Waters Ashore: Insurance Lessons from a Navy Project Dispute

    Precedent-Setting ‘Green’ Apartments in Kansas City

    2024 Update to CEB’s Mechanics Liens Now Available

    Meet D1's Neutrals Series: BILL FRANCZEK

    Rich NYC Suburbs Fight Housing Plan They Say Will ‘Destroy’ Them

    PSA: Be Sure to Document (Even When Time is Short)

    That’s not the way we’ve always done it! (Why you should update your office practices)

    Representation and Warranties Claims Reach Record Payouts in 2024
    Corporate Profile

    PINOPOLIS SOUTH CAROLINA CONSTRUCTION EXPERT WITNESS
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Drawing from more than 4500 engineering, construction, and builders standard of care related expert designations, the Pinopolis, South Carolina Construction Expert Directory delivers a comprehensive construction and design expert support solution to legal professionals and construction practice groups concerned with the effective resolution of construction defect and claims litigation. BHA provides general construction investigation, trial and claims support services to the industry's leading construction attorneys, Fortune 500 builders, insurers, owners, as well as a variety of public entities. Employing in house resources which include construction standard of care consultants, registered architects, professional engineers, and credentialed building envelope experts, the construction experts group brings specialized experience and local capabilities to Pinopolis and the surrounding areas.

    Pinopolis South Carolina architectural expert witnessPinopolis South Carolina architecture expert witnessPinopolis South Carolina structural concrete expertPinopolis South Carolina expert witness structural engineerPinopolis South Carolina civil engineer expert witnessPinopolis South Carolina defective construction expertPinopolis South Carolina expert witness roofing
    Construction Expert Witness News & Info
    Pinopolis, South Carolina

    GRSM Secures Complete Judgment for Defense in Years-Long Dispute Spanning Multiple Venues

    June 22, 2026 —
    Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani’s Hartford, Connecticut, and Dallas offices recently secured a complete defense judgment and recovery of attorney’s fees and costs in an arbitration on behalf of a longtime client, concluding a dispute that lasted several years and traversed multiple jurisdictions. The dispute initially arose in Texas state court, and almost immediately, the claimant began pursuing the matter aggressively, a pattern that continued until the day judgment was entered in GRSM’s client’s favor. GRSM’s team mounted a strong defense, achieving an early success in compelling mandatory arbitration. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

    The Single Source of Truth in Construction Projects: Reality or Myth?

    March 24, 2026 —
    The idea of a single source of truth has been a fundamental part of the digital vision in the AEC industry for many years. From centralized CAD storage to BIM collaboration platforms and, more recently, Common Data Environments, the goal stays the same. Project teams want a reliable place where everyone can access the latest information. The phrase “single source of truth” comes from database and information management practices in the IT world, where the goal was to maintain one authoritative record of data and eliminate data redundancy. As the AEC industry began adopting digital tools, the same idea was applied to project information and workflows. Despite decades of technological progress, the question remains whether “one ring that rules them all” can actually be implemented in real construction projects. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at aec-business@aepartners.fi

    For Urban Walkers, a Patchy Dilemma: Who Owns the Sidewalk?

    July 06, 2026 —
    In 2007, New York City’s sanitation department threatened Natalie Shea with a $300 fine for defacing public property with graffiti. Her crime: drawing a blue flower in front of her family’s Park Slope home with sidewalk chalk. She was six years old. The incident, which made local and national news at the time, captures the fraught role that sidewalks often play in US cities. These patches of pavement do more than carry pedestrians to their destinations: They’re also places for commerce, social interaction and childhood play, from chalking to learning how to ride a bike. Urbanist Jane Jacobs once likened the range of activities that city sidewalks attract to an “intricate ballet.” In the new book Sidewalk Nation: The Life and Law of America’s Most Overlooked Resource (Harvard University Press), author Michael Pollack explores the “tangled web of state and local regulation” that governs sidewalks, with cities often passing along responsibilities for tasks like clearing snow and keeping walkways safe. He paints a portrait of the American sidewalk a disorderly and often neglected network, filled with literal and metaphorical cracks that give rise to all sorts of conflict, from mundane clashes over maintenance to more consequential fights over accessibility and inequality. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Linda Poon, Bloomberg

    4th Department Narrowly Interprets Professional Services

    August 11, 2026 —
    In the recent case of Cty. of Erie v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am., 2026 NY Slip Op 04092 (App. Div. 4th Dept.), New York’s Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that a general liability carrier for a construction manager owed additional insured coverage to the County of Erie, notwithstanding an exclusion in the construction manager’s policy for injuries arising out of professional services. The underlying case involved injuries sustained when the underlying plaintiff fell off of her bicycle at a park owned by the County when she transitioned from the pavement edge to grass. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Craig Rokuson, Traub Lieberman
    Mr. Rokuson may be contacted at crokuson@tlsslaw.com

    Risks of Using an AI Chatbot for Legal Advice: Lessons from United States v. Heppner

    April 08, 2026 —
    Imagine that you are an executive (who is not a lawyer) and are concerned about what your company plans to do is legal. You could call your lawyer who might bill you for the call. Or, you can ask your AI chatbot, such as Claude or ChatGPT, about the legal risk. The chatbot will likely compliment you on the incisive question, provide you with highly confident answer (that may or may not be right) and will not bill you on an hourly basis. That is essentially what financial services executive Bradley Heppner did. It did not end well. A federal court recently ruled that Heppner’s chats with the AI tool Claude were not protected by attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine. That means that the other side (in this case, the federal government) could get access to his chatbot prompts, uploads and responses, and learn a great deal about, for example, whether Heppner knew what he was doing was illegal. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Payne & Fears LLP

    Breaking Ground On New California Public Works Prevailing Wage Requirements

    April 27, 2026 —
    Seyfarth Synopsis: As of January 1, 2026, AB 889 bulldozed California’s Prevailing Wage law, which impacts public works employers—including public agencies, the contractors that work for them, and private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. The amended law reframes the calculation of fringe benefits for individuals who work on public works project and mandates annualization of such benefits, demolishes the practice of frontloading these benefits, and requires employers to maintain inspection-ready records of compliance. This year, AB 889 significantly revised California’s prevailing wage law, codified at Labor Code section 1773.1, to clarify the state’s prevailing wage regulations and streamline enforcement. Accordingly, as of January 1, 2026, California public works employers are required to annualize employees’ fringe benefits and maintain specific documentation demonstrating statutory compliance. These new obligations impact public agencies and their contractors, as well as private owners and developers whose projects may be subject to public works requirements. Continue reading for the blueprint of how to comply with the state’s amended prevailing wage law. Reprinted courtesy of Heather Frisch, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Christopher Bouquet, Seyfarth Shaw LLP and Ashley Stein, Seyfarth Shaw LLP Ms. Frisch may be contacted at hfrisch@seyfarth.com Mr. Bouquet may be contacted at cbouquet@seyfarth.com Ms. Stein may be contacted at astein@seyfarth.com Read the full story...

    SDV Celebrates 30th Anniversary Press Release

    April 08, 2026 —
    Trumbull, Connecticut – Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C. (SDV) is proud to announce the celebration of its 30th anniversary. Founded in 1996 by three attorneys in a small New Haven, Connecticut office, SDV was built on a clear and focused mission: representing policyholders in insurance coverage matters. Three decades later, that commitment remains at the core of the firm’s identity and has been instrumental in its continued success and reputation nationwide. Today, SDV is a nationally recognized boutique firm with 50 attorneys serving policyholders across the United States. Building on its longstanding reputation for excellence and client advocacy, the firm is pleased to announce the opening of its newest office in Massachusetts—an exciting milestone that reflects SDV’s continued growth. The new office is led by Managing Partner Anna Perry. Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.

    Surety Liability Is Coextensive with Its Bond Principal

    April 14, 2026 —
    A recent Miller act payment bond case, U.S. f/u/b/o Whitetail General Constructors v. Northcon, Inc., 2026 WL 46671 (D.Mont. 2026), contains a short noteworthy discussion as to a surety’s liability being coextensive with that of its bond principal. If you are bonded, or you are pursuing a bond, you need to appreciate this, which is why this is a noteworthy discussion:
    A “surety’s liability on a Miller Act bond must be at least coextensive with the obligations imposed by the Act if the bond is to have its intended effect.” “Therefore, ‘the liability of a surety and its principal on a Miller Act payment bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of the principal only to the extent that it is consistent with the rights and obligations created under the Miller Act.’” In other words, “[w]here a subcontract’s terms are consistent with the Miller Act’s provisions, the surety’s liability on the Miller Act bond is coextensive with the contractual liability of its princip[al].”
    “The liability of a surety under the Miller Act is controlled by federal law, rather than state contract law[.]” The court may, however, “look to state law when interpreting contractual provisions” in a Miller Act case.
    “[T]he measure of recovery under the Miller Act is generally determined by the terms of the subcontract [or underlying contract].”
    Northcon, supra, at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com